Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Which logo?

[Daniel Dekany]

Wednesday, February 1, 2017, 9:36:41 AM, Julien NICOLAS wrote:

> On 28/01/2017 18:08, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> So this meant to be kind of a survey, rather than a proper vote, and
>> for now we use the logo only on Twitter, and it can be changed
>> anytime. Here's what we have:
>>
>> Logos: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNS2VaTDhCcDVLQTQ
>> - #1: "" with the infinitely long dropshadow, no gradients or such
>> - #1.5 #1 with fading out (somewhat) the shadow on bottom-right
>> - #2: #.5 with brighter top-left
>> - #3: Totally flat "". The cornets of the square aren't rounded in
>>this one, though that's not up to us, as Twitter will round it.
>>
>> The votes:
>> Sergio Fernández (PPMC): #3
>> Christoph Rüger: #1.5
>> Denis Bredelet: #2
>> Mauricio Nuñez: #3
>> Jacques Le Roux: #1 #2 (counted as two 0.5 votes)
>> Jacopo Cappellato (PPMC): #1.5
>> Piyush Mor: #3
>> Julien NICOLAS: #1.5
>> Barrie Selack: #3
>> David E Jones (PPMC): #3
>> Kirys: #1.5
>> Daniel Dekany (PPMC): #1.5
>>
>> Thus the result:
>> #3: 5 total (2 PPMC)
>> #1.5: 5 total (2 PPMC)
>> #2: 1.5 total
>> #1: 0.5 total
>>
>> (I have checked, and no opinion was expressed on the related tweet.)
>>
>> I guess both the #1 and #2 votes would gravitate towards the more
>> similar #1.5, rather than #1. (Also note that while minimalism is
>> trending, it still stands that simply typing something, choosing a
>> standard font and a color, and a flat background color, then calling
>> it a logo is... Let's just say, users won't necessarily realize that
>> the product has a logo at all.)
>>
>> So, Nicolas, can you provide:
>>
>> - What font is that, with what license? Do we have right to use it?
> It's not a font, it's a shape inspired from original logo :)

Great, then we are all set.

> I don't know what is needed but I transfert all rights of my logos to 
> the freemarker project. :)

ASF already owns your contribution, so... :) Actually, now that you
say this, it would be much cleaner if you make a pull request out of
this. The images (with names like logo-square-.)
should go into the https://github.com/apache/incubator-freemarker-site
repository, under the src/main/image directory (that directory doesn't
exist yet, your pull request should create it).

>> - An SVG version of #1.5 without and without the round corner
> Here after, the link to the folder of each versions (svg, png) at 200px
> x 200px
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNeF9Ca21UNl9JU2s

So, it should be rather a pull request... sorry for that.

>> - A 200x200 px rendering of #1.5 *without* the round corner (because
>>Twitter will do the rounding)
>>
>> Thank you!
> Very happy to help :)
>>
>> BTW, I guess it could fade out the shadow faster a bit... but, let's
>> not complicate the matter. We want replace that blurry JPEG artifact
>> demonstration that we have on Twitter currently ASAP.

-- 
Thanks,
 Daniel Dekany

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Which logo?

[Jacopo Cappellato]

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Julien NICOLAS 
wrote:

>
> I don't know what is needed but I transfert all rights of my logos to the
> freemarker project. :)


Julien has already filed a ICLA so we should be good with that.

Jacopo

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Which logo?

[Julien NICOLAS]

On 28/01/2017 18:08, Daniel Dekany wrote:

So this meant to be kind of a survey, rather than a proper vote, and
for now we use the logo only on Twitter, and it can be changed
anytime. Here's what we have:

Logos: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNS2VaTDhCcDVLQTQ
- #1: "" with the infinitely long dropshadow, no gradients or such
- #1.5 #1 with fading out (somewhat) the shadow on bottom-right
- #2: #.5 with brighter top-left
- #3: Totally flat "". The cornets of the square aren't rounded in
   this one, though that's not up to us, as Twitter will round it.

The votes:
Sergio Fernández (PPMC): #3
Christoph Rüger: #1.5
Denis Bredelet: #2
Mauricio Nuñez: #3
Jacques Le Roux: #1 #2 (counted as two 0.5 votes)
Jacopo Cappellato (PPMC): #1.5
Piyush Mor: #3
Julien NICOLAS: #1.5
Barrie Selack: #3
David E Jones (PPMC): #3
Kirys: #1.5
Daniel Dekany (PPMC): #1.5

Thus the result:
#3: 5 total (2 PPMC)
#1.5: 5 total (2 PPMC)
#2: 1.5 total
#1: 0.5 total

(I have checked, and no opinion was expressed on the related tweet.)

I guess both the #1 and #2 votes would gravitate towards the more
similar #1.5, rather than #1. (Also note that while minimalism is
trending, it still stands that simply typing something, choosing a
standard font and a color, and a flat background color, then calling
it a logo is... Let's just say, users won't necessarily realize that
the product has a logo at all.)

So, Nicolas, can you provide:

- What font is that, with what license? Do we have right to use it?

It's not a font, it's a shape inspired from original logo :)
I don't know what is needed but I transfert all rights of my logos to 
the freemarker project. :)



- An SVG version of #1.5 without and without the round corner
Here after, the link to the folder of each versions (svg, png) at 200px 
x 200px

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNeF9Ca21UNl9JU2s


- A 200x200 px rendering of #1.5 *without* the round corner (because
   Twitter will do the rounding)

Thank you!

Very happy to help :)


BTW, I guess it could fade out the shadow faster a bit... but, let's
not complicate the matter. We want replace that blurry JPEG artifact
demonstration that we have on Twitter currently ASAP.

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Which logo?

[Christoph Rüger]

+1 Looks good :)

2017-01-30 16:27 GMT+01:00 Daniel Dekany :

> I have just went ahead and replaced the logo on
> https://twitter.com/freemarker with #1.5.
>
> --
> Thanks,
>  Daniel Dekany
>
>
> Saturday, January 28, 2017, 6:08:16 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>
> > So this meant to be kind of a survey, rather than a proper vote, and
> > for now we use the logo only on Twitter, and it can be changed
> > anytime. Here's what we have:
> >
> > Logos: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNS2VaTDhCcDVLQTQ
> > - #1: "" with the infinitely long dropshadow, no gradients or such
> > - #1.5 #1 with fading out (somewhat) the shadow on bottom-right
> > - #2: #.5 with brighter top-left
> > - #3: Totally flat "". The cornets of the square aren't rounded in
> >   this one, though that's not up to us, as Twitter will round it.
> >
> > The votes:
> > Sergio Fernández (PPMC): #3
> > Christoph Rüger: #1.5
> > Denis Bredelet: #2
> > Mauricio Nuñez: #3
> > Jacques Le Roux: #1 #2 (counted as two 0.5 votes)
> > Jacopo Cappellato (PPMC): #1.5
> > Piyush Mor: #3
> > Julien NICOLAS: #1.5
> > Barrie Selack: #3
> > David E Jones (PPMC): #3
> > Kirys: #1.5
> > Daniel Dekany (PPMC): #1.5
> >
> > Thus the result:
> > #3: 5 total (2 PPMC)
> > #1.5: 5 total (2 PPMC)
> > #2: 1.5 total
> > #1: 0.5 total
> >
> > (I have checked, and no opinion was expressed on the related tweet.)
> >
> > I guess both the #1 and #2 votes would gravitate towards the more
> > similar #1.5, rather than #3. (Also note that while minimalism is
> > trending, it still stands that simply typing something, choosing a
> > standard font and a color, and a flat background color, then calling
> > it a logo is... Let's just say, users won't necessarily realize that
> > the product has a logo at all.)
> >
> > So, Nicolas, can you provide:
> >
> > - What font is that, with what license? Do we have right to use it?
> > - An SVG version of #1.5 without and without the round corner
> > - A 200x200 px rendering of #1.5 *without* the round corner (because
> >   Twitter will do the rounding)
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> > BTW, I guess it could fade out the shadow faster a bit... but, let's
> > not complicate the matter. We want replace that blurry JPEG artifact
> > demonstration that we have on Twitter currently ASAP.
> >
>
> --
> Thanks,
>  Daniel Dekany
>
>


-- 
Christoph Rüger, Geschäftsführer
Synesty  - Anbinden und Automatisieren ohne
Programmieren - Automatisierung, Schnittstellen, Datenfeeds

Xing: https://www.xing.com/profile/Christoph_Rueger2
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/christoph-rueger/a/685/198

-- 
Synesty GmbH
Moritz-von-Rohr-Str. 1a
07745 Jena
Tel.: +49 3641 559649
Fax.: +49 3641 5596499
Internet: http://synesty.com

Geschäftsführer: Christoph Rüger
Unternehmenssitz: Jena
Handelsregister B beim Amtsgericht: Jena
Handelsregister-Nummer: HRB 508766
Ust-IdNr.: DE287564982

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Which logo?

[Daniel Dekany]

I have just went ahead and replaced the logo on
https://twitter.com/freemarker with #1.5.

-- 
Thanks,
 Daniel Dekany


Saturday, January 28, 2017, 6:08:16 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:

> So this meant to be kind of a survey, rather than a proper vote, and
> for now we use the logo only on Twitter, and it can be changed
> anytime. Here's what we have:
>
> Logos: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNS2VaTDhCcDVLQTQ
> - #1: "" with the infinitely long dropshadow, no gradients or such
> - #1.5 #1 with fading out (somewhat) the shadow on bottom-right
> - #2: #.5 with brighter top-left
> - #3: Totally flat "". The cornets of the square aren't rounded in
>   this one, though that's not up to us, as Twitter will round it.
>
> The votes:
> Sergio Fernández (PPMC): #3
> Christoph Rüger: #1.5
> Denis Bredelet: #2
> Mauricio Nuñez: #3
> Jacques Le Roux: #1 #2 (counted as two 0.5 votes)
> Jacopo Cappellato (PPMC): #1.5
> Piyush Mor: #3
> Julien NICOLAS: #1.5
> Barrie Selack: #3
> David E Jones (PPMC): #3
> Kirys: #1.5
> Daniel Dekany (PPMC): #1.5
>
> Thus the result:
> #3: 5 total (2 PPMC)
> #1.5: 5 total (2 PPMC)
> #2: 1.5 total
> #1: 0.5 total
>
> (I have checked, and no opinion was expressed on the related tweet.)
>
> I guess both the #1 and #2 votes would gravitate towards the more
> similar #1.5, rather than #3. (Also note that while minimalism is
> trending, it still stands that simply typing something, choosing a
> standard font and a color, and a flat background color, then calling
> it a logo is... Let's just say, users won't necessarily realize that
> the product has a logo at all.)
>
> So, Nicolas, can you provide:
>
> - What font is that, with what license? Do we have right to use it?
> - An SVG version of #1.5 without and without the round corner
> - A 200x200 px rendering of #1.5 *without* the round corner (because
>   Twitter will do the rounding)
>
> Thank you!
>
> BTW, I guess it could fade out the shadow faster a bit... but, let's
> not complicate the matter. We want replace that blurry JPEG artifact
> demonstration that we have on Twitter currently ASAP.
>

-- 
Thanks,
 Daniel Dekany

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Which logo?

[Daniel Dekany]

Saturday, January 28, 2017, 6:08:16 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:

[snip]
> I guess both the #1 and #2 votes would gravitate towards the more
> similar #1.5, rather than #1.
[snip]

I ment "rather than #3"...

-- 
Thanks,
 Daniel Dekany

[RESULT][VOTE] Which logo?

[Daniel Dekany]

So this meant to be kind of a survey, rather than a proper vote, and
for now we use the logo only on Twitter, and it can be changed
anytime. Here's what we have:

Logos: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNS2VaTDhCcDVLQTQ
- #1: "" with the infinitely long dropshadow, no gradients or such
- #1.5 #1 with fading out (somewhat) the shadow on bottom-right
- #2: #.5 with brighter top-left
- #3: Totally flat "". The cornets of the square aren't rounded in
  this one, though that's not up to us, as Twitter will round it.

The votes:
Sergio Fernández (PPMC): #3
Christoph Rüger: #1.5
Denis Bredelet: #2
Mauricio Nuñez: #3
Jacques Le Roux: #1 #2 (counted as two 0.5 votes)
Jacopo Cappellato (PPMC): #1.5
Piyush Mor: #3
Julien NICOLAS: #1.5
Barrie Selack: #3
David E Jones (PPMC): #3
Kirys: #1.5
Daniel Dekany (PPMC): #1.5

Thus the result:
#3: 5 total (2 PPMC)
#1.5: 5 total (2 PPMC)
#2: 1.5 total
#1: 0.5 total

(I have checked, and no opinion was expressed on the related tweet.)

I guess both the #1 and #2 votes would gravitate towards the more
similar #1.5, rather than #1. (Also note that while minimalism is
trending, it still stands that simply typing something, choosing a
standard font and a color, and a flat background color, then calling
it a logo is... Let's just say, users won't necessarily realize that
the product has a logo at all.)

So, Nicolas, can you provide:

- What font is that, with what license? Do we have right to use it?
- An SVG version of #1.5 without and without the round corner
- A 200x200 px rendering of #1.5 *without* the round corner (because
  Twitter will do the rounding)

Thank you!

BTW, I guess it could fade out the shadow faster a bit... but, let's
not complicate the matter. We want replace that blurry JPEG artifact
demonstration that we have on Twitter currently ASAP.

-- 
Thanks,
 Daniel Dekany