[GSHELL] Unable to build gshell
Gshell is missing the following dependency: org.codehaus.groovy.maven:gmaven-plugin:pom:1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT Is there anyway it can be uploaded to a know snapshot repo so that gshell can download it ? -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2401) Upgrade commons-logging to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12592348#action_12592348 ] Ceki Gulcu commented on GERONIMO-2401: -- Perhaps it is too late, but if you are migrating to the SLF4J API, then you might find slf4j-migrator [1] helpful. HTH, [1] http://www.slf4j.org/migrator.html Upgrade commons-logging to 1.1 -- Key: GERONIMO-2401 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2401 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Improvement Security Level: public(Regular issues) Components: dependencies, Logging Affects Versions: 1.2, 2.0-M5 Reporter: Jason Dillon Assignee: Jason Dillon Fix For: 2.2 Upgrade commons-logging to the latest release 1.1 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-326) Customize namespace prefixes in JAXB generated/saved G plans
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] B.J. Reed updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-326: --- Attachment: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-326.patch This devtools-326 patch is to add a small predetermined namespace prefix during the JAXB marshalling. The real fix is the new NamespacePrefixMapperImpl class that was added to org.apache.geronimo.st.core and its use by JAXBUtils.java. However, as secondary work (and also included in this patch), this changed the test cases and some of the expected xml in org.apache.geronimo.jee.v21.jaxbmodel. I've also created a couple of jaxbmodel common test classes to simplify the test code. Customize namespace prefixes in JAXB generated/saved G plans Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-326 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-326 Project: Geronimo-Devtools Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 2.1.0 Reporter: Shiva Kumar H R Assignee: Tim McConnell Fix For: 2.1.x Attachments: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-326.patch In the JAXB generated/saved Geronimo deployment plans, currently the namespace prefixes are n1, n2 etc. It would be better to customize them to be something more meaningful. Reference: https://jaxb.dev.java.net/guide/Changing_prefixes.html -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release - RC2
Joe Bohn wrote: I've prepared a second release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.1 for your review and vote. +1 It seems to work for me. -- Thanks, Dan Becker
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release - RC2
+1 provided TCK tests pass. Verified that log viewer problems and security realm portlet problem I reported in 2.1 are fixed. ++Vamsi On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, I've prepared a second release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.1 for your review and vote. The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.1 release currently resides here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1.1 When the release vote is approved, I will svn mv the code to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/2.1.1 An archive of this source code can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-2.1.1-src.tar.gzhttp://people.apache.org/%7Ejbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-2.1.1-src.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/http://people.apache.org/%7Ejbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/contains the 10 Java EE, Minimal, and Framework server binary distributions to be released (framework, tomcat/jetty, Java EE/Minimal, tar/zip) as well as the RELEASE_NOTES and source code archives for the release. For your convenience, here are pointers to the urls for the distributions in zip format: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-2.1.1-bin.ziphttp://people.apache.org/%7Ejbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-jetty6-minimal-2.1.1-bin.ziphttp://people.apache.org/%7Ejbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-jetty6-minimal-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.1.1-bin.ziphttp://people.apache.org/%7Ejbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal-2.1.1-bin.ziphttp://people.apache.org/%7Ejbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-framework-2.1.1-bin.ziphttp://people.apache.org/%7Ejbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-framework-2.1.1-bin.zip The maven artifacts for the release can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-repo/geronimo-2.1.1-rc2/http://people.apache.org/%7Ejbohn/staging-repo/geronimo-2.1.1-rc2/ When the release vote is approved, these maven artifacts will be moved to the m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository at Apache. [ ] +1 Release Geronimo 2.1.1 [ ] 0 No opinion [ ] -1 Do not release Geronimo 2.1.1 (please provide rationale) I'll plan on calling this vote on Sunday evening (11 PM EST). I will start tck runs shortly on these images. Joe Bohn
Re: [GSHELL] Unable to build gshell
They are available here (and have been for many days now): http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/ The build seems to be happy from what I can tell... chugging away, downloading things fine: snip Downloading: http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/runtime/gmaven-runtime-1.5/1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT/gmaven-runtime-1.5-1.0-beta-4-20080419.173658-4.jar 43K downloaded Downloading: http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/feature/gmaven-feature-support/1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT/gmaven-feature-support-1.0-beta-4-20080418.100607-1.jar 15K downloaded Downloading: http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/runtime/gmaven-runtime-support/1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT/gmaven-runtime-support-1.0-beta-4-20080419.173658-5.jar 71K downloaded /snip --jason On Apr 25, 2008, at 3:34 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Gshell is missing the following dependency: org.codehaus.groovy.maven:gmaven-plugin:pom:1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT Is there anyway it can be uploaded to a know snapshot repo so that gshell can download it ? -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2401) Upgrade commons-logging to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12592375#action_12592375 ] Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2401: Ya, too late... the heavy lifting is all done now, not that heavy though ;-) Upgrade commons-logging to 1.1 -- Key: GERONIMO-2401 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2401 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Improvement Security Level: public(Regular issues) Components: dependencies, Logging Affects Versions: 1.2, 2.0-M5 Reporter: Jason Dillon Assignee: Jason Dillon Fix For: 2.2 Upgrade commons-logging to the latest release 1.1 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: [GSHELL] Unable to build gshell
Yeah, I've just added the plugin repo ;-) On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They are available here (and have been for many days now): http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/ The build seems to be happy from what I can tell... chugging away, downloading things fine: snip Downloading: http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/runtime/gmaven-runtime-1.5/1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT/gmaven-runtime-1.5-1.0-beta-4-20080419.173658-4.jar 43K downloaded Downloading: http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/feature/gmaven-feature-support/1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT/gmaven-feature-support-1.0-beta-4-20080418.100607-1.jar 15K downloaded Downloading: http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/runtime/gmaven-runtime-support/1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT/gmaven-runtime-support-1.0-beta-4-20080419.173658-5.jar 71K downloaded /snip --jason On Apr 25, 2008, at 3:34 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Gshell is missing the following dependency: org.codehaus.groovy.maven:gmaven-plugin:pom:1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT Is there anyway it can be uploaded to a know snapshot repo so that gshell can download it ? -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: svn commit: r651601 - /geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml
This is duplicate information which is picked up from genesis project- config. Please revert. --jason On Apr 25, 2008, at 8:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: gnodet Date: Fri Apr 25 06:28:41 2008 New Revision: 651601 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=651601view=rev Log: Add repository for the gmaven plugin Modified: geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml Modified: geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml?rev=651601r1=651600r2=651601view=diff = = = = = = = = == --- geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml (original) +++ geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml Fri Apr 25 06:28:41 2008 @@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ version1.0-alpha-2-SNAPSHOT/version +organization +nameThe Apache Software Foundation/name +urlhttp://www.apache.org//url +/organization + description GShell is a framework for building rich command-line applications. /description @@ -640,6 +645,22 @@ /releases /repository /repositories +pluginRepositories +pluginRepository +idcodehaus-snapshots/id +nameCodehaus Snapshots Repository/name +urlhttp://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/url +layoutdefault/layout +snapshots +enabledtrue/enabled +updatePolicydaily/updatePolicy +checksumPolicyignore/checksumPolicy +/snapshots +releases +enabledfalse/enabled +/releases +/pluginRepository +/pluginRepositories distributionManagement site
[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 651597
Geronimo Revision: 651597 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080425/build-0900.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080425/unit-test-reports
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.geronimo.configs:myfaces:2.2-SNAPSHOT: checking for
updates from codehaus-snapshots
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.geronimo.configs:myfaces:2.2-SNAPSHOT: checking for
updates from apache.snapshots
[INFO] [car:prepare-metadata]
[INFO] [car:archive-car]
[INFO] Building jar:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/myfaces/myfaces-deployer/target/myfaces-deployer-2.2-SNAPSHOT.car
[INFO] [ianal:verify-legal-files {execution: default}]
[INFO] Checking legal files in: myfaces-deployer-2.2-SNAPSHOT.car
[INFO] [install:install]
[INFO] Installing
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/myfaces/myfaces-deployer/target/myfaces-deployer-2.2-SNAPSHOT.car
to
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/configs/myfaces-deployer/2.2-SNAPSHOT/myfaces-deployer-2.2-SNAPSHOT.car
[INFO] [car:update-pluginlist]
[INFO]
[INFO] Building Geronimo Plugins, OpenEJB :: Clustering over WADI
[INFO]task-segment: [install]
[INFO]
[INFO] [enforcer:enforce {execution: default}]
[INFO] [remote-resources:process {execution: default}]
[INFO] [resources:resources]
[INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] [compiler:compile]
[INFO] Compiling 10 source files to
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/openejb/geronimo-openejb-clustering-wadi/target/classes
[INFO] [resources:testResources]
[INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] [compiler:testCompile]
[INFO] Compiling 4 source files to
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/openejb/geronimo-openejb-clustering-wadi/target/test-classes
[INFO] [surefire:test]
[INFO] Surefire report directory:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/openejb/geronimo-openejb-clustering-wadi/target/surefire-reports
---
T E S T S
---
Running
org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest
Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 7, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.905 sec
FAILURE!
Running
org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.infra.BasicNetworkConnectorTrackerTest
Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.024 sec
Running org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.infra.NetworkConnectorMonitorTest
Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.449 sec
Running
org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest
Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 8, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.24 sec
FAILURE!
Results :
Tests in error:
testNewBeanEntryForUnknownDeploymentThrowsISE(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest)
testNewBeanEntryOK(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest)
testSessionDestructionFreeInstance(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest)
testInboundSessionMigrationActivateAndPoolBeanEntry(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest)
testOutboundSessionMigrationPassivateBeanEntry(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest)
testOnFreeBeanEntryReleaseSession(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest)
testOnPoolInstanceWithoutTransactionTriggersSessionOnEndAccess(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest)
testInvokeBusinessMethodForUnknownDeploymentThrowsOEJBE(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest)
testInvokeRemoteMethodForUnknownDeploymentThrowsOEJBE(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest)
testOEJBIsRethrownForBusinessMethod(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest)
testOEJBIsRethrownForRemoveMethod(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest)
testBusinessMethodInvokationOK(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest)
testRemoveMethodInvokationOK(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest)
testGetLocationsRetunsNullWhenDeploymentIsNotRegistered(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest)
testGetLocationsOK(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release - RC2
+1 provided TCK passes I've been running my production system on 2.1.1 for a couple of days now. Jay Joe Bohn wrote: All, I've prepared a second release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.1 for your review and vote. The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.1 release currently resides here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1.1 When the release vote is approved, I will svn mv the code to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/2.1.1 An archive of this source code can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-2.1.1-src.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/ contains the 10 Java EE, Minimal, and Framework server binary distributions to be released (framework, tomcat/jetty, Java EE/Minimal, tar/zip) as well as the RELEASE_NOTES and source code archives for the release. For your convenience, here are pointers to the urls for the distributions in zip format: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-jetty6-minimal-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-framework-2.1.1-bin.zip The maven artifacts for the release can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-repo/geronimo-2.1.1-rc2/ When the release vote is approved, these maven artifacts will be moved to the m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository at Apache. [ ] +1 Release Geronimo 2.1.1 [ ] 0 No opinion [ ] -1 Do not release Geronimo 2.1.1 (please provide rationale) I'll plan on calling this vote on Sunday evening (11 PM EST). I will start tck runs shortly on these images. Joe Bohn
Re: [GSHELL] Unable to build gshell
No, I have not pulled in your changes yet. The repo is already defined in the parent pom here: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/genesis/config/project-config/1.3/project-config-1.3.pom --jason On Apr 25, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Yeah, I've just added the plugin repo ;-) On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They are available here (and have been for many days now): http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/ maven/ The build seems to be happy from what I can tell... chugging away, downloading things fine: snip Downloading: http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/runtime/gmaven-runtime-1.5/1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT/gmaven-runtime-1.5-1.0-beta-4-20080419.173658-4.jar 43K downloaded Downloading: http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/feature/gmaven-feature-support/1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT/gmaven-feature-support-1.0-beta-4-20080418.100607-1.jar 15K downloaded Downloading: http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/runtime/gmaven-runtime-support/1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT/gmaven-runtime-support-1.0-beta-4-20080419.173658-5.jar 71K downloaded /snip --jason On Apr 25, 2008, at 3:34 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Gshell is missing the following dependency: org.codehaus.groovy.maven:gmaven-plugin:pom:1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT Is there anyway it can be uploaded to a know snapshot repo so that gshell can download it ? -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: svn commit: r651601 - /geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml
Right, not sure why it failed the first time. I'll remove the repository from the pom. On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is duplicate information which is picked up from genesis project-config. Please revert. --jason On Apr 25, 2008, at 8:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: gnodet Date: Fri Apr 25 06:28:41 2008 New Revision: 651601 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=651601view=rev Log: Add repository for the gmaven plugin Modified: geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml Modified: geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml?rev=651601r1=651600r2=651601view=diff == --- geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml (original) +++ geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml Fri Apr 25 06:28:41 2008 @@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ version1.0-alpha-2-SNAPSHOT/version +organization +nameThe Apache Software Foundation/name +urlhttp://www.apache.org//url +/organization + description GShell is a framework for building rich command-line applications. /description @@ -640,6 +645,22 @@ /releases /repository /repositories +pluginRepositories +pluginRepository +idcodehaus-snapshots/id +nameCodehaus Snapshots Repository/name +urlhttp://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/url +layoutdefault/layout +snapshots +enabledtrue/enabled +updatePolicydaily/updatePolicy +checksumPolicyignore/checksumPolicy +/snapshots +releases +enabledfalse/enabled +/releases +/pluginRepository +/pluginRepositories distributionManagement site -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: svn commit: r651601 - /geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml
Kay, I understand... blame maven, thats what I do :-P --jason On Apr 25, 2008, at 8:50 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Right, not sure why it failed the first time. I'll remove the repository from the pom. On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is duplicate information which is picked up from genesis project-config. Please revert. --jason On Apr 25, 2008, at 8:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: gnodet Date: Fri Apr 25 06:28:41 2008 New Revision: 651601 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=651601view=rev Log: Add repository for the gmaven plugin Modified: geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml Modified: geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml?rev=651601r1=651600r2=651601view=diff = = = = = = = = = = --- geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml (original) +++ geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml Fri Apr 25 06:28:41 2008 @@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ version1.0-alpha-2-SNAPSHOT/version +organization +nameThe Apache Software Foundation/name +urlhttp://www.apache.org//url +/organization + description GShell is a framework for building rich command-line applications. /description @@ -640,6 +645,22 @@ /releases /repository /repositories +pluginRepositories +pluginRepository +idcodehaus-snapshots/id +nameCodehaus Snapshots Repository/name +urlhttp://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/url +layoutdefault/layout +snapshots +enabledtrue/enabled +updatePolicydaily/updatePolicy +checksumPolicyignore/checksumPolicy +/snapshots +releases +enabledfalse/enabled +/releases +/pluginRepository +/pluginRepositories distributionManagement site -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: [GSHELL] Unable to build gshell
I'm actually having trouble building GShell myself. I'm getting a weird error. I haven't had time to look at it yet but maybe I'll just throw it out there in case you've seen it before. [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Error creating shaded jar. Embedded error: duplicate entry: org/apache/geronimo/gshell/common/Arguments.class [INFO] [INFO] Trace org.apache.maven.lifecycle.LifecycleExecutionException: Error creating shaded jar. at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:564) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalWithLifecycle(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:480) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoal(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:459) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalAndHandleFailures(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:311) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeTaskSegments(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:278) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.execute(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:143) at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:334) at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:125) at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:272) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java:315) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java:430) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375) Caused by: org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecutionException: Error creating shaded jar. at org.apache.maven.plugins.shade.mojo.ShadeMojo.execute(ShadeMojo.java:327) at org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultPluginManager.executeMojo(DefaultPluginManager.java:443) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:539) ... 16 more Caused by: java.util.zip.ZipException: duplicate entry: org/apache/geronimo/gshell/common/Arguments.class at java.util.zip.ZipOutputStream.putNextEntry(ZipOutputStream.java:163) at java.util.jar.JarOutputStream.putNextEntry(JarOutputStream.java:90) at org.apache.maven.plugins.shade.DefaultShader.addRemappedClass(DefaultShader.java:182) at org.apache.maven.plugins.shade.DefaultShader.shade(DefaultShader.java:104) at org.apache.maven.plugins.shade.mojo.ShadeMojo.execute(ShadeMojo.java:285) ... 18 more Look familiar at all? On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, I have not pulled in your changes yet. The repo is already defined in the parent pom here: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/genesis/config/project-config/1.3/project-config-1.3.pom --jason On Apr 25, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Yeah, I've just added the plugin repo ;-) On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They are available here (and have been for many days now): http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/ The build seems to be happy from what I can tell... chugging away, downloading things fine: snip Downloading: http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/runtime/gmaven-runtime-1.5/1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT/gmaven-runtime-1.5-1.0-beta-4-20080419.173658-4.jar 43K downloaded Downloading: http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/feature/gmaven-feature-support/1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT/gmaven-feature-support-1.0-beta-4-20080418.100607-1.jar 15K downloaded Downloading: http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/runtime/gmaven-runtime-support/1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT/gmaven-runtime-support-1.0-beta-4-20080419.173658-5.jar 71K downloaded /snip --jason On Apr 25, 2008, at 3:34 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Gshell is missing the following dependency: org.codehaus.groovy.maven:gmaven-plugin:pom:1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT Is there anyway it can be uploaded to a know snapshot repo so that gshell can download it ? -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ -- ~Jason Warner
Re: svn commit: r651601 - /geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml
So I've removed the repositories definition, but I've kept the override of the organization, because the informations from the genesis-config are wrong. The apache top pom says: organization nameThe Apache Software Foundation/name urlhttp://www.apache.org//url /organization and these are the agreed on values, but genesis override those with: organization nameApache Software Foundation/name urlhttp://www.apache.org/url /organization I think genesis should be fixed and those values removed from the genesis pom, so in the mean time, i'd rather have them overriden to the correct values in the gshell parent pom. On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kay, I understand... blame maven, thats what I do :-P --jason On Apr 25, 2008, at 8:50 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Right, not sure why it failed the first time. I'll remove the repository from the pom. On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is duplicate information which is picked up from genesis project-config. Please revert. --jason On Apr 25, 2008, at 8:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: gnodet Date: Fri Apr 25 06:28:41 2008 New Revision: 651601 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=651601view=rev Log: Add repository for the gmaven plugin Modified: geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml Modified: geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml?rev=651601r1=651600r2=651601view=diff == --- geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml (original) +++ geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml Fri Apr 25 06:28:41 2008 @@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ version1.0-alpha-2-SNAPSHOT/version +organization +nameThe Apache Software Foundation/name +urlhttp://www.apache.org//url +/organization + description GShell is a framework for building rich command-line applications. /description @@ -640,6 +645,22 @@ /releases /repository /repositories +pluginRepositories +pluginRepository +idcodehaus-snapshots/id +nameCodehaus Snapshots Repository/name +urlhttp://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/url +layoutdefault/layout +snapshots +enabledtrue/enabled +updatePolicydaily/updatePolicy +checksumPolicyignore/checksumPolicy +/snapshots +releases +enabledfalse/enabled +/releases +/pluginRepository +/pluginRepositories distributionManagement site -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: [GSHELL] Unable to build gshell
Yeah, i use mvn clean install and it removes these problems. I think it's caused by the shade plugin somehow. Does gshell use the latest version ? On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Jason Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm actually having trouble building GShell myself. I'm getting a weird error. I haven't had time to look at it yet but maybe I'll just throw it out there in case you've seen it before. [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Error creating shaded jar. Embedded error: duplicate entry: org/apache/geronimo/gshell/common/Arguments.class [INFO] [INFO] Trace org.apache.maven.lifecycle.LifecycleExecutionException: Error creating shaded jar. at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:564) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalWithLifecycle(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:480) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoal(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:459) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalAndHandleFailures(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:311) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeTaskSegments(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:278) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.execute(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:143) at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:334) at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:125) at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:272) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java:315) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java:430) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375) Caused by: org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecutionException: Error creating shaded jar. at org.apache.maven.plugins.shade.mojo.ShadeMojo.execute(ShadeMojo.java:327) at org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultPluginManager.executeMojo(DefaultPluginManager.java:443) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:539) ... 16 more Caused by: java.util.zip.ZipException: duplicate entry: org/apache/geronimo/gshell/common/Arguments.class at java.util.zip.ZipOutputStream.putNextEntry(ZipOutputStream.java:163) at java.util.jar.JarOutputStream.putNextEntry(JarOutputStream.java:90) at org.apache.maven.plugins.shade.DefaultShader.addRemappedClass(DefaultShader.java:182) at org.apache.maven.plugins.shade.DefaultShader.shade(DefaultShader.java:104) at org.apache.maven.plugins.shade.mojo.ShadeMojo.execute(ShadeMojo.java:285) ... 18 more Look familiar at all? On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, I have not pulled in your changes yet. The repo is already defined in the parent pom here: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/genesis/config/project-config/1.3/project-config-1.3.pom --jason On Apr 25, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Yeah, I've just added the plugin repo ;-) On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They are available here (and have been for many days now): http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/ The build seems to be happy from what I can tell... chugging away, downloading things fine: snip Downloading: http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/runtime/gmaven-runtime-1.5/1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT/gmaven-runtime-1.5-1.0-beta-4-20080419.173658-4.jar 43K downloaded Downloading: http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/feature/gmaven-feature-support/1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT/gmaven-feature-support-1.0-beta-4-20080418.100607-1.jar 15K downloaded Downloading: http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/runtime/gmaven-runtime-support/1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT/gmaven-runtime-support-1.0-beta-4-20080419.173658-5.jar 71K downloaded /snip --jason On Apr 25, 2008, at 3:34 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Gshell is missing the following dependency: org.codehaus.groovy.maven:gmaven-plugin:pom:1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT Is there anyway it
Re: [GSHELL] Unable to build gshell
That worked perfectly. I usually do use clean install but I haven't been lately. That'll teach me to change my ways. Thanks! On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, i use mvn clean install and it removes these problems. I think it's caused by the shade plugin somehow. Does gshell use the latest version ? On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Jason Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm actually having trouble building GShell myself. I'm getting a weird error. I haven't had time to look at it yet but maybe I'll just throw it out there in case you've seen it before. [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Error creating shaded jar. Embedded error: duplicate entry: org/apache/geronimo/gshell/common/Arguments.class [INFO] [INFO] Trace org.apache.maven.lifecycle.LifecycleExecutionException: Error creating shaded jar. at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:564) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalWithLifecycle(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:480) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoal(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:459) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalAndHandleFailures(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:311) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeTaskSegments(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:278) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.execute(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:143) at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:334) at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:125) at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:272) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java:315) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java:430) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375) Caused by: org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecutionException: Error creating shaded jar. at org.apache.maven.plugins.shade.mojo.ShadeMojo.execute(ShadeMojo.java:327) at org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultPluginManager.executeMojo(DefaultPluginManager.java:443) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:539) ... 16 more Caused by: java.util.zip.ZipException: duplicate entry: org/apache/geronimo/gshell/common/Arguments.class at java.util.zip.ZipOutputStream.putNextEntry(ZipOutputStream.java:163) at java.util.jar.JarOutputStream.putNextEntry(JarOutputStream.java:90) at org.apache.maven.plugins.shade.DefaultShader.addRemappedClass(DefaultShader.java:182) at org.apache.maven.plugins.shade.DefaultShader.shade(DefaultShader.java:104) at org.apache.maven.plugins.shade.mojo.ShadeMojo.execute(ShadeMojo.java:285) ... 18 more Look familiar at all? On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, I have not pulled in your changes yet. The repo is already defined in the parent pom here: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/genesis/config/project-config/1.3/project-config-1.3.pom --jason On Apr 25, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Yeah, I've just added the plugin repo ;-) On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They are available here (and have been for many days now): http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/ The build seems to be happy from what I can tell... chugging away, downloading things fine: snip Downloading: http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/runtime/gmaven-runtime-1.5/1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT/gmaven-runtime-1.5-1.0-beta-4-20080419.173658-4.jar 43K downloaded Downloading: http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/feature/gmaven-feature-support/1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT/gmaven-feature-support-1.0-beta-4-20080418.100607-1.jar 15K downloaded Downloading:
Re: svn commit: r651601 - /geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml
Kay. --jason On Apr 25, 2008, at 9:00 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: So I've removed the repositories definition, but I've kept the override of the organization, because the informations from the genesis-config are wrong. The apache top pom says: organization nameThe Apache Software Foundation/name urlhttp://www.apache.org//url /organization and these are the agreed on values, but genesis override those with: organization nameApache Software Foundation/name urlhttp://www.apache.org/url /organization I think genesis should be fixed and those values removed from the genesis pom, so in the mean time, i'd rather have them overriden to the correct values in the gshell parent pom. On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kay, I understand... blame maven, thats what I do :-P --jason On Apr 25, 2008, at 8:50 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Right, not sure why it failed the first time. I'll remove the repository from the pom. On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is duplicate information which is picked up from genesis project-config. Please revert. --jason On Apr 25, 2008, at 8:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: gnodet Date: Fri Apr 25 06:28:41 2008 New Revision: 651601 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=651601view=rev Log: Add repository for the gmaven plugin Modified: geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml Modified: geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml?rev=651601r1=651600r2=651601view=diff = = = = = = = = = = --- geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml (original) +++ geronimo/gshell/trunk/pom.xml Fri Apr 25 06:28:41 2008 @@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ version1.0-alpha-2-SNAPSHOT/version +organization +nameThe Apache Software Foundation/name +urlhttp://www.apache.org//url +/organization + description GShell is a framework for building rich command-line applications. /description @@ -640,6 +645,22 @@ /releases /repository /repositories +pluginRepositories +pluginRepository +idcodehaus-snapshots/id +nameCodehaus Snapshots Repository/name +urlhttp://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/url +layoutdefault/layout +snapshots +enabledtrue/enabled +updatePolicydaily/updatePolicy +checksumPolicyignore/checksumPolicy +/snapshots +releases +enabledfalse/enabled +/releases +/pluginRepository +/pluginRepositories distributionManagement site -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
[BUILD] branches/2.1: Failed for Revision: 651581
Geronimo Revision: 651581 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20080425/build-0800.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20080425 [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 34 minutes 31 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Fri Apr 25 08:51:49 EDT 2008 [INFO] Final Memory: 348M/920M [INFO] TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only) = See detailed results at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/testsuite/ResultsSummary.html Assembly: tomcat = See the full test.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20080425/logs-0800-tomcat/test.log Assembly: jetty = See the full test.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20080425/logs-0800-jetty/test.log [INFO] Running console-testsuite.advance-test [INFO] Tests run: 13, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 71.784 sec FAILURE! Samples: branches/2.1 = Log: http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20080425/samples-0800.log Build status: OK
[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-3972) Monitering Graphics failed to represent in IE 6 SP2
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Donald Woods resolved GERONIMO-3972. Resolution: Fixed Marking as resolved. Please reopen if this doesn't resolve your issue. Monitering Graphics failed to represent in IE 6 SP2 --- Key: GERONIMO-3972 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3972 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public(Regular issues) Components: monitoring Affects Versions: 2.1.1, 2.2 Environment: Windows Reporter: YunFeng Ma Assignee: Erik B. Craig Fix For: 2.1.2, 2.2 There is a JavaScript error in IE 6 SP2: Error: 'text' is null or not an object -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 (RC1)
Tim, you forgot the following part in your original e-mail. [ ] +1 Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 [ ] 0 No opinion [ ] -1 Do not release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 (please provide rationale) Here is my vote: +1 I really liked the reduction in the footprint. Did basic testing of the plugin with G 2.1.1-RC2 Tomcat server and a simple web application. Did not run into any problems. ++Vamsi On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 RC1 (to correspond with the Geronimo 2.1.0 server release). The deployable zip file is here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/geronimo-eclipse-plugin-2.1.0-deployable.ziphttp://people.apache.org/%7Emcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/geronimo-eclipse-plugin-2.1.0-deployable.zip The update site zip file is here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/http://people.apache.org/%7Emcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/geronimo-eclipse-plugin-2.1.0-updatesite.zip The current svn location is here (revision number 651108): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/branches/2.1.0 The future svn location will be here (when approved): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/tags/2.1.0 There is a rudimentary set of install instructions available at the URL below that will hopefully describe the necessary prereq(s) and steps required to install and run the GEP: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/Geronimo_Eclipse_Plugin_2.1.0_Instructions-RC1.txthttp://people.apache.org/%7Emcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/Geronimo_Eclipse_Plugin_2.1.0_Instructions-RC1.txt Additionally, there is an ant build.xml file that can be used to download the prereq(s) for the GEP. It is documented in the instructions. Finally, I've created a Staging Site that can used to test the update manager functions of Eclipse for downloading both the GEP itself and the Geronimo Server. This is also documented in the instructions. Please let me know if there are any questions. The vote will conclude at 11:00 PM EST on Saturday, April 26th. -- Thanks, Tim McConnell
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release - RC2
A user reported yesterday some issues starting the server due to some port conflicts and he started to use the config-substitutions.properties to workaround this issue. I had the same port conflict problem caused by a different application but instead of just changing the COSNamingPort I changed the PortOffset instead. If I change only the PortOffset I can start the server just fine but fail to deploy apps. I thought PortOffset alone would do the trick Do I have to do something else after changing the PortOffset? Cheers! Hernan Joe Bohn wrote: This is a discussion thread for issues related to the Geronimo Server 2.1.1 release candidate (rc2) currently up for vote. Please vote. Joe
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release - RC2
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 8:32 PM, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A user reported yesterday some issues starting the server due to some port conflicts and he started to use the config-substitutions.properties to workaround this issue. I had the same port conflict problem caused by a different application but instead of just changing the COSNamingPort I changed the PortOffset instead. If I change only the PortOffset I can start the server just fine but fail to deploy apps. I thought PortOffset alone would do the trick If you are using the deploy tool, you will have to use a port number which is 1099+portOffset. Do I have to do something else after changing the PortOffset? Cheers! Hernan Joe Bohn wrote: This is a discussion thread for issues related to the Geronimo Server 2.1.1 release candidate (rc2) currently up for vote. Please vote. Joe
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release - RC2
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 8:32 PM, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A user reported yesterday some issues starting the server due to some port conflicts and he started to use the config-substitutions.properties to workaround this issue. I had the same port conflict problem caused by a different application but instead of just changing the COSNamingPort I changed the PortOffset instead. If I change only the PortOffset I can start the server just fine but fail to deploy apps. I thought PortOffset alone would do the trick If you are using the deploy tool, you will have to use a port number which is 1099+portOffset. ahhh, elementary Watson! ;-) Cheers! Hernan Do I have to do something else after changing the PortOffset? Cheers! Hernan Joe Bohn wrote: This is a discussion thread for issues related to the Geronimo Server 2.1.1 release candidate (rc2) currently up for vote. Please vote. Joe
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release - RC2
+1 Cheers! Hernan Joe Bohn wrote: All, I've prepared a second release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.1 for your review and vote. The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.1 release currently resides here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1.1 When the release vote is approved, I will svn mv the code to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/2.1.1 An archive of this source code can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-2.1.1-src.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/ contains the 10 Java EE, Minimal, and Framework server binary distributions to be released (framework, tomcat/jetty, Java EE/Minimal, tar/zip) as well as the RELEASE_NOTES and source code archives for the release. For your convenience, here are pointers to the urls for the distributions in zip format: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-jetty6-minimal-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-framework-2.1.1-bin.zip The maven artifacts for the release can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-repo/geronimo-2.1.1-rc2/ When the release vote is approved, these maven artifacts will be moved to the m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository at Apache. [ ] +1 Release Geronimo 2.1.1 [ ] 0 No opinion [ ] -1 Do not release Geronimo 2.1.1 (please provide rationale) I'll plan on calling this vote on Sunday evening (11 PM EST). I will start tck runs shortly on these images. Joe Bohn
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release - RC2
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 8:32 PM, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A user reported yesterday some issues starting the server due to some port conflicts and he started to use the config-substitutions.properties to workaround this issue. I had the same port conflict problem caused by a different application but instead of just changing the COSNamingPort I changed the PortOffset instead. If I change only the PortOffset I can start the server just fine but fail to deploy apps. I thought PortOffset alone would do the trick If you are using the deploy tool, you will have to use a port number which is 1099+portOffset. ahhh, elementary Watson! ;-) ;-) ++Vamsi Cheers! Hernan Do I have to do something else after changing the PortOffset? Cheers! Hernan Joe Bohn wrote: This is a discussion thread for issues related to the Geronimo Server 2.1.1 release candidate (rc2) currently up for vote. Please vote. Joe
Committing patches to the subversion repository documentation
This page[1] is labeled as Do not use but it hasn't been updated in over a year. Are these the procedures that we should be following for committing code? Are there instructions elsewhere that we should be using instead until these are verified? Thanks! [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/committing-patches-to-the-subversion-repository.html -- ~Jason Warner
Re: Committing patches to the subversion repository documentation
That looks ludicrously overengineered to me. I start with an up to date copy of geronimo, frequently with my own local uncommitted changes in other parts of geronimo, apply the patch, fix conflicts, make sure it works, improve the patch if I see problems, and commit the code relevant to the patch. If the patch is in an area that I'm also working on I use a cleaner copy of geronimo instead of my main working copy. thanks david jencks On Apr 25, 2008, at 8:55 AM, Jason Warner wrote: This page[1] is labeled as Do not use but it hasn't been updated in over a year. Are these the procedures that we should be following for committing code? Are there instructions elsewhere that we should be using instead until these are verified? Thanks! [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/committing-patches-to-the-subversion-repository.html -- ~Jason Warner
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release - RC2
+1 (assuming no tck problems) david jencks On Apr 24, 2008, at 4:41 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: All, I've prepared a second release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.1 for your review and vote. The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.1 release currently resides here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1.1 When the release vote is approved, I will svn mv the code to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/2.1.1 An archive of this source code can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-2.1.1-src.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/ contains the 10 Java EE, Minimal, and Framework server binary distributions to be released (framework, tomcat/jetty, Java EE/Minimal, tar/zip) as well as the RELEASE_NOTES and source code archives for the release. For your convenience, here are pointers to the urls for the distributions in zip format: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-jetty6-minimal-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-framework-2.1.1-bin.zip The maven artifacts for the release can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-repo/geronimo-2.1.1-rc2/ When the release vote is approved, these maven artifacts will be moved to the m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository at Apache. [ ] +1 Release Geronimo 2.1.1 [ ] 0 No opinion [ ] -1 Do not release Geronimo 2.1.1 (please provide rationale) I'll plan on calling this vote on Sunday evening (11 PM EST). I will start tck runs shortly on these images. Joe Bohn
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-326) Customize namespace prefixes in JAXB generated/saved G plans
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12592441#action_12592441 ] Tim McConnell commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-326: Hi BJ, again thanks much for the patch. I'll commit it to trunk as soon as GEP 2.1.0 gets reelased. However I don't see the new class NamespacePrefixMapperImpl.java in your patch. Is it to be provided in another patch ?? Customize namespace prefixes in JAXB generated/saved G plans Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-326 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-326 Project: Geronimo-Devtools Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 2.1.0 Reporter: Shiva Kumar H R Assignee: Tim McConnell Fix For: 2.1.x Attachments: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-326.patch In the JAXB generated/saved Geronimo deployment plans, currently the namespace prefixes are n1, n2 etc. It would be better to customize them to be something more meaningful. Reference: https://jaxb.dev.java.net/guide/Changing_prefixes.html -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-326) Customize namespace prefixes in JAXB generated/saved G plans
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] B.J. Reed updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-326: --- Attachment: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-326b.patch Sorry, I had forgotten to svn add the new files into the patch. This should be better. Customize namespace prefixes in JAXB generated/saved G plans Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-326 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-326 Project: Geronimo-Devtools Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 2.1.0 Reporter: Shiva Kumar H R Assignee: Tim McConnell Fix For: 2.1.x Attachments: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-326.patch, GERONIMODEVTOOLS-326b.patch In the JAXB generated/saved Geronimo deployment plans, currently the namespace prefixes are n1, n2 etc. It would be better to customize them to be something more meaningful. Reference: https://jaxb.dev.java.net/guide/Changing_prefixes.html -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 (RC1)
Tim McConnell wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 RC1 (to correspond with the Geronimo 2.1.0 server release). +1. Works for me. (Created a basic G server (with Tomcat) and ran a simple web app.) -- Thanks, Dan Becker
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 (RC1)
[Y] +1 Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 All steps in http://cwiki.apache.org/geronimo/java-ee-50-app-development-on-geronimo-simplified-using-eclipse.html worked successfully on AG 2.1.0 server. On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tim, you forgot the following part in your original e-mail. [ ] +1 Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 [ ] 0 No opinion [ ] -1 Do not release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 (please provide rationale) Here is my vote: +1 I really liked the reduction in the footprint. Did basic testing of the plugin with G 2.1.1-RC2 Tomcat server and a simple web application. Did not run into any problems. ++Vamsi On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 RC1 (to correspond with the Geronimo 2.1.0 server release). The deployable zip file is here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/geronimo-eclipse-plugin-2.1.0-deployable.ziphttp://people.apache.org/%7Emcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/geronimo-eclipse-plugin-2.1.0-deployable.zip The update site zip file is here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/http://people.apache.org/%7Emcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/geronimo-eclipse-plugin-2.1.0-updatesite.zip The current svn location is here (revision number 651108): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/branches/2.1.0 The future svn location will be here (when approved): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/tags/2.1.0 There is a rudimentary set of install instructions available at the URL below that will hopefully describe the necessary prereq(s) and steps required to install and run the GEP: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/Geronimo_Eclipse_Plugin_2.1.0_Instructions-RC1.txthttp://people.apache.org/%7Emcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/Geronimo_Eclipse_Plugin_2.1.0_Instructions-RC1.txt Additionally, there is an ant build.xml file that can be used to download the prereq(s) for the GEP. It is documented in the instructions. Finally, I've created a Staging Site that can used to test the update manager functions of Eclipse for downloading both the GEP itself and the Geronimo Server. This is also documented in the instructions. Please let me know if there are any questions. The vote will conclude at 11:00 PM EST on Saturday, April 26th. -- Thanks, Tim McConnell -- Thanks, Shiva
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-203) No-harm error dialog while switching from Run-to-Debug or Debug-to-Run
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12592462#action_12592462 ] Shiva Kumar H R commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-203: -- This looks to have been fixed by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-178 at revision: 648588. Need to cross-check once. No-harm error dialog while switching from Run-to-Debug or Debug-to-Run -- Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-203 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-203 Project: Geronimo-Devtools Issue Type: Bug Components: eclipse-plugin Affects Versions: 2.0.0 Reporter: Shiva Kumar H R Assignee: Shiva Kumar H R Fix For: 2.1.x Start server as usual. Once server has started, right click on the server and select Debug. Server will now be stopped and restarted in Debug mode. Although this succeeds, sometimes during the process it throws a confusing error dialog saying Problem Occurred ... Server Apache Geronimo v2.0 Server at localhost failed to start. Similarly scenario while switching back from Debug to Run modes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 (RC1)
Here's my +1 Tim McConnell wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 RC1 (to correspond with the Geronimo 2.1.0 server release). The deployable zip file is here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/geronimo-eclipse-plugin-2.1.0-deployable.zip The update site zip file is here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/ geronimo-eclipse-plugin-2.1.0-updatesite.zip The current svn location is here (revision number 651108): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/branches/2.1.0 The future svn location will be here (when approved): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/tags/2.1.0 There is a rudimentary set of install instructions available at the URL below that will hopefully describe the necessary prereq(s) and steps required to install and run the GEP: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/Geronimo_Eclipse_Plugin_2.1.0_Instructions-RC1.txt Additionally, there is an ant build.xml file that can be used to download the prereq(s) for the GEP. It is documented in the instructions. Finally, I've created a Staging Site that can used to test the update manager functions of Eclipse for downloading both the GEP itself and the Geronimo Server. This is also documented in the instructions. Please let me know if there are any questions. The vote will conclude at 11:00 PM EST on Saturday, April 26th. -- Thanks, Tim McConnell -- Thanks, Tim McConnell
Re: [GSHELL] Unable to build gshell
There are some other issues I noticed with the shading, but as long as you clean install its happy. Will fix soonish. --jason On Apr 25, 2008, at 8:59 PM, Jason Warner wrote: I'm actually having trouble building GShell myself. I'm getting a weird error. I haven't had time to look at it yet but maybe I'll just throw it out there in case you've seen it before. [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Error creating shaded jar. Embedded error: duplicate entry: org/apache/geronimo/gshell/common/ Arguments.class [INFO] [INFO] Trace org.apache.maven.lifecycle.LifecycleExecutionException: Error creating shaded jar. at org .apache .maven .lifecycle .DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java: 564) at org .apache .maven .lifecycle .DefaultLifecycleExecutor .executeGoalWithLifecycle(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:480) at org .apache .maven .lifecycle .DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoal(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java: 459) at org .apache .maven .lifecycle .DefaultLifecycleExecutor .executeGoalAndHandleFailures(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:311) at org .apache .maven .lifecycle .DefaultLifecycleExecutor .executeTaskSegments(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:278) at org .apache .maven .lifecycle .DefaultLifecycleExecutor.execute(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:143) at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:334) at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:125) at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:272) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun .reflect .NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun .reflect .DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl .invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java:315) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java:430) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375) Caused by: org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecutionException: Error creating shaded jar. at org.apache.maven.plugins.shade.mojo.ShadeMojo.execute(ShadeMojo.java: 327) at org .apache .maven .plugin.DefaultPluginManager.executeMojo(DefaultPluginManager.java: 443) at org .apache .maven .lifecycle .DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java: 539) ... 16 more Caused by: java.util.zip.ZipException: duplicate entry: org/apache/ geronimo/gshell/common/Arguments.class at java.util.zip.ZipOutputStream.putNextEntry(ZipOutputStream.java:163) at java.util.jar.JarOutputStream.putNextEntry(JarOutputStream.java:90) at org .apache .maven .plugins.shade.DefaultShader.addRemappedClass(DefaultShader.java:182) at org .apache.maven.plugins.shade.DefaultShader.shade(DefaultShader.java: 104) at org.apache.maven.plugins.shade.mojo.ShadeMojo.execute(ShadeMojo.java: 285) ... 18 more Look familiar at all? On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, I have not pulled in your changes yet. The repo is already defined in the parent pom here: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/genesis/config/project-config/1.3/project-config-1.3.pom --jason On Apr 25, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Yeah, I've just added the plugin repo ;-) On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They are available here (and have been for many days now): http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/ The build seems to be happy from what I can tell... chugging away, downloading things fine: snip Downloading: http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/runtime/gmaven-runtime-1.5/1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT/gmaven-runtime-1.5-1.0-beta-4-20080419.173658-4.jar 43K downloaded Downloading: http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/feature/gmaven-feature-support/1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT/gmaven-feature-support-1.0-beta-4-20080418.100607-1.jar 15K downloaded Downloading: http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/groovy/maven/runtime/gmaven-runtime-support/1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT/gmaven-runtime-support-1.0-beta-4-20080419.173658-5.jar 71K downloaded /snip --jason On Apr 25, 2008, at 3:34 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Gshell is missing the following dependency: org.codehaus.groovy.maven:gmaven-plugin:pom:1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT Is there anyway it can be uploaded to a know snapshot repo so that gshell can download it ? -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet
Geronimo server/trunk is now using SLF4J
I've just committed my changes to used SLF4J as the primary logging
facade for server/trunk.
Commons logging should be completely gone now. For dependencies which
use JCL, we are using the jcl104-over-slf4j adapter which provides the
JCL API and tunnels it through SLF4J.
I still need to hook up the - stuff to turn up the verbosity,
might get to that tonight. Otherwise, looks like things most just
work as they did before.
* * *
Now the thing to do is to start cleaning up logging code to make use
of SLF4J's more elegant API. Thats primarily the varargs methods and
{} substing magic it has. So something like this:
if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {
log.debug(This is foo: + foo + , this is bar: + bar);
}
becomes simply:
log.debug(This is foo: {}, this is bar: {}, foo, bar);
* * *
We are still using Log4j as the underlying logging provider, which
SLF4J delegates to. I did however nuke the caching bits, and we no
longer have any special bootstrap logging stuff. Just a
log4j.properties in geronimo-cli which provides the bootstrap log4j
configuration used before the Log4jService boots up.
* * *
Let me know if you run into any problems.
Cheers,
--jason
[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-3985) Use SLF4J as the logging facade for Geronimo
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Dillon closed GERONIMO-3985. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.2 Use SLF4J as the logging facade for Geronimo Key: GERONIMO-3985 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3985 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Improvement Security Level: public(Regular issues) Reporter: Jason Dillon Assignee: Jason Dillon Fix For: 2.2 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Geronimo server/trunk is now using SLF4J
Sweet. Thanks!
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just committed my changes to used SLF4J as the primary logging facade
for server/trunk.
Commons logging should be completely gone now. For dependencies which use
JCL, we are using the jcl104-over-slf4j adapter which provides the JCL API
and tunnels it through SLF4J.
I still need to hook up the - stuff to turn up the verbosity, might get
to that tonight. Otherwise, looks like things most just work as they did
before.
* * *
Now the thing to do is to start cleaning up logging code to make use of
SLF4J's more elegant API. Thats primarily the varargs methods and {}
substing magic it has. So something like this:
if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {
log.debug(This is foo: + foo + , this is bar: + bar);
}
becomes simply:
log.debug(This is foo: {}, this is bar: {}, foo, bar);
* * *
We are still using Log4j as the underlying logging provider, which SLF4J
delegates to. I did however nuke the caching bits, and we no longer have
any special bootstrap logging stuff. Just a log4j.properties in
geronimo-cli which provides the bootstrap log4j configuration used before
the Log4jService boots up.
* * *
Let me know if you run into any problems.
Cheers,
--jason
--
~Jason Warner
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3978) Unable to CTRL-C start-server process on Windows
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Dillon updated GERONIMO-3978: --- Summary: Unable to CTRL-C start-server process on Windows (was: Problem when Geronimo 2.1 server is started using start-server) Unable to CTRL-C start-server process on Windows -- Key: GERONIMO-3978 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3978 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public(Regular issues) Environment: Win XP, G Tomcat 2.1 Reporter: Vamsavardhana Reddy Assignee: Jason Dillon On Windows XP, if I start a Geronimo Tomcat 2.1 server using bin\start-server from a command prompt, I am noticing that the server can not be shutdown using Control+C. So, I am using Admin Console to shutdown the server. But it does not return to command prompt unless I kill the java process from Windows Task Manager. Jarek says, As a workaround, you can start gshell with -T false option and then control-c worked fine while running the server in foreground. See http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@geronimo.apache.org/msg57308.html -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2474) Pick the Jexl or Ognl parser for condition expression evaluation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12592474#action_12592474 ] Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2474: I'm still leaning towords Jexl... and will probably drop Ognl stuff soon. Pick the Jexl or Ognl parser for condition expression evaluation Key: GERONIMO-2474 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2474 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Sub-task Security Level: public(Regular issues) Components: core Affects Versions: 1.2 Reporter: Jason Dillon Assignee: Jason Dillon Priority: Minor -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3661) Optimize GShell libs for G server assemblies
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12592475#action_12592475 ] Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-3661: This is pending the GShell implementation of dependencies via maven-artifact. Optimize GShell libs for G server assemblies Key: GERONIMO-3661 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3661 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Improvement Security Level: public(Regular issues) Affects Versions: 2.1 Reporter: Jason Dillon Assignee: Jason Dillon Priority: Blocker Fix For: 2.2 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-3932) several enhancements to the async container client sample app
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Warner resolved GERONIMO-3932. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.2 Committed revision 651688 Thanks, Sangjin! several enhancements to the async container client sample app - Key: GERONIMO-3932 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3932 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public(Regular issues) Components: sample apps Affects Versions: 2.2 Reporter: Sangjin Lee Assignee: Jason Warner Priority: Minor Fix For: 2.2 Attachments: GERONIMO-3932.patch I made a few enhancements and bug fixes in the async client sample app. The changes include - calls HttpServletResponse.flushBuffer() to address a Tomcat NPE - added a dump query that dumps some stats - made Callback thread safe using an AtomicBoolean - wrote Utils to be a little more efficient - and so on Thanks! -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 651682
Geronimo Revision: 651682 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080425/build-1500.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080425/unit-test-reports
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.geronimo.configs:myfaces:2.2-SNAPSHOT: checking for
updates from codehaus-snapshots
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.geronimo.configs:myfaces:2.2-SNAPSHOT: checking for
updates from apache.snapshots
[INFO] [car:prepare-metadata]
[INFO] [car:archive-car]
[INFO] Building jar:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/myfaces/myfaces-deployer/target/myfaces-deployer-2.2-SNAPSHOT.car
[INFO] [ianal:verify-legal-files {execution: default}]
[INFO] Checking legal files in: myfaces-deployer-2.2-SNAPSHOT.car
[INFO] [install:install]
[INFO] Installing
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/myfaces/myfaces-deployer/target/myfaces-deployer-2.2-SNAPSHOT.car
to
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/configs/myfaces-deployer/2.2-SNAPSHOT/myfaces-deployer-2.2-SNAPSHOT.car
[INFO] [car:update-pluginlist]
[INFO]
[INFO] Building Geronimo Plugins, OpenEJB :: Clustering over WADI
[INFO]task-segment: [install]
[INFO]
[INFO] [enforcer:enforce {execution: default}]
[INFO] [remote-resources:process {execution: default}]
[INFO] [resources:resources]
[INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] [compiler:compile]
[INFO] Compiling 10 source files to
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/openejb/geronimo-openejb-clustering-wadi/target/classes
[INFO] [resources:testResources]
[INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] [compiler:testCompile]
[INFO] Compiling 4 source files to
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/openejb/geronimo-openejb-clustering-wadi/target/test-classes
[INFO] [surefire:test]
[INFO] Surefire report directory:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/openejb/geronimo-openejb-clustering-wadi/target/surefire-reports
---
T E S T S
---
Running
org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest
Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 7, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.907 sec
FAILURE!
Running
org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.infra.BasicNetworkConnectorTrackerTest
Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.021 sec
Running org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.infra.NetworkConnectorMonitorTest
Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.482 sec
Running
org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest
Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 8, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.278 sec
FAILURE!
Results :
Tests in error:
testNewBeanEntryForUnknownDeploymentThrowsISE(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest)
testNewBeanEntryOK(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest)
testSessionDestructionFreeInstance(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest)
testInboundSessionMigrationActivateAndPoolBeanEntry(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest)
testOutboundSessionMigrationPassivateBeanEntry(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest)
testOnFreeBeanEntryReleaseSession(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest)
testOnPoolInstanceWithoutTransactionTriggersSessionOnEndAccess(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest)
testInvokeBusinessMethodForUnknownDeploymentThrowsOEJBE(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest)
testInvokeRemoteMethodForUnknownDeploymentThrowsOEJBE(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest)
testOEJBIsRethrownForBusinessMethod(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest)
testOEJBIsRethrownForRemoveMethod(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest)
testBusinessMethodInvokationOK(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest)
testRemoveMethodInvokationOK(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest)
testGetLocationsRetunsNullWhenDeploymentIsNotRegistered(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest)
testGetLocationsOK(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest
[BUILD] branches/2.1: Failed for Revision: 651662
Geronimo Revision: 651662 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20080425/build-1400.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20080425 [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 34 minutes 46 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Fri Apr 25 14:52:27 EDT 2008 [INFO] Final Memory: 307M/1015M [INFO] TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only) = See detailed results at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/testsuite/ResultsSummary.html Assembly: tomcat = See the full test.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20080425/logs-1400-tomcat/test.log Assembly: jetty = See the full test.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20080425/logs-1400-jetty/test.log [INFO] Running console-testsuite.advance-test [INFO] Tests run: 13, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 76.83 sec FAILURE! Samples: branches/2.1 = Log: http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20080425/samples-1400.log Build status: OK
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 (RC1)
I checked out branches/2.1.0, ran mvn clean install, and got this failure in the build: [INFO] [INFO] Building org.apache.geronimo.jee.v21.jaxbmodel [INFO]task-segment: [clean, install] [INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.jee.openejb.OpenEjbJarTest Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.844 sec FAILURE! Results : Failed tests: testCompleteXML(org.apache.geronimo.jee.openejb.OpenEjbJarTest) Tests run: 14, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD FAILURE [INFO] On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's my +1 Tim McConnell wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 RC1 (to correspond with the Geronimo 2.1.0 server release). The deployable zip file is here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/geronimo-eclipse-plugin-2.1.0-deployable.zip The update site zip file is here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/ geronimo-eclipse-plugin-2.1.0-updatesite.zip The current svn location is here (revision number 651108): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/branches/2.1.0 The future svn location will be here (when approved): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/tags/2.1.0 There is a rudimentary set of install instructions available at the URL below that will hopefully describe the necessary prereq(s) and steps required to install and run the GEP: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/Geronimo_Eclipse_Plugin_2.1.0_Instructions-RC1.txt Additionally, there is an ant build.xml file that can be used to download the prereq(s) for the GEP. It is documented in the instructions. Finally, I've created a Staging Site that can used to test the update manager functions of Eclipse for downloading both the GEP itself and the Geronimo Server. This is also documented in the instructions. Please let me know if there are any questions. The vote will conclude at 11:00 PM EST on Saturday, April 26th. -- Thanks, Tim McConnell -- Thanks, Tim McConnell
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release - RC2
+1 On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, I've prepared a second release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.1 for your review and vote. The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.1 release currently resides here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1.1 When the release vote is approved, I will svn mv the code to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/2.1.1 An archive of this source code can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-2.1.1-src.tar.gzhttp://people.apache.org/%7Ejbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-2.1.1-src.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/http://people.apache.org/%7Ejbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/contains the 10 Java EE, Minimal, and Framework server binary distributions to be released (framework, tomcat/jetty, Java EE/Minimal, tar/zip) as well as the RELEASE_NOTES and source code archives for the release. For your convenience, here are pointers to the urls for the distributions in zip format: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-2.1.1-bin.ziphttp://people.apache.org/%7Ejbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-jetty6-minimal-2.1.1-bin.ziphttp://people.apache.org/%7Ejbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-jetty6-minimal-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.1.1-bin.ziphttp://people.apache.org/%7Ejbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal-2.1.1-bin.ziphttp://people.apache.org/%7Ejbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-framework-2.1.1-bin.ziphttp://people.apache.org/%7Ejbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-framework-2.1.1-bin.zip The maven artifacts for the release can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-repo/geronimo-2.1.1-rc2/http://people.apache.org/%7Ejbohn/staging-repo/geronimo-2.1.1-rc2/ When the release vote is approved, these maven artifacts will be moved to the m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository at Apache. [ ] +1 Release Geronimo 2.1.1 [ ] 0 No opinion [ ] -1 Do not release Geronimo 2.1.1 (please provide rationale) I'll plan on calling this vote on Sunday evening (11 PM EST). I will start tck runs shortly on these images. Joe Bohn -- Erik B. Craig
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release - RC2
+1 with the standard tck disclaimer David On Apr 24, 2008, at 4:41 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: All, I've prepared a second release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.1 for your review and vote. The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.1 release currently resides here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1.1 When the release vote is approved, I will svn mv the code to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/2.1.1 An archive of this source code can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-2.1.1-src.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/ contains the 10 Java EE, Minimal, and Framework server binary distributions to be released (framework, tomcat/jetty, Java EE/Minimal, tar/zip) as well as the RELEASE_NOTES and source code archives for the release. For your convenience, here are pointers to the urls for the distributions in zip format: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-jetty6-minimal-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-framework-2.1.1-bin.zip The maven artifacts for the release can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-repo/geronimo-2.1.1-rc2/ When the release vote is approved, these maven artifacts will be moved to the m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository at Apache. [ ] +1 Release Geronimo 2.1.1 [ ] 0 No opinion [ ] -1 Do not release Geronimo 2.1.1 (please provide rationale) I'll plan on calling this vote on Sunday evening (11 PM EST). I will start tck runs shortly on these images. Joe Bohn
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release - RC2
+1 (assuming no tck failures) -Donald Joe Bohn wrote: All, I've prepared a second release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.1 for your review and vote. The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.1 release currently resides here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1.1 When the release vote is approved, I will svn mv the code to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/2.1.1 An archive of this source code can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-2.1.1-src.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/ contains the 10 Java EE, Minimal, and Framework server binary distributions to be released (framework, tomcat/jetty, Java EE/Minimal, tar/zip) as well as the RELEASE_NOTES and source code archives for the release. For your convenience, here are pointers to the urls for the distributions in zip format: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-jetty6-minimal-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal-2.1.1-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/geronimo-2.1.1-dist-rc2/geronimo-framework-2.1.1-bin.zip The maven artifacts for the release can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-repo/geronimo-2.1.1-rc2/ When the release vote is approved, these maven artifacts will be moved to the m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository at Apache. [ ] +1 Release Geronimo 2.1.1 [ ] 0 No opinion [ ] -1 Do not release Geronimo 2.1.1 (please provide rationale) I'll plan on calling this vote on Sunday evening (11 PM EST). I will start tck runs shortly on these images. Joe Bohn smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 (RC1)
+1 Cheers! Hernan Tim McConnell wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 RC1 (to correspond with the Geronimo 2.1.0 server release). The deployable zip file is here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/geronimo-eclipse-plugin-2.1.0-deployable.zip The update site zip file is here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/ geronimo-eclipse-plugin-2.1.0-updatesite.zip The current svn location is here (revision number 651108): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/branches/2.1.0 The future svn location will be here (when approved): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/tags/2.1.0 There is a rudimentary set of install instructions available at the URL below that will hopefully describe the necessary prereq(s) and steps required to install and run the GEP: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/Geronimo_Eclipse_Plugin_2.1.0_Instructions-RC1.txt Additionally, there is an ant build.xml file that can be used to download the prereq(s) for the GEP. It is documented in the instructions. Finally, I've created a Staging Site that can used to test the update manager functions of Eclipse for downloading both the GEP itself and the Geronimo Server. This is also documented in the instructions. Please let me know if there are any questions. The vote will conclude at 11:00 PM EST on Saturday, April 26th. -- Thanks, Tim McConnell
[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 651764
Geronimo Revision: 651764 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080425/build-2100.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080425/unit-test-reports
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.geronimo.configs:myfaces:2.2-SNAPSHOT: checking for
updates from codehaus-snapshots
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.geronimo.configs:myfaces:2.2-SNAPSHOT: checking for
updates from apache.snapshots
[INFO] [car:prepare-metadata]
[INFO] [car:archive-car]
[INFO] Building jar:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/myfaces/myfaces-deployer/target/myfaces-deployer-2.2-SNAPSHOT.car
[INFO] [ianal:verify-legal-files {execution: default}]
[INFO] Checking legal files in: myfaces-deployer-2.2-SNAPSHOT.car
[INFO] [install:install]
[INFO] Installing
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/myfaces/myfaces-deployer/target/myfaces-deployer-2.2-SNAPSHOT.car
to
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/configs/myfaces-deployer/2.2-SNAPSHOT/myfaces-deployer-2.2-SNAPSHOT.car
[INFO] [car:update-pluginlist]
[INFO]
[INFO] Building Geronimo Plugins, OpenEJB :: Clustering over WADI
[INFO]task-segment: [install]
[INFO]
[INFO] [enforcer:enforce {execution: default}]
[INFO] [remote-resources:process {execution: default}]
[INFO] [resources:resources]
[INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] [compiler:compile]
[INFO] Compiling 10 source files to
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/openejb/geronimo-openejb-clustering-wadi/target/classes
[INFO] [resources:testResources]
[INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] [compiler:testCompile]
[INFO] Compiling 4 source files to
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/openejb/geronimo-openejb-clustering-wadi/target/test-classes
[INFO] [surefire:test]
[INFO] Surefire report directory:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/plugins/openejb/geronimo-openejb-clustering-wadi/target/surefire-reports
---
T E S T S
---
Running
org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest
Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 7, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.877 sec
FAILURE!
Running
org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.infra.BasicNetworkConnectorTrackerTest
Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.021 sec
Running org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.infra.NetworkConnectorMonitorTest
Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.409 sec
Running
org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest
Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 8, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.241 sec
FAILURE!
Results :
Tests in error:
testNewBeanEntryForUnknownDeploymentThrowsISE(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest)
testNewBeanEntryOK(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest)
testSessionDestructionFreeInstance(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest)
testInboundSessionMigrationActivateAndPoolBeanEntry(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest)
testOutboundSessionMigrationPassivateBeanEntry(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest)
testOnFreeBeanEntryReleaseSession(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest)
testOnPoolInstanceWithoutTransactionTriggersSessionOnEndAccess(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest)
testInvokeBusinessMethodForUnknownDeploymentThrowsOEJBE(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest)
testInvokeRemoteMethodForUnknownDeploymentThrowsOEJBE(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest)
testOEJBIsRethrownForBusinessMethod(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest)
testOEJBIsRethrownForRemoveMethod(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest)
testBusinessMethodInvokationOK(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest)
testRemoveMethodInvokationOK(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest)
testGetLocationsRetunsNullWhenDeploymentIsNotRegistered(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest)
testGetLocationsOK(org.apache.geronimo.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 (RC1)
+1 My simple test environment - eclipse-jee-europa-winter-macosx-carbon.tar.gz on MacOS 10.5.2 geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.1.1-bin.zip (RC2) created simple web project and deployed to running server used gsh to stop/start server and plugin status updated -Donald Tim McConnell wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 RC1 (to correspond with the Geronimo 2.1.0 server release). The deployable zip file is here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/geronimo-eclipse-plugin-2.1.0-deployable.zip The update site zip file is here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/ geronimo-eclipse-plugin-2.1.0-updatesite.zip The current svn location is here (revision number 651108): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/branches/2.1.0 The future svn location will be here (when approved): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/tags/2.1.0 There is a rudimentary set of install instructions available at the URL below that will hopefully describe the necessary prereq(s) and steps required to install and run the GEP: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/Geronimo_Eclipse_Plugin_2.1.0_Instructions-RC1.txt Additionally, there is an ant build.xml file that can be used to download the prereq(s) for the GEP. It is documented in the instructions. Finally, I've created a Staging Site that can used to test the update manager functions of Eclipse for downloading both the GEP itself and the Geronimo Server. This is also documented in the instructions. Please let me know if there are any questions. The vote will conclude at 11:00 PM EST on Saturday, April 26th. -- Thanks, Tim McConnell smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 (RC1)
I don't remember if I had brought this up earlier, but wanted to... Should we also include tar.gz distributions in our Geronimo Eclipse Plugin releases? ++Vamsi On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Discussion thread for the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 (RC1) Release vote.
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 (RC1)
To add on, I would love to see these tar.gz distributions in GEP 2.1.0 release itself if adding these does not amount to a lot of work. ++Vamsi On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't remember if I had brought this up earlier, but wanted to... Should we also include tar.gz distributions in our Geronimo Eclipse Plugin releases? ++Vamsi On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Discussion thread for the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 (RC1) Release vote.
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 (RC1)
Download and Install option while adding a New Server does not work if I install the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin by extracting geronimo-eclipse-plugin-2.1.0-deployable.zip . It works only if I install the plugin using the Eclipse Update Manager with update site url http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/staging_site/ . Is anyone else seeing this problem? ++Vamsi On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Discussion thread for the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 (RC1) Release vote.
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 (RC1)
Looks like the server binaries are downloaded from a runtimes directory under the update site url. Should these be absolute urls pointing to distributions located under http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/ ? Why should the method of plugin installation matter to how the plugin works? ++Vamsi On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Download and Install option while adding a New Server does not work if I install the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin by extracting geronimo-eclipse-plugin-2.1.0-deployable.zip . It works only if I install the plugin using the Eclipse Update Manager with update site url http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/staging_site/http://people.apache.org/%7Emcconne/releases/2.1.0/RC1/staging_site/. Is anyone else seeing this problem? ++Vamsi On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Discussion thread for the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.0 (RC1) Release vote.
Re: [BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 651174
Did something in openejb change recently? These tests were all passing while I was testing my SLF4J changes with `mvn -o` and then I did an online built and now they are failing because of: snip java.lang.NullPointerException: context or beanClass input parameter is null at org .apache.openejb.core.CoreDeploymentInfo.init(CoreDeploymentInfo.java: 182) at org .apache .geronimo .openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest $1.init(ClusteredStatefulContainerTest.java:107) at org .apache .geronimo .openejb .cluster .stateful .container .ClusteredStatefulContainerTest .setUp(ClusteredStatefulContainerTest.java:95) at com.agical.rmock.extension.junit.BasicJUnitStrategyTestCase $1.run(BasicJUnitStrategyTestCase.java:32) at com .agical.rmock.core.strategy.impl.CompositeStep.run(CompositeStep.java: 24) at com.agical.rmock.core.strategy.impl.FinallyStep.run(FinallyStep.java:19) at com.agical.rmock.core.expectation.Engine.runStrategy(Engine.java: 142) ... /snip and snip java.lang.IllegalStateException: No existing context at org.apache.openejb.core.ThreadContext.exit(ThreadContext.java:65) at org .apache .geronimo .openejb .cluster .stateful .container .ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest .tearDown(ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest.java:102) at com.agical.rmock.extension.junit.BasicJUnitStrategyTestCase $2.run(BasicJUnitStrategyTestCase.java:61) at com.agical.rmock.core.strategy.impl.FinallyStep.run(FinallyStep.java:23) at com.agical.rmock.core.expectation.Engine.runStrategy(Engine.java: 142) /snip It appears to be unrelated to SLF4J changes, but I'm not sure... anyone know better why these tests are failing? --jason On Apr 24, 2008, at 3:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Geronimo Revision: 651174 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080424/build-0300.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080424 [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 32 minutes 43 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Thu Apr 24 03:40:55 EDT 2008 [INFO] Final Memory: 337M/672M [INFO] TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only) = See detailed results at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/testsuite/ResultsSummary.html Assembly: tomcat = See the full test.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080424/logs-0300-tomcat/test.log Assembly: jetty = See the full test.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080424/logs-0300-jetty/test.log [INFO] Running TestSuite [INFO] Tests run: 13, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 79.962 sec FAILURE! Samples: trunk = Log: http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080424/samples-0300.log Build status: OK
