[BUILD] branches/2.1: Failed for Revision: 955129
Geronimo Revision: 955129 built with tests included See the full build-0200.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20100616/build-0200.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20100616 [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 28 minutes 40 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Wed Jun 16 02:33:37 EDT 2010 [INFO] Final Memory: 300M/987M [INFO] TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only) = Assembly: tomcat = See full test results and logs at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20100616/logs-0200-tomcat/ [INFO] Running console-testsuite.basic-console [INFO] Tests run: 38, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 97.514 sec FAILURE! [INFO] Running console-testsuite.advance-test [INFO] Tests run: 15, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 76.695 sec FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running sec-testsuite.security [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.245 sec FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running security-testsuite.security [INFO] Tests run: 36, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 29.632 sec FAILURE! Assembly: jetty = See full test results and logs at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20100616/logs-0200-jetty/ [INFO] Running console-testsuite.basic-console [INFO] Tests run: 38, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 99.276 sec FAILURE! [INFO] Running console-testsuite.advance-test [INFO] Tests run: 15, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 80.674 sec FAILURE! -- [INFO] Running sec-testsuite.security [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3.814 sec FAILURE! Samples: branches/2.1 = Log: http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20100616/samples-0200.log Build status: FAILED
Binaries
The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives Is there also a binary package to try out? I guess this would make more eyeballs test the new server. Juergen -- View this message in context: http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Geronimo-3-0-M1-release-3rd-attempt-tp883434p899243.html Sent from the Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Binaries
On Jun 16, 2010, at 3:45 AM, weberjn wrote: The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives Is there also a binary package to try out? I guess this would make more eyeballs test the new server. They are staged here -- https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/ Would be good to see us pulling out the artifacts that will end up in the geronimo dist/ directory (source and assemblies w/ signatures/checksums) and stage them on people for server release votes. --kevan
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5369) Geronimo 2.2.1 start failed on jdk 1.5.22, but successfully on JDK 1.6
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12879333#action_12879333 ] Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5369: Hmm. I wouldn't drop 1.5 support in a 2.2.x. Not for this reason, anyway. Would prefer to see us building with Java 5. Geronimo 2.2.1 start failed on jdk 1.5.22, but successfully on JDK 1.6 -- Key: GERONIMO-5369 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5369 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public(Regular issues) Components: startup/shutdown Affects Versions: 2.2.1 Environment: OS: jdk 1.5.22, suse 10 sp2, redhat 5.3 Reporter: viola.lu Priority: Minor Fix For: 2.2.1 1. export JAVA_HOME=/opt/jdk1.5.22 2.start server, but failed with errors: 2010-06-07 13:54:48,828 ERROR [GBeanInstanceState] Error while starting; GBean is now in the FAILED state: abstractName=org.apache.geronimo.configs/mejb/2.2.1-SNAPSHOT/car?J2EEApplication=null,j2eeType=EJBModule,name=org.apache.geronimo.configs/mejb/2.2.1-SNAPSHOT/car org.apache.openejb.OpenEJBException: Creating application failed: /g22src/plugins/mejb/geronimo-mejb/target/geronimo-mejb-2.2.1-SNAPSHOT.jar: Error deploying 'ejb/mgmt/MEJB'. Exception: class java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: MINUTES: MINUTES 3.If i export JAVA_HOME=/opt/jdk1.6.10, server started without error. I think this is cozed by openejb 3.1.* build, i tried to build openejb3.1.* with jdk 1.5,but failed by some method missing. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5369) Geronimo 2.2.1 start failed on jdk 1.5.22, but successfully on JDK 1.6
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12879338#action_12879338 ] Shawn Jiang commented on GERONIMO-5369: --- Right, Besides this JIRA, I saw some saaj related problems caused by java 6 working with G 2.2.x. Therefore, I tried to build 22 with java 5. the result assemblies turned out to work for both java 5 and 6. I suggest we change the current geronimo 2.2.x build system to use java 5 instead of java 6. Geronimo 2.2.1 start failed on jdk 1.5.22, but successfully on JDK 1.6 -- Key: GERONIMO-5369 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5369 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public(Regular issues) Components: startup/shutdown Affects Versions: 2.2.1 Environment: OS: jdk 1.5.22, suse 10 sp2, redhat 5.3 Reporter: viola.lu Priority: Minor Fix For: 2.2.1 1. export JAVA_HOME=/opt/jdk1.5.22 2.start server, but failed with errors: 2010-06-07 13:54:48,828 ERROR [GBeanInstanceState] Error while starting; GBean is now in the FAILED state: abstractName=org.apache.geronimo.configs/mejb/2.2.1-SNAPSHOT/car?J2EEApplication=null,j2eeType=EJBModule,name=org.apache.geronimo.configs/mejb/2.2.1-SNAPSHOT/car org.apache.openejb.OpenEJBException: Creating application failed: /g22src/plugins/mejb/geronimo-mejb/target/geronimo-mejb-2.2.1-SNAPSHOT.jar: Error deploying 'ejb/mgmt/MEJB'. Exception: class java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: MINUTES: MINUTES 3.If i export JAVA_HOME=/opt/jdk1.6.10, server started without error. I think this is cozed by openejb 3.1.* build, i tried to build openejb3.1.* with jdk 1.5,but failed by some method missing. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 955103
Geronimo Revision: 955103 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100615/build-2100.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100615
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 36 minutes 37 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Tue Jun 15 21:40:37 EDT 2010
[INFO] Final Memory: 466M/1015M
[INFO]
TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only)
=
Assembly: tomcat
=
See full test results and logs at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100615/logs-2100-tomcat/
Running TestSuite
Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.744 sec
FAILURE!
[INFO] [surefire:test {execution: default-test}]
[INFO] Tests are skipped.
[INFO] [war:war {execution: default-war}]
[INFO] Packaging webapp
[INFO] Assembling webapp[appname-war] in
[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT]
[INFO] Processing war project
[INFO] Copying webapp
webResources[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/src/main/webapp]
to[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT]
[INFO] Copying webapp
webResources[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/classes]
to[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT]
[INFO] Copying webapp
resources[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/src/main/webapp]
[INFO] Building jar:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
[INFO] Webapp assembled in[46 msecs]
[INFO] Building war:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT.war
[INFO] [failsafe:integration-test {execution: integration-test}]
[INFO] Failsafe report directory:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/failsafe-reports
---
T E S T S
---
There are no tests to run.
Results :
Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
[INFO] [ianal:verify-legal-files {execution: default}]
[WARNING] Skipping verification of legal files in artifacts:
[WARNING] org.apache.geronimo.testsuite:appname-war:war:3.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] [install:install {execution: default-install}]
[INFO] Installing
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT.war
to
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/testsuite/appname-war/3.0-SNAPSHOT/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT.war
[INFO] [failsafe:verify {execution: verify}]
[INFO] Failsafe report directory:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/failsafe-reports
[INFO]
[INFO] Building Geronimo TestSuite :: Enterprise Testsuite :: AppName - Client
[INFO]task-segment: [install]
[INFO]
[INFO] [genesis:validate-configuration {execution: default}]
[INFO] [geronimo-property:set-property {execution: set-property}]
[INFO] [enforcer:enforce {execution: default}]
[INFO] [remote-resources:process {execution: default}]
[INFO] [resources:resources {execution: default-resources}]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 2 resources
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-client/src/main/filtered-resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [compiler:compile {execution: default-compile}]
[INFO] Compiling 1 source file to
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-client/target/classes
[INFO] [resources:testResources {execution: default-testResources}]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-client/src/test/resources
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-client/src/test/filtered-resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [compiler:testCompile {execution: default-testCompile}]
[INFO]
Define context to serves a directory's content through Geronimo
Hi everyone, What I am currently trying to do is to expose the content of a directory on my Geronimo server. More precisely, I've migrated web applications from Tomcat 6 to Geronimo. When I was running my applications on Tomcat 6, I've defined a context within the server.xml so that users can read the content of a specific directory. Here's an excerpt of my server.xml file for Tomcat 6: ... Context path=/reporting docBase=C:\\Dir reloadable=true/Context ... Consequently, supposed there is a foo.txt file in the C:\\Dir directory, my users can access this file simply by typing the following address in any web browser -- http://localhost/reporting/foo.txt. How can I do the same thing on geronimo? I've done a lot of searching but didn't find any exact answer... Thanks in advance. -- View this message in context: http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/Define-context-to-serves-a-directory-s-content-through-Geronimo-tp900174p900174.html Sent from the Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt
On 6/15/10 11:33 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: Here's my +1 as well ... but I did notice a few strange things that I don't think have been pointed out yet: Perhaps the most annoying thing is that we aren't including the tranql connector rars in server images as with previous releases. I guess this isn't a big concern because they should be available via other means - just a bit annoying. Yep, I fixed that in trunk. I also noticed a dependency management entry in the root pom for a geronimo bundle of axiom (at a SNAPSHOT version). This doesn't actually exist but it seems that it isn't causing any build issues either. I was able to build fine and I ran one of the EBA samples in the tomcat assembly. Joe On 6/9/10 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review. The LICENSE problem has been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed have been included. See the JIRA issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090styleName=TextprojectId=10220 Staged to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/ The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them. The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours. [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) Rick
Running the Aries Samples under Geronimo 3.0-M1
A few people have asked about running the Apache Aries samples under Geronimo 3.0. Jarek first posted about this a while ago and since then I created some wiki pages with the directions and even created a Geronimo blog entry about it (so far the only real blog entry we have - nudge ;-) ). However, it seems that the directions are easily missed in our voluminous wiki ... so I thought I should post about it again here. I actually created the same wiki page twice for this. The first time was under our developer doc in the wiki here: https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/apache-aries-samples-running-in-geronimo-30.html I then copied the exact same content under the 3.0 doc space after it was created. https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC30/apache-aries-samples-running-in-geronimo-30.html I guess I should remove the developer one but for me it's much easier to find (1st one under Development) than the one buried under the 3.0 sample doc stuff. I'll update the wiki page(s) again once our 3.0-M1 vote is complete and remove the requirement to build Geronimo from trunk. If you want to try it out now I'd suggest using the 3.0-M1 tag (or using the server images up for vote) rather than trunk just because I know it works in 3.0-M1 and I'm not sure if changes in trunk may have broken something. HTH, Joe
[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 955351
Geronimo Revision: 955351 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100616/build-1500.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100616
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 40 minutes 19 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Wed Jun 16 15:42:46 EDT 2010
[INFO] Final Memory: 470M/1014M
[INFO]
TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only)
=
Assembly: tomcat
=
See full test results and logs at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100616/logs-1500-tomcat/
Running TestSuite
Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.724 sec
FAILURE!
[INFO] [surefire:test {execution: default-test}]
[INFO] Tests are skipped.
[INFO] [war:war {execution: default-war}]
[INFO] Packaging webapp
[INFO] Assembling webapp[appname-war] in
[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT]
[INFO] Processing war project
[INFO] Copying webapp
webResources[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/src/main/webapp]
to[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT]
[INFO] Copying webapp
webResources[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/classes]
to[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT]
[INFO] Copying webapp
resources[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/src/main/webapp]
[INFO] Building jar:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
[INFO] Webapp assembled in[51 msecs]
[INFO] Building war:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT.war
[INFO] [failsafe:integration-test {execution: integration-test}]
[INFO] Failsafe report directory:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/failsafe-reports
---
T E S T S
---
There are no tests to run.
Results :
Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
[INFO] [ianal:verify-legal-files {execution: default}]
[WARNING] Skipping verification of legal files in artifacts:
[WARNING] org.apache.geronimo.testsuite:appname-war:war:3.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] [install:install {execution: default-install}]
[INFO] Installing
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT.war
to
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/testsuite/appname-war/3.0-SNAPSHOT/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT.war
[INFO] [failsafe:verify {execution: verify}]
[INFO] Failsafe report directory:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/failsafe-reports
[INFO]
[INFO] Building Geronimo TestSuite :: Enterprise Testsuite :: AppName - Client
[INFO]task-segment: [install]
[INFO]
[INFO] [genesis:validate-configuration {execution: default}]
[INFO] [geronimo-property:set-property {execution: set-property}]
[INFO] [enforcer:enforce {execution: default}]
[INFO] [remote-resources:process {execution: default}]
[INFO] [resources:resources {execution: default-resources}]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 2 resources
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-client/src/main/filtered-resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [compiler:compile {execution: default-compile}]
[INFO] Compiling 1 source file to
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-client/target/classes
[INFO] [resources:testResources {execution: default-testResources}]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-client/src/test/resources
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-client/src/test/filtered-resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [compiler:testCompile {execution: default-testCompile}]
[INFO
Re: Define context to serves a directory's content through Geronimo
Have you tried the in-place deployment ? https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/deploying-and-undeploying-applications.html#Deployingandundeployingapplications-ViaDeployertool 2010/6/17 superk888 superk...@gmail.com Hi everyone, What I am currently trying to do is to expose the content of a directory on my Geronimo server. More precisely, I've migrated web applications from Tomcat 6 to Geronimo. When I was running my applications on Tomcat 6, I've defined a context within the server.xml so that users can read the content of a specific directory. Here's an excerpt of my server.xml file for Tomcat 6: ... Context path=/reporting docBase=C:\\Dir reloadable=true/Context ... Consequently, supposed there is a foo.txt file in the C:\\Dir directory, my users can access this file simply by typing the following address in any web browser -- http://localhost/reporting/foo.txt. How can I do the same thing on geronimo? I've done a lot of searching but didn't find any exact answer... Thanks in advance. -- View this message in context: http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/Define-context-to-serves-a-directory-s-content-through-Geronimo-tp900174p900174.html Sent from the Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Ivan
Re: Define context to serves a directory's content through Geronimo
I did ran into this page but still, how am I supposed to configure the reference to my directory (the one I would like to make accessible to external users). Is configuring the working directory in the geronimo-web.xml file supposed to do the trick? I tried this but it doesn't work. -- View this message in context: http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/Define-context-to-serves-a-directory-s-content-through-Geronimo-tp900174p901263.html Sent from the Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Define context to serves a directory's content through Geronimo
Not sure I understand your reponse correctly, a. you only need to deploy another web application using in-place deployment, which points to the directory b. in the geronimo-web.xml, configure the context path with reporting 2010/6/17 superk888 superk...@gmail.com I did ran into this page but still, how am I supposed to configure the reference to my directory (the one I would like to make accessible to external users). Is configuring the working directory in the geronimo-web.xml file supposed to do the trick? I tried this but it doesn't work. -- View this message in context: http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/Define-context-to-serves-a-directory-s-content-through-Geronimo-tp900174p901263.html Sent from the Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Ivan
[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-5325) iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rex Wang closed GERONIMO-5325. -- Thanks Shawn for the great job! iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly --- Key: GERONIMO-5325 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public(Regular issues) Affects Versions: 2.2 Reporter: Rex Wang Assignee: Ben Liang Fix For: 2.2.1 Attachments: 5325-Ben_2_new.patch, 5325_Ben.patch, screenshot-1-assembly-portlet.jpg, screenshot-debug-views.jpg, screenshot-huge-blank.jpg, screenshot-timeout.jpg, timeout.bmp, Two scroll bars.jpg #1. The assemble server page is not formatting properly in 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT. Go to assemble server page, click expert user and try to scroll down. Unless I make the font type very small, I can't see the system plugins and can't scroll down to them. #2, This also cause the debugviews portlet displays incorrectly. #3, Go to repository portlet first, and then go to JMS Resources portlet. The scroll bar is pretty long and when you scroll down, you can see there is a huge blank at the bottom of the page. See the attachment. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Define context to serves a directory's content through Geronimo
On Jun 16, 2010, at 6:44 PM, superk888 wrote: I did ran into this page but still, how am I supposed to configure the reference to my directory (the one I would like to make accessible to external users). Is configuring the working directory in the geronimo-web.xml file supposed to do the trick? I tried this but it doesn't work. No. I don't see how that would work... So, I suppose there's a reason that you don't include this static content in your WAR? Not that it particularly matters, but what version of Geronimo are you using? --kevan
[DISCUSSION] change 2.2 branch build JDK from 6 to 5
We should change the 2.2 build JDK from 6 to 5 because we can't start the server with jdk 5 if we build 2.2 branch with jdk 6. See [1] for more background. Jarek, I remember that you are owner of the geronimo build system. Can you help do that ? [1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5369 -- Shawn
Re: [Discussion] How to display help informations on the Console
Thanks for the comments, please find my input inlines. On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Bill Stoddard wgstodd...@gmail.comwrote: On 6/14/10 10:01 AM, Donald Woods wrote: #1-3 are good usability improvements. Can we use Dojo for #4-6? Seems hover help would be the best option, as adding an example beside/below every field could require a lot of screen area and doesn't cover the cases for links (like Start/Stop/Restart/Delete). Also, the portlet help page should include the same text as the hoover help (which should be the same resource strings), plus additional help text if needed. Agree~! #7 requires us to stop reorganizing the User Docs and would mean we couldn't rename pages. If we go this route, we should include a hidden comment on each doc page with a reference back to the portlet that has a link to it, so we know not to rename the page unless the portlet link is updated too. Connecting the documentation and console will be expensive to maintain. As a general principle, I would suggest carefully weighing the 'opportunity cost' of adding new features to the server that require on-going maintenance. Each added feature that requires on-going maintenance takes time away from other potentially more important work. Over time as more 'on-going' maintenance requirements accumulate, the development team spends more and more effort to just tending to the maintenance; less time is spent on innovation and keeping current with technology trends. Bill Agree~!. An alternative of #7 is to provide the linkage to doc index page instead of matching the exact page on the top panel of doc. But in the code level, we could define different keys for different portlets for future improvements. All those keys use the same value for each release, for example: For 2.2, use https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/ For 3.0, use https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC30/ The alternative provides the users a short-cut to Geronimo doc site from console and possibilities to implement #7 for exact match. Jeff
Re: [DISCUSSION] change 2.2 branch build JDK from 6 to 5
Shawn, 2.1 and 2.2 are already built with Java 5. Jarek On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote: We should change the 2.2 build JDK from 6 to 5 because we can't start the server with jdk 5 if we build 2.2 branch with jdk 6. See [1] for more background. Jarek, I remember that you are owner of the geronimo build system. Can you help do that ? [1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5369 -- Shawn
