On 6/15/10 11:33 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: > Here's my +1 as well ... but I did notice a few strange things that I > don't think have been pointed out yet: > > Perhaps the most annoying thing is that we aren't including the tranql > connector rars in server images as with previous releases. I guess this > isn't a big concern because they should be available via other means - > just a bit annoying.
Yep, I fixed that in trunk. > > I also noticed a dependency management entry in the root pom for a > geronimo bundle of axiom (at a SNAPSHOT version). This doesn't actually > exist but it seems that it isn't causing any build issues either. > > I was able to build fine and I ran one of the EBA samples in the tomcat > assembly. > > Joe > > > On 6/9/10 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: >> A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review. The LICENSE problem >> has been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed >> have been included. >> >> See the JIRA issues here: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220 >> >> >> >> Staged to >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/ >> >> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip >> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz >> >> >> >> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something >> plausible builds from them. >> >> The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours. >> >> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door >> [ ] 0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) >> >> Rick >> > >
