Re: [VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt.
Vote passed with three +1 : Shawn Jiang, Forrest Xia, Ivan one +0 : Kevan Miller no -1 Thanks everyone for the vote, I will push the staging artifacts to central soon. On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote: [VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt. This is a bug fix release that only includes one bug fix for GERONIMO-5848 The components up for vote are: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec/1.1/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1-source-release.zip https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec/1.1/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1-source-release.tar.gz The staging repository is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/ The source repo is: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1/ Vote will be open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Shawn -- Shawn
Re: [VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt.
On Jul 16, 2011, at 6:43 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote: Vote passed with three +1 : Shawn Jiang, Forrest Xia, Ivan one +0 : Kevan Miller no -1 Thanks everyone for the vote, I will push the staging artifacts to central soon. This is a perfectly valid vote. However, given the minimum number of PMC votes (3) and relatively short duration of the vote (4 days). I'd like to see a couple of things: 1) reminder email on the vote thread announcing that you'll call the vote in a few days and asking for more reviews of the release 2) giving a day or two longer for these reviews to occur. --kevan
Re: [VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt.
On Jul 13, 2011, at 12:29 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote: On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: Looks good with one exception. geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1/NOTICE.txt contains: Copyright 2003-2006 The Apache Software Foundation Not a hard requirement, but by our convention the latter date should be 2011. Just updated latter date to 2011 for all notice files in geronimo bundles. Also, most of our LICENSE/NOTICE files no longer have the .txt suffix. Do you mean we need to rename LICENSE/NOTICE to LICENSE.txt/NOTICE.txt ? Oops. So, I misread your question and now I've messed this all up. Let me try again. Most of our LICENSE/NOTICE files no longer have a .txt suffix. LICENSE/NOTICE should be our desired names for license/notice files. LICENSE.txt/NOTICE.txt files are acceptable, but LICENSE/NOTICE are the preferred names for the ASF. Where possible we should use the file names without a .txt suffix. No nead to -1 or cancel any votes, just for this. So, current votes are fine, IMO. --kevan
Re: [VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt.
, OK, then I'll rename all LICENSE.txt, NOTICE.txt back for all remaining specs/bundles. On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote: On Jul 13, 2011, at 12:29 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote: On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: Looks good with one exception. geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1/NOTICE.txt contains: Copyright 2003-2006 The Apache Software Foundation Not a hard requirement, but by our convention the latter date should be 2011. Just updated latter date to 2011 for all notice files in geronimo bundles. Also, most of our LICENSE/NOTICE files no longer have the .txt suffix. Do you mean we need to rename LICENSE/NOTICE to LICENSE.txt/NOTICE.txt ? Oops. So, I misread your question and now I've messed this all up. Let me try again. Most of our LICENSE/NOTICE files no longer have a .txt suffix. LICENSE/NOTICE should be our desired names for license/notice files. LICENSE.txt/NOTICE.txt files are acceptable, but LICENSE/NOTICE are the preferred names for the ASF. Where possible we should use the file names without a .txt suffix. No nead to -1 or cancel any votes, just for this. So, current votes are fine, IMO. --kevan -- Shawn
Re: [VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt.
On Jul 15, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote: , OK, then I'll rename all LICENSE.txt, NOTICE.txt back for all remaining specs/bundles. I think I got them all... --kevan
Re: [VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt.
Just saw the commit history, thanks ! : ) Will close this vote soon. On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote: On Jul 15, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote: , OK, then I'll rename all LICENSE.txt, NOTICE.txt back for all remaining specs/bundles. I think I got them all... --kevan -- Shawn
[VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt.
[VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt. This is a bug fix release that only includes one bug fix for GERONIMO-5848 The components up for vote are: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec/1.1/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1-source-release.zip https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec/1.1/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1-source-release.tar.gz The staging repository is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/ The source repo is: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1/ Vote will be open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Shawn
Re: [VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt.
1, mvn install build is OK 2, mvn rat:check result is clean. Again, Here is my own +1. On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote: [VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt. This is a bug fix release that only includes one bug fix for GERONIMO-5848 The components up for vote are: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec/1.1/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1-source-release.zip https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec/1.1/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1-source-release.tar.gz The staging repository is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/ The source repo is: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1/ Vote will be open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Shawn -- Shawn
Re: [VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt.
Build and rat check seems OK for me +1 Forrest On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote: 1, mvn install build is OK 2, mvn rat:check result is clean. Again, Here is my own +1. On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote: [VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt. This is a bug fix release that only includes one bug fix for GERONIMO-5848 The components up for vote are: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec/1.1/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1-source-release.zip https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec/1.1/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1-source-release.tar.gz The staging repository is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/ The source repo is: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1/ Vote will be open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Shawn -- Shawn
Re: [VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt.
+1 2011/7/13 Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com Build and rat check seems OK for me +1 Forrest On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote: 1, mvn install build is OK 2, mvn rat:check result is clean. Again, Here is my own +1. On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.comwrote: [VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt. This is a bug fix release that only includes one bug fix for GERONIMO-5848 The components up for vote are: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec/1.1/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1-source-release.zip https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec/1.1/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1-source-release.tar.gz The staging repository is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/ The source repo is: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1/ Vote will be open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Shawn -- Shawn -- Ivan
Re: [VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt.
Looks good with one exception. geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1/NOTICE.txt contains: Copyright 2003-2006 The Apache Software Foundation Not a hard requirement, but by our convention the latter date should be 2011. Also, most of our LICENSE/NOTICE files no longer have the .txt suffix. Neither of these are a hard requirement. But given the number of releases that we'll have coming up, may as well cleanup now... Beyond the above, source, signatures/checksums, and build -- all look good to me. With the above minor concerns, I'm +0. --kevan On Jul 12, 2011, at 11:18 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote: [VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt. This is a bug fix release that only includes one bug fix for GERONIMO-5848 The components up for vote are: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec/1.1/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1-source-release.zip https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec/1.1/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1-source-release.tar.gz The staging repository is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/ The source repo is: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1/ Vote will be open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Shawn
Re: [VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote: Looks good with one exception. geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1/NOTICE.txt contains: Copyright 2003-2006 The Apache Software Foundation Not a hard requirement, but by our convention the latter date should be 2011. Just updated latter date to 2011 for all notice files in geronimo bundles. Also, most of our LICENSE/NOTICE files no longer have the .txt suffix. Do you mean we need to rename LICENSE/NOTICE to LICENSE.txt/NOTICE.txt ? Neither of these are a hard requirement. But given the number of releases that we'll have coming up, may as well cleanup now... Beyond the above, source, signatures/checksums, and build -- all look good to me. With the above minor concerns, I'm +0. --kevan On Jul 12, 2011, at 11:18 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote: [VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt. This is a bug fix release that only includes one bug fix for GERONIMO-5848 The components up for vote are: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec/1.1/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1-source-release.zip https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec/1.1/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1-source-release.tar.gz The staging repository is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/ The source repo is: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1/ Vote will be open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Shawn -- Shawn
Re: [VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt.
On Jul 13, 2011, at 12:29 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote: On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: Looks good with one exception. geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1/NOTICE.txt contains: Copyright 2003-2006 The Apache Software Foundation Not a hard requirement, but by our convention the latter date should be 2011. Just updated latter date to 2011 for all notice files in geronimo bundles. Also, most of our LICENSE/NOTICE files no longer have the .txt suffix. Do you mean we need to rename LICENSE/NOTICE to LICENSE.txt/NOTICE.txt ? Yes. --kevan
Re: [VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt.
OK, for this spec, let's leave it as is. I'll update the remaining bundles before releasing them. On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote: On Jul 13, 2011, at 12:29 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote: On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: Looks good with one exception. geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1/NOTICE.txt contains: Copyright 2003-2006 The Apache Software Foundation Not a hard requirement, but by our convention the latter date should be 2011. Just updated latter date to 2011 for all notice files in geronimo bundles. Also, most of our LICENSE/NOTICE files no longer have the .txt suffix. Do you mean we need to rename LICENSE/NOTICE to LICENSE.txt/NOTICE.txt ? Yes. --kevan -- Shawn
