Help with car-maven-plugin site generation needed

2007-09-08 Thread David Jencks

I thought I might try to document the c-m-p a bit but when I try to run

mvn site

the javadoc plugin complains that I'm not using jdk 1.4 syntax.  I  
tried everything I could think of to set source1.5/source but  
with no success whatsoever.  If anyone has a clue how to fix this  
please demonstrate!


btw I'm using maven 2.0.7 and wonder if we should make that a  
requirement.


thanks
david jencks



Re: Help with car-maven-plugin site generation needed

2007-09-08 Thread Jason Dillon
I will have a look As soon as I get back online. Got a new fancy airport 
extreme And well it was soo easy that I managed to *uck it all up

--jason


-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 00:25:30 
To:Geronimo Dev List (JIRA) dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Help with car-maven-plugin site generation needed


I thought I might try to document the c-m-p a bit but when I try to run

mvn site

the javadoc plugin complains that I'm not using jdk 1.4 syntax.  I  
tried everything I could think of to set source1.5/source but  
with no success whatsoever.  If anyone has a clue how to fix this  
please demonstrate!

btw I'm using maven 2.0.7 and wonder if we should make that a  
requirement.

thanks
david jencks





Re: Help with car-maven-plugin site generation needed

2007-09-08 Thread Prasad Kashyap
The javadoc-plugin configuration in genesis in set to use jdk 1.4.
Rebuild genesis/configs/project-config by changing the javadoc-plugin
configuration in it to use jdk 1.5. Then run site at c-m-p. This
should fix it.

Cheers
Prasad

On 9/8/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I thought I might try to document the c-m-p a bit but when I try to run

 mvn site

 the javadoc plugin complains that I'm not using jdk 1.4 syntax.  I
 tried everything I could think of to set source1.5/source but
 with no success whatsoever.  If anyone has a clue how to fix this
 please demonstrate!

 btw I'm using maven 2.0.7 and wonder if we should make that a
 requirement.

 thanks
 david jencks