New JIRA Version Created called Verification Required

2006-06-02 Thread Matt Hogstrom

All,

After moving some of the JIRAs for the third time today there is a recurring pattern of bugs that 
are reported and are so old that we don't know if they are issues anymore.  To separate these from 
the other bugs that can be worked on directly I created a new Version called Verification 
Required.  The intent of this category is to place JIRAs here that need a test case built to verify 
the problem still exists or not.  Seems like this would be a good place to point new comers as this 
would give them a solid thing to work on and get their hands dirty with Geronimo as well.


I'm moving several JIRAs in there today.  If there is strong objection then they can easily be moved 
out and put into some version number.  I'm trying to change some of the way we look at JIRA because 
there are a large number of the open ones that just sit there.


Thoughts?

Matt


Re: New JIRA Version Created called Verification Required

2006-06-02 Thread Aaron Mulder

Works for me.

Aaron

On 6/2/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

All,

After moving some of the JIRAs for the third time today there is a recurring 
pattern of bugs that
are reported and are so old that we don't know if they are issues anymore.  To 
separate these from
the other bugs that can be worked on directly I created a new Version called 
Verification
Required.  The intent of this category is to place JIRAs here that need a test 
case built to verify
the problem still exists or not.  Seems like this would be a good place to 
point new comers as this
would give them a solid thing to work on and get their hands dirty with 
Geronimo as well.

I'm moving several JIRAs in there today.  If there is strong objection then 
they can easily be moved
out and put into some version number.  I'm trying to change some of the way we 
look at JIRA because
there are a large number of the open ones that just sit there.

Thoughts?

Matt



Re: New JIRA Version Created called Verification Required

2006-06-02 Thread Hernan Cunico
It sounds great. Actually I received a bunch of questions about writing tests cases, this would be 
just the right place to start.


Cheers!
Hernan

Matt Hogstrom wrote:

All,

After moving some of the JIRAs for the third time today there is a 
recurring pattern of bugs that are reported and are so old that we don't 
know if they are issues anymore.  To separate these from the other bugs 
that can be worked on directly I created a new Version called 
Verification Required.  The intent of this category is to place JIRAs 
here that need a test case built to verify the problem still exists or 
not.  Seems like this would be a good place to point new comers as this 
would give them a solid thing to work on and get their hands dirty with 
Geronimo as well.


I'm moving several JIRAs in there today.  If there is strong objection 
then they can easily be moved out and put into some version number.  I'm 
trying to change some of the way we look at JIRA because there are a 
large number of the open ones that just sit there.


Thoughts?

Matt



Re: New JIRA Version Created called Verification Required

2006-06-02 Thread Jacek Laskowski

On 6/2/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I'm moving several JIRAs in there today.  If there is strong objection then 
they can easily be moved
out and put into some version number.  I'm trying to change some of the way we 
look at JIRA because
there are a large number of the open ones that just sit there.

Thoughts?


+1


Matt


Jacek

--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.net.pl


Re: New JIRA Version Created called Verification Required

2006-06-02 Thread Joe Bohn

+1

Matt Hogstrom wrote:

All,

After moving some of the JIRAs for the third time today there is a 
recurring pattern of bugs that are reported and are so old that we don't 
know if they are issues anymore.  To separate these from the other bugs 
that can be worked on directly I created a new Version called 
Verification Required.  The intent of this category is to place JIRAs 
here that need a test case built to verify the problem still exists or 
not.  Seems like this would be a good place to point new comers as this 
would give them a solid thing to work on and get their hands dirty with 
Geronimo as well.


I'm moving several JIRAs in there today.  If there is strong objection 
then they can easily be moved out and put into some version number.  I'm 
trying to change some of the way we look at JIRA because there are a 
large number of the open ones that just sit there.


Thoughts?

Matt




--
Joe Bohn
joe.bohn at earthlink.net

He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he cannot 
lose.   -- Jim Elliot


Re: New JIRA Version Created called Verification Required

2006-06-02 Thread Jason Dillon
What about creating a new issue status of the same name instead of using 
versions... Which I think is a bit misused in this context. 

--jason


-Original Message-
From: Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 12:08:23 
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: New JIRA Version Created called Verification Required

All,

After moving some of the JIRAs for the third time today there is a recurring 
pattern of bugs that 
are reported and are so old that we don't know if they are issues anymore.  To 
separate these from 
the other bugs that can be worked on directly I created a new Version called 
Verification 
Required.  The intent of this category is to place JIRAs here that need a test 
case built to verify 
the problem still exists or not.  Seems like this would be a good place to 
point new comers as this 
would give them a solid thing to work on and get their hands dirty with 
Geronimo as well.

I'm moving several JIRAs in there today.  If there is strong objection then 
they can easily be moved 
out and put into some version number.  I'm trying to change some of the way we 
look at JIRA because 
there are a large number of the open ones that just sit there.

Thoughts?

Matt


Re: New JIRA Version Created called Verification Required

2006-06-02 Thread Matt Hogstrom

I'm getting the feeling that you understand this JIRA stuff pretty well :)

Version is being abused and your suggestion is much better.

Jason Dillon wrote:
What about creating a new issue status of the same name instead of using versions... Which I think is a bit misused in this context. 


--jason


-Original Message-
From: Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 12:08:23 
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org

Subject: New JIRA Version Created called Verification Required

All,

After moving some of the JIRAs for the third time today there is a recurring pattern of bugs that 
are reported and are so old that we don't know if they are issues anymore.  To separate these from 
the other bugs that can be worked on directly I created a new Version called Verification 
Required.  The intent of this category is to place JIRAs here that need a test case built to verify 
the problem still exists or not.  Seems like this would be a good place to point new comers as this 
would give them a solid thing to work on and get their hands dirty with Geronimo as well.


I'm moving several JIRAs in there today.  If there is strong objection then they can easily be moved 
out and put into some version number.  I'm trying to change some of the way we look at JIRA because 
there are a large number of the open ones that just sit there.


Thoughts?

Matt


Re: New JIRA Version Created called Verification Required

2006-06-02 Thread Jason Dillon

I'm getting the feeling that you understand this JIRA stuff pretty well :)


Maybe I am... ;-)

I introduced PBT (where I'm about to leave) to JIRA about a year ago,
and was the admin for about 10 months.  I've implemented some crude,
yet custom, workflows for our IT operations production change policy
(they wanted the project called PCP for some reason).  They also use
JIRA for most technical project management, bug tracking and future
task planning.

Its a good tool... despite some of its weakness and awkwardness.

Cheers,

--jason