Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?
I'll start a release asap. I know you've worked on the release process. Should a simple mvn release:prepare release:perform -Dgpg.passphrase=xxx -DaltDeploymentRepository=yyy work ? Or is there a better way to release gshell ? On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 11:59, Jason Dillon wrote: > That should be fine. > > --jason > > > On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > >> I've just build gshell using maven-project-2.1.0-M1 and it builds and >> starts correctly. >> Maybe we sould use that one instead ? or does r72 includes other >> mandatory fixes ? >> >> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 09:07, Jason Dillon wrote: >>> >>> maven-project-2.1.0-r72 is on the nexus instance on our zone, but >>> looks >>> like its not running, not sure why... will take a look in a bit. >>> >>> --jason >>> >>> >>> On Feb 4, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >>> Done. I still have a problem with the dependency on maven-project-2.1.0-r72 which I can't found anymore. I will try to upgrade to 3.0-alpha-1 and see what it gives. On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 04:47, Jason Dillon wrote: > > Yes, go ahead. > > --jason > > > On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > >> We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel before this month. >> Do you want me to roll back to genesis 1.6 ? >> >> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 06:14, Jason Dillon >> wrote: >>> >>> Well, I think its mostly Genesis 2.0 that is causing the lag on >>> GShell's >>> release. I'm going to see about fixing that this week, otherwise >>> rolling >>> back to the Genesis 1.6 stuff for the alpha-2. >>> >>> --jason >>> >>> >>> On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >>> We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel in the near future. What are the missing bits to release GShell soon ? On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:25, Jason Dillon wrote: > > The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability. The > major > changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans to make > any > other significant changes to the core APIs. What I am doing now is > trying > to slim down the core dependencies and speed up the boot time... > and > sorting > out some of the many HACK/TODO comments which I've littered the > codebase > with. > > As for an alpha-2 release, I imagine that will be on the horizon > soon. > I > don't plan on having all of the little things fixed before that, > though > I > hope to sort out a few of the more significant ones before > releasing. > If > I > had to guess I'd say that the codebase should be in a position to > be > released in 2-4 weeks at present change velocity. > > --jason > > > On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > >> In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest trunk of >> GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade >> locally >> on >> my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that >> yesterday. >> However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We currently >> use >> an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid >> such >> issue and having to rewrite this integration once more. >> Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms of >> APIs) >> and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or whatever) ? >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet -
Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?
That should be fine. --jason On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I've just build gshell using maven-project-2.1.0-M1 and it builds and starts correctly. Maybe we sould use that one instead ? or does r72 includes other mandatory fixes ? On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 09:07, Jason Dillon wrote: maven-project-2.1.0-r72 is on the nexus instance on our zone, but looks like its not running, not sure why... will take a look in a bit. --jason On Feb 4, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Done. I still have a problem with the dependency on maven-project-2.1.0-r72 which I can't found anymore. I will try to upgrade to 3.0-alpha-1 and see what it gives. On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 04:47, Jason Dillon wrote: Yes, go ahead. --jason On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel before this month. Do you want me to roll back to genesis 1.6 ? On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 06:14, Jason Dillon wrote: Well, I think its mostly Genesis 2.0 that is causing the lag on GShell's release. I'm going to see about fixing that this week, otherwise rolling back to the Genesis 1.6 stuff for the alpha-2. --jason On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel in the near future. What are the missing bits to release GShell soon ? On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:25, Jason Dillon > wrote: The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability. The major changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans to make any other significant changes to the core APIs. What I am doing now is trying to slim down the core dependencies and speed up the boot time... and sorting out some of the many HACK/TODO comments which I've littered the codebase with. As for an alpha-2 release, I imagine that will be on the horizon soon. I don't plan on having all of the little things fixed before that, though I hope to sort out a few of the more significant ones before releasing. If I had to guess I'd say that the codebase should be in a position to be released in 2-4 weeks at present change velocity. --jason On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest trunk of GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade locally on my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that yesterday. However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We currently use an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid such issue and having to rewrite this integration once more. Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms of APIs) and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or whatever) ? -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?
I've just build gshell using maven-project-2.1.0-M1 and it builds and starts correctly. Maybe we sould use that one instead ? or does r72 includes other mandatory fixes ? On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 09:07, Jason Dillon wrote: > maven-project-2.1.0-r72 is on the nexus instance on our zone, but looks > like its not running, not sure why... will take a look in a bit. > > --jason > > > On Feb 4, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > >> Done. I still have a problem with the dependency on >> maven-project-2.1.0-r72 which I can't found anymore. >> I will try to upgrade to 3.0-alpha-1 and see what it gives. >> >> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 04:47, Jason Dillon wrote: >>> >>> Yes, go ahead. >>> >>> --jason >>> >>> >>> On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >>> We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel before this month. Do you want me to roll back to genesis 1.6 ? On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 06:14, Jason Dillon wrote: > > Well, I think its mostly Genesis 2.0 that is causing the lag on > GShell's > release. I'm going to see about fixing that this week, otherwise > rolling > back to the Genesis 1.6 stuff for the alpha-2. > > --jason > > > On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > >> We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel in the near future. >> What are the missing bits to release GShell soon ? >> >> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:25, Jason Dillon >> wrote: >>> >>> The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability. The >>> major >>> changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans to make >>> any >>> other significant changes to the core APIs. What I am doing now is >>> trying >>> to slim down the core dependencies and speed up the boot time... and >>> sorting >>> out some of the many HACK/TODO comments which I've littered the >>> codebase >>> with. >>> >>> As for an alpha-2 release, I imagine that will be on the horizon >>> soon. >>> I >>> don't plan on having all of the little things fixed before that, >>> though >>> I >>> hope to sort out a few of the more significant ones before releasing. >>> If >>> I >>> had to guess I'd say that the codebase should be in a position to be >>> released in 2-4 weeks at present change velocity. >>> >>> --jason >>> >>> >>> On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >>> In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest trunk of GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade locally on my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that yesterday. However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We currently use an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid such issue and having to rewrite this integration once more. Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms of APIs) and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or whatever) ? -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?
maven-project-2.1.0-r72 is on the nexus instance on our zone, but looks like its not running, not sure why... will take a look in a bit. --jason On Feb 4, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Done. I still have a problem with the dependency on maven-project-2.1.0-r72 which I can't found anymore. I will try to upgrade to 3.0-alpha-1 and see what it gives. On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 04:47, Jason Dillon wrote: Yes, go ahead. --jason On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel before this month. Do you want me to roll back to genesis 1.6 ? On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 06:14, Jason Dillon wrote: Well, I think its mostly Genesis 2.0 that is causing the lag on GShell's release. I'm going to see about fixing that this week, otherwise rolling back to the Genesis 1.6 stuff for the alpha-2. --jason On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel in the near future. What are the missing bits to release GShell soon ? On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:25, Jason Dillon > wrote: The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability. The major changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans to make any other significant changes to the core APIs. What I am doing now is trying to slim down the core dependencies and speed up the boot time... and sorting out some of the many HACK/TODO comments which I've littered the codebase with. As for an alpha-2 release, I imagine that will be on the horizon soon. I don't plan on having all of the little things fixed before that, though I hope to sort out a few of the more significant ones before releasing. If I had to guess I'd say that the codebase should be in a position to be released in 2-4 weeks at present change velocity. --jason On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest trunk of GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade locally on my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that yesterday. However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We currently use an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid such issue and having to rewrite this integration once more. Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms of APIs) and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or whatever) ? -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?
Done. I still have a problem with the dependency on maven-project-2.1.0-r72 which I can't found anymore. I will try to upgrade to 3.0-alpha-1 and see what it gives. On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 04:47, Jason Dillon wrote: > Yes, go ahead. > > --jason > > > On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > >> We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel before this month. >> Do you want me to roll back to genesis 1.6 ? >> >> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 06:14, Jason Dillon wrote: >>> >>> Well, I think its mostly Genesis 2.0 that is causing the lag on GShell's >>> release. I'm going to see about fixing that this week, otherwise rolling >>> back to the Genesis 1.6 stuff for the alpha-2. >>> >>> --jason >>> >>> >>> On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >>> We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel in the near future. What are the missing bits to release GShell soon ? On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:25, Jason Dillon wrote: > > The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability. The major > changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans to make any > other significant changes to the core APIs. What I am doing now is > trying > to slim down the core dependencies and speed up the boot time... and > sorting > out some of the many HACK/TODO comments which I've littered the > codebase > with. > > As for an alpha-2 release, I imagine that will be on the horizon soon. > I > don't plan on having all of the little things fixed before that, though > I > hope to sort out a few of the more significant ones before releasing. > If > I > had to guess I'd say that the codebase should be in a position to be > released in 2-4 weeks at present change velocity. > > --jason > > > On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > >> In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest trunk of >> GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade locally on >> my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that yesterday. >> However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We currently use >> an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid such >> issue and having to rewrite this integration once more. >> Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms of APIs) >> and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or whatever) ? >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?
Yes, go ahead. --jason On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel before this month. Do you want me to roll back to genesis 1.6 ? On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 06:14, Jason Dillon wrote: Well, I think its mostly Genesis 2.0 that is causing the lag on GShell's release. I'm going to see about fixing that this week, otherwise rolling back to the Genesis 1.6 stuff for the alpha-2. --jason On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel in the near future. What are the missing bits to release GShell soon ? On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:25, Jason Dillon wrote: The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability. The major changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans to make any other significant changes to the core APIs. What I am doing now is trying to slim down the core dependencies and speed up the boot time... and sorting out some of the many HACK/TODO comments which I've littered the codebase with. As for an alpha-2 release, I imagine that will be on the horizon soon. I don't plan on having all of the little things fixed before that, though I hope to sort out a few of the more significant ones before releasing. If I had to guess I'd say that the codebase should be in a position to be released in 2-4 weeks at present change velocity. --jason On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest trunk of GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade locally on my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that yesterday. However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We currently use an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid such issue and having to rewrite this integration once more. Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms of APIs) and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or whatever) ? -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?
We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel before this month. Do you want me to roll back to genesis 1.6 ? On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 06:14, Jason Dillon wrote: > Well, I think its mostly Genesis 2.0 that is causing the lag on GShell's > release. I'm going to see about fixing that this week, otherwise rolling > back to the Genesis 1.6 stuff for the alpha-2. > > --jason > > > On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > >> We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel in the near future. >> What are the missing bits to release GShell soon ? >> >> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:25, Jason Dillon >> wrote: >>> >>> The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability. The major >>> changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans to make any >>> other significant changes to the core APIs. What I am doing now is >>> trying >>> to slim down the core dependencies and speed up the boot time... and >>> sorting >>> out some of the many HACK/TODO comments which I've littered the codebase >>> with. >>> >>> As for an alpha-2 release, I imagine that will be on the horizon soon. I >>> don't plan on having all of the little things fixed before that, though I >>> hope to sort out a few of the more significant ones before releasing. If >>> I >>> had to guess I'd say that the codebase should be in a position to be >>> released in 2-4 weeks at present change velocity. >>> >>> --jason >>> >>> >>> On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >>> In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest trunk of GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade locally on my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that yesterday. However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We currently use an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid such issue and having to rewrite this integration once more. Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms of APIs) and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or whatever) ? -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?
Well, I think its mostly Genesis 2.0 that is causing the lag on GShell's release. I'm going to see about fixing that this week, otherwise rolling back to the Genesis 1.6 stuff for the alpha-2. --jason On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel in the near future. What are the missing bits to release GShell soon ? On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:25, Jason Dillon wrote: The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability. The major changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans to make any other significant changes to the core APIs. What I am doing now is trying to slim down the core dependencies and speed up the boot time... and sorting out some of the many HACK/TODO comments which I've littered the codebase with. As for an alpha-2 release, I imagine that will be on the horizon soon. I don't plan on having all of the little things fixed before that, though I hope to sort out a few of the more significant ones before releasing. If I had to guess I'd say that the codebase should be in a position to be released in 2-4 weeks at present change velocity. --jason On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest trunk of GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade locally on my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that yesterday. However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We currently use an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid such issue and having to rewrite this integration once more. Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms of APIs) and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or whatever) ? -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?
We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel in the near future. What are the missing bits to release GShell soon ? On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:25, Jason Dillon wrote: > The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability. The major > changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans to make any > other significant changes to the core APIs. What I am doing now is trying > to slim down the core dependencies and speed up the boot time... and sorting > out some of the many HACK/TODO comments which I've littered the codebase > with. > > As for an alpha-2 release, I imagine that will be on the horizon soon. I > don't plan on having all of the little things fixed before that, though I > hope to sort out a few of the more significant ones before releasing. If I > had to guess I'd say that the codebase should be in a position to be > released in 2-4 weeks at present change velocity. > > --jason > > > On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > >> In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest trunk of >> GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade locally on >> my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that yesterday. >> However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We currently use >> an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid such >> issue and having to rewrite this integration once more. >> Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms of APIs) >> and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or whatever) ? >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?
The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability. The major changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans to make any other significant changes to the core APIs. What I am doing now is trying to slim down the core dependencies and speed up the boot time... and sorting out some of the many HACK/TODO comments which I've littered the codebase with. As for an alpha-2 release, I imagine that will be on the horizon soon. I don't plan on having all of the little things fixed before that, though I hope to sort out a few of the more significant ones before releasing. If I had to guess I'd say that the codebase should be in a position to be released in 2-4 weeks at present change velocity. --jason On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest trunk of GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade locally on my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that yesterday. However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We currently use an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid such issue and having to rewrite this integration once more. Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms of APIs) and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or whatever) ? -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
