Re: [VOTE] Release Eclipse Plugin 1.2.0 (RC2)
Continue vote on..http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.2.0-v200611070107-deployable-RC4.zipAdditional copyrights were updated and a fix allowing server ping thread to have modifiable parameters needed to be added.On Nov 6, 2006, at 10:16 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:Ok. Fair enough. Please revote on..http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.2.0-v200611060915-deployable-RC2.zipVote will concluded in 72 hours on Nov 9, 10:00 AM EST.My +1.On Nov 6, 2006, at 9:49 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:On Nov 6, 2006, at 9:29 AM, Sachin Patel wrote: +1: Sachin Patel+0: None-1: None Sachin,Sorry, but you don't have the required number of PMC votes (IIUC correctly you need 3). Plus, it's not clear that all of your source headers have been updated...--kevan -sachin -sachin
Re: [VOTE] Release Eclipse Plugin 1.2.0 (RC2)
On Nov 6, 2006, at 12:15 PM, Sachin Patel wrote: Actually since you have it up, can you go ahead and fix it? Done. --kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release Eclipse Plugin 1.2.0 (RC2)
thx. Issues resolved in...http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.2.0-v200611061236-deployable-RC3.zipPlease continue vote.On Nov 6, 2006, at 12:18 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:+1 once the Bouncy Castle and source header issues Kevan identifiedare resolved.PaulOn 11/6/06, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Nov 6, 2006, at 10:16 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:Ok. Fair enough. Please revote on..http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.2.0-v200611060915-deployable-RC2.zipVote will concluded in 72 hours on Nov 9, 10:00 AM EST.Sachin,G 1.1.1 added Bouncy Castle to the LICENSE and NOTICE files. Since you areincluding geronimo-util, they should be added to the your notice and licensefiles, also. I don't know of a way to automatically aggregate this LICENSEand NOTICE information, but it would sure be nice...Minor, but it looks like NOTICE has a mix of DOS and UNIX line endings.I tried out rat (release audit tool) from http://code.google.com/p/arat/Seems pretty useful. I'll point it at Geronimo 1.2, sometime this week.It identified that the following source files were missing appropriateheaders. Are .classpath, .project, and .option files really meant to beunder svn control? There were 3 obvious source files that are missingheaders...==.classpath(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.common.deployment.model/.classpath)==.project(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.common.deployment.model/.project)==.classpath(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.common.deployment.model.edit/.classpath)==.project(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.common.deployment.model.edit/.project)==.classpath(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.deployment.model/.classpath)==.project(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.deployment.model/.project)==.classpath(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.deployment.model.edit/.classpath)==.project(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.deployment.model.edit/.project)==.project(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.runtime.common/.project)==.project(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.runtime.v1/.project)==.project(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.runtime.v11/.project)==.classpath(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.core/.classpath)==.options(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.core/.options)==.project(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.core/.project)==.classpath(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.ui/.classpath)==.options(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.ui/.options)==.project(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.ui/.project)==.classpath(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.core/.classpath)==.options(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.core/.options)==.project(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.core/.project)==.classpath(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.ui/.classpath)==.options(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.ui/.options)==.project(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.ui/.project)==.classpath(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.core/.classpath)==.options(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.core/.options)==.project(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.core/.project)==.classpath(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/.classpath)==.options(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/.options)==.project(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/.project)==Activator.java(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/src/org/apache/geronimo/st/v11/ui/Activator.java)==Messages.java(/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/src/org/apache/geronimo/st/v11/ui/internal/Messages.java)==SecurityPage.java(/Users/kevan/geroni
Re: [VOTE] Release Eclipse Plugin 1.2.0 (RC2)
+1 once the Bouncy Castle and source header issues Kevan identified are resolved. Paul On 11/6/06, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Nov 6, 2006, at 10:16 AM, Sachin Patel wrote: Ok. Fair enough. Please revote on.. http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.2.0-v200611060915-deployable-RC2.zip Vote will concluded in 72 hours on Nov 9, 10:00 AM EST. Sachin, G 1.1.1 added Bouncy Castle to the LICENSE and NOTICE files. Since you are including geronimo-util, they should be added to the your notice and license files, also. I don't know of a way to automatically aggregate this LICENSE and NOTICE information, but it would sure be nice... Minor, but it looks like NOTICE has a mix of DOS and UNIX line endings. I tried out rat (release audit tool) from http://code.google.com/p/arat/ Seems pretty useful. I'll point it at Geronimo 1.2, sometime this week. It identified that the following source files were missing appropriate headers. Are .classpath, .project, and .option files really meant to be under svn control? There were 3 obvious source files that are missing headers... ==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.common.deployment.model/.classpath) ==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.common.deployment.model/.project) ==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.common.deployment.model.edit/.classpath) ==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.common.deployment.model.edit/.project) ==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.deployment.model/.classpath) ==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.deployment.model/.project) ==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.deployment.model.edit/.classpath) ==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.deployment.model.edit/.project) ==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.runtime.common/.project) ==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.runtime.v1/.project) ==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.runtime.v11/.project) ==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.core/.classpath) ==.options (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.core/.options) ==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.core/.project) ==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.ui/.classpath) ==.options (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.ui/.options) ==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.ui/.project) ==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.core/.classpath) ==.options (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.core/.options) ==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.core/.project) ==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.ui/.classpath) ==.options (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.ui/.options) ==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.ui/.project) ==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.core/.classpath) ==.options (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.core/.options) ==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.core/.project) ==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/.classpath) ==.options (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/.options) ==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/.project) ==Activator.java (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/src/org/apache/geronimo/st/v11/ui/Activator.java) ==Messages.java (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/src/org/apache/geronimo/st/v11/ui/internal/Messages.java) ==SecurityPage.java (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/src/org/apache/geronimo/st/v11/ui/pages/
Re: [VOTE] Release Eclipse Plugin 1.2.0
On 11/6/06, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Are all of the source headers updated? They should all be updated. I'll be looking at them later to verify it. (currently with access to gmail only) Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.jaceklaskowski.pl
Re: [VOTE] Release Eclipse Plugin 1.2.0 (RC2)
Actually since you have it up, can you go ahead and fix it?On Nov 6, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:On Nov 6, 2006, at 10:16 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:Ok. Fair enough. Please revote on..http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.2.0-v200611060915-deployable-RC2.zipVote will concluded in 72 hours on Nov 9, 10:00 AM EST.Sachin,G 1.1.1 added Bouncy Castle to the LICENSE and NOTICE files. Since you are including geronimo-util, they should be added to the your notice and license files, also. I don't know of a way to automatically aggregate this LICENSE and NOTICE information, but it would sure be nice...Minor, but it looks like NOTICE has a mix of DOS and UNIX line endings.I tried out rat (release audit tool) from http://code.google.com/p/arat/ Seems pretty useful. I'll point it at Geronimo 1.2, sometime this week.It identified that the following source files were missing appropriate headers. Are .classpath, .project, and .option files really meant to be under svn control? There were 3 obvious source files that are missing headers...==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.common.deployment.model/.classpath)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.common.deployment.model/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.common.deployment.model.edit/.classpath)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.common.deployment.model.edit/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.deployment.model/.classpath)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.deployment.model/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.deployment.model.edit/.classpath)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.deployment.model.edit/.project)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.runtime.common/.project)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.runtime.v1/.project)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.runtime.v11/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.core/.classpath)==.options (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.core/.options)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.core/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.ui/.classpath)==.options (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.ui/.options)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.ui/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.core/.classpath)==.options (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.core/.options)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.core/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.ui/.classpath)==.options (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.ui/.options)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.ui/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.core/.classpath)==.options (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.core/.options)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.core/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/.classpath)==.options (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/.options)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/.project)==Activator.java (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/src/org/apache/geronimo/st/v11/ui/Activator.java)==Messages.java (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/src/org/apache/geronimo/st/v11/ui/internal/Messages.java)==SecurityPage.java (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/src/org/apache/geronimo/st/v11/ui/pages/SecurityPage.java)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/pl
Re: [VOTE] Release Eclipse Plugin 1.2.0 (RC2)
Yes the .option and .classpath files need to be under source control. The maven eclipse plugin does not correctly generate these for eclipse bundles. The .options file could be autogenerated with a plugin, but have not done this yet.I'll fix the LICENSE and NOTICE files for Bouncy Castle.On Nov 6, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:On Nov 6, 2006, at 10:16 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:Ok. Fair enough. Please revote on..http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.2.0-v200611060915-deployable-RC2.zipVote will concluded in 72 hours on Nov 9, 10:00 AM EST.Sachin,G 1.1.1 added Bouncy Castle to the LICENSE and NOTICE files. Since you are including geronimo-util, they should be added to the your notice and license files, also. I don't know of a way to automatically aggregate this LICENSE and NOTICE information, but it would sure be nice...Minor, but it looks like NOTICE has a mix of DOS and UNIX line endings.I tried out rat (release audit tool) from http://code.google.com/p/arat/ Seems pretty useful. I'll point it at Geronimo 1.2, sometime this week.It identified that the following source files were missing appropriate headers. Are .classpath, .project, and .option files really meant to be under svn control? There were 3 obvious source files that are missing headers...==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.common.deployment.model/.classpath)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.common.deployment.model/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.common.deployment.model.edit/.classpath)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.common.deployment.model.edit/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.deployment.model/.classpath)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.deployment.model/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.deployment.model.edit/.classpath)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.deployment.model.edit/.project)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.runtime.common/.project)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.runtime.v1/.project)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.runtime.v11/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.core/.classpath)==.options (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.core/.options)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.core/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.ui/.classpath)==.options (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.ui/.options)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.ui/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.core/.classpath)==.options (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.core/.options)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.core/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.ui/.classpath)==.options (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.ui/.options)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.ui/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.core/.classpath)==.options (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.core/.options)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.core/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/.classpath)==.options (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/.options)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/.project)==Activator.java (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/src/org/apache/geronimo/st/v11/ui/Activator.java)==Messages.java (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/src/org/apache/geronimo/st/v11/ui/internal/Messages.java)==Sec
Re: [VOTE] Release Eclipse Plugin 1.2.0 (RC2)
On Nov 6, 2006, at 10:16 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:Ok. Fair enough. Please revote on..http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.2.0-v200611060915-deployable-RC2.zipVote will concluded in 72 hours on Nov 9, 10:00 AM EST.Sachin,G 1.1.1 added Bouncy Castle to the LICENSE and NOTICE files. Since you are including geronimo-util, they should be added to the your notice and license files, also. I don't know of a way to automatically aggregate this LICENSE and NOTICE information, but it would sure be nice...Minor, but it looks like NOTICE has a mix of DOS and UNIX line endings.I tried out rat (release audit tool) from http://code.google.com/p/arat/ Seems pretty useful. I'll point it at Geronimo 1.2, sometime this week.It identified that the following source files were missing appropriate headers. Are .classpath, .project, and .option files really meant to be under svn control? There were 3 obvious source files that are missing headers...==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.common.deployment.model/.classpath)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.common.deployment.model/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.common.deployment.model.edit/.classpath)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.common.deployment.model.edit/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.deployment.model/.classpath)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.deployment.model/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.deployment.model.edit/.classpath)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.deployment.model.edit/.project)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.runtime.common/.project)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.runtime.v1/.project)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.runtime.v11/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.core/.classpath)==.options (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.core/.options)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.core/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.ui/.classpath)==.options (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.ui/.options)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.ui/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.core/.classpath)==.options (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.core/.options)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.core/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.ui/.classpath)==.options (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.ui/.options)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v1.ui/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.core/.classpath)==.options (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.core/.options)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.core/.project)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/.classpath)==.options (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/.options)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/.project)==Activator.java (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/src/org/apache/geronimo/st/v11/ui/Activator.java)==Messages.java (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/src/org/apache/geronimo/st/v11/ui/internal/Messages.java)==SecurityPage.java (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui/src/org/apache/geronimo/st/v11/ui/pages/SecurityPage.java)==.classpath (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.v11.deployment.model/.classpath)==.project (/Users/kevan/geronimo/devtools/eclips
Re: [VOTE] Release Eclipse Plugin 1.2.0
Sachin,My apologies on not voting. I was confused about the source headers as well and thought a new vote would be forthcoming. What is the current status on the original vote. Are you re-spinning and starting a new vote? If so I'll commit to having my response within the 72-hours. Apologies for any confusion.On Oct 31, 2006, at 11:32 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:The Eclipse Plugin v1.2.0 is ready for release. The plugin has been updated and re-written to move away from the WTP Generic Server Framework, and no longer relies on the Generic Server implementation in WTP. Other bug fixes and feature updates are indicated in the release notes.http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.2.0-v20061037-deployable.ziphttp://people.apache.org/~sppatel/PLUGIN_RELEASE-NOTES-1.2.0.txtThe driver requires the 1.5.1 release of WTP and is available for download here...http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R1.5/R-1.5.1-200609230508/Note: Unfortunately, we will no longer be able to maintain equal versions between the server and the plugin, as the plugins where incremented from either 1.0.0 or 1.0.1 to 1.1.0 due to the fact that the changes where not "minor". The feature version was then bumped from 1.1.0 to 1.2.0 to indicate the "non-maintenance" release and thus no longer matches the server version.[+1] Release[0] No opinion[-1] Do not releaseI'll plan on concluding the vote on Monday, November 6th at 9 AM EDT-sachin Matt Hogstrom[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Eclipse Plugin 1.2.0
Are all of the source headers updated? --kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release Eclipse Plugin 1.2.0
+1 after fixing copyrightsOn Oct 31, 2006, at 11:32 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:The Eclipse Plugin v1.2.0 is ready for release. The plugin has been updated and re-written to move away from the WTP Generic Server Framework, and no longer relies on the Generic Server implementation in WTP. Other bug fixes and feature updates are indicated in the release notes.http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.2.0-v20061037-deployable.ziphttp://people.apache.org/~sppatel/PLUGIN_RELEASE-NOTES-1.2.0.txtThe driver requires the 1.5.1 release of WTP and is available for download here...http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R1.5/R-1.5.1-200609230508/Note: Unfortunately, we will no longer be able to maintain equal versions between the server and the plugin, as the plugins where incremented from either 1.0.0 or 1.0.1 to 1.1.0 due to the fact that the changes where not "minor". The feature version was then bumped from 1.1.0 to 1.2.0 to indicate the "non-maintenance" release and thus no longer matches the server version.[+1] Release[0] No opinion[-1] Do not releaseI'll plan on concluding the vote on Monday, November 6th at 9 AM EDT-sachin -sachin
Re: [VOTE] Release Eclipse Plugin 1.2.0
I have used the Copyright plugin before... its mostly usable... best results if you override the defaults for each type with the exact text you want. Wish it was easier to enable the profile for each module, but you gotta do that by hand. --jason On Nov 3, 2006, at 1:31 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: On 11/3/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: IDEA's Copyright plugin is handy to process files with or with out a copyright notice. Ah I see - http://www.intellij.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/ CopyrightPlugin. I've got the open source license of IDEA recently so it's time to give it a shot. Thanks! I hope I won't get burned out very quickly trying all these tools and end up with nothing ;-) Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.jaceklaskowski.pl
Re: [VOTE] Release Eclipse Plugin 1.2.0
Hi Sachin, I'm stuck with a deployment descriptor editor issue. I think you mentioned it's been reported already. Once I got it failing I am no longer able to edit geronimo-web.xml for instance. I deleted the file, recreated it, did some other stuffs but still I can not get that file opened again with the editor. Text based editors work fine. Any pointers? Cheers! Hernan Sachin Patel wrote: The Eclipse Plugin v1.2.0 is ready for release. The plugin has been updated and re-written to move away from the WTP Generic Server Framework, and no longer relies on the Generic Server implementation in WTP. Other bug fixes and feature updates are indicated in the release notes. http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.2.0-v20061037-deployable.zip http://people.apache.org/~sppatel/PLUGIN_RELEASE-NOTES-1.2.0.txt The driver requires the 1.5.1 release of WTP and is available for download here... http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R1.5/R-1.5.1-200609230508/ Note: Unfortunately, we will no longer be able to maintain equal versions between the server and the plugin, as the plugins where incremented from either 1.0.0 or 1.0.1 to 1.1.0 due to the fact that the changes where not "minor". The feature version was then bumped from 1.1.0 to 1.2.0 to indicate the "non-maintenance" release and thus no longer matches the server version. [+1] Release [0] No opinion [-1] Do not release I'll plan on concluding the vote on Monday, November 6th at 9 AM EDT -sachin
Re: [VOTE] Release Eclipse Plugin 1.2.0
On 11/3/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: IDEA's Copyright plugin is handy to process files with or with out a copyright notice. Ah I see - http://www.intellij.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/CopyrightPlugin. I've got the open source license of IDEA recently so it's time to give it a shot. Thanks! I hope I won't get burned out very quickly trying all these tools and end up with nothing ;-) Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.jaceklaskowski.pl
Re: [VOTE] Release Eclipse Plugin 1.2.0
IDEA's Copyright plugin is handy to process files with or with out a copyright notice. There also used to be some other more general tool to manage headers... but I forget what it was called. --jason On Nov 3, 2006, at 1:01 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: On 11/3/06, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/3/06, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes I assume it needs to change. Jacek can you run your perl script against > trunk of devtools as well? Sure. Doing now... Whoops - 350 files to process and only 30 met the script's criteria. The rest don't have license at all (!) It seems I need another script. Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.jaceklaskowski.pl
Re: [VOTE] Release Eclipse Plugin 1.2.0
On 11/3/06, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/3/06, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes I assume it needs to change. Jacek can you run your perl script against > trunk of devtools as well? Sure. Doing now... Whoops - 350 files to process and only 30 met the script's criteria. The rest don't have license at all (!) It seems I need another script. Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.jaceklaskowski.pl
Re: [VOTE] Release Eclipse Plugin 1.2.0
On 11/3/06, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes I assume it needs to change. Jacek can you run your perl script against trunk of devtools as well? Sure. Doing now... Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.jaceklaskowski.pl
Re: [VOTE] Release Eclipse Plugin 1.2.0
Yes I assume it needs to change. Jacek can you run your perl script against trunk of devtools as well?On Nov 3, 2006, at 1:12 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:Kevan brought http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html to ourattention the other day in context of geronimo 1.2. Does the eclipseplugin release need to be updated as well?PaulOn 10/31/06, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The Eclipse Plugin v1.2.0 is ready for release. The plugin has been updatedand re-written to move away from the WTP Generic Server Framework, and nolonger relies on the Generic Server implementation in WTP. Other bug fixesand feature updates are indicated in the release notes.http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.2.0-v20061037-deployable.ziphttp://people.apache.org/~sppatel/PLUGIN_RELEASE-NOTES-1.2.0.txtThe driver requires the 1.5.1 release of WTP and is available for downloadhere...http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R1.5/R-1.5.1-200609230508/Note: Unfortunately, we will no longer be able to maintain equal versionsbetween the server and the plugin, as the plugins where incremented fromeither 1.0.0 or 1.0.1 to 1.1.0 due to the fact that the changes where not"minor". The feature version was then bumped from 1.1.0 to 1.2.0 toindicate the "non-maintenance" release and thus no longer matches the serverversion.[+1] Release[0] No opinion[-1] Do not releaseI'll plan on concluding the vote on Monday, November 6th at 9 AM EDT-sachin -sachin
Re: [VOTE] Release Eclipse Plugin 1.2.0
Kevan brought http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html to our attention the other day in context of geronimo 1.2. Does the eclipse plugin release need to be updated as well? Paul On 10/31/06, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The Eclipse Plugin v1.2.0 is ready for release. The plugin has been updated and re-written to move away from the WTP Generic Server Framework, and no longer relies on the Generic Server implementation in WTP. Other bug fixes and feature updates are indicated in the release notes. http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.2.0-v20061037-deployable.zip http://people.apache.org/~sppatel/PLUGIN_RELEASE-NOTES-1.2.0.txt The driver requires the 1.5.1 release of WTP and is available for download here... http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R1.5/R-1.5.1-200609230508/ Note: Unfortunately, we will no longer be able to maintain equal versions between the server and the plugin, as the plugins where incremented from either 1.0.0 or 1.0.1 to 1.1.0 due to the fact that the changes where not "minor". The feature version was then bumped from 1.1.0 to 1.2.0 to indicate the "non-maintenance" release and thus no longer matches the server version. [+1] Release [0] No opinion [-1] Do not release I'll plan on concluding the vote on Monday, November 6th at 9 AM EDT -sachin
