Re: [Vote]: Re-version eclipse plugin from 0.5.0 to 1.0.0
+1 to 1.0.0 thanks david jencks On Jan 13, 2006, at 4:43 AM, Sachin Patel wrote: Its been brought to my attention that to better align versions with server releases, the eclipse-plugin should be re-versioned for its initial release to be 1.0.0, not 0.5.0. The idea here being that any major releases of the server, will have a matching corresponding eclipse feature version. Minor versions may still need to be independently versioned. Having a plugin that packages some of the Geronimo 1.0.0 runtime jars into a plugin that is versioned 0.5.0 is confusing to many users. We have a small time frame to decide if we do want to change the version immediately, as Eclipse-WTP is about to release their first maintenance release 1.0.1, and we agree upon this, I will need to inform them of this change so they can react ASAP. Our next opportunity to do this will may not be for another 1-2 months. [ ] Re-version the initial release to 1.0.0 [ ] Leave it at 0.5.0 [ ] Doesn't matter - sachin
Re: [Vote]: Re-version eclipse plugin from 0.5.0 to 1.0.0
[X] Re-version the initial release to 1.0.0 [ ] Leave it at 0.5.0 [ ] Doesn't matter Regards, Alan
Re: [Vote]: Re-version eclipse plugin from 0.5.0 to 1.0.0
+1 I agree with keeping the versions in sync will reduce confusion. Sachin Patel wrote: Its been brought to my attention that to better align versions with server releases, the eclipse-plugin should be re-versioned for its initial release to be 1.0.0, not 0.5.0. The idea here being that any major releases of the server, will have a matching corresponding eclipse feature version. Minor versions may still need to be independently versioned. Having a plugin that packages some of the Geronimo 1.0.0 runtime jars into a plugin that is versioned 0.5.0 is confusing to many users. We have a small time frame to decide if we do want to change the version immediately, as Eclipse-WTP is about to release their first maintenance release 1.0.1, and we agree upon this, I will need to inform them of this change so they can react ASAP. Our next opportunity to do this will may not be for another 1-2 months. [ ] Re-version the initial release to 1.0.0 [ ] Leave it at 0.5.0 [ ] Doesn't matter - sachin
Re: [Vote]: Re-version eclipse plugin from 0.5.0 to 1.0.0
+1 to what ever Sachin wants to call it. -dain On Jan 13, 2006, at 4:43 AM, Sachin Patel wrote: Its been brought to my attention that to better align versions with server releases, the eclipse-plugin should be re-versioned for its initial release to be 1.0.0, not 0.5.0. The idea here being that any major releases of the server, will have a matching corresponding eclipse feature version. Minor versions may still need to be independently versioned. Having a plugin that packages some of the Geronimo 1.0.0 runtime jars into a plugin that is versioned 0.5.0 is confusing to many users. We have a small time frame to decide if we do want to change the version immediately, as Eclipse-WTP is about to release their first maintenance release 1.0.1, and we agree upon this, I will need to inform them of this change so they can react ASAP. Our next opportunity to do this will may not be for another 1-2 months. [ ] Re-version the initial release to 1.0.0 [ ] Leave it at 0.5.0 [ ] Doesn't matter - sachin
Re: [Vote]: Re-version eclipse plugin from 0.5.0 to 1.0.0
2006/1/13, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [X] Re-version the initial release to 1.0.0 > [ ] Leave it at 0.5.0 > [ ] Doesn't matter Jacek
Re: [Vote]: Re-version eclipse plugin from 0.5.0 to 1.0.0
[X] Re-version the initial release to 1.0.0 Alignment of major releases will avoid confusion and the need for a compatibility matrix. Also, hopefully will eliminate an onslaught of questions as to which levels are compatible.. -Dave- Sachin Patel wrote: Its been brought to my attention that to better align versions with server releases, the eclipse-plugin should be re-versioned for its initial release to be 1.0.0, not 0.5.0. The idea here being that any major releases of the server, will have a matching corresponding eclipse feature version. Minor versions may still need to be independently versioned. Having a plugin that packages some of the Geronimo 1.0.0 runtime jars into a plugin that is versioned 0.5.0 is confusing to many users. We have a small time frame to decide if we do want to change the version immediately, as Eclipse-WTP is about to release their first maintenance release 1.0.1, and we agree upon this, I will need to inform them of this change so they can react ASAP. Our next opportunity to do this will may not be for another 1-2 months. [ ] Re-version the initial release to 1.0.0 [ ] Leave it at 0.5.0 [ ] Doesn't matter - sachin
Re: [Vote]: Re-version eclipse plugin from 0.5.0 to 1.0.0
As a frequent user of enterprise application development tooling I can attest to the fact that discrepancies between the version numbers in the tool/plugin and the application server it is compatible with or embeds can lead to confusion and lost productivity. So I would definitely vote in favor of keeping the version numbers aligned as closely as possible. [x] Re-version the initial release to 1.0.0 Best wishes, Paul On 1/13/06, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Its been brought to my attention that to better align versions withserver releases, the eclipse-plugin should be re-versioned for itsinitial release to be 1.0.0, not 0.5.0. The idea here being that anymajor releases of the server, will have a matching corresponding eclipse feature version. Minor versions may still need to beindependently versioned. Having a plugin that packages some of theGeronimo 1.0.0 runtime jars into a plugin that is versioned 0.5.0 isconfusing to many users. We have a small time frame to decide if we do want to change theversion immediately, as Eclipse-WTP is about to release their firstmaintenance release 1.0.1, and we agree upon this, I will need toinform them of this change so they can react ASAP. Our next opportunity to do this will may not be for another 1-2 months.[ ] Re-version the initial release to 1.0.0[ ] Leave it at 0.5.0[ ] Doesn't matter- sachin
