Re: Apache 2.0.55 w/ SSL

[Paul Risenhoover]

Thanks.


-

 Original Message -
From: Joost de Heer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache 2.0.55 w/ SSL
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:23:14 +0200

 
 Paul Risenhoover wrote:
  Where can I pick up a Win32 build of Apache 2.0.55 w/ SSL?
 
 http://hunter.campbus.com/

Apache 2.0.55 w/ SSL

[Paul Risenhoover]

Where can I pick up a Win32 build of Apache 2.0.55 w/ SSL?

2.1.8-beta (Windows)

[Paul Risenhoover]

Hi All,

I am new to this list, but after scouring the archives it appears this 
is the exact place I need to be for my request (and I can help you all 
out as well).


It appears that a few days ago you started testing 2.1.8 and voted to 
release.  I would like to test a Windows + openSSL build of the 2.1.8 
beta.  I have a specific need for Large File Support -- some of the 
files I am transferring are 3-4+ GB and growing steadily.


Unfortunately, I have been unable to cobble together a Windows build 
from the sources currently available.  If somebody can provide me with a 
Windows build I can begin testing immediately.


Thanks for your time,
Paul

Re: 2.1.8-beta (Windows)

[Paul Risenhoover]

I guess the question is, How badly does it misbehave?  Is it 
completely unusable or are their distinct modules (which I could 
possibly disable) that are bad.


I *really* need Large File Support -- on Windows.

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:


Paul Risenhoover wrote:



Unfortunately, I have been unable to cobble together a Windows build 
from the sources currently available.  If somebody can provide me 
with a Windows build I can begin testing immediately.



That's not unsurprising, I offered the RM a correction to the
2.1.7 Announcement (you will note it states that some older Windows
versions won't work) should state that this beta version is known
to misbehave on Windows.  I'm sorry this was just missed in the flury
of activity on 2.1.7 that usually preceeds a release, and hopefully
the RM will note this as 2.1.8 is prepared.

Please look forward to a 2.1.9-beta in the very near future which
should address the known problems.  If not, feel free to describe
the problem you are having next time you post, so that we can improve
our docs as we help you make progress.

Bill