Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10
Den Thursday 16 October 2008 17:20:08 skrev Sander Temme: On Oct 16, 2008, at 6:07 AM, Oden Eriksson wrote: For some unknown reason I suddenly get some failed tests on Mandriva Cooker, it worked fine 2008-10-10 (!?) I saw that on my Solaris x86 VM, but it happened across the board against 2.2.9 and the 2.2.10 rc. And, I didn't see it on either Ubuntu or my Mac so I'm blaming staleness in the Perl setup on that Solaris install. OK. Thanks. That might be the problem. -- Regards // Oden Eriksson
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10
Den Friday 10 October 2008 16:36:02 skrev Jim Jagielski: For some unknown reason I suddenly get some failed tests on Mandriva Cooker, it worked fine 2008-10-10 (!?) t/modules/digestNOK 6/13# Failed test 6 in t/modules/digest.t at line 84 t/modules/digestNOK 7/13# Failed test 7 in t/modules/digest.t at line 96 t/modules/digestNOK 8/13# Failed test 8 in t/modules/digest.t at line 106 t/modules/digestNOK 11/13# Failed test 11 in t/modules/digest.t at line 141 t/modules/digestNOK 12/13# Failed test 12 in t/modules/digest.t at line 152 t/modules/digestFAILED tests 6-8, 11-12 -- Regards // Oden Eriksson
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10
On Oct 16, 2008, at 6:07 AM, Oden Eriksson wrote: For some unknown reason I suddenly get some failed tests on Mandriva Cooker, it worked fine 2008-10-10 (!?) I saw that on my Solaris x86 VM, but it happened across the board against 2.2.9 and the 2.2.10 rc. And, I didn't see it on either Ubuntu or my Mac so I'm blaming staleness in the Perl setup on that Solaris install. S. -- Sander Temme [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10
William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2008-10-14 23:06 Tom Donovan wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: I noticed a few little things building 2.2.10 with VC9 on Windows: * the windows source .zip is missing most of apr-iconv - only the .mak and .dep files are present. With previous versions we included all the files for iconv (from apr-iconv-1.2.1-win32-src-r2.zip) Bugger - thanks for catching that! As this still lives in /dev/dist/, I've just replaced it with a corrected httpd-2.2.10-win32-src.zip There are another 8 projects that currently cannot be built with x64 configuration on Windows. Here is some error message: - libapriconv_ccs_modules: link to ..\Debug\libapriconv-1.lib error (should to ..\x64\Debug\libapriconv-1.lib - apr_dbd_mysql: mysql.h: No such file or directory - apr_dbd_oracle: oci.h: No such file or directory - apr_dbd_pgsql: libpq-fe.h: No such file or directory - apr_dbd_sqlite2 sqlite.h: No such file or directory - apr_dbd_sqlite3: sqlite3.h: No such file or directory (And, still, we can not yet build x64 httpd.exe ;) Bing
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10
Tom Donovan wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: .msi*'s to direct at /dist/httpd/binaries/win32/, -symbols.zip*'s to direct at archive.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/symbols/, and the usual httpd-2.2.10-win32-src.zip* files are all in the usual /dev/dist/ location. * Makefile.win should probably include the ODBC driver by default on windows, to be consistent with what APR does: @for %d in (odbc $(DBD_LIST)) do \ To follow up ... although it wasn't default, there was no reason not to ship apr_dbd_odbc-1.dll, so these .msi's were refreshed before I synced to /dist/.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: .msi*'s to direct at /dist/httpd/binaries/win32/, -symbols.zip*'s to direct at archive.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/symbols/, and the usual httpd-2.2.10-win32-src.zip* files are all in the usual /dev/dist/ location. I noticed a few little things building 2.2.10 with VC9 on Windows: * the windows source .zip is missing most of apr-iconv - only the .mak and .dep files are present. With previous versions we included all the files for iconv (from apr-iconv-1.2.1-win32-src-r2.zip) * Makefile.win should probably include the ODBC driver by default on windows, to be consistent with what APR does: @for %d in (odbc $(DBD_LIST)) do \ +1 otherwise. -tom-
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10
Tom Donovan wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: .msi*'s to direct at /dist/httpd/binaries/win32/, -symbols.zip*'s to direct at archive.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/symbols/, and the usual httpd-2.2.10-win32-src.zip* files are all in the usual /dev/dist/ location. I noticed a few little things building 2.2.10 with VC9 on Windows: * the windows source .zip is missing most of apr-iconv - only the .mak and .dep files are present. With previous versions we included all the files for iconv (from apr-iconv-1.2.1-win32-src-r2.zip) Bugger - thanks for catching that! As this still lives in /dev/dist/, I've just replaced it with a corrected httpd-2.2.10-win32-src.zip * Makefile.win should probably include the ODBC driver by default on windows, to be consistent with what APR does: @for %d in (odbc $(DBD_LIST)) do \ Agreed, feel free to commit. Not something that would change for 2.2.10, as the release was already tagged, but something that should be changed for 2.2.11 (+1 to backport also, fwiw). +1 otherwise. -tom-
[RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10
We are plenty of binding (and non-binding) +1 votes... I will start the process of doing the actual release. I will move the tarballs over in the next few hours. I've also gone ahead and updated the site docs (but not updated the site)
Re: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10
The tarballs have been moved... will await for mirrors to sync up On Oct 14, 2008, at 1:56 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: We are plenty of binding (and non-binding) +1 votes... I will start the process of doing the actual release. I will move the tarballs over in the next few hours. I've also gone ahead and updated the site docs (but not updated the site)
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10
+1 Greg On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Based on the positive feedback on the test tarballs, I'd like to start a vote on releasing 2.2.10. I'm looking to release on Tuesday, since I'll be traveling Monday, so I'll close the vote on Tues AM.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10
On 10/10/2008 04:36 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Based on the positive feedback on the test tarballs, I'd like to start a vote on releasing 2.2.10. I'm looking to release on Tuesday, since I'll be traveling Monday, so I'll close the vote on Tues AM. +1 for release. Tested on Solaris 8 32 Bit build with gcc. Solaris 9 32 Bit build with gcc. Solaris 10 32 Bit build with gcc. SuSE Linux 10.2 32 Bit SuSE Linux 10.1 64 Bit RHEL 4 32 Bit RHEL 5 32 Bit RHEL 4 64 Bit RHEL 5 64 Bit Regards Rüdiger
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10
On Oct 11, 2008, at 6:12 PM, Sander Temme wrote: SunOS solaris10 5.10 Generic_137112-02 i86pc i386 i86pc (in addition, tested SSL functionality with the nCipher plugin and OpenSSL 0.9.8i from Sunfreeware, with positive result) Oh yeah, I forgot. Used gcc by virtue of not bothering to specify CC=/ usr/bin/cc. S. -- Sander Temme [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10
Jim Jagielski wrote: Based on the positive feedback on the test tarballs, I'd like to start a vote on releasing 2.2.10. I'm looking to release on Tuesday, since I'll be traveling Monday, so I'll close the vote on Tues AM. -1 Doesn't build on Windows. apr-util included doesn't include the backport of r667437, so it break compiles with nasty warnings .\dbd\apr_dbd.c(101) : warning C4013: 'apu_dso_init' undefined .\dbd\apr_dbd.c(148) : warning C4013: 'apu_dso_mutex_lock' undefined .\dbd\apr_dbd.c(155) : warning C4013: 'apu_dso_mutex_unlock' undefined So, none of the tools using static apr-util (htdbm, htcacheclean, etc) cannot be build cause of missing aprutil-1.lib Regards -- ^(TM)
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10
Mladen Turk wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: Based on the positive feedback on the test tarballs, I'd like to start a vote on releasing 2.2.10. I'm looking to release on Tuesday, since I'll be traveling Monday, so I'll close the vote on Tues AM. -1 Doesn't build on Windows. apr-util included doesn't include the backport of r667437, so it break compiles with nasty warnings Oops. Wrong archive file (used 2.2.9 instead 2.2.10) Builds fine, so +1 Windows 32 Windows 64 Sorry for the noise :) Regards -- ^(TM)
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10
Mladen Turk wrote: -1 Doesn't build on Windows. apr-util included doesn't include the backport of r667437, so it break compiles with nasty warnings .\dbd\apr_dbd.c(101) : warning C4013: 'apu_dso_init' undefined .\dbd\apr_dbd.c(148) : warning C4013: 'apu_dso_mutex_lock' undefined .\dbd\apr_dbd.c(155) : warning C4013: 'apu_dso_mutex_unlock' undefined So, none of the tools using static apr-util (htdbm, htcacheclean, etc) cannot be build cause of missing aprutil-1.lib I'm sort of baffled. I'll have to look at my build logs (which were piped away to a handy location, not on this box) but I didn't see any noise from the compiler that I remember. I trust you are building apr-util as part of httpd and not stand-alone (there's a tarball for that purpose).
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10
Mladen Turk wrote: Oops. Wrong archive file (used 2.2.9 instead 2.2.10) Builds fine, so +1 Windows 32 Windows 64 Same here; +1 - .zip and .msi including 0.9.8i will be along shortly. Sorry for the noise :) And I need to read entire threads :)
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Oops. Wrong archive file (used 2.2.9 instead 2.2.10) Builds fine, so +1 Windows 32 Windows 64 Same here; +1 - .zip and .msi including 0.9.8i will be along shortly. .msi*'s to direct at /dist/httpd/binaries/win32/, -symbols.zip*'s to direct at archive.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/symbols/, and the usual httpd-2.2.10-win32-src.zip* files are all in the usual /dev/dist/ location.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10
Paul Querna wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: Based on the positive feedback on the test tarballs, I'd like to start a vote on releasing 2.2.10. I'm looking to release on Tuesday, since I'll be traveling Monday, so I'll close the vote on Tues AM. I've upgraded eos.apache.org and aurora.apache.org to 2.2.10, which are both solaris 10 on sparc, aka the servers hosting www.apache.org and most TLP sites. Seems good so far. Lemme know if anyone sees anything odd. Well, I forgot to mention, I *thought* I installed the Worker MPM. But due to me failing at editing config.nice, I actually built the Event MPM. Which promptly stopped responding to requests on aurora.apache.org within a two hours. I've since fixed the build and switched to the worker mpm on both aurora and eos. (and if anyone could figure out the event mpm problem on solaris, that'd be sweet, but its not a regression afaik).
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10
On 10/11/2008 09:52 AM, Paul Querna wrote: Paul Querna wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: Based on the positive feedback on the test tarballs, I'd like to start a vote on releasing 2.2.10. I'm looking to release on Tuesday, since I'll be traveling Monday, so I'll close the vote on Tues AM. I've upgraded eos.apache.org and aurora.apache.org to 2.2.10, which are both solaris 10 on sparc, aka the servers hosting www.apache.org and most TLP sites. Seems good so far. Lemme know if anyone sees anything odd. Well, I forgot to mention, I *thought* I installed the Worker MPM. But due to me failing at editing config.nice, I actually built the Event MPM. Which promptly stopped responding to requests on aurora.apache.org within a two hours. I've since fixed the build and switched to the worker mpm on both aurora and eos. (and if anyone could figure out the event mpm problem on solaris, that'd be sweet, but its not a regression afaik). I guess it would be helpful to have some more infos on the stopped responding to requests on aurora.apache.org within a two hours :-). A backtrace would be a nice start. Regards Rüdiger
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10
On Oct 10, 2008, at 7:36 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Based on the positive feedback on the test tarballs, I'd like to start a vote on releasing 2.2.10. I'm looking to release on Tuesday, since I'll be traveling Monday, so I'll close the vote on Tues AM. Tested on the following with the perl-framework: Darwin legadema.sandla.org 9.5.0 Darwin Kernel Version 9.5.0: Wed Sep 3 11:29:43 PDT 2008; root:xnu-1228.7.58~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 Linux surtur 2.6.24-19-generic #1 SMP Wed Aug 20 17:53:40 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux (Ubuntu Hardy) SunOS solaris10 5.10 Generic_137112-02 i86pc i386 i86pc (in addition, tested SSL functionality with the nCipher plugin and OpenSSL 0.9.8i from Sunfreeware, with positive result) No regressions. +1 for release S. -- Sander Temme [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
[VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10
Based on the positive feedback on the test tarballs, I'd like to start a vote on releasing 2.2.10. I'm looking to release on Tuesday, since I'll be traveling Monday, so I'll close the vote on Tues AM.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10
On Fri, October 10, 2008 3:36 pm, Jim Jagielski wrote: Based on the positive feedback on the test tarballs, I'd like to start a vote on releasing 2.2.10. I'm looking to release on Tuesday, since I'll be traveling Monday, so I'll close the vote on Tues AM. After all my positive testing, thus far, I'm in the +1 camp. Cheers, Tony
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10
Running stable in a production environment here. Haven't notice any problems +1 Jorge
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Based on the positive feedback on the test tarballs, I'd like to start a vote on releasing 2.2.10. I'm looking to release on Tuesday, since I'll be traveling Monday, so I'll close the vote on Tues AM. +1 for release -- Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10
Jim Jagielski wrote: Based on the positive feedback on the test tarballs, I'd like to start a vote on releasing 2.2.10. I'm looking to release on Tuesday, since I'll be traveling Monday, so I'll close the vote on Tues AM. I've upgraded eos.apache.org and aurora.apache.org to 2.2.10, which are both solaris 10 on sparc, aka the servers hosting www.apache.org and most TLP sites. Seems good so far. Lemme know if anyone sees anything odd. -Paul
