Hi Sander.
is it possible to post patches from the most recent CVS version.
that would make it much easier for people to apply them
Thanks
..Ian
On Sun, 2001-08-26 at 08:29, Sander Striker wrote:
> [this time including the attachment...]
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > It seems that the memory management requirements for
> > buckets is that they have to be able to control their
> > own lifetime. In other words, they need to be allocated
> > and freed on an individual basis.
> > It seems that their lifetime is bound by the lifetime
> > of the connection.
> >
> > The above let me believe that buckets need a free
> > function to complement apr_palloc. Hence the
> > attached patch that introduces apr_pfree *). I know
> > this patch introduces some extra overhead, although
> > not much, which could be unacceptable. OTOH would
> > this make it possible to use one memory management
> > scheme throughout apache...
> >
> > Maybe something to consider, maybe not. I don't
> > even know if these are the criteria or not ;)
> >
> >
> > Sander
> >
> > *) patch is against the recently posted possible
> >replacement code for pools.
>
--
Ian Holsman
Performance Measurement & Analysis
CNET Networks-415 364-8608
