[RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
Vote passes! Moving tarballs to dist and allowing for mirrors to sync. Will announce tomorrow! On May 20, 2011, at 5:48 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > The candidate tarballs for 2.3.12 are now available at: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > ONLY the -deps tarballs have been changed/updated to include > apr-1.4.5/apu-1.3.12; Since these are provided as a service, > I see no reason to require a whole new vote, nor to invalidate > any votes on 2.3.12-beta proper. However, please feel free to > retest and revote should you feel so inclined ;) > > (as of now, we have 4 "binding" +1s: jeff, rainer, stefan, jim) > > Cheers! >
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
The candidate tarballs for 2.3.12 are now available at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ ONLY the -deps tarballs have been changed/updated to include apr-1.4.5/apu-1.3.12; Since these are provided as a service, I see no reason to require a whole new vote, nor to invalidate any votes on 2.3.12-beta proper. However, please feel free to retest and revote should you feel so inclined ;) (as of now, we have 4 "binding" +1s: jeff, rainer, stefan, jim) Cheers!
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
On 5/19/2011 8:45 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I will reroll the dependency tarball, once the apr/apu > vote passes... Once that happens I'll allow for 24 hrs > for comments/issues on that tarball and then release/announce. +1 Once apr/apu votes are in process, I will roll 2.2.19. Allowing 24 hours for the 2.2.19 vote concurrent to the apr/apu votes, I plan to wait for the mirrors to catch up, then announce.
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
I will reroll the dependency tarball, once the apr/apu vote passes... Once that happens I'll allow for 24 hrs for comments/issues on that tarball and then release/announce.
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
On May 14, 2011, at 6:54 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > > We should /not/ be halting a *beta* when one platform, one feature, or > any other single documented issue has an issue. Versions and releases > are cheap, release it and get on with the next beta :) > No one has suggested that...
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > The candidate tarballs for 2.3.12 are now available at: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm opening up a vote to release these as 2.3.12-beta, with > a hope to push on for a quick GA after maybe another beta > release in the near future. +1 for release as beta FWIW, beta + beta-deps works for me on MinGW with existing constraints
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
On Sat, 14 May 2011, Rainer Jung wrote: On 14.05.2011 12:54, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 5/13/2011 9:31 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: ... and the apu issue affects users who configure auth_ldap, right? Correct. That's why I voted +1. I also agree that it doesn't affect the 2.3.12 release. If we had some newer apu, we could have rerolled the deps tarball. But let's just hope that 2.3.13 will be there, soon.
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
On 14.05.2011 12:54, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 5/13/2011 9:31 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: ... and the apu issue affects users who configure auth_ldap, right? Correct. That's why I voted +1. Rainer
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
On 14 May 2011, at 12:54 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: We should /not/ be halting a *beta* when one platform, one feature, or any other single documented issue has an issue. Versions and releases are cheap, release it and get on with the next beta :) The windows issue is a non-issue (cruft in the bin/ directory, oh well) and the apu issue affects users who configure auth_ldap, right? Betas are not meant to be perfect, and they are no fun if there are no bugs. +1. Regards, Graham --
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
On 5/13/2011 9:31 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> On May 13, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 11 May 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> The candidate tarballs for 2.3.12 are now available at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm opening up a vote to release these as 2.3.12-beta, with a hope to push on for a quick GA after maybe another beta release in the near future. >>> >>> +1 for httpd 2.3.12-beta (with external apr/apu) >>> >>> As noted by Rainer, the apu in httpd-2.3.12-beta-deps is broken, though. Is >>> this ok or should the deps tarball be rerolled? >>> >> >> Reroll with what is the question? An older apu? We can't roll with >> HEAD. >> >> Maybe we could, with our APR hats on, push out a quick APU 1.3.12... > > We should definitely have a new apr (Windows issue) and apu (LDAP > issue) before long, but what about just providing patches for this > beta? I doubt that anyone consuming the beta would have a problem > with that. We should /not/ be halting a *beta* when one platform, one feature, or any other single documented issue has an issue. Versions and releases are cheap, release it and get on with the next beta :) The windows issue is a non-issue (cruft in the bin/ directory, oh well) and the apu issue affects users who configure auth_ldap, right? Betas are not meant to be perfect, and they are no fun if there are no bugs.
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On May 13, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > >> On Wed, 11 May 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >>> The candidate tarballs for 2.3.12 are now available at: >>> >>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ >>> >>> I'm opening up a vote to release these as 2.3.12-beta, with >>> a hope to push on for a quick GA after maybe another beta >>> release in the near future. >> >> +1 for httpd 2.3.12-beta (with external apr/apu) >> >> As noted by Rainer, the apu in httpd-2.3.12-beta-deps is broken, though. Is >> this ok or should the deps tarball be rerolled? >> > > Reroll with what is the question? An older apu? We can't roll with > HEAD. > > Maybe we could, with our APR hats on, push out a quick APU 1.3.12... We should definitely have a new apr (Windows issue) and apu (LDAP issue) before long, but what about just providing patches for this beta? I doubt that anyone consuming the beta would have a problem with that. BTW, I'm a bit behind and probably can't test until tomorrow.
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
On May 13, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > On Wed, 11 May 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> The candidate tarballs for 2.3.12 are now available at: >> >> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ >> >> I'm opening up a vote to release these as 2.3.12-beta, with >> a hope to push on for a quick GA after maybe another beta >> release in the near future. > > +1 for httpd 2.3.12-beta (with external apr/apu) > > As noted by Rainer, the apu in httpd-2.3.12-beta-deps is broken, though. Is > this ok or should the deps tarball be rerolled? > Reroll with what is the question? An older apu? We can't roll with HEAD. Maybe we could, with our APR hats on, push out a quick APU 1.3.12...
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
On Wed, 11 May 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote: The candidate tarballs for 2.3.12 are now available at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm opening up a vote to release these as 2.3.12-beta, with a hope to push on for a quick GA after maybe another beta release in the near future. +1 for httpd 2.3.12-beta (with external apr/apu) As noted by Rainer, the apu in httpd-2.3.12-beta-deps is broken, though. Is this ok or should the deps tarball be rerolled?
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
On 11.05.2011 14:33, Jim Jagielski wrote: The candidate tarballs for 2.3.12 are now available at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm opening up a vote to release these as 2.3.12-beta, with a hope to push on for a quick GA after maybe another beta release in the near future. +1 to 2.3.12-beta. - Sigs and hashes OK - contents of tarballs identical - contents of tag and tarballs identical except for expected deltas Build on Solaris 8+10 Sparc, SuSE 10 32 and 64, and RHEL 5 64 - with default, shared and static modules - with module sets none, few, most, all - against bundled APR/APU and external APR/APU 1.4.4/1.3.11 - using expat 2.0.1, pcre 8.12, openssl 1.0.0d, lua 5.1.4 - Tool chain: - platform gcc except for Solaris 8+10 (gcc 4.1.2) - CFLAGS: -O2 -g -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing (and -mpcu=v9 on Solaris) Passed test framework on all those platforms for all available MPMs (except simple) - with shared and static modules using the "all" module set - with bundled APR/APU and external APR/APU 1.4.4/1.3.11 One single reason for test failures fixed in APU 1.3.x and above, see r1101657. It caused crashes for spawned processes like prg RewriteMaps due to NULL cleanup registered in ldap rebind. Regards, Rainer
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
All test pass: OSX and Fed14 +1 On May 11, 2011, at 8:33 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > The candidate tarballs for 2.3.12 are now available at: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm opening up a vote to release these as 2.3.12-beta, with > a hope to push on for a quick GA after maybe another beta > release in the near future. > > Cheers! >