Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta?
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Please fetch up the newly prepared mod_ftp-0.9.6.tar.gz (or .bz2), or the win32/netware/os2 suitable package mod_ftp-0.9.6-crlf.zip from; [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6 GA +1 for GA; wrowe +.5 for GA; trawick, rjung binding +1 for beta; wrowe, trawick, rpluem, fuankg, rjung Additional positive feedback from Jorge and Mario (linux, win32) It would be good in the next cycle, with all of the small improvements that Jeff and I had worked on, to bless this as GA. Unfortunately .5 votes don't sum to 1 :) Thanks everyone for reviewing!
Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta?
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:05 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Please fetch up the newly prepared mod_ftp-0.9.6.tar.gz (or .bz2), or the win32/netware/os2 suitable package mod_ftp-0.9.6-crlf.zip from; [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6 GA +1 for GA; wrowe +.5 for GA; trawick, rjung binding +1 for beta; wrowe, trawick, rpluem, fuankg, rjung Additional positive feedback from Jorge and Mario (linux, win32) It would be good in the next cycle, with all of the small improvements that Jeff and I had worked on, to bless this as GA. Unfortunately .5 votes don't sum to 1 :) It is a beta now but could still be GA if nobody finds a regression and something magic happens and we get votes for GA, right?
Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta?
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: I'll leave the vote open three more days before ending evaluation of this package There are sufficient votes to release, so in about 14 hours it will be announced unless the tide turns between now and then.
Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta?
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Following Rainer's Solaris discoveries and our DISTDIR suggestions, Please fetch up the newly prepared mod_ftp-0.9.6.tar.gz (or .bz2), or the win32/netware/os2 suitable package mod_ftp-0.9.6-crlf.zip from; 7 days have passed, and although my first inclination is to declare the vote closed with 2 +1's and begin the dissolution of this effort, I'll leave the vote open three more days before ending evaluation of this package and taking it to its logical conclusion.
RE: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta?
+1 on beta Regards Rüdiger -Original Message- From: William A. Rowe, Jr. Sent: Dienstag, 29. September 2009 05:29 To: test...@httpd.apache.org; dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta? Following Rainer's Solaris discoveries and our DISTDIR suggestions, Please fetch up the newly prepared mod_ftp-0.9.6.tar.gz (or .bz2), or the win32/netware/os2 suitable package mod_ftp-0.9.6-crlf.zip from; http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_ftp/ review, take it for a spin, and cast your choice [ ] -1 for any release of 0.9.6 (regressed from 0.9.2 or earlier?) [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6 GA For getting started, http://httpd.apache.org/mod_ftp/ and http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_ftp/tags/0.9.6/README-FTP Bill
Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta?
William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb: Following Rainer's Solaris discoveries and our DISTDIR suggestions, Please fetch up the newly prepared mod_ftp-0.9.6.tar.gz (or .bz2), or the win32/netware/os2 suitable package mod_ftp-0.9.6-crlf.zip from; http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_ftp/ review, take it for a spin, and cast your choice [x] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta successfully tested on: OpenSuSE 10.3-32, OpenSuSE 11.1-64 NetWare 6.5SP8 (with limitation for the non-working ephemeral port) Gün.
Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta?
William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb: For getting started, http://httpd.apache.org/mod_ftp/ perhaps something for the FAQ: Q: Why does does the build-in ftp client of Firefox not work with some configurations? A: Due to stupid command sequences the Firefox internal ftp client fails if you have subfolders in the ftproot. This seems a known bug (we found others reporting same issue too at various places). As workaround either use a separate ftp client like FileZilla, or use the Firefox Plugin FireFTP. Gün.
Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta?
~Jorge [X] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta Works ok here on linux (gentoo) On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 5:28 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote: Following Rainer's Solaris discoveries and our DISTDIR suggestions, Please fetch up the newly prepared mod_ftp-0.9.6.tar.gz (or .bz2), or the win32/netware/os2 suitable package mod_ftp-0.9.6-crlf.zip from; http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_ftp/ review, take it for a spin, and cast your choice [ ] -1 for any release of 0.9.6 (regressed from 0.9.2 or earlier?) [X] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6 GA For getting started, http://httpd.apache.org/mod_ftp/ and http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_ftp/tags/0.9.6/README-FTP Bill
Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta?
[X] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta Works on Win XP SP3 and Windows 2003 ST SP2 Mario On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Jorge Schrauwen jorge.schrau...@gmail.com wrote: ~Jorge [X] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta Works ok here on linux (gentoo) On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 5:28 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: Following Rainer's Solaris discoveries and our DISTDIR suggestions, Please fetch up the newly prepared mod_ftp-0.9.6.tar.gz (or .bz2), or the win32/netware/os2 suitable package mod_ftp-0.9.6-crlf.zip from; http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_ftp/ review, take it for a spin, and cast your choice [ ] -1 for any release of 0.9.6 (regressed from 0.9.2 or earlier?) [X] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6 GA For getting started, http://httpd.apache.org/mod_ftp/ and http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_ftp/tags/0.9.6/README-FTP Bill
Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta?
On 29.09.2009 05:28, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: [ ] -1 for any release of 0.9.6 (regressed from 0.9.2 or earlier?) [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6 GA Exactly like Jeff: +1 for beta + 0.5 for GA (I don't know enough about it to be more sure) This time I tested on Windows (XP with VS .NET 2003 against httpd 2.2.14 out of tree). Note concerning the Windows build files: I did a neu erstellen, should be something like cleanbuild. As a result for mod_ftp I did not get .pdb files. They were only produced for mod_ftp_example. Digging into it a little deeper reveals, that if you do neu erstellen, then it first produces all files for mod_ftp (including pdb), then removes most of them as part of the clean for mod_ftp_example and then produces the files for mod_ftp_example. Regards, Rainer
Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta?
Rainer Jung wrote: Note concerning the Windows build files: I did a neu erstellen, should be something like cleanbuild. As a result for mod_ftp I did not get .pdb files. They were only produced for mod_ftp_example. Digging into it a little deeper reveals, that if you do neu erstellen, then it first produces all files for mod_ftp (including pdb), then removes most of them as part of the clean for mod_ftp_example and then produces the files for mod_ftp_example. As I inquired before, do you encounter this problem cleaning, building and installing using Makefile-ftp.win? Choosing ALL=1 to the makefile should trigger this. The problem is again, command line vars are not passing from the first nmake invocation into its sub-nmake's, something I need to investigate.
Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta?
On 06.10.2009 18:47, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Note concerning the Windows build files: I did a neu erstellen, should be something like cleanbuild. As a result for mod_ftp I did not get .pdb files. They were only produced for mod_ftp_example. Digging into it a little deeper reveals, that if you do neu erstellen, then it first produces all files for mod_ftp (including pdb), then removes most of them as part of the clean for mod_ftp_example and then produces the files for mod_ftp_example. As I inquired before, do you encounter this problem cleaning, building and installing using Makefile-ftp.win? Choosing ALL=1 to the makefile should trigger this. The problem is again, command line vars are not passing from the first nmake invocation into its sub-nmake's, something I need to investigate. No, I used the .dsw and Visual Studio. See my separate post about mod_fcgid where I reported problems and fix for the Makefile-*.win a few minutes ago. I found the ALL switch during that test in the fcgid makefile (sic). For me it looks like parsing the vars does work, it was only broken fr INSTDIR, because it was accidentially and unconditionaly overwritten at the beginning of the Makefile. See patch link in my other post. Regards, Rainer
Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta?
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:28 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote: Following Rainer's Solaris discoveries and our DISTDIR suggestions, Please fetch up the newly prepared mod_ftp-0.9.6.tar.gz (or .bz2), or the win32/netware/os2 suitable package mod_ftp-0.9.6-crlf.zip from; http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_ftp/ review, take it for a spin, and cast your choice [ ] -1 for any release of 0.9.6 (regressed from 0.9.2 or earlier?) [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6 GA +1 for beta + 0.5 for GA (I don't know enough about it to be more sure)
