Re: Apache 2.0.53/Win32/.msi+.exe installers

[Mladen Turk]

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ you will find new Win32
installers for the apache_2.0.53 release, and the new Win32
source tarball (buildable from command line on VC5+ with
nmake -f makefile.win).
Install and builds (tested VC6 and VS2003).
Even more it works :)!
Cheers,
Mladen.

Re: Apache 2.0.53/Win32/.msi+.exe installers

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

Given Mladen's and Randy's testing, including my own, I've
pushed these out to binaries/win32/... thanks all.

At 05:53 AM 2/14/2005, Mladen Turk wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ you will find new Win32
installers for the apache_2.0.53 release, and the new Win32
source tarball (buildable from command line on VC5+ with
nmake -f makefile.win).

Install and builds (tested VC6 and VS2003).
Even more it works :)!

Cheers,
Mladen.

Re: Apache 2.0.53/Win32/.msi+.exe installers

[Randy Kobes]

On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

 Dearest testing community;

 at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ you will find new Win32
 installers for the apache_2.0.53 release, and the new Win32
 source tarball (buildable from command line on VC5+ with
 nmake -f makefile.win).

 Please validate and report, before I push this out live.
 Mea Culpa this is running behind, we have both the svn change
 which I had to contend with, an incomplete apr-iconv release
 which had to be completed, and this is the *first* release
 of 2.0.x using the InstallShield X product (previous releases
 were created with InstallShield for Windows Installer.)

 As with most 'automatic conversions' not everything that is
 converted magically becomes magically correct.  Although it
 seems this installer is stable, wider testing is needed due
 to the changeover.

 Please cc: me in all replies to avoid moderation.  Thanks!

 Bill

For me, both the .msi installer and the build from the
sources (using VC++ 6) worked fine.

-- 
best regards,
randy kobes