Re: Time for 2.4.4
On 16.02.2013 15:50, Jim Jagielski wrote: I plan to TR on Monday (Feb 18) afternoon (eastern time)... On Feb 1, 2013, at 9:15 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: I think it's about time for 2.4.4... just a handful of proposed backports are still open. I propose we do a TR the end of next week with a release the week after that. I'll be RM. Info: I ran the test suite and got no failures. Tested configuration: - current 2.4.4 HEAD with APR/APU 1.4.6/1.5.1 - using shared modules reallyall and --enable-load-all-modules - tested for prefork, worker and event - each MPM tested with log level info, debug and trace8 - platform Solaris 10 Sparc 32 Bit build - Libraries Expat 2.1.0, PCRE 8.32, OpenSSL 1.0.1e with a few patches, Lua 5.2.1, LibXML2 2.9.0. - Tool chain: gcc 4.7.2, CFLAGS -O2 -g -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing -mpcu=v9 Regards, Rainer
Re: Time for 2.4.4
I plan to TR on Monday (Feb 18) afternoon (eastern time)... On Feb 1, 2013, at 9:15 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: I think it's about time for 2.4.4... just a handful of proposed backports are still open. I propose we do a TR the end of next week with a release the week after that. I'll be RM. Comments?
Re: STATUS vote! (Was: Re: Time for 2.4.4)
Just a FYI: I'll be traveling a bit next week so I'll do the TR by Monday and leave the vote open until I get back on Friday. On Feb 6, 2013, at 7:43 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: Just a handful of backports in STATUS which appear viable for 2.4.4... look, review and vote if possible! :) On Feb 1, 2013, at 9:15 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: I think it's about time for 2.4.4... just a handful of proposed backports are still open. I propose we do a TR the end of next week with a release the week after that. I'll be RM. Comments?
STATUS vote! (Was: Re: Time for 2.4.4)
Just a handful of backports in STATUS which appear viable for 2.4.4... look, review and vote if possible! :) On Feb 1, 2013, at 9:15 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: I think it's about time for 2.4.4... just a handful of proposed backports are still open. I propose we do a TR the end of next week with a release the week after that. I'll be RM. Comments?
Re: Time for 2.4.4
On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 09:15:46 -0500 Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: I think it's about time for 2.4.4... just a handful of proposed backports are still open. I propose we do a TR the end of next week with a release the week after that. I'll be RM. Comments? +1, it's been a while, thanks for RM'ing! I've only just recovered from a really ugly mail data mess that started back in September, but I'm essentially back. [I have Claws email client to thank for untangling this whole mess, thunderbird has been relegated to the trash bin.] I'd be happy to go ahead and tag 2.2.24 while we are at it, and will look through STATUS for all the low hanging fruit, vote up some backports, apply accepted backports, etc.
Re: Time for 2.4.4
On 01 Feb 2013, at 4:15 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: I think it's about time for 2.4.4... just a handful of proposed backports are still open. I propose we do a TR the end of next week with a release the week after that. I'll be RM. Comments? +1, and thanks for offering to RM :) Regards, Graham -- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Time for 2.4.4
+1, and thanks for offering to RM :) +1 on both counts!
Re: Time for 2.4.4
On 01.02.2013 16:24, Eric Covener wrote: +1, and thanks for offering to RM :) +1 on both counts! +1
