Re: porstfs bug t2000 and 2.2

2006-08-30 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 09:20:52AM -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
 We tested a Sun t2000 with httpd 2.2.  It did okay. Now, Sun says 
 there is an issue with 2.2 and portfs on Solaris 10 on the t2000.  

It didn't do very well for me with Solaris 10 either.

 Not real sure what this means.  Anyone else heard this?

Yep, it's event ports, which we support. How their implementation
handles it, who knows :-)

-- 
Colm MacCárthaighPublic Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: porstfs bug t2000 and 2.2

2006-08-30 Thread Rainer Jung
Look at Sun Alert 102485:

http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-26-102485-1

The bug should have been fixed with 118833-12 several months ago. Most
early evaluaters of Niagara with Apache 2.2 ran into kernel panics
because of the bug.

The most recent kernel update patch is 118833-20 (SPARC versions, X86
should be analogous).

Regards,

Rainer

Colm MacCarthaigh schrieb:
 On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 09:20:52AM -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
 We tested a Sun t2000 with httpd 2.2.  It did okay. Now, Sun says 
 there is an issue with 2.2 and portfs on Solaris 10 on the t2000.  
 
 It didn't do very well for me with Solaris 10 either.
 
 Not real sure what this means.  Anyone else heard this?
 
 Yep, it's event ports, which we support. How their implementation
 handles it, who knows :-)
 


Re: porstfs bug t2000 and 2.2

2006-08-30 Thread Justin Erenkrantz

On 8/30/06, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

The most recent kernel update patch is 118833-20 (SPARC versions, X86
should be analogous).


Yah, that bug has been fixed.  (Paul reported the bug early on, I think.)

We have also heard reports that the SSL crypto engine on the T2000's
is horked.  We've been told that upcoming firmware should resolve that
issue.

FWIW, we're going to be deploying httpd on one of the ASF's T2000 soon
(it's going to eventually take over for our Itanium box).  So, if it's
unstable, we'll be finding out real soon now.  -- justin


Re: porstfs bug t2000 and 2.2

2006-08-30 Thread Shanti Subramanyam


Yes - there are issues with Apache on Solaris 10 when using SSL (nothing 
to do with the T2000). We currently have two bugs outstanding :

   http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6375348
   http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6374503

In our testing, this causes about a 10-12% performance degradation, but 
is not specific to Apache 2.2.If you run apache as root, there is no 
degradation at all and should see improved performance with the T2000 
crypto hardware.


As you correctly point out, the event port bug has been fixed so make 
sure that your T2000 box has this patch.


We have just released 'Cool Stack' - optimized versions of apache and 
other common OSS apps for SPARC (x86 coming soon). Please see 
http://cooltools.sunsource.net/coolstack to download.


Shanti
PAE, Sun Microsystems


Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

On 8/30/06, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


The most recent kernel update patch is 118833-20 (SPARC versions, X86
should be analogous).



Yah, that bug has been fixed.  (Paul reported the bug early on, I think.)

We have also heard reports that the SSL crypto engine on the T2000's
is horked.  We've been told that upcoming firmware should resolve that
issue.

FWIW, we're going to be deploying httpd on one of the ASF's T2000 soon
(it's going to eventually take over for our Itanium box).  So, if it's
unstable, we'll be finding out real soon now.  -- justin