Re: svn commit: r1187986 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual: custom-error.xml mod/core.xml
On Monday 24 October 2011, Roy T. Fielding wrote: On Oct 23, 2011, at 3:09 PM, s...@apache.org wrote: --- httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/core.xml (original) +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/core.xml Sun Oct 23 22:09:34 2011 @@ -1165,6 +1165,7 @@ in case of an error/description ErrorDocument 404 /cgi-bin/bad_urls.plbr / ErrorDocument 401 /subscription_info.htmlbr / ErrorDocument 403 Sorry can't allow you access today + ErrorDocument 403 Forbidden! /example pAdditionally, the special value codedefault/code can be used I don't think that change was intended, right? Looks like an error test. No, this example is intendended to demonstrate that the double quotes are not significant. But a line break was missing.
Re: svn commit: r1187986 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual: custom-error.xml mod/core.xml
On 10/24/2011 6:25 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: On Monday 24 October 2011, Roy T. Fielding wrote: On Oct 23, 2011, at 3:09 PM, s...@apache.org wrote: --- httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/core.xml (original) +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/core.xml Sun Oct 23 22:09:34 2011 @@ -1165,6 +1165,7 @@ in case of an error/description ErrorDocument 404 /cgi-bin/bad_urls.plbr / ErrorDocument 401 /subscription_info.htmlbr / ErrorDocument 403 Sorry can't allow you access today + ErrorDocument 403 Forbidden! /example pAdditionally, the special value codedefault/code can be used I don't think that change was intended, right? Looks like an error test. No, this example is intendended to demonstrate that the double quotes are not significant. But a line break was missing. Actually that shouldn't be supported. If it was an undocumented feature it aught to stay undocumented. How do we know this isn't a typo of URI /Forbidden! ? Trip on the way-back machine to early 1.3, the leading quote was required (and trailing quote wasn't allowed, weird). I had intended that they would have leading and trailing quotes when I patched that oddity.
Re: svn commit: r1187986 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual: custom-error.xml mod/core.xml
On Monday 24 October 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 10/24/2011 6:25 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: On Monday 24 October 2011, Roy T. Fielding wrote: On Oct 23, 2011, at 3:09 PM, s...@apache.org wrote: --- httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/core.xml (original) +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/core.xml Sun Oct 23 22:09:34 2011 @@ -1165,6 +1165,7 @@ in case of an error/description ErrorDocument 404 /cgi-bin/bad_urls.plbr / ErrorDocument 401 /subscription_info.htmlbr / ErrorDocument 403 Sorry can't allow you access today + ErrorDocument 403 Forbidden! /example pAdditionally, the special value codedefault/code can be used I don't think that change was intended, right? Looks like an error test. No, this example is intendended to demonstrate that the double quotes are not significant. But a line break was missing. Actually that shouldn't be supported. If it was an undocumented feature it aught to stay undocumented. How do we know this isn't a typo of URI /Forbidden! ? We don't. We just look at the leading slash. I have merely documented what is the current behaviour since 2.0. Trip on the way-back machine to early 1.3, the leading quote was required (and trailing quote wasn't allowed, weird). I had intended that they would have leading and trailing quotes when I patched that oddity. The quotes are eaten by ap_getword_conf in AP_INIT_TAKE2. One would have to use AP_INIT_RAW_ARGS to see them. But IMO the current behavior is ok, no need to change it.
Re: svn commit: r1187986 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual: custom-error.xml mod/core.xml
On Oct 23, 2011, at 3:09 PM, s...@apache.org wrote: --- httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/core.xml (original) +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/core.xml Sun Oct 23 22:09:34 2011 @@ -1165,6 +1165,7 @@ in case of an error/description ErrorDocument 404 /cgi-bin/bad_urls.plbr / ErrorDocument 401 /subscription_info.htmlbr / ErrorDocument 403 Sorry can't allow you access today + ErrorDocument 403 Forbidden! /example pAdditionally, the special value codedefault/code can be used I don't think that change was intended, right? Looks like an error test. Roy
