Re: svn commit: r1439000 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/os/win32/BaseAddr.ref

2013-01-26 Thread Rainer Jung 
On 27.01.2013 01:08, gsm...@apache.org wrote:
 Author: gsmith
 Date: Sun Jan 27 00:08:04 2013
 New Revision: 1439000
 
 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1439000view=rev
 Log:
 mod_lua image size has surpassed 0x0001, step it up a notch
 
 Modified:
 httpd/httpd/trunk/os/win32/BaseAddr.ref
 
 Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/os/win32/BaseAddr.ref
 URL: 
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/os/win32/BaseAddr.ref?rev=1439000r1=1438999r2=1439000view=diff
 ==
 --- httpd/httpd/trunk/os/win32/BaseAddr.ref (original)
 +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/os/win32/BaseAddr.ref Sun Jan 27 00:08:04 2013
 @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ mod_socache_dc.so   0x6F8A  
  mod_socache_memcache.so 0x6F890x0001
  mod_socache_shmcb.so0x6F880x0001
  mod_sed.so  0x6F870x0001
 -mod_lua.so  0x6F860x0001
 +mod_lua.so  0x6F860x0002

Doesn't that mean the address needs to be 0x6F85 to provide ample
space before the mod_sed.so address? And then all addresses below
mod_lua need to be lowered by 0x1 as well?

  mod_ratelimit.so0x6F850x0001
  mod_remoteip.so 0x6F840x0001
  mod_lbmethod_bybusyness.so  0x6F830x0001

Regards,

Rainer

Re: svn commit: r1439000 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/os/win32/BaseAddr.ref

2013-01-26 Thread Gregg Smith 

On 1/26/2013 8:04 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:

Doesn't that mean the address needs to be 0x6F85 to provide ample
space before the mod_sed.so address? And then all addresses below
mod_lua need to be lowered by 0x1 as well?


Yes, thanks for the catch. Fixed in r1439027.

Regards,

Gregg