Re: Embdedded IoTDB Grafana Endpoint
Comparing to restful API, using javascript API reduces JSON parse and can use all session functions. If we do this, I think we should publish a javascript/typescript connector package in npm (like a maven in java). By the way, I develop a simple grafanan iotdb plugin ( https://github.com/Genius-pig/iotdb) by using rest API ( https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1716). restApi is more common, it transfers data through HTTP, so you can use it in any client in any language. On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 2:35 PM Jialin Qiao wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for sharing the use case! Currently we do not have a JavaScript > API. > > However, since we use thrift [1] as the RPC framework, you could generate > the JavaScript API easily. > > Please refer to the usage of Python API [2] > > [1] https://github.com/apache/iotdb/tree/master/thrift > [2] https://github.com/apache/iotdb/tree/master/client-py > > Thanks, > -- > Jialin Qiao > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > 乔嘉林 > 清华大学 软件学院 > > -原始邮件- > 发件人: "Shi Jinghai" > 发送时间: 2020-11-09 13:29:42 (星期一) > 收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org" > 抄送: > 主题: Re: Embdedded IoTDB Grafana Endpoint > > As I’m working on an edge system design, I’d suggest running IoTDB in > Node-RED environment and use Grafana in Node-RED. > > BTW, is there any Javascript connector ready for IoTDB? > > Shi Jinghai > > > 发件人: Jialin Qiao<mailto:qj...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> > 发送时间: 2020年11月7日 12:22 > 收件人: dev@iotdb.apache.org<mailto:dev@iotdb.apache.org> > 主题: Re: Embdedded IoTDB Grafana Endpoint > > Hi, > > I dislike the idea of having spring in the server as well. > > +1, could we combine the small handler with our RestAPI? > > Thanks, > -- > Jialin Qiao > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > 乔嘉林 > 清华大学 软件学院 > > -原始邮件- > 发件人: "Julian Feinauer" > 发送时间: 2020-11-06 22:38:50 (星期五) > 收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org" > 抄送: > 主题: Re: Embdedded IoTDB Grafana Endpoint > > Hey, > > yes, to do it clean we could do it directly without Spring. Then > ist just a very small handler. > Similar to what we already use optionally in the prometheus > module. > > I dislike the idea of having spring in the server as well. > > Julian > > Am 06.11.20, 12:03 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" < > saint...@gmail.com>: > > Hi, > >what do you think of an option to run the SimpleJson > Grafana Connector > directly in IoTDBs Server Context (could be disbaled by > default). > it is ok. > > But I think we need to prune some dependencies of Spring... > It it too large > now.. (I remember it is ~ 20MB to add such a module) > > Best, > --- > Xiangdong Huang > School of Software, Tsinghua University > >黄向东 > 清华大学 软件学院 > > > Julian Feinauer > 于2020年11月6日周五 下午6:13写道： > >Hi folks, > >as we just discussed the prometheus integration, what > do you think of an >option to run the SimpleJson Grafana Connector directly > in IoTDBs Server >Context (could be disbaled by default). >This would make it way easier for users to just „look“ > aat their IoTDB >Data. > >WDYT? > >Julian > > > dev@iotdb.apache.org> > > mailto:dev@iotdb.apache.org>mailto:qj...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> dev@iotdb.apache.org>
Re: Embdedded IoTDB Grafana Endpoint
Hi, Thank you for sharing the use case! Currently we do not have a JavaScript API. However, since we use thrift [1] as the RPC framework, you could generate the JavaScript API easily. Please refer to the usage of Python API [2] [1] https://github.com/apache/iotdb/tree/master/thrift [2] https://github.com/apache/iotdb/tree/master/client-py Thanks, -- Jialin Qiao School of Software, Tsinghua University 乔嘉林 清华大学 软件学院 -原始邮件- 发件人: "Shi Jinghai" 发送时间: 2020-11-09 13:29:42 (星期一) 收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org" 抄送: 主题: Re: Embdedded IoTDB Grafana Endpoint As I’m working on an edge system design, I’d suggest running IoTDB in Node-RED environment and use Grafana in Node-RED. BTW, is there any Javascript connector ready for IoTDB? Shi Jinghai 发件人: Jialin Qiao<mailto:qj...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> 发送时间: 2020年11月7日 12:22 收件人: dev@iotdb.apache.org<mailto:dev@iotdb.apache.org> 主题: Re: Embdedded IoTDB Grafana Endpoint Hi, I dislike the idea of having spring in the server as well. +1, could we combine the small handler with our RestAPI? Thanks, -- Jialin Qiao School of Software, Tsinghua University 乔嘉林 清华大学 软件学院 -原始邮件- 发件人: "Julian Feinauer" 发送时间: 2020-11-06 22:38:50 (星期五) 收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org" 抄送: 主题: Re: Embdedded IoTDB Grafana Endpoint Hey, yes, to do it clean we could do it directly without Spring. Then ist just a very small handler. Similar to what we already use optionally in the prometheus module. I dislike the idea of having spring in the server as well. Julian Am 06.11.20, 12:03 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" : Hi, what do you think of an option to run the SimpleJson Grafana Connector directly in IoTDBs Server Context (could be disbaled by default). it is ok. But I think we need to prune some dependencies of Spring... It it too large now.. (I remember it is ~ 20MB to add such a module) Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2020年11月6日周五 下午6:13写道： Hi folks, as we just discussed the prometheus integration, what do you think of an option to run the SimpleJson Grafana Connector directly in IoTDBs Server Context (could be disbaled by default). This would make it way easier for users to just „look“ aat their IoTDB Data. WDYT? Julian mailto:dev@iotdb.apache.org>mailto:qj...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
Re: Embdedded IoTDB Grafana Endpoint
As I’m working on an edge system design, I’d suggest running IoTDB in Node-RED environment and use Grafana in Node-RED. BTW, is there any Javascript connector ready for IoTDB? Shi Jinghai 发件人: Jialin Qiao<mailto:qj...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> 发送时间: 2020年11月7日 12:22 收件人: dev@iotdb.apache.org<mailto:dev@iotdb.apache.org> 主题: Re: Embdedded IoTDB Grafana Endpoint Hi, I dislike the idea of having spring in the server as well. +1, could we combine the small handler with our RestAPI? Thanks, -- Jialin Qiao School of Software, Tsinghua University 乔嘉林 清华大学 软件学院 -原始邮件- 发件人: "Julian Feinauer" 发送时间: 2020-11-06 22:38:50 (星期五) 收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org" 抄送: 主题: Re: Embdedded IoTDB Grafana Endpoint Hey, yes, to do it clean we could do it directly without Spring. Then ist just a very small handler. Similar to what we already use optionally in the prometheus module. I dislike the idea of having spring in the server as well. Julian Am 06.11.20, 12:03 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" : Hi, what do you think of an option to run the SimpleJson Grafana Connector directly in IoTDBs Server Context (could be disbaled by default). it is ok. But I think we need to prune some dependencies of Spring... It it too large now.. (I remember it is ~ 20MB to add such a module) Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2020年11月6日周五 下午6:13写道： Hi folks, as we just discussed the prometheus integration, what do you think of an option to run the SimpleJson Grafana Connector directly in IoTDBs Server Context (could be disbaled by default). This would make it way easier for users to just „look“ aat their IoTDB Data. WDYT? Julian
Re: Embdedded IoTDB Grafana Endpoint
Hi, I dislike the idea of having spring in the server as well. +1, could we combine the small handler with our RestAPI? Thanks, -- Jialin Qiao School of Software, Tsinghua University 乔嘉林 清华大学 软件学院 -原始邮件- 发件人: "Julian Feinauer" 发送时间: 2020-11-06 22:38:50 (星期五) 收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org" 抄送: 主题: Re: Embdedded IoTDB Grafana Endpoint Hey, yes, to do it clean we could do it directly without Spring. Then ist just a very small handler. Similar to what we already use optionally in the prometheus module. I dislike the idea of having spring in the server as well. Julian Am 06.11.20, 12:03 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" : Hi, what do you think of an option to run the SimpleJson Grafana Connector directly in IoTDBs Server Context (could be disbaled by default). it is ok. But I think we need to prune some dependencies of Spring... It it too large now.. (I remember it is ~ 20MB to add such a module) Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2020年11月6日周五 下午6:13写道： Hi folks, as we just discussed the prometheus integration, what do you think of an option to run the SimpleJson Grafana Connector directly in IoTDBs Server Context (could be disbaled by default). This would make it way easier for users to just „look“ aat their IoTDB Data. WDYT? Julian
Re: Embdedded IoTDB Grafana Endpoint
Hey, yes, to do it clean we could do it directly without Spring. Then ist just a very small handler. Similar to what we already use optionally in the prometheus module. I dislike the idea of having spring in the server as well. Julian Am 06.11.20, 12:03 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" : Hi, > what do you think of an option to run the SimpleJson Grafana Connector directly in IoTDBs Server Context (could be disbaled by default). it is ok. But I think we need to prune some dependencies of Spring... It it too large now.. (I remember it is ~ 20MB to add such a module) Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2020年11月6日周五 下午6:13写道： > Hi folks, > > as we just discussed the prometheus integration, what do you think of an > option to run the SimpleJson Grafana Connector directly in IoTDBs Server > Context (could be disbaled by default). > This would make it way easier for users to just „look“ aat their IoTDB > Data. > > WDYT? > > Julian >
Re: Embdedded IoTDB Grafana Endpoint
Hi, > what do you think of an option to run the SimpleJson Grafana Connector directly in IoTDBs Server Context (could be disbaled by default). it is ok. But I think we need to prune some dependencies of Spring... It it too large now.. (I remember it is ~ 20MB to add such a module) Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2020年11月6日周五 下午6:13写道： > Hi folks, > > as we just discussed the prometheus integration, what do you think of an > option to run the SimpleJson Grafana Connector directly in IoTDBs Server > Context (could be disbaled by default). > This would make it way easier for users to just „look“ aat their IoTDB > Data. > > WDYT? > > Julian >
Embdedded IoTDB Grafana Endpoint
Hi folks, as we just discussed the prometheus integration, what do you think of an option to run the SimpleJson Grafana Connector directly in IoTDBs Server Context (could be disbaled by default). This would make it way easier for users to just „look“ aat their IoTDB Data. WDYT? Julian
