Re: [VOTE] KIP-899: Allow producer and consumer clients to rebootstrap

2024-05-22 Thread Andrew Schofield
Hi,
I’ll add an item to the plan for KIP-932 to do this for the KafkaShareConsumer.
My guess is that there will be actually nothing to do in practice because of
code in common with the KafkaConsumer, but definitely worth me checking it out.

Thanks,
Andrew

> On 22 May 2024, at 18:28, Jun Rao  wrote:
>
> Hi, Ivan,
>
> Thanks for the reply. KafkaShareConsumer doesn't take all configuration
> values from KafkaConsumer. So, we need to make a note that this new config
> will be part of KafkaShareConsumer too.
>
> Jun
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 9:45 AM Ivan Yurchenko  wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I had a look at the KIP-932, and it seems KafkaShareConsumer is to be
>> configured the same way as the normal consumer using key-value props. As I
>> understand correctly, no adaptation is needed for it to benefit from
>> KIP-899?
>>
>> Meanwhile, the PR [1] is open for review. If there are comments that
>> require changes, we can address them in the PR or in case it's already
>> merged, afterwards.
>>
>> Best,
>> Ivan
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13277
>>
>> On Thu, May 16, 2024, at 01:52, Jun Rao wrote:
>>> Hi, Ivan,
>>>
>>> You are right. StreamsConfigs can take all existing consumer configs,
>> with
>>> or without prefixes. So, we don't need to add the new config to
>>> StreamsConfig explicitly.
>>>
>>> For KIP-932, it says for each new consumer config, we need to determine
>>> whether it should be added to ShareConsumer config too.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Jun
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:16 PM Ivan Yurchenko  wrote:
>>>
 Hi Jun,

 Thank you for you comment. I was thinking that this
 `metadata.recovery.strategy` could be passed to the relevant consumer
>> in
 streams using the `restore.consumer.` prefix. I that what you meant or
>> I
 misunderstand?
 As for the KIP-932, I'll have a closer look.

 Ivan


 On Wed, May 15, 2024, at 20:14, Jun Rao wrote:
> Hi, Ivan,
>
> Thanks for the KIP. +1
>
> Just a minor comment. Should we add metadata.recovery.strategy to the
> Streams and the newly introduced ShareConsumer (KIP-932) too?
>
> Jun
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 11:35 AM Manikumar >>
 wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the KIP.
>>
>> +1 (binding).
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 7:50 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
>> o.g.h.ibra...@gmail.com
>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Ivan,
>>> Thanks for the KIP this is a very nice feature to have.
>>> +1(non-binding)
>>> Omnia
 On 15 Apr 2024, at 14:33, Andrew Schofield <
 andrew_schofi...@live.com>
>> wrote:

 Thanks for the KIP

 +1 (non-binding)

 Andrew

> On 15 Apr 2024, at 14:16, Chris Egerton
>> 
>> wrote:
>
> Hi Ivan,
>
> Thanks for the KIP. After the recent changes, this LGTM. +1
 (binding)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chris
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 12:15 AM Ivan Yurchenko <
>> ivan0yurche...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> The discussion [1] for KIP-899 [2] has been open for quite
>> some
>> time. I'd
>> like to put the KIP up for a vote.
>>
>> Best,
>> Ivan
>>
>> [1]
 https://lists.apache.org/thread/m0ncbmfxs5m87sszby2jbmtjx2bdpcdl
>> [2]
>>
>>
>>

>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-899%3A+Allow+producer+and+consumer+clients+to+rebootstrap
>>

>>>
>>
>

>>>
>>



Re: [VOTE] KIP-899: Allow producer and consumer clients to rebootstrap

2024-05-22 Thread Jun Rao
Hi, Ivan,

Thanks for the reply. KafkaShareConsumer doesn't take all configuration
values from KafkaConsumer. So, we need to make a note that this new config
will be part of KafkaShareConsumer too.

Jun

On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 9:45 AM Ivan Yurchenko  wrote:

> Hi!
>
> I had a look at the KIP-932, and it seems KafkaShareConsumer is to be
> configured the same way as the normal consumer using key-value props. As I
> understand correctly, no adaptation is needed for it to benefit from
> KIP-899?
>
> Meanwhile, the PR [1] is open for review. If there are comments that
> require changes, we can address them in the PR or in case it's already
> merged, afterwards.
>
> Best,
> Ivan
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13277
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2024, at 01:52, Jun Rao wrote:
> > Hi, Ivan,
> >
> > You are right. StreamsConfigs can take all existing consumer configs,
> with
> > or without prefixes. So, we don't need to add the new config to
> > StreamsConfig explicitly.
> >
> > For KIP-932, it says for each new consumer config, we need to determine
> > whether it should be added to ShareConsumer config too.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jun
> >
> > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:16 PM Ivan Yurchenko  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jun,
> > >
> > > Thank you for you comment. I was thinking that this
> > > `metadata.recovery.strategy` could be passed to the relevant consumer
> in
> > > streams using the `restore.consumer.` prefix. I that what you meant or
> I
> > > misunderstand?
> > > As for the KIP-932, I'll have a closer look.
> > >
> > > Ivan
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 15, 2024, at 20:14, Jun Rao wrote:
> > > > Hi, Ivan,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the KIP. +1
> > > >
> > > > Just a minor comment. Should we add metadata.recovery.strategy to the
> > > > Streams and the newly introduced ShareConsumer (KIP-932) too?
> > > >
> > > > Jun
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 11:35 AM Manikumar  >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the KIP.
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding).
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 7:50 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
> o.g.h.ibra...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Ivan,
> > > > > > Thanks for the KIP this is a very nice feature to have.
> > > > > > +1(non-binding)
> > > > > > Omnia
> > > > > > > On 15 Apr 2024, at 14:33, Andrew Schofield <
> > > andrew_schofi...@live.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Andrew
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> On 15 Apr 2024, at 14:16, Chris Egerton
> 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Hi Ivan,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Thanks for the KIP. After the recent changes, this LGTM. +1
> > > (binding)
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Cheers,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Chris
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 12:15 AM Ivan Yurchenko <
> > > > > ivan0yurche...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> Hello,
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> The discussion [1] for KIP-899 [2] has been open for quite
> some
> > > > > time. I'd
> > > > > > >>> like to put the KIP up for a vote.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Best,
> > > > > > >>> Ivan
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> [1]
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/m0ncbmfxs5m87sszby2jbmtjx2bdpcdl
> > > > > > >>> [2]
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > >
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-899%3A+Allow+producer+and+consumer+clients+to+rebootstrap
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Re: [VOTE] KIP-899: Allow producer and consumer clients to rebootstrap

2024-05-22 Thread Ivan Yurchenko
Hi!

I had a look at the KIP-932, and it seems KafkaShareConsumer is to be 
configured the same way as the normal consumer using key-value props. As I 
understand correctly, no adaptation is needed for it to benefit from KIP-899?

Meanwhile, the PR [1] is open for review. If there are comments that require 
changes, we can address them in the PR or in case it's already merged, 
afterwards.

Best,
Ivan

[1] https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13277

On Thu, May 16, 2024, at 01:52, Jun Rao wrote:
> Hi, Ivan,
> 
> You are right. StreamsConfigs can take all existing consumer configs, with
> or without prefixes. So, we don't need to add the new config to
> StreamsConfig explicitly.
> 
> For KIP-932, it says for each new consumer config, we need to determine
> whether it should be added to ShareConsumer config too.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jun
> 
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:16 PM Ivan Yurchenko  wrote:
> 
> > Hi Jun,
> >
> > Thank you for you comment. I was thinking that this
> > `metadata.recovery.strategy` could be passed to the relevant consumer in
> > streams using the `restore.consumer.` prefix. I that what you meant or I
> > misunderstand?
> > As for the KIP-932, I'll have a closer look.
> >
> > Ivan
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 15, 2024, at 20:14, Jun Rao wrote:
> > > Hi, Ivan,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the KIP. +1
> > >
> > > Just a minor comment. Should we add metadata.recovery.strategy to the
> > > Streams and the newly introduced ShareConsumer (KIP-932) too?
> > >
> > > Jun
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 11:35 AM Manikumar 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for the KIP.
> > > >
> > > > +1 (binding).
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 7:50 PM Omnia Ibrahim  > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Ivan,
> > > > > Thanks for the KIP this is a very nice feature to have.
> > > > > +1(non-binding)
> > > > > Omnia
> > > > > > On 15 Apr 2024, at 14:33, Andrew Schofield <
> > andrew_schofi...@live.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for the KIP
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Andrew
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> On 15 Apr 2024, at 14:16, Chris Egerton 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Hi Ivan,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thanks for the KIP. After the recent changes, this LGTM. +1
> > (binding)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Cheers,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Chris
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 12:15 AM Ivan Yurchenko <
> > > > ivan0yurche...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> Hello,
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> The discussion [1] for KIP-899 [2] has been open for quite some
> > > > time. I'd
> > > > > >>> like to put the KIP up for a vote.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Best,
> > > > > >>> Ivan
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> [1]
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/m0ncbmfxs5m87sszby2jbmtjx2bdpcdl
> > > > > >>> [2]
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-899%3A+Allow+producer+and+consumer+clients+to+rebootstrap
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 


Re: [VOTE] KIP-899: Allow producer and consumer clients to rebootstrap

2024-05-15 Thread Jun Rao
Hi, Ivan,

You are right. StreamsConfigs can take all existing consumer configs, with
or without prefixes. So, we don't need to add the new config to
StreamsConfig explicitly.

For KIP-932, it says for each new consumer config, we need to determine
whether it should be added to ShareConsumer config too.

Thanks,

Jun

On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:16 PM Ivan Yurchenko  wrote:

> Hi Jun,
>
> Thank you for you comment. I was thinking that this
> `metadata.recovery.strategy` could be passed to the relevant consumer in
> streams using the `restore.consumer.` prefix. I that what you meant or I
> misunderstand?
> As for the KIP-932, I'll have a closer look.
>
> Ivan
>
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2024, at 20:14, Jun Rao wrote:
> > Hi, Ivan,
> >
> > Thanks for the KIP. +1
> >
> > Just a minor comment. Should we add metadata.recovery.strategy to the
> > Streams and the newly introduced ShareConsumer (KIP-932) too?
> >
> > Jun
> >
> > On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 11:35 AM Manikumar 
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for the KIP.
> > >
> > > +1 (binding).
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 7:50 PM Omnia Ibrahim  >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Ivan,
> > > > Thanks for the KIP this is a very nice feature to have.
> > > > +1(non-binding)
> > > > Omnia
> > > > > On 15 Apr 2024, at 14:33, Andrew Schofield <
> andrew_schofi...@live.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the KIP
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Andrew
> > > > >
> > > > >> On 15 Apr 2024, at 14:16, Chris Egerton 
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hi Ivan,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks for the KIP. After the recent changes, this LGTM. +1
> (binding)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Cheers,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Chris
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 12:15 AM Ivan Yurchenko <
> > > ivan0yurche...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Hello,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The discussion [1] for KIP-899 [2] has been open for quite some
> > > time. I'd
> > > > >>> like to put the KIP up for a vote.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Best,
> > > > >>> Ivan
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/m0ncbmfxs5m87sszby2jbmtjx2bdpcdl
> > > > >>> [2]
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-899%3A+Allow+producer+and+consumer+clients+to+rebootstrap
> > > > >>>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Re: [VOTE] KIP-899: Allow producer and consumer clients to rebootstrap

2024-05-15 Thread Ivan Yurchenko
Hi Jun,

Thank you for you comment. I was thinking that this 
`metadata.recovery.strategy` could be passed to the relevant consumer in 
streams using the `restore.consumer.` prefix. I that what you meant or I 
misunderstand?
As for the KIP-932, I'll have a closer look.

Ivan


On Wed, May 15, 2024, at 20:14, Jun Rao wrote:
> Hi, Ivan,
> 
> Thanks for the KIP. +1
> 
> Just a minor comment. Should we add metadata.recovery.strategy to the
> Streams and the newly introduced ShareConsumer (KIP-932) too?
> 
> Jun
> 
> On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 11:35 AM Manikumar  wrote:
> 
> > Thanks for the KIP.
> >
> > +1 (binding).
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 7:50 PM Omnia Ibrahim 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Ivan,
> > > Thanks for the KIP this is a very nice feature to have.
> > > +1(non-binding)
> > > Omnia
> > > > On 15 Apr 2024, at 14:33, Andrew Schofield 
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the KIP
> > > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > Andrew
> > > >
> > > >> On 15 Apr 2024, at 14:16, Chris Egerton 
> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi Ivan,
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks for the KIP. After the recent changes, this LGTM. +1 (binding)
> > > >>
> > > >> Cheers,
> > > >>
> > > >> Chris
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 12:15 AM Ivan Yurchenko <
> > ivan0yurche...@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hello,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The discussion [1] for KIP-899 [2] has been open for quite some
> > time. I'd
> > > >>> like to put the KIP up for a vote.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Best,
> > > >>> Ivan
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/m0ncbmfxs5m87sszby2jbmtjx2bdpcdl
> > > >>> [2]
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-899%3A+Allow+producer+and+consumer+clients+to+rebootstrap
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 


Re: [VOTE] KIP-899: Allow producer and consumer clients to rebootstrap

2024-05-15 Thread Ivan Yurchenko
Hi all,

It seems we can close the vote in favor of the KIP:
- Binding +1s: Chris Egerton, Manikumar Reddy, Jun Rao, Rajini Sivaram.
- Non-binding +1s: Andrew Schofield, Omnia Ibrahim.
- No -1s.

Thank you all for your votes!
I'll do the necessary changes to the KIPs page and proceed with the 
implementation.

Best,
Ivan


On Wed, May 15, 2024, at 21:50, Rajini Sivaram wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
> 
> Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding)
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Rajini
> 
> 
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:15 PM Jun Rao  wrote:
> 
> > Hi, Ivan,
> >
> > Thanks for the KIP. +1
> >
> > Just a minor comment. Should we add metadata.recovery.strategy to the
> > Streams and the newly introduced ShareConsumer (KIP-932) too?
> >
> > Jun
> >
> > On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 11:35 AM Manikumar 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for the KIP.
> > >
> > > +1 (binding).
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 7:50 PM Omnia Ibrahim 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Ivan,
> > > > Thanks for the KIP this is a very nice feature to have.
> > > > +1(non-binding)
> > > > Omnia
> > > > > On 15 Apr 2024, at 14:33, Andrew Schofield <
> > andrew_schofi...@live.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the KIP
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Andrew
> > > > >
> > > > >> On 15 Apr 2024, at 14:16, Chris Egerton 
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hi Ivan,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks for the KIP. After the recent changes, this LGTM. +1
> > (binding)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Cheers,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Chris
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 12:15 AM Ivan Yurchenko <
> > > ivan0yurche...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Hello,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The discussion [1] for KIP-899 [2] has been open for quite some
> > > time. I'd
> > > > >>> like to put the KIP up for a vote.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Best,
> > > > >>> Ivan
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> [1]
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/m0ncbmfxs5m87sszby2jbmtjx2bdpcdl
> > > > >>> [2]
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-899%3A+Allow+producer+and+consumer+clients+to+rebootstrap
> > > > >>>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 


Re: [VOTE] KIP-899: Allow producer and consumer clients to rebootstrap

2024-05-15 Thread Rajini Sivaram
Hi Ivan,

Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding)

Regards,

Rajini


On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:15 PM Jun Rao  wrote:

> Hi, Ivan,
>
> Thanks for the KIP. +1
>
> Just a minor comment. Should we add metadata.recovery.strategy to the
> Streams and the newly introduced ShareConsumer (KIP-932) too?
>
> Jun
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 11:35 AM Manikumar 
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the KIP.
> >
> > +1 (binding).
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 7:50 PM Omnia Ibrahim 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Ivan,
> > > Thanks for the KIP this is a very nice feature to have.
> > > +1(non-binding)
> > > Omnia
> > > > On 15 Apr 2024, at 14:33, Andrew Schofield <
> andrew_schofi...@live.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the KIP
> > > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > Andrew
> > > >
> > > >> On 15 Apr 2024, at 14:16, Chris Egerton 
> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi Ivan,
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks for the KIP. After the recent changes, this LGTM. +1
> (binding)
> > > >>
> > > >> Cheers,
> > > >>
> > > >> Chris
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 12:15 AM Ivan Yurchenko <
> > ivan0yurche...@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hello,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The discussion [1] for KIP-899 [2] has been open for quite some
> > time. I'd
> > > >>> like to put the KIP up for a vote.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Best,
> > > >>> Ivan
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/m0ncbmfxs5m87sszby2jbmtjx2bdpcdl
> > > >>> [2]
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-899%3A+Allow+producer+and+consumer+clients+to+rebootstrap
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Re: [VOTE] KIP-899: Allow producer and consumer clients to rebootstrap

2024-05-15 Thread Jun Rao
Hi, Ivan,

Thanks for the KIP. +1

Just a minor comment. Should we add metadata.recovery.strategy to the
Streams and the newly introduced ShareConsumer (KIP-932) too?

Jun

On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 11:35 AM Manikumar  wrote:

> Thanks for the KIP.
>
> +1 (binding).
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 7:50 PM Omnia Ibrahim 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ivan,
> > Thanks for the KIP this is a very nice feature to have.
> > +1(non-binding)
> > Omnia
> > > On 15 Apr 2024, at 14:33, Andrew Schofield 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the KIP
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Andrew
> > >
> > >> On 15 Apr 2024, at 14:16, Chris Egerton 
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Ivan,
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for the KIP. After the recent changes, this LGTM. +1 (binding)
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >>
> > >> Chris
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 12:15 AM Ivan Yurchenko <
> ivan0yurche...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hello,
> > >>>
> > >>> The discussion [1] for KIP-899 [2] has been open for quite some
> time. I'd
> > >>> like to put the KIP up for a vote.
> > >>>
> > >>> Best,
> > >>> Ivan
> > >>>
> > >>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/m0ncbmfxs5m87sszby2jbmtjx2bdpcdl
> > >>> [2]
> > >>>
> > >>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-899%3A+Allow+producer+and+consumer+clients+to+rebootstrap
> > >>>
> > >
> >
>


Re: [VOTE] KIP-899: Allow producer and consumer clients to rebootstrap

2024-05-08 Thread Manikumar
Thanks for the KIP.

+1 (binding).

On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 7:50 PM Omnia Ibrahim  wrote:
>
> Hi Ivan,
> Thanks for the KIP this is a very nice feature to have.
> +1(non-binding)
> Omnia
> > On 15 Apr 2024, at 14:33, Andrew Schofield  
> > wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the KIP
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> >> On 15 Apr 2024, at 14:16, Chris Egerton  wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Ivan,
> >>
> >> Thanks for the KIP. After the recent changes, this LGTM. +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Chris
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 12:15 AM Ivan Yurchenko 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> The discussion [1] for KIP-899 [2] has been open for quite some time. I'd
> >>> like to put the KIP up for a vote.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Ivan
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/m0ncbmfxs5m87sszby2jbmtjx2bdpcdl
> >>> [2]
> >>>
> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-899%3A+Allow+producer+and+consumer+clients+to+rebootstrap
> >>>
> >
>


Re: [VOTE] KIP-899: Allow producer and consumer clients to rebootstrap

2024-04-17 Thread Omnia Ibrahim
Hi Ivan, 
Thanks for the KIP this is a very nice feature to have. 
+1(non-binding) 
Omnia
> On 15 Apr 2024, at 14:33, Andrew Schofield  wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the KIP
> 
> +1 (non-binding)
> 
> Andrew
> 
>> On 15 Apr 2024, at 14:16, Chris Egerton  wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Ivan,
>> 
>> Thanks for the KIP. After the recent changes, this LGTM. +1 (binding)
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Chris
>> 
>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 12:15 AM Ivan Yurchenko 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> The discussion [1] for KIP-899 [2] has been open for quite some time. I'd
>>> like to put the KIP up for a vote.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Ivan
>>> 
>>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/m0ncbmfxs5m87sszby2jbmtjx2bdpcdl
>>> [2]
>>> 
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-899%3A+Allow+producer+and+consumer+clients+to+rebootstrap
>>> 
> 



Re: [VOTE] KIP-899: Allow producer and consumer clients to rebootstrap

2024-04-15 Thread Andrew Schofield
Thanks for the KIP

+1 (non-binding)

Andrew

> On 15 Apr 2024, at 14:16, Chris Egerton  wrote:
>
> Hi Ivan,
>
> Thanks for the KIP. After the recent changes, this LGTM. +1 (binding)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chris
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 12:15 AM Ivan Yurchenko 
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> The discussion [1] for KIP-899 [2] has been open for quite some time. I'd
>> like to put the KIP up for a vote.
>>
>> Best,
>> Ivan
>>
>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/m0ncbmfxs5m87sszby2jbmtjx2bdpcdl
>> [2]
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-899%3A+Allow+producer+and+consumer+clients+to+rebootstrap
>>



Re: [VOTE] KIP-899: Allow producer and consumer clients to rebootstrap

2024-04-15 Thread Chris Egerton
Hi Ivan,

Thanks for the KIP. After the recent changes, this LGTM. +1 (binding)

Cheers,

Chris

On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 12:15 AM Ivan Yurchenko 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> The discussion [1] for KIP-899 [2] has been open for quite some time. I'd
> like to put the KIP up for a vote.
>
> Best,
> Ivan
>
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/m0ncbmfxs5m87sszby2jbmtjx2bdpcdl
> [2]
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-899%3A+Allow+producer+and+consumer+clients+to+rebootstrap
>


[VOTE] KIP-899: Allow producer and consumer clients to rebootstrap

2023-08-01 Thread Ivan Yurchenko
Hello,

The discussion [1] for KIP-899 [2] has been open for quite some time. I'd
like to put the KIP up for a vote.

Best,
Ivan

[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/m0ncbmfxs5m87sszby2jbmtjx2bdpcdl
[2]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-899%3A+Allow+producer+and+consumer+clients+to+rebootstrap