---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16360/#review31299
---
In general, does the alternate approach of sending all commands to every broker
and let the broker ignore a become follower if it is for the same leader as the
current one? The reason why this would work is because all controller-broker
communication is synchronous, so even if the same broker became leader in quick
succession (1->2->1), the follower would see the 1->2 transition before seeing
the 2->1, so it wouldn't incorrectly ignore a become follower request from the
same leader.
- Neha Narkhede
On Jan. 2, 2014, 6:44 p.m., Guozhang Wang wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/16360/
> ---
>
> (Updated Jan. 2, 2014, 6:44 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for kafka.
>
>
> Bugs: KAFKA-1188
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1188
>
>
> Repository: kafka
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> KAFKA-1188.v3
>
>
> KAFKA-1118.v2
>
>
> KAFKA-1188.v1
>
>
> Diffs
> -
>
> core/src/main/scala/kafka/cluster/Partition.scala
> 5c9307d71641ccc6c09a54b69d5aa2b4bc2a4cde
> core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/ReplicaManager.scala
> 242c18d47828b7c5e6b1fc219a0f1199fb1f9512
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16360/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> ---
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Guozhang Wang
>
>
