Re: [PROPOSAL] Use paxexam-karaf on Karaf 2.3.x branch

[Claus Ibsen]

We are using it now on Camel trunk, thanks to Willem migrating it from
Pax Exam 1.x.
Its much better and faster to test. Albeit it still takes longer than
a regular unit test, but that is expected its still running a
container et all.


On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Willem Jiang  wrote:
> +1
>
> Willem
>
>
> On 6/18/12 4:09 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Working on karaf-2.3.x branch, I detected issue on the itests after
>> upgrading to OSGi 4.3:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1554
>>
>> As the Karaf 2.3.x itests are based on the 2.2.x ones, they are
>> "fragile" and so it's not easy to update pax-runner and/or OSGi
>> framework without breaking something else.
>>
>> That's why I propose to refactore the itests in order to use
>> paxexam-karaf (from github): it will simplify the itests and we will be
>> able to easily extend it.
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>
>
>
> --
> Willem
> --
> FuseSource
> Web: http://www.fusesource.com
> Blog:    http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
>         http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese)
> Twitter: willemjiang
> Weibo: willemjiang



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen

Re: [PROPOSAL] Use paxexam-karaf on Karaf 2.3.x branch

[Willem Jiang]

+1,

using the paxexam-karaf can speed up the test process.
On 6/18/12 4:08 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:

Hi all,

Working on karaf-2.3.x branch, I detected issue on the itests after
upgrading to OSGi 4.3:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1554

As the Karaf 2.3.x itests are based on the 2.2.x ones, they are
"fragile" and so it's not easy to update pax-runner and/or OSGi
framework without breaking something else.

That's why I propose to refactore the itests in order to use
paxexam-karaf (from github): it will simplify the itests and we will be
able to easily extend it.

WDYT ?

Regards
JB



--
Willem
--
FuseSource
Web: http://www.fusesource.com
Blog:http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
 http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: willemjiang

Re: [PROPOSAL] Use paxexam-karaf on Karaf 2.3.x branch

[Willem Jiang]

+1

Willem

On 6/18/12 4:09 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:

Hi all,

Working on karaf-2.3.x branch, I detected issue on the itests after
upgrading to OSGi 4.3:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1554

As the Karaf 2.3.x itests are based on the 2.2.x ones, they are
"fragile" and so it's not easy to update pax-runner and/or OSGi
framework without breaking something else.

That's why I propose to refactore the itests in order to use
paxexam-karaf (from github): it will simplify the itests and we will be
able to easily extend it.

WDYT ?

Regards
JB



--
Willem
--
FuseSource
Web: http://www.fusesource.com
Blog:http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
 http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: willemjiang

Re: [PROPOSAL] Use paxexam-karaf on Karaf 2.3.x branch

[Jamie G.]

+1

Cheers,
Jamie

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Freeman Fang  wrote:
> +1
>
> Freeman
>
> On 2012-6-18, at 下午4:09, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Working on karaf-2.3.x branch, I detected issue on the itests after
>> upgrading to OSGi 4.3:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1554
>>
>> As the Karaf 2.3.x itests are based on the 2.2.x ones, they are "fragile"
>> and so it's not easy to update pax-runner and/or OSGi framework without
>> breaking something else.
>>
>> That's why I propose to refactore the itests in order to use paxexam-karaf
>> (from github): it will simplify the itests and we will be able to easily
>> extend it.
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbono...@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
> -
> Freeman Fang
>
> FuseSource
> Email:ff...@fusesource.com
> Web: fusesource.com
> Twitter: freemanfang
> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
> http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
> weibo: http://weibo.com/u/1473905042
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [PROPOSAL] Use paxexam-karaf on Karaf 2.3.x branch

[Freeman Fang]

+1

Freeman
On 2012-6-18, at 下午4:09, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:


Hi all,

Working on karaf-2.3.x branch, I detected issue on the itests after  
upgrading to OSGi 4.3:


https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1554

As the Karaf 2.3.x itests are based on the 2.2.x ones, they are  
"fragile" and so it's not easy to update pax-runner and/or OSGi  
framework without breaking something else.


That's why I propose to refactore the itests in order to use paxexam- 
karaf (from github): it will simplify the itests and we will be able  
to easily extend it.


WDYT ?

Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com


-
Freeman Fang

FuseSource
Email:ff...@fusesource.com
Web: fusesource.com
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
weibo: http://weibo.com/u/1473905042

Re: [PROPOSAL] Use paxexam-karaf on Karaf 2.3.x branch

[Andreas Pieber]

big +1 from my side too; will make it also easier to write itests for
trunk and 2.3.x (only changing the namespace)

Kind regards,
Andreas

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Ioannis Canellos  wrote:
> JB, I was about to bring this proposal forward myself!
>
> A huge +1.
>
> --
> *Ioannis Canellos*
> *
> FuseSource 
>
> **
> Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
> **
> Twitter: iocanel
> *

Re: [PROPOSAL] Use paxexam-karaf on Karaf 2.3.x branch

[Ioannis Canellos]

JB, I was about to bring this proposal forward myself!

A huge +1.

-- 
*Ioannis Canellos*
*
FuseSource 

**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Twitter: iocanel
*

Re: [PROPOSAL] Use paxexam-karaf on Karaf 2.3.x branch

[Achim Nierbeck]

yeah, +1 from my side.


2012/6/18 Guillaume Nodet :
> Sounds good to me.
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Working on karaf-2.3.x branch, I detected issue on the itests after
>> upgrading to OSGi 4.3:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1554
>>
>> As the Karaf 2.3.x itests are based on the 2.2.x ones, they are "fragile"
>> and so it's not easy to update pax-runner and/or OSGi framework without
>> breaking something else.
>>
>> That's why I propose to refactore the itests in order to use paxexam-karaf
>> (from github): it will simplify the itests and we will be able to easily
>> extend it.
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbono...@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
>
> --
> 
> Guillaume Nodet
> 
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> 
> FuseSource, Integration everywhere
> http://fusesource.com



-- 

Apache Karaf  Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web 
Committer & Project Lead
OPS4J Pax for Vaadin
 Commiter & Project
Lead
blog 

Re: [PROPOSAL] Use paxexam-karaf on Karaf 2.3.x branch

[Guillaume Nodet]

Sounds good to me.

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Working on karaf-2.3.x branch, I detected issue on the itests after
> upgrading to OSGi 4.3:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1554
>
> As the Karaf 2.3.x itests are based on the 2.2.x ones, they are "fragile"
> and so it's not easy to update pax-runner and/or OSGi framework without
> breaking something else.
>
> That's why I propose to refactore the itests in order to use paxexam-karaf
> (from github): it will simplify the itests and we will be able to easily
> extend it.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com



-- 

Guillaume Nodet

Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

FuseSource, Integration everywhere
http://fusesource.com

Re: [PROPOSAL] Use paxexam-karaf on Karaf 2.3.x branch

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

Sorry for the noise, my e-mail client sent the message three times :/

Regards
JB

On 06/18/2012 10:08 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:

Hi all,

Working on karaf-2.3.x branch, I detected issue on the itests after
upgrading to OSGi 4.3:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1554

As the Karaf 2.3.x itests are based on the 2.2.x ones, they are
"fragile" and so it's not easy to update pax-runner and/or OSGi
framework without breaking something else.

That's why I propose to refactore the itests in order to use
paxexam-karaf (from github): it will simplify the itests and we will be
able to easily extend it.

WDYT ?

Regards
JB


--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

[PROPOSAL] Use paxexam-karaf on Karaf 2.3.x branch

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

Hi all,

Working on karaf-2.3.x branch, I detected issue on the itests after 
upgrading to OSGi 4.3:


https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1554

As the Karaf 2.3.x itests are based on the 2.2.x ones, they are 
"fragile" and so it's not easy to update pax-runner and/or OSGi 
framework without breaking something else.


That's why I propose to refactore the itests in order to use 
paxexam-karaf (from github): it will simplify the itests and we will be 
able to easily extend it.


WDYT ?

Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

[PROPOSAL] Use paxexam-karaf on Karaf 2.3.x branch

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

Hi all,

Working on karaf-2.3.x branch, I detected issue on the itests after 
upgrading to OSGi 4.3:


https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1554

As the Karaf 2.3.x itests are based on the 2.2.x ones, they are 
"fragile" and so it's not easy to update pax-runner and/or OSGi 
framework without breaking something else.


That's why I propose to refactore the itests in order to use 
paxexam-karaf (from github): it will simplify the itests and we will be 
able to easily extend it.


WDYT ?

Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

[PROPOSAL] Use paxexam-karaf on Karaf 2.3.x branch

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

Hi all,

Working on karaf-2.3.x branch, I detected issue on the itests after 
upgrading to OSGi 4.3:


https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1554

As the Karaf 2.3.x itests are based on the 2.2.x ones, they are 
"fragile" and so it's not easy to update pax-runner and/or OSGi 
framework without breaking something else.


That's why I propose to refactore the itests in order to use 
paxexam-karaf (from github): it will simplify the itests and we will be 
able to easily extend it.


WDYT ?

Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com