Re: [l10n-dev] POOTLE: Content update is completed
Pavel Janík wrote: On 17.3.2008, at 11:16, sophie wrote: Hi Rail, Rail Aliev wrote: On Monday 17 March 2008 11:44:54 Frank Mau wrote: AFAIK know basic/source/app needs no translation readlicense_oo needs translation only for French Frank, Can you describe the reason? Because a product can't be distributed in France if its documentation is not translated in French. I don't have the law article at hand, but without this translation, OOo can be rejected during a bid invitation for example. However, I don't know if it's France specific. Sophie? So you think this is the reason why Frank effectively told "no need to translate README files AT ALL, only for French"? No that was the explanation for French, not for not translating the readme files. I think this is not the reason and if it is, it is very stupid ;-) May be Franck said that there is no legal obligation other than in France, but yes [even if nobody read README file and it should be renamed READMENOT imho ;-)] it contains very important information and must be translated, of course. Kind regards Sophie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [l10n-dev] POOTLE: Content update is completed
On Monday 17 March 2008 13:16:43 sophie wrote: > Hi Rail, > > Rail Aliev wrote: > > On Monday 17 March 2008 11:44:54 Frank Mau wrote: > >> AFAIK know > >> basic/source/app needs no translation > >> readlicense_oo needs translation only for French > > > > Frank, > > Can you describe the reason? > > Because a product can't be distributed in France if its documentation is > not translated in French. I don't have the law article at hand, but > without this translation, OOo can be rejected during a bid invitation > for example. However, I don't know if it's France specific. This may be the reason why readlicense_oo should be translated, but not the reason why it shouldn't be translated, IMHO. -- Rail Aliev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [l10n-dev] POOTLE: Content update is completed
sophie wrote: Hi Rail, Rail Aliev wrote: On Monday 17 March 2008 11:44:54 Frank Mau wrote: AFAIK know basic/source/app needs no translation readlicense_oo needs translation only for French Frank, Can you describe the reason? Because a product can't be distributed in France if its documentation is not translated in French. I don't have the law article at hand, but without this translation, OOo can be rejected during a bid invitation for example. However, I don't know if it's France specific. readlicense_oo module name is misleading a bit, at moment it contains only README, which is an important document for enduser (contains system requirements and many other useful things to know). Bad thingie is that license itself is not translatable in oo.o (at least in common way) and this really violates laws not only in France. (Here too by the way, but no software seller cares...) Anyways there is no reason not to translate README-file (even never heard of that, we translated it since it became available). ain - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [l10n-dev] POOTLE: Content update is completed
On 17.3.2008, at 11:16, sophie wrote: Hi Rail, Rail Aliev wrote: On Monday 17 March 2008 11:44:54 Frank Mau wrote: AFAIK know basic/source/app needs no translation readlicense_oo needs translation only for French Frank, Can you describe the reason? Because a product can't be distributed in France if its documentation is not translated in French. I don't have the law article at hand, but without this translation, OOo can be rejected during a bid invitation for example. However, I don't know if it's France specific. Sophie? So you think this is the reason why Frank effectively told "no need to translate README files AT ALL, only for French"? I think this is not the reason and if it is, it is very stupid ;-) -- Pavel Janík - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [l10n-dev] POOTLE: Content update is completed
Hi Rail, Rail Aliev wrote: On Monday 17 March 2008 11:44:54 Frank Mau wrote: AFAIK know basic/source/app needs no translation readlicense_oo needs translation only for French Frank, Can you describe the reason? Because a product can't be distributed in France if its documentation is not translated in French. I don't have the law article at hand, but without this translation, OOo can be rejected during a bid invitation for example. However, I don't know if it's France specific. Kind regards Sophie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [l10n-dev] POOTLE: Content update is completed
On Monday 17 March 2008 11:44:54 Frank Mau wrote: > AFAIK know > basic/source/app needs no translation > readlicense_oo needs translation only for French Frank, Can you describe the reason? -- Rail Aliev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [l10n-dev] POOTLE: Content update is completed
Hi, On 17.3.2008, at 9:44, Frank Mau wrote: basic/source/app needs no translation nonsense. readlicense_oo needs translation only for French nonsense. It makes sense iff Frank was referring to the group of Sun languages... -- Pavel Janík - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [l10n-dev] POOTLE: Content update is completed
André Schnabel 쓴 글: Hi Aijin, Aijin Kim schrieb: Hi Pavel, I was told that those module/files have no need to be translated by base team and we decided not to upload them from Pootle to avoide confusion. They have never been translated and I've been removing the module/files every updates. Afair, README as well as testtool have been translated. SO, I'd rather leave it to the translation teams to pick those files or not. It makes sense to let each team decide. Before uploading the modules to Pootle, let me confirm once again with Frank Mau. And we may need to ask him to extract the existing translations of the modules from DB as they were not provided with initial content uploaded to Pootle. Hi Frank, Can you please confirm if below modules need to be translated? basic/source/app readlicense_oo Thanks, Aijin André - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [l10n-dev] POOTLE: Content update is completed
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Pavel Janík <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was told that those module/files have no need to be translated by > > base team and we decided not to upload them from Pootle to avoide > > confusion. They have never been translated and I've been removing > > the module/files every updates. > > Who told it to you? > -- > Pavel Janík > > That's a good example what will happen after separating pootle list. Looks like I have to take my vote back. ;) ain
Re: [l10n-dev] POOTLE: Content update is completed
Hi Aijin, Aijin Kim schrieb: Hi Pavel, I was told that those module/files have no need to be translated by base team and we decided not to upload them from Pootle to avoide confusion. They have never been translated and I've been removing the module/files every updates. Afair, README as well as testtool have been translated. SO, I'd rather leave it to the translation teams to pick those files or not. André - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [l10n-dev] POOTLE: Content update is completed
I was told that those module/files have no need to be translated by base team and we decided not to upload them from Pootle to avoide confusion. They have never been translated and I've been removing the module/files every updates. Who told it to you? -- Pavel Janík - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [l10n-dev] POOTLE: Content update is completed
Hi Pavel, I was told that those module/files have no need to be translated by base team and we decided not to upload them from Pootle to avoide confusion. They have never been translated and I've been removing the module/files every updates. Thanks, Aijin Pavel Janík wrote: Hi, On 14.3.2008, at 7:18, Aijin Kim wrote: Dear Pootle user, I'm not Pootle user, but I have a question anyway. I've just found that a few folder/files of UI which don't have to be translated were included. I removed them from Pootle. The removed folder/files are: readlicense_oo/* readlicense_oo/docs/readme.po contains README... /basic/source/app.po This file contains translations for VCL Testtool... If you already downloaded the files, please ignore them during your work. Why should Pootle users ignore them? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [l10n-dev] POOTLE: Content update is completed
Hi, On 14.3.2008, at 7:18, Aijin Kim wrote: Dear Pootle user, I'm not Pootle user, but I have a question anyway. I've just found that a few folder/files of UI which don't have to be translated were included. I removed them from Pootle. The removed folder/files are: readlicense_oo/* readlicense_oo/docs/readme.po contains README... /basic/source/app.po This file contains translations for VCL Testtool... If you already downloaded the files, please ignore them during your work. Why should Pootle users ignore them? -- Pavel Janík - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [l10n-dev] POOTLE: Content update is completed
Dear Pootle user, I've just found that a few folder/files of UI which don't have to be translated were included. I removed them from Pootle. The removed folder/files are: readlicense_oo/* /basic/source/app.po If you already downloaded the files, please ignore them during your work. Thanks, Aijin Aijin Kim wrote: > Dear Pootle user, > > Pootle is updated with the contents of DEV300_m3 milestone. Now you can > continue your work with the latest content. > The final due date of translation for OO.o 3.0 is April 3rd as original > schedule. > > Thanks, > Aijin > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[l10n-dev] POOTLE: Content update is completed
Dear Pootle user, Pootle is updated with the contents of DEV300_m3 milestone. Now you can continue your work with the latest content. The final due date of translation for OO.o 3.0 is April 3rd as original schedule. Thanks, Aijin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
