+1 @David Smiley
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 4:07 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
wrote:
>
> Maybe we need them for kerberos? I'm totally fine getting rid of kerberos
> support from Solr core some day, but it might not be very easy to refactor it
> into a package.
>
> On Sat, 10 Oct, 2020, 10:26 pm David Smiley, wrote:
>>
>> I think that historically, we are good at adding code but not good at
>> removing code. We add new ways to do things but keep the old. Removal is
>> more work often forgotten but doing nothing implicitly adds technical debt
>> henceforth.
>>
>> With that segue... given that our latest SolrClient implementations are
>> based on Jetty HttpClient (to support Http2 but should support 1.1?), do we
>> need the original Apache HttpComponents/HttpClient as well? This is an
>> honest question... maybe there are subtle reasons they are needed and I
>> think it would be good as a project that we are clear on them.
>>
>> ~ David Smiley
>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
--
-
Noble Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org