[FAILED][VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1
d there are sound proposals to ease the > >> > >> > > pain and they can be implemented any time, do you think it is > >> > >> > > still a blocker? > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 12:59 PM Robert Muir > >> > >> > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Along the same lines of back compat woes, I'd like to see my > >> > >> > >> blocker > >> > >> > >> issue about back compat testing addressed in the release > >> > >> > >> candidate, > >> > >> > >> rather than simply ignored. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10168 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> With the 9.0 release, we are attempting to *double* our backwards > >> > >> > >> compatibility guarantees (2 major versions), yet here we are > >> > >> > >> discussing insane release strategies that can't be > >> > >> > >> guaranteed/tested > >> > >> > >> to work (8.12-after-9.0-etc), here we are with back compat tests > >> > >> > >> taking a minute and half on branch_9_0! Imagine how long they > >> > >> > >> will > >> > >> > >> take for branch_9_9! > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> When it comes to more back compat, people are quick to demand > >> > >> > >> more of > >> > >> > >> it every time. But when it comes to addressing the necessary > >> > >> > >> issues to > >> > >> > >> make it work...crickets. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 5:11 AM Robert Muir > >> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > -1 to release lucene 9.0, as long as branch_8x remains. > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > I know you made a separate thread for this, but it is a real > >> > >> > >> > problem. > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > The problem is that we can't support backwards compatibility > >> > >> > >> > like > >> > >> > >> > this: releasing 9.0 then 8.12's and stuff. It isn't how the > >> > >> > >> > back > >> > >> > >> > compat testing works, it is completely cowboy and unsupported. > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 9:19 AM Adrien Grand > >> > >> > >> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > I think we should remove it but I remember it was > >> > >> > >> > > controversial in the past. I'll start a separate thread. > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 14:38, Uwe Schindler > >> > >> > >> > > a écrit : > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Yes. But we won't have a 8.12 release so I assume the > >> > >> > >> > >> branch_8x is dead. Maybe we should dass a note to it's > >> > >> > >> > >> readme or delete it? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Uwe > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Am 20. November 2021 13:15:23 UTC schrieb Adrien Grand > >> > >> > >> > >> : > >> > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >>> We need to keep the 8.11 jobs, but I think they can be > >> > >> > >> > >>> disabled. We typically only enable them when we start > >> > >> > >> > >>> discussing doing a new patch release? > >> > >> > >&g
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1
ate, >> > >> > >> rather than simply ignored. >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10168 >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> With the 9.0 release, we are attempting to *double* our backwards >> > >> > >> compatibility guarantees (2 major versions), yet here we are >> > >> > >> discussing insane release strategies that can't be >> > >> > >> guaranteed/tested >> > >> > >> to work (8.12-after-9.0-etc), here we are with back compat tests >> > >> > >> taking a minute and half on branch_9_0! Imagine how long they will >> > >> > >> take for branch_9_9! >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> When it comes to more back compat, people are quick to demand more >> > >> > >> of >> > >> > >> it every time. But when it comes to addressing the necessary >> > >> > >> issues to >> > >> > >> make it work...crickets. >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 5:11 AM Robert Muir >> > >> > >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -1 to release lucene 9.0, as long as branch_8x remains. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > I know you made a separate thread for this, but it is a real >> > >> > >> > problem. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > The problem is that we can't support backwards compatibility like >> > >> > >> > this: releasing 9.0 then 8.12's and stuff. It isn't how the back >> > >> > >> > compat testing works, it is completely cowboy and unsupported. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 9:19 AM Adrien Grand >> > >> > >> > wrote: >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > I think we should remove it but I remember it was >> > >> > >> > > controversial in the past. I'll start a separate thread. >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 14:38, Uwe Schindler >> > >> > >> > > a écrit : >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> Yes. But we won't have a 8.12 release so I assume the >> > >> > >> > >> branch_8x is dead. Maybe we should dass a note to it's readme >> > >> > >> > >> or delete it? >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> Uwe >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> Am 20. November 2021 13:15:23 UTC schrieb Adrien Grand >> > >> > >> > >> : >> > >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > >> > >>> We need to keep the 8.11 jobs, but I think they can be >> > >> > >> > >>> disabled. We typically only enable them when we start >> > >> > >> > >>> discussing doing a new patch release? >> > >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > >> > >>> Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 12:51, Uwe Schindler >> > >> > >> > >>> a écrit : >> > >> > >> > >>>> >> > >> > >> > >>>> Hi, >> > >> > >> > >>>> >> > >> > >> > >>>> I setup my usual release tester job on Policeman Jenkins >> > >> > >> > >>>> and it succeeded: >> > >> > >> > >>>> SUCCESS! [0:19:00.801641] >> > >> > >> > >>>> >> > >> > >> > >>>> See here for log: >> > >> > >> > >>>> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/4/console >> > >> > >> > >>>> >> > >> > >> > >>>> So it looks like technically the release is fine. I will >> > >> > >> > >>>> wait a bit with m
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1
anch_9_9! > > >> > >> > > >> > >> When it comes to more back compat, people are quick to demand > more of > > >> > >> it every time. But when it comes to addressing the necessary > issues to > > >> > >> make it work...crickets. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 5:11 AM Robert Muir > wrote: > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > -1 to release lucene 9.0, as long as branch_8x remains. > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > I know you made a separate thread for this, but it is a real > problem. > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > The problem is that we can't support backwards compatibility > like > > >> > >> > this: releasing 9.0 then 8.12's and stuff. It isn't how the > back > > >> > >> > compat testing works, it is completely cowboy and unsupported. > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 9:19 AM Adrien Grand < > jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > I think we should remove it but I remember it was > controversial in the past. I'll start a separate thread. > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 14:38, Uwe Schindler > a écrit : > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> Yes. But we won't have a 8.12 release so I assume the > branch_8x is dead. Maybe we should dass a note to it's readme or delete it? > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> Uwe > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> Am 20. November 2021 13:15:23 UTC schrieb Adrien Grand < > jpou...@gmail.com>: > > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > >>> We need to keep the 8.11 jobs, but I think they can be > disabled. We typically only enable them when we start discussing doing a > new patch release? > > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > >>> Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 12:51, Uwe Schindler < > u...@thetaphi.de> a écrit : > > >> > >> > >>>> > > >> > >> > >>>> Hi, > > >> > >> > >>>> > > >> > >> > >>>> I setup my usual release tester job on Policeman Jenkins > and it succeeded: > > >> > >> > >>>> SUCCESS! [0:19:00.801641] > > >> > >> > >>>> > > >> > >> > >>>> See here for log: > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/4/console > > >> > >> > >>>> > > >> > >> > >>>> So it looks like technically the release is fine. I will > wait a bit with my +1, because I wanted to manually check the artifacts and > javadocs first. > > >> > >> > >>>> > > >> > >> > >>>> I also enabled the 9.0 and 9.x builds on Policeman > Jenkins (sorry for the delay). At the same time I disabled 8.x builds. If > Solr people still need them we can enable them. But I think the only ones > we need now are 8.11.x ones, right? > > >> > >> > >>>> > > >> > >> > >>>> Uwe > > >> > >> > >>>> > > >> > >> > >>>> - > > >> > >> > >>>> Uwe Schindler > > >> > >> > >>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > >> > >> > >>>> https://www.thetaphi.de > > >> > >> > >>>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > >> > >> > >>>> > > >> > >> > >>>> > -Original Message- > > >> > >> > >>>> > From: Adrien Grand > > >> > >> > >>>> > Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2021 9:25 AM > > >> > >> > >>>> > To: Lucene Dev > > >> > >> > >>>> > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1 > > >> > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >> > >>>> > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.0.0. > > >> > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >> > >>>> > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > >> > >> > >>>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev- > > >> > >> > >>>> > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 > > >> > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >> > >>>> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > >> > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >> > >>>> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > >> > >> > >>>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev- > > >> > >> > >>>> > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 > > >> > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >> > >>>> > The vote will be open until 2021-11-24 09:00 UTC. > > >> > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >> > >>>> > [ ] +1 approve > > >> > >> > >>>> > [ ] +0 no opinion > > >> > >> > >>>> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > >> > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >> > >>>> > Here is my +1 > > >> > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >> > >>>> > -- > > >> > >> > >>>> > Adrien > > >> > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >> > >>>> > > - > > >> > >> > >>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > >> > >> > >>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: > dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > >> > >> > >>>> > > >> > >> > >>>> > > >> > >> > >>>> > - > > >> > >> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > >> > >> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: > dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > >> > >> > >>>> > > >> > >> > >> -- > > >> > >> > >> Uwe Schindler > > >> > >> > >> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen > > >> > >> > >> https://www.thetaphi.de > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > - > > >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> - > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Adrien > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1
; >> > > >> > >> > -1 to release lucene 9.0, as long as branch_8x remains. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > I know you made a separate thread for this, but it is a real > >> > >> > problem. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > The problem is that we can't support backwards compatibility like > >> > >> > this: releasing 9.0 then 8.12's and stuff. It isn't how the back > >> > >> > compat testing works, it is completely cowboy and unsupported. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 9:19 AM Adrien Grand > >> > >> > wrote: > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > I think we should remove it but I remember it was controversial > >> > >> > > in the past. I'll start a separate thread. > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 14:38, Uwe Schindler a > >> > >> > > écrit : > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Yes. But we won't have a 8.12 release so I assume the branch_8x > >> > >> > >> is dead. Maybe we should dass a note to it's readme or delete it? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Uwe > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Am 20. November 2021 13:15:23 UTC schrieb Adrien Grand > >> > >> > >> : > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > >>> We need to keep the 8.11 jobs, but I think they can be > >> > >> > >>> disabled. We typically only enable them when we start > >> > >> > >>> discussing doing a new patch release? > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > >>> Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 12:51, Uwe Schindler > >> > >> > >>> a écrit : > >> > >> > >>>> > >> > >> > >>>> Hi, > >> > >> > >>>> > >> > >> > >>>> I setup my usual release tester job on Policeman Jenkins and > >> > >> > >>>> it succeeded: > >> > >> > >>>> SUCCESS! [0:19:00.801641] > >> > >> > >>>> > >> > >> > >>>> See here for log: > >> > >> > >>>> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/4/console > >> > >> > >>>> > >> > >> > >>>> So it looks like technically the release is fine. I will wait > >> > >> > >>>> a bit with my +1, because I wanted to manually check the > >> > >> > >>>> artifacts and javadocs first. > >> > >> > >>>> > >> > >> > >>>> I also enabled the 9.0 and 9.x builds on Policeman Jenkins > >> > >> > >>>> (sorry for the delay). At the same time I disabled 8.x builds. > >> > >> > >>>> If Solr people still need them we can enable them. But I think > >> > >> > >>>> the only ones we need now are 8.11.x ones, right? > >> > >> > >>>> > >> > >> > >>>> Uwe > >> > >> > >>>> > >> > >> > >>>> - > >> > >> > >>>> Uwe Schindler > >> > >> > >>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > >> > >> > >>>> https://www.thetaphi.de > >> > >> > >>>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > >> > >> > >>>> > >> > >> > >>>> > -Original Message- > >> > >> > >>>> > From: Adrien Grand > >> > >> > >>>> > Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2021 9:25 AM > >> > >> > >>>> > To: Lucene Dev > >> > >> > >>>> > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1 > >> > >> > >>>> > > >> > >> > >>>> > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.0.0. > >> > >> > >>>> > > >> > >> > >>>> > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > >> > >> > >>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev- > >> > >> > >>>> > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 > >> > >> > >>>> > > >> > >> > >>>> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > >> > >> > >>>> > > >> > >> > >>>> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > >> > >> > >>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev- > >> > >> > >>>> > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 > >> > >> > >>>> > > >> > >> > >>>> > The vote will be open until 2021-11-24 09:00 UTC. > >> > >> > >>>> > > >> > >> > >>>> > [ ] +1 approve > >> > >> > >>>> > [ ] +0 no opinion > >> > >> > >>>> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >> > >> > >>>> > > >> > >> > >>>> > Here is my +1 > >> > >> > >>>> > > >> > >> > >>>> > -- > >> > >> > >>>> > Adrien > >> > >> > >>>> > > >> > >> > >>>> > - > >> > >> > >>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> > >> > >>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> > >> > >>>> > >> > >> > >>>> > >> > >> > >>>> - > >> > >> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> > >> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> > >> > >>>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> > >> Uwe Schindler > >> > >> > >> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen > >> > >> > >> https://www.thetaphi.de > >> > >> > >> > >> - > >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> > >> > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> > > > > > > -- > > Adrien > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1
uld remove it but I remember it was controversial in >> > >> > > the past. I'll start a separate thread. >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 14:38, Uwe Schindler a >> > >> > > écrit : >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> Yes. But we won't have a 8.12 release so I assume the branch_8x is >> > >> > >> dead. Maybe we should dass a note to it's readme or delete it? >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> Uwe >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> Am 20. November 2021 13:15:23 UTC schrieb Adrien Grand >> > >> > >> : >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > >>> We need to keep the 8.11 jobs, but I think they can be disabled. >> > >> > >>> We typically only enable them when we start discussing doing a >> > >> > >>> new patch release? >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > >>> Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 12:51, Uwe Schindler a >> > >> > >>> écrit : >> > >> > >>>> >> > >> > >>>> Hi, >> > >> > >>>> >> > >> > >>>> I setup my usual release tester job on Policeman Jenkins and it >> > >> > >>>> succeeded: >> > >> > >>>> SUCCESS! [0:19:00.801641] >> > >> > >>>> >> > >> > >>>> See here for log: >> > >> > >>>> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/4/console >> > >> > >>>> >> > >> > >>>> So it looks like technically the release is fine. I will wait a >> > >> > >>>> bit with my +1, because I wanted to manually check the artifacts >> > >> > >>>> and javadocs first. >> > >> > >>>> >> > >> > >>>> I also enabled the 9.0 and 9.x builds on Policeman Jenkins >> > >> > >>>> (sorry for the delay). At the same time I disabled 8.x builds. >> > >> > >>>> If Solr people still need them we can enable them. But I think >> > >> > >>>> the only ones we need now are 8.11.x ones, right? >> > >> > >>>> >> > >> > >>>> Uwe >> > >> > >>>> >> > >> > >>>> - >> > >> > >>>> Uwe Schindler >> > >> > >>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >> > >> > >>>> https://www.thetaphi.de >> > >> > >>>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> > >> > >>>> >> > >> > >>>> > -Original Message- >> > >> > >>>> > From: Adrien Grand >> > >> > >>>> > Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2021 9:25 AM >> > >> > >>>> > To: Lucene Dev >> > >> > >>>> > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1 >> > >> > >>>> > >> > >> > >>>> > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.0.0. >> > >> > >>>> > >> > >> > >>>> > The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> > >> > >>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev- >> > >> > >>>> > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 >> > >> > >>>> > >> > >> > >>>> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >> > >> > >>>> > >> > >> > >>>> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >> > >> > >>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev- >> > >> > >>>> > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 >> > >> > >>>> > >> > >> > >>>> > The vote will be open until 2021-11-24 09:00 UTC. >> > >> > >>>> > >> > >> > >>>> > [ ] +1 approve >> > >> > >>>> > [ ] +0 no opinion >> > >> > >>>> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> > >> > >>>> > >> > >> > >>>> > Here is my +1 >> > >> > >>>> > >> > >> > >>>> > -- >> > >> > >>>> > Adrien >> > >> > >>>> > >> > >> > >>>> > - >> > >> > >>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > >> > >>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > >> > >>>> >> > >> > >>>> >> > >> > >>>> - >> > >> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > >> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > >> > >>>> >> > >> > >> -- >> > >> > >> Uwe Schindler >> > >> > >> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen >> > >> > >> https://www.thetaphi.de >> > >> >> > >> - >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > > -- > Adrien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1
gt; >> > >>> > > >> > >>> Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 12:51, Uwe Schindler > a écrit : > > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> Hi, > > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> I setup my usual release tester job on Policeman Jenkins and > it succeeded: > > >> > >>>> SUCCESS! [0:19:00.801641] > > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> See here for log: > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/4/console > > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> So it looks like technically the release is fine. I will wait > a bit with my +1, because I wanted to manually check the artifacts and > javadocs first. > > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> I also enabled the 9.0 and 9.x builds on Policeman Jenkins > (sorry for the delay). At the same time I disabled 8.x builds. If Solr > people still need them we can enable them. But I think the only ones we > need now are 8.11.x ones, right? > > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> Uwe > > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> - > > >> > >>>> Uwe Schindler > > >> > >>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > >> > >>>> https://www.thetaphi.de > > >> > >>>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > -Original Message- > > >> > >>>> > From: Adrien Grand > > >> > >>>> > Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2021 9:25 AM > > >> > >>>> > To: Lucene Dev > > >> > >>>> > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1 > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.0.0. > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > >> > >>>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev- > > >> > >>>> > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > >> > >>>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev- > > >> > >>>> > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> > The vote will be open until 2021-11-24 09:00 UTC. > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> > [ ] +1 approve > > >> > >>>> > [ ] +0 no opinion > > >> > >>>> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> > Here is my +1 > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> > -- > > >> > >>>> > Adrien > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> > > - > > >> > >>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > >> > >>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > - > > >> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > >> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > >> > >>>> > > >> > >> -- > > >> > >> Uwe Schindler > > >> > >> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen > > >> > >> https://www.thetaphi.de > > >> > > >> - > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > -- Adrien
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1
t;>> SUCCESS! [0:19:00.801641] > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> See here for log: > >> > >>>> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/4/console > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> So it looks like technically the release is fine. I will wait a bit > >> > >>>> with my +1, because I wanted to manually check the artifacts and > >> > >>>> javadocs first. > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> I also enabled the 9.0 and 9.x builds on Policeman Jenkins (sorry > >> > >>>> for the delay). At the same time I disabled 8.x builds. If Solr > >> > >>>> people still need them we can enable them. But I think the only > >> > >>>> ones we need now are 8.11.x ones, right? > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> Uwe > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> - > >> > >>>> Uwe Schindler > >> > >>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > >> > >>>> https://www.thetaphi.de > >> > >>>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > -Original Message- > >> > >>>> > From: Adrien Grand > >> > >>>> > Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2021 9:25 AM > >> > >>>> > To: Lucene Dev > >> > >>>> > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1 > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.0.0. > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > >> > >>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev- > >> > >>>> > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > >> > >>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev- > >> > >>>> > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > The vote will be open until 2021-11-24 09:00 UTC. > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > [ ] +1 approve > >> > >>>> > [ ] +0 no opinion > >> > >>>> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > Here is my +1 > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > -- > >> > >>>> > Adrien > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> > - > >> > >>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> > >>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> - > >> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> > >>>> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Uwe Schindler > >> > >> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen > >> > >> https://www.thetaphi.de > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1
Thanks Ignacio, I see several choices, but the status quo of the testing is the problem. One choice is to not make any technical changes, but do something to prevent lucene from having to be compatible with 20 different versions :) For example, not supporting 2 major versions back would cut it in half. Another solution would be to release major versions faster so that we churn thru the versions at a more sustainable rate rather than having them pile up. Another option is to technically alter how the testing is done (as suggested on the issue). It could mean that some of them only run nightly or otherwise in jenkins. Which exact tests? I'm not sure, just as long as it becomes reasonable. On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 7:18 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > > Your issue has not been ignored but the problem is that the version of the > blocker has not been added so it doesn't appear in a search for blockers in > Lucene 9 :( > > Do we need to discuss this again? I thought we discussed and agreed on > increasing our backwards compatibility. My personal opinion is that it is a > natural step for mature software that it is increasingly used in production > environments. > > Regarding your concerns in the subject, there is a healthy discussion in the > issue and there are sound proposals to ease the pain and they can be > implemented any time, do you think it is still a blocker? > > > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 12:59 PM Robert Muir wrote: >> >> Along the same lines of back compat woes, I'd like to see my blocker >> issue about back compat testing addressed in the release candidate, >> rather than simply ignored. >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10168 >> >> With the 9.0 release, we are attempting to *double* our backwards >> compatibility guarantees (2 major versions), yet here we are >> discussing insane release strategies that can't be guaranteed/tested >> to work (8.12-after-9.0-etc), here we are with back compat tests >> taking a minute and half on branch_9_0! Imagine how long they will >> take for branch_9_9! >> >> When it comes to more back compat, people are quick to demand more of >> it every time. But when it comes to addressing the necessary issues to >> make it work...crickets. >> >> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 5:11 AM Robert Muir wrote: >> > >> > -1 to release lucene 9.0, as long as branch_8x remains. >> > >> > I know you made a separate thread for this, but it is a real problem. >> > >> > The problem is that we can't support backwards compatibility like >> > this: releasing 9.0 then 8.12's and stuff. It isn't how the back >> > compat testing works, it is completely cowboy and unsupported. >> > >> > On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 9:19 AM Adrien Grand wrote: >> > > >> > > I think we should remove it but I remember it was controversial in the >> > > past. I'll start a separate thread. >> > > >> > > Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 14:38, Uwe Schindler a écrit : >> > >> >> > >> Yes. But we won't have a 8.12 release so I assume the branch_8x is >> > >> dead. Maybe we should dass a note to it's readme or delete it? >> > >> >> > >> Uwe >> > >> >> > >> Am 20. November 2021 13:15:23 UTC schrieb Adrien Grand >> > >> : >> > >>> >> > >>> We need to keep the 8.11 jobs, but I think they can be disabled. We >> > >>> typically only enable them when we start discussing doing a new patch >> > >>> release? >> > >>> >> > >>> Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 12:51, Uwe Schindler a écrit >> > >>> : >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Hi, >> > >>>> >> > >>>> I setup my usual release tester job on Policeman Jenkins and it >> > >>>> succeeded: >> > >>>> SUCCESS! [0:19:00.801641] >> > >>>> >> > >>>> See here for log: >> > >>>> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/4/console >> > >>>> >> > >>>> So it looks like technically the release is fine. I will wait a bit >> > >>>> with my +1, because I wanted to manually check the artifacts and >> > >>>> javadocs first. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> I also enabled the 9.0 and 9.x builds on Policeman Jenkins (sorry for >> > >>>> the delay). At the same time I disab
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1
Your issue has not been ignored but the problem is that the version of the blocker has not been added so it doesn't appear in a search for blockers in Lucene 9 :( Do we need to discuss this again? I thought we discussed and agreed on increasing our backwards compatibility. My personal opinion is that it is a natural step for mature software that it is increasingly used in production environments. Regarding your concerns in the subject, there is a healthy discussion in the issue and there are sound proposals to ease the pain and they can be implemented any time, do you think it is still a blocker? On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 12:59 PM Robert Muir wrote: > Along the same lines of back compat woes, I'd like to see my blocker > issue about back compat testing addressed in the release candidate, > rather than simply ignored. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10168 > > With the 9.0 release, we are attempting to *double* our backwards > compatibility guarantees (2 major versions), yet here we are > discussing insane release strategies that can't be guaranteed/tested > to work (8.12-after-9.0-etc), here we are with back compat tests > taking a minute and half on branch_9_0! Imagine how long they will > take for branch_9_9! > > When it comes to more back compat, people are quick to demand more of > it every time. But when it comes to addressing the necessary issues to > make it work...crickets. > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 5:11 AM Robert Muir wrote: > > > > -1 to release lucene 9.0, as long as branch_8x remains. > > > > I know you made a separate thread for this, but it is a real problem. > > > > The problem is that we can't support backwards compatibility like > > this: releasing 9.0 then 8.12's and stuff. It isn't how the back > > compat testing works, it is completely cowboy and unsupported. > > > > On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 9:19 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > > > > > > I think we should remove it but I remember it was controversial in the > past. I'll start a separate thread. > > > > > > Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 14:38, Uwe Schindler a écrit > : > > >> > > >> Yes. But we won't have a 8.12 release so I assume the branch_8x is > dead. Maybe we should dass a note to it's readme or delete it? > > >> > > >> Uwe > > >> > > >> Am 20. November 2021 13:15:23 UTC schrieb Adrien Grand < > jpou...@gmail.com>: > > >>> > > >>> We need to keep the 8.11 jobs, but I think they can be disabled. We > typically only enable them when we start discussing doing a new patch > release? > > >>> > > >>> Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 12:51, Uwe Schindler a > écrit : > > >>>> > > >>>> Hi, > > >>>> > > >>>> I setup my usual release tester job on Policeman Jenkins and it > succeeded: > > >>>> SUCCESS! [0:19:00.801641] > > >>>> > > >>>> See here for log: > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/4/console > > >>>> > > >>>> So it looks like technically the release is fine. I will wait a bit > with my +1, because I wanted to manually check the artifacts and javadocs > first. > > >>>> > > >>>> I also enabled the 9.0 and 9.x builds on Policeman Jenkins (sorry > for the delay). At the same time I disabled 8.x builds. If Solr people > still need them we can enable them. But I think the only ones we need now > are 8.11.x ones, right? > > >>>> > > >>>> Uwe > > >>>> > > >>>> - > > >>>> Uwe Schindler > > >>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > >>>> https://www.thetaphi.de > > >>>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > >>>> > > >>>> > -Original Message- > > >>>> > From: Adrien Grand > > >>>> > Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2021 9:25 AM > > >>>> > To: Lucene Dev > > >>>> > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1 > > >>>> > > > >>>> > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.0.0. > > >>>> > > > >>>> > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > >>>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev- > > >>>> > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 > > >>>> > > > >>>> > You can run the smoke tester directly with t
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1
Along the same lines of back compat woes, I'd like to see my blocker issue about back compat testing addressed in the release candidate, rather than simply ignored. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10168 With the 9.0 release, we are attempting to *double* our backwards compatibility guarantees (2 major versions), yet here we are discussing insane release strategies that can't be guaranteed/tested to work (8.12-after-9.0-etc), here we are with back compat tests taking a minute and half on branch_9_0! Imagine how long they will take for branch_9_9! When it comes to more back compat, people are quick to demand more of it every time. But when it comes to addressing the necessary issues to make it work...crickets. On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 5:11 AM Robert Muir wrote: > > -1 to release lucene 9.0, as long as branch_8x remains. > > I know you made a separate thread for this, but it is a real problem. > > The problem is that we can't support backwards compatibility like > this: releasing 9.0 then 8.12's and stuff. It isn't how the back > compat testing works, it is completely cowboy and unsupported. > > On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 9:19 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > > > > I think we should remove it but I remember it was controversial in the > > past. I'll start a separate thread. > > > > Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 14:38, Uwe Schindler a écrit : > >> > >> Yes. But we won't have a 8.12 release so I assume the branch_8x is dead. > >> Maybe we should dass a note to it's readme or delete it? > >> > >> Uwe > >> > >> Am 20. November 2021 13:15:23 UTC schrieb Adrien Grand : > >>> > >>> We need to keep the 8.11 jobs, but I think they can be disabled. We > >>> typically only enable them when we start discussing doing a new patch > >>> release? > >>> > >>> Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 12:51, Uwe Schindler a écrit : > >>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> I setup my usual release tester job on Policeman Jenkins and it > >>>> succeeded: > >>>> SUCCESS! [0:19:00.801641] > >>>> > >>>> See here for log: > >>>> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/4/console > >>>> > >>>> So it looks like technically the release is fine. I will wait a bit with > >>>> my +1, because I wanted to manually check the artifacts and javadocs > >>>> first. > >>>> > >>>> I also enabled the 9.0 and 9.x builds on Policeman Jenkins (sorry for > >>>> the delay). At the same time I disabled 8.x builds. If Solr people still > >>>> need them we can enable them. But I think the only ones we need now are > >>>> 8.11.x ones, right? > >>>> > >>>> Uwe > >>>> > >>>> - > >>>> Uwe Schindler > >>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > >>>> https://www.thetaphi.de > >>>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > >>>> > >>>> > -Original Message- > >>>> > From: Adrien Grand > >>>> > Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2021 9:25 AM > >>>> > To: Lucene Dev > >>>> > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1 > >>>> > > >>>> > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.0.0. > >>>> > > >>>> > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > >>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev- > >>>> > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 > >>>> > > >>>> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > >>>> > > >>>> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > >>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev- > >>>> > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 > >>>> > > >>>> > The vote will be open until 2021-11-24 09:00 UTC. > >>>> > > >>>> > [ ] +1 approve > >>>> > [ ] +0 no opinion > >>>> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >>>> > > >>>> > Here is my +1 > >>>> > > >>>> > -- > >>>> > Adrien > >>>> > > >>>> > - > >>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> - > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >>>> > >> -- > >> Uwe Schindler > >> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen > >> https://www.thetaphi.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1
-1 to release lucene 9.0, as long as branch_8x remains. I know you made a separate thread for this, but it is a real problem. The problem is that we can't support backwards compatibility like this: releasing 9.0 then 8.12's and stuff. It isn't how the back compat testing works, it is completely cowboy and unsupported. On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 9:19 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > > I think we should remove it but I remember it was controversial in the past. > I'll start a separate thread. > > Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 14:38, Uwe Schindler a écrit : >> >> Yes. But we won't have a 8.12 release so I assume the branch_8x is dead. >> Maybe we should dass a note to it's readme or delete it? >> >> Uwe >> >> Am 20. November 2021 13:15:23 UTC schrieb Adrien Grand : >>> >>> We need to keep the 8.11 jobs, but I think they can be disabled. We >>> typically only enable them when we start discussing doing a new patch >>> release? >>> >>> Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 12:51, Uwe Schindler a écrit : >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I setup my usual release tester job on Policeman Jenkins and it succeeded: >>>> SUCCESS! [0:19:00.801641] >>>> >>>> See here for log: >>>> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/4/console >>>> >>>> So it looks like technically the release is fine. I will wait a bit with >>>> my +1, because I wanted to manually check the artifacts and javadocs first. >>>> >>>> I also enabled the 9.0 and 9.x builds on Policeman Jenkins (sorry for the >>>> delay). At the same time I disabled 8.x builds. If Solr people still need >>>> them we can enable them. But I think the only ones we need now are 8.11.x >>>> ones, right? >>>> >>>> Uwe >>>> >>>> - >>>> Uwe Schindler >>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >>>> https://www.thetaphi.de >>>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >>>> >>>> > -Original Message- >>>> > From: Adrien Grand >>>> > Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2021 9:25 AM >>>> > To: Lucene Dev >>>> > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1 >>>> > >>>> > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.0.0. >>>> > >>>> > The artifacts can be downloaded from: >>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev- >>>> > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 >>>> > >>>> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >>>> > >>>> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev- >>>> > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 >>>> > >>>> > The vote will be open until 2021-11-24 09:00 UTC. >>>> > >>>> > [ ] +1 approve >>>> > [ ] +0 no opinion >>>> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>>> > >>>> > Here is my +1 >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Adrien >>>> > >>>> > - >>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>>> - >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>> >> -- >> Uwe Schindler >> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen >> https://www.thetaphi.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1
SUCCESS! [0:17:58.084253] +1 from me. There are a few things I think could be done better (the demo application... is not really what it should or could be) but these have been with us for so long that it's definitely not a showstopper. D. On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 9:25 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.0.0. > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev-903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev-903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 > > The vote will be open until 2021-11-24 09:00 UTC. > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Here is my +1 > > -- > Adrien > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1
And now also with JDK-11 and JDK-17 combined, thanks to Robert Muir: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/5/console - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Uwe Schindler > Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2021 12:51 PM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1 > > Hi, > > I setup my usual release tester job on Policeman Jenkins and it succeeded: > SUCCESS! [0:19:00.801641] > > See here for log: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release- > Tester/4/console > > So it looks like technically the release is fine. I will wait a bit with my > +1, > because I wanted to manually check the artifacts and javadocs first. > > I also enabled the 9.0 and 9.x builds on Policeman Jenkins (sorry for the > delay). > At the same time I disabled 8.x builds. If Solr people still need them we can > enable them. But I think the only ones we need now are 8.11.x ones, right? > > Uwe > > - > Uwe Schindler > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > https://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > -Original Message- > > From: Adrien Grand > > Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2021 9:25 AM > > To: Lucene Dev > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1 > > > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.0.0. > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev- > > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev- > > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 > > > > The vote will be open until 2021-11-24 09:00 UTC. > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > Here is my +1 > > > > -- > > Adrien > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1
I think we should remove it but I remember it was controversial in the past. I'll start a separate thread. Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 14:38, Uwe Schindler a écrit : > Yes. But we won't have a 8.12 release so I assume the branch_8x is dead. > Maybe we should dass a note to it's readme or delete it? > > Uwe > > Am 20. November 2021 13:15:23 UTC schrieb Adrien Grand >: >> >> We need to keep the 8.11 jobs, but I think they can be disabled. We >> typically only enable them when we start discussing doing a new patch >> release? >> >> Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 12:51, Uwe Schindler a écrit : >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I setup my usual release tester job on Policeman Jenkins and it >>> succeeded: >>> SUCCESS! [0:19:00.801641] >>> >>> See here for log: >>> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/4/console >>> >>> So it looks like technically the release is fine. I will wait a bit with >>> my +1, because I wanted to manually check the artifacts and javadocs first. >>> >>> I also enabled the 9.0 and 9.x builds on Policeman Jenkins (sorry for >>> the delay). At the same time I disabled 8.x builds. If Solr people still >>> need them we can enable them. But I think the only ones we need now are >>> 8.11.x ones, right? >>> >>> Uwe >>> >>> - >>> Uwe Schindler >>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >>> https://www.thetaphi.de >>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >>> >>> > -Original Message- >>> > From: Adrien Grand >>> > Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2021 9:25 AM >>> > To: Lucene Dev >>> > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1 >>> > >>> > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.0.0. >>> > >>> > The artifacts can be downloaded from: >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev- >>> > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 >>> > >>> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >>> > >>> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev- >>> > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 >>> > >>> > The vote will be open until 2021-11-24 09:00 UTC. >>> > >>> > [ ] +1 approve >>> > [ ] +0 no opinion >>> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>> > >>> > Here is my +1 >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Adrien >>> > >>> > - >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> >>> -- > Uwe Schindler > Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen > https://www.thetaphi.de >
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1
Yes. But we won't have a 8.12 release so I assume the branch_8x is dead. Maybe we should dass a note to it's readme or delete it? Uwe Am 20. November 2021 13:15:23 UTC schrieb Adrien Grand : >We need to keep the 8.11 jobs, but I think they can be disabled. We >typically only enable them when we start discussing doing a new patch >release? > >Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 12:51, Uwe Schindler a écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> I setup my usual release tester job on Policeman Jenkins and it succeeded: >> SUCCESS! [0:19:00.801641] >> >> See here for log: >> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/4/console >> >> So it looks like technically the release is fine. I will wait a bit with >> my +1, because I wanted to manually check the artifacts and javadocs first. >> >> I also enabled the 9.0 and 9.x builds on Policeman Jenkins (sorry for the >> delay). At the same time I disabled 8.x builds. If Solr people still need >> them we can enable them. But I think the only ones we need now are 8.11.x >> ones, right? >> >> Uwe >> >> - >> Uwe Schindler >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >> https://www.thetaphi.de >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Adrien Grand >> > Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2021 9:25 AM >> > To: Lucene Dev >> > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1 >> > >> > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.0.0. >> > >> > The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev- >> > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 >> > >> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >> > >> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev- >> > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 >> > >> > The vote will be open until 2021-11-24 09:00 UTC. >> > >> > [ ] +1 approve >> > [ ] +0 no opinion >> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> > >> > Here is my +1 >> > >> > -- >> > Adrien >> > >> > - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1
We need to keep the 8.11 jobs, but I think they can be disabled. We typically only enable them when we start discussing doing a new patch release? Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 12:51, Uwe Schindler a écrit : > Hi, > > I setup my usual release tester job on Policeman Jenkins and it succeeded: > SUCCESS! [0:19:00.801641] > > See here for log: > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/4/console > > So it looks like technically the release is fine. I will wait a bit with > my +1, because I wanted to manually check the artifacts and javadocs first. > > I also enabled the 9.0 and 9.x builds on Policeman Jenkins (sorry for the > delay). At the same time I disabled 8.x builds. If Solr people still need > them we can enable them. But I think the only ones we need now are 8.11.x > ones, right? > > Uwe > > - > Uwe Schindler > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > https://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > -Original Message- > > From: Adrien Grand > > Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2021 9:25 AM > > To: Lucene Dev > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1 > > > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.0.0. > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev- > > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev- > > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 > > > > The vote will be open until 2021-11-24 09:00 UTC. > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > Here is my +1 > > > > -- > > Adrien > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1
Oh did not know. Will extend my Jenkins job. Uwe Am 20. November 2021 13:05:43 UTC schrieb Robert Muir : >I also ran the smoketester with --test-java17 >/usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk, which ran all the checks on both java 11 >and java 17. > >SUCCESS! [0:34:34.251839] > >On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 7:25 AM Robert Muir wrote: >> >> I ran the smoketester and it passed: >> >> SUCCESS! [0:18:08.361431] >> >> Thanks to all the hard work on smoke testing, release scripts, and build! >> >> Like Uwe, I plan to do some manual inspection and look for trouble >> before voting. But things look to be in a good place. >> >> On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 3:25 AM Adrien Grand wrote: >> > >> > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.0.0. >> > >> > The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev-903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 >> > >> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >> > >> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev-903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 >> > >> > The vote will be open until 2021-11-24 09:00 UTC. >> > >> > [ ] +1 approve >> > [ ] +0 no opinion >> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> > >> > Here is my +1 >> > >> > -- >> > Adrien >> > >> > - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1
I also ran the smoketester with --test-java17 /usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk, which ran all the checks on both java 11 and java 17. SUCCESS! [0:34:34.251839] On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 7:25 AM Robert Muir wrote: > > I ran the smoketester and it passed: > > SUCCESS! [0:18:08.361431] > > Thanks to all the hard work on smoke testing, release scripts, and build! > > Like Uwe, I plan to do some manual inspection and look for trouble > before voting. But things look to be in a good place. > > On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 3:25 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > > > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.0.0. > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev-903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev-903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 > > > > The vote will be open until 2021-11-24 09:00 UTC. > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > Here is my +1 > > > > -- > > Adrien > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1
I ran the smoketester and it passed: SUCCESS! [0:18:08.361431] Thanks to all the hard work on smoke testing, release scripts, and build! Like Uwe, I plan to do some manual inspection and look for trouble before voting. But things look to be in a good place. On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 3:25 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.0.0. > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev-903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev-903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 > > The vote will be open until 2021-11-24 09:00 UTC. > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Here is my +1 > > -- > Adrien > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1
Hi, I setup my usual release tester job on Policeman Jenkins and it succeeded: SUCCESS! [0:19:00.801641] See here for log: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/4/console So it looks like technically the release is fine. I will wait a bit with my +1, because I wanted to manually check the artifacts and javadocs first. I also enabled the 9.0 and 9.x builds on Policeman Jenkins (sorry for the delay). At the same time I disabled 8.x builds. If Solr people still need them we can enable them. But I think the only ones we need now are 8.11.x ones, right? Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Adrien Grand > Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2021 9:25 AM > To: Lucene Dev > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1 > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.0.0. > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev- > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev- > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 > > The vote will be open until 2021-11-24 09:00 UTC. > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Here is my +1 > > -- > Adrien > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1
Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.0.0. The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev-903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev-903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075 The vote will be open until 2021-11-24 09:00 UTC. [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Here is my +1 -- Adrien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
