Re: 5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 release?)
SOLR-8180 (jcl-over-slf4j) is there too now, some 30min ago. On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:27 PM Upayavira wrote: > Thx, I hope to create the first RC tomorrow. > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015, at 06:36 PM, Noble Paul wrote: > > I'm done with SOLR-8355 > > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Noble Paul wrote: > > > hi Upayavira, > > > sorry for the trouble. There is another blocker created > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8355 > > > I'm fixing that > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ > > > LONDON) wrote: > > >> Fair point, I have re-worded the ticket title and summary. Will await > > >> further opinions before applying or not applying the patch to 5.4 > branch > > >> (and trunk and branch_5x). > > >> > > >> Christine > > >> > > >> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: Nov 30 2015 14:29:58 > > >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org > > >> Subject: Re: 5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A > 5.4 > > >> release?) > > >> > > >> The patch seems innocuous enough. From the ticket though it isn't so > clear > > >> to me what problem it solves. I'm open to the opinion of others. > > >> > > >> Upayavira > > >> > > >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ > LONDON) > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> Any thoughts on getting the > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6911 fix into 5.4 solr > or not? > > >> Basically StandardQueryParser's existing getMultiFields method is a > no-op. > > >> > > >> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: Nov 25 2015 14:11:46 > > >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org > > >> Subject: Re:5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 > > >> release?) > > >> > > >> I have created the lucene_solr_5_4 branch. Please, no new features in > this > > >> branch. > > >> > > >> Please update this thread with any changes you propose to make to this > > >> branch. Only JIRA tickets which are a blocker and have fix version > 5.4 will > > >> delay a release candidate build. > > >> > > >> Please do review the below - and take any action to clear up these > tickets > > >> asap. > > >> > > >> I expect to create the first RC this time next week. > > >> > > >> Thanks! > > >> > > >> Upayavira > > >> > > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 02:05 PM, Upayavira wrote: > > >> > > >> I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the > feature > > >> freeze starts. > > >> > > >> Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version > 5.4. I > > >> suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that > the > > >> majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5. > > >> > > >> Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets: > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) > blocker > > >> "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization > causes > > >> issue with replication" > > >> > > >> Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the > release? > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical > > >> "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp" > > >> > > >> This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense. > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical > > >> "Add tests for bin/post" > > >> > > >> Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding > back a > > >> release > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical > > >> "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 > (b71)" > > >> > > >> Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker? > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), > blocker > > >> "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x" > > >> > > >> Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will > not > > >> consider this a blocker either. > > >> > > >> - o - > > >> > > >> So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. > Anyone > > >> have comments/observations here? > > >> > > >> I will create the branch shortly. > > >> > > >> Upayavira > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > - > > > Noble Paul > > > > > > > > -- > > - > > Noble Paul > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > -- Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
Re: 5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 release?)
Thx, I hope to create the first RC tomorrow. On Tue, Dec 1, 2015, at 06:36 PM, Noble Paul wrote: > I'm done with SOLR-8355 > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Noble Paul wrote: > > hi Upayavira, > > sorry for the trouble. There is another blocker created > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8355 > > I'm fixing that > > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ > > LONDON) wrote: > >> Fair point, I have re-worded the ticket title and summary. Will await > >> further opinions before applying or not applying the patch to 5.4 branch > >> (and trunk and branch_5x). > >> > >> Christine > >> > >> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: Nov 30 2015 14:29:58 > >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: 5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 > >> release?) > >> > >> The patch seems innocuous enough. From the ticket though it isn't so clear > >> to me what problem it solves. I'm open to the opinion of others. > >> > >> Upayavira > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) > >> wrote: > >> > >> Any thoughts on getting the > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6911 fix into 5.4 solr or not? > >> Basically StandardQueryParser's existing getMultiFields method is a no-op. > >> > >> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: Nov 25 2015 14:11:46 > >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org > >> Subject: Re:5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 > >> release?) > >> > >> I have created the lucene_solr_5_4 branch. Please, no new features in this > >> branch. > >> > >> Please update this thread with any changes you propose to make to this > >> branch. Only JIRA tickets which are a blocker and have fix version 5.4 will > >> delay a release candidate build. > >> > >> Please do review the below - and take any action to clear up these tickets > >> asap. > >> > >> I expect to create the first RC this time next week. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> Upayavira > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 02:05 PM, Upayavira wrote: > >> > >> I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the > >> feature > >> freeze starts. > >> > >> Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I > >> suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the > >> majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5. > >> > >> Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets: > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker > >> "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes > >> issue with replication" > >> > >> Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release? > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical > >> "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp" > >> > >> This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense. > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical > >> "Add tests for bin/post" > >> > >> Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a > >> release > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical > >> "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)" > >> > >> Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker? > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), blocker > >> "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x" > >> > >> Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not > >> consider this a blocker either. > >> > >> - o - > >> > >> So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. > >> Anyone > >> have comments/observations here? > >> > >> I will create the branch shortly. > >> > >> Upayavira > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > - > > Noble Paul > > > > -- > - > Noble Paul > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: 5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 release?)
I'm done with SOLR-8355 On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Noble Paul wrote: > hi Upayavira, > sorry for the trouble. There is another blocker created > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8355 > I'm fixing that > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ > LONDON) wrote: >> Fair point, I have re-worded the ticket title and summary. Will await >> further opinions before applying or not applying the patch to 5.4 branch >> (and trunk and branch_5x). >> >> Christine >> >> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: Nov 30 2015 14:29:58 >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Re: 5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 >> release?) >> >> The patch seems innocuous enough. From the ticket though it isn't so clear >> to me what problem it solves. I'm open to the opinion of others. >> >> Upayavira >> >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) >> wrote: >> >> Any thoughts on getting the >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6911 fix into 5.4 solr or not? >> Basically StandardQueryParser's existing getMultiFields method is a no-op. >> >> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: Nov 25 2015 14:11:46 >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Re:5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 >> release?) >> >> I have created the lucene_solr_5_4 branch. Please, no new features in this >> branch. >> >> Please update this thread with any changes you propose to make to this >> branch. Only JIRA tickets which are a blocker and have fix version 5.4 will >> delay a release candidate build. >> >> Please do review the below - and take any action to clear up these tickets >> asap. >> >> I expect to create the first RC this time next week. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Upayavira >> >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 02:05 PM, Upayavira wrote: >> >> I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the feature >> freeze starts. >> >> Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I >> suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the >> majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5. >> >> Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker >> "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes >> issue with replication" >> >> Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release? >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical >> "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp" >> >> This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense. >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical >> "Add tests for bin/post" >> >> Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a >> release >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical >> "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)" >> >> Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker? >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), blocker >> "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x" >> >> Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not >> consider this a blocker either. >> >> - o - >> >> So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. Anyone >> have comments/observations here? >> >> I will create the branch shortly. >> >> Upayavira >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > - > Noble Paul -- - Noble Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: 5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 release?)
hi Upayavira, sorry for the trouble. There is another blocker created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8355 I'm fixing that On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) wrote: > Fair point, I have re-worded the ticket title and summary. Will await > further opinions before applying or not applying the patch to 5.4 branch > (and trunk and branch_5x). > > Christine > > From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: Nov 30 2015 14:29:58 > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: 5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 > release?) > > The patch seems innocuous enough. From the ticket though it isn't so clear > to me what problem it solves. I'm open to the opinion of others. > > Upayavira > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) > wrote: > > Any thoughts on getting the > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6911 fix into 5.4 solr or not? > Basically StandardQueryParser's existing getMultiFields method is a no-op. > > From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: Nov 25 2015 14:11:46 > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re:5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 > release?) > > I have created the lucene_solr_5_4 branch. Please, no new features in this > branch. > > Please update this thread with any changes you propose to make to this > branch. Only JIRA tickets which are a blocker and have fix version 5.4 will > delay a release candidate build. > > Please do review the below - and take any action to clear up these tickets > asap. > > I expect to create the first RC this time next week. > > Thanks! > > Upayavira > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 02:05 PM, Upayavira wrote: > > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the feature > freeze starts. > > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5. > > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker > "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes > issue with replication" > > Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release? > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical > "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp" > > This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical > "Add tests for bin/post" > > Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a > release > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical > "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)" > > Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker? > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), blocker > "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x" > > Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not > consider this a blocker either. > > - o - > > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. Anyone > have comments/observations here? > > I will create the branch shortly. > > Upayavira > > > > -- - Noble Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: 5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 release?)
Fair point, I have re-worded the ticket title and summary. Will await further opinions before applying or not applying the patch to 5.4 branch (and trunk and branch_5x). Christine From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: Nov 30 2015 14:29:58 To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: 5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 release?) The patch seems innocuous enough. From the ticket though it isn't so clear to me what problem it solves. I'm open to the opinion of others. Upayavira On Mon, Nov 30, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) wrote: Any thoughts on getting the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6911 fix into 5.4 solr or not? Basically StandardQueryParser's existing getMultiFields method is a no-op. From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: Nov 25 2015 14:11:46 To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re:5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 release?) I have created the lucene_solr_5_4 branch. Please, no new features in this branch. Please update this thread with any changes you propose to make to this branch. Only JIRA tickets which are a blocker and have fix version 5.4 will delay a release candidate build. Please do review the below - and take any action to clear up these tickets asap. I expect to create the first RC this time next week. Thanks! Upayavira On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 02:05 PM, Upayavira wrote: I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the feature freeze starts. Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5. Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes issue with replication" Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp" This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical "Add tests for bin/post" Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a release https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)" Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), blocker "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x" Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not consider this a blocker either. - o - So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. Anyone have comments/observations here? I will create the branch shortly. Upayavira
Re: 5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 release?)
The patch seems innocuous enough. From the ticket though it isn't so clear to me what problem it solves. I'm open to the opinion of others. Upayavira On Mon, Nov 30, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) wrote: > Any thoughts on getting the > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6911 fix into 5.4 solr or > not? Basically StandardQueryParser's existing getMultiFields method is > a no-op. > > From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: Nov 25 2015 14:11:46 To: > dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re:5.4 branch created, feature freeze > in place (was Re: A 5.4 release?) >> I have created the lucene_solr_5_4 branch. Please, no new features in >> this branch. >> >> Please update this thread with any changes you propose to make to >> this branch. Only JIRA tickets which are a blocker and have fix >> version 5.4 will delay a release candidate build. >> >> Please do review the below - and take any action to clear up these >> tickets asap. >> >> I expect to create the first RC this time next week. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Upayavira >> >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 02:05 PM, Upayavira wrote: >>> I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the >>> feature freeze starts. >>> >>> Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version >>> 5.4. I suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I >>> expect that the majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5. >>> >>> Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets: >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) >>> blocker "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased >>> authorization causes issue with replication" >>> >>> Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the >>> release? >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical >>> "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp" >>> >>> This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense. >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical >>> "Add tests for bin/post" >>> >>> Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back >>> a release >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical >>> "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 >>> (b71)" >>> >>> Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker? >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), >>> blocker "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x" >>> >>> Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will >>> not consider this a blocker either. >>> >>> - o - >>> >>> So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of >>> attention. Anyone have comments/observations here? >>> >>> I will create the branch shortly. >>> >>> Upayavira >>
Re:5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 release?)
Any thoughts on getting the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6911 fix into 5.4 solr or not? Basically StandardQueryParser's existing getMultiFields method is a no-op. From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: Nov 25 2015 14:11:46 To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re:5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 release?) I have created the lucene_solr_5_4 branch. Please, no new features in this branch. Please update this thread with any changes you propose to make to this branch. Only JIRA tickets which are a blocker and have fix version 5.4 will delay a release candidate build. Please do review the below - and take any action to clear up these tickets asap. I expect to create the first RC this time next week. Thanks! Upayavira On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 02:05 PM, Upayavira wrote: I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the feature freeze starts. Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5. Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes issue with replication" Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp" This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical "Add tests for bin/post" Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a release https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)" Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), blocker "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x" Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not consider this a blocker either. - o - So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. Anyone have comments/observations here? I will create the branch shortly. Upayavira
Re:5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 release?)
As suggested I have now patched https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8340 fix to 5.4 branch. From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: Nov 25 2015 14:11:46 To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re:5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 release?) I have created the lucene_solr_5_4 branch. Please, no new features in this branch. Please update this thread with any changes you propose to make to this branch. Only JIRA tickets which are a blocker and have fix version 5.4 will delay a release candidate build. Please do review the below - and take any action to clear up these tickets asap. I expect to create the first RC this time next week. Thanks! Upayavira On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 02:05 PM, Upayavira wrote: I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the feature freeze starts. Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5. Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes issue with replication" Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp" This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical "Add tests for bin/post" Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a release https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)" Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), blocker "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x" Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not consider this a blocker either. - o - So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. Anyone have comments/observations here? I will create the branch shortly. Upayavira
Re: 5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 release?)
I plan to address SOLR-8180 which is about adding jcl-over-slf4j as a dependency on SolrJ. On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:11 AM Upayavira wrote: > I have created the lucene_solr_5_4 branch. Please, no new features in this > branch. > > Please update this thread with any changes you propose to make to this > branch. Only JIRA tickets which are a blocker and have fix version 5.4 will > delay a release candidate build. > > Please do review the below - and take any action to clear up these tickets > asap. > > I expect to create the first RC this time next week. > > Thanks! > > Upayavira > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 02:05 PM, Upayavira wrote: > > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the > feature freeze starts. > > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5. > > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker > "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes > issue with replication" > > Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release? > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical > "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp" > > This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical > "Add tests for bin/post" > > Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a > release > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical > "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)" > > Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker? > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), > blocker > "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x" > > Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not > consider this a blocker either. > > - o - > > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. > Anyone have comments/observations here? > > I will create the branch shortly. > > Upayavira > > > -- Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 release?)
I have created the lucene_solr_5_4 branch. Please, no new features in this branch. Please update this thread with any changes you propose to make to this branch. Only JIRA tickets which are a blocker and have fix version 5.4 will delay a release candidate build. Please do review the below - and take any action to clear up these tickets asap. I expect to create the first RC this time next week. Thanks! Upayavira On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 02:05 PM, Upayavira wrote: > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the > feature freeze starts. > > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version > 5.4. I suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect > that the majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5. > > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) > blocker "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased > authorization causes issue with replication" > > Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the > release? > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical "Move > solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp" > > This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical "Add > tests for bin/post" > > Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back > a release > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical > "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)" > > Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker? > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), > blocker "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x" > > Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not > consider this a blocker either. > > - o - > > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. > Anyone have comments/observations here? > > I will create the branch shortly. > > Upayavira
