Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
Hi Ignacio,
I found a wrong space character in Optimizations part of the Lucene News.
(" Optimizations" should be " Optimizations")
So I changed it on CMS and submitted.
It looks fine now, but needs checking.
Thanks,
Namgyu
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
e observed using a snapshot of Lucene 8.2 that > there is an increase of around 30% on the memory usage of IndexReaders for > some of the test datasets, for example: > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > https://elasticsearch-benchmarks.elastic.co/#tracks/http-logs/nightly/default/30d > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > We suspect this is due to this change: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8781 > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 7:10 AM David Smiley < > david.w.smi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> >> Since there won't be any 8.1.2 yet some issues got > fixed for 8.1.2 and there is an 8.1.2 section in CHANGES.txt those issues > might not be very noticeable to users that only look at the published HTML > version (e.g. https://lucene.apache.org/solr/8_1_1/changes/Changes.html > ). Maybe 8.1.2 should be integrated into 8.2.0 in CHANGES.txt? Despite > this, I see at least one of those issues got into the curated release notes > / highlights any way -- thanks Ignacio. > > >> >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> >> ~ David Smiley > > >> >>> > > > > >> >> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > >> >>> > > > > >> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > >> >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 9:40 AM Jan Høydahl < > jan@cominvent.com> wrote: > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Please use HTTPS in the links to download pages. > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Jan Høydahl > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> 12. jul. 2019 kl. 09:04 skrev Ignacio Vera < > iver...@gmail.com>: > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Ishan: I had a look into the issues and I have no > objections as far as they get properly reviewed if possible. It will be > good to commit the shortly so they go through a few CI iterations in case > something gets broken. I am planning to build the first RC early next week > as there are no blockers for the release. > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Steve: Than you so much, I need to work on getting > the right permissions. > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Finally I wrote a draft for the release notes for > Lucene and Solr. It would be good if someone with more experience in Solr > can review/modify my attempt as it is difficult for me to know which are > the most important bits. Here are the links to the drafts (not they are in > wiki, let me know if you have problems accessing them): > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Lucene: > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732808&draftShareId=cb366dc4-c136-4505-9c37-60bde5db2550&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914476369 > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Solr: > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732972&draftShareId=5cace703-b80b-49c4-a07f-55b891683f90&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914529931 > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 6:36 PM
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
snapshot of Lucene 8.2 that there is > >> >>> > > > > >> > an increase of around 30% on the memory usage of > >> >>> > > > > >> > IndexReaders for some of the test datasets, for example: > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> > https://elasticsearch-benchmarks.elastic.co/#tracks/http-logs/nightly/default/30d > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> > We suspect this is due to this change: > >> >>> > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8781 > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 7:10 AM David Smiley > >> >>> > > > > >> > wrote: > >> >>> > > > > >> >> > >> >>> > > > > >> >> Since there won't be any 8.1.2 yet some issues got fixed > >> >>> > > > > >> >> for 8.1.2 and there is an 8.1.2 section in CHANGES.txt > >> >>> > > > > >> >> those issues might not be very noticeable to users that > >> >>> > > > > >> >> only look at the published HTML version (e.g. > >> >>> > > > > >> >> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/8_1_1/changes/Changes.html > >> >>> > > > > >> >> ). Maybe 8.1.2 should be integrated into 8.2.0 in > >> >>> > > > > >> >> CHANGES.txt? Despite this, I see at least one of those > >> >>> > > > > >> >> issues got into the curated release notes / highlights > >> >>> > > > > >> >> any way -- thanks Ignacio. > >> >>> > > > > >> >> > >> >>> > > > > >> >> ~ David Smiley > >> >>> > > > > >> >> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > >> >>> > > > > >> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > >> >>> > > > > >> >> > >> >>> > > > > >> >> > >> >>> > > > > >> >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 9:40 AM Jan Høydahl > >> >>> > > > > >> >> wrote: > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Please use HTTPS in the links to download pages. > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Jan Høydahl > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> 12. jul. 2019 kl. 09:04 skrev Ignacio Vera > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> : > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Ishan: I had a look into the issues and I have no > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> objections as far as they get properly reviewed if > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> possible. It will be good to commit the shortly so they > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> go through a few CI iterations in case something gets > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> broken. I am planning to build the first RC early next > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> week as there are no blockers for the release. > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Steve: Than you so much, I need to work on getting the > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> right permissions. > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Finally I wrote a draft for the release notes for > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Lucene and Solr. It would be good if someone with more > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> experience in Solr can review/modify my attempt as it > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> is dif
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
Ignacio, When you do the final release steps, please try out the updated addVersion.py here https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8883 which generate more complete and consistent new version sections in CHANGES.txt for our next release. I should commit this. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 3:58 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is: > > > +1 8 (5 binding) > > 0 0 > > -1 0 > > > This vote has PASSED > > > I am +1 to have a separate ANNOUNCE mail in Solr mailing list about the > bad default as this is not specific to this release. > > > >
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is: +1 8 (5 binding) 0 0 -1 0 This vote has PASSED I am +1 to have a separate ANNOUNCE mail in Solr mailing list about the bad default as this is not specific to this release.
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
Jason, I’ll not veto the release either. Propose to author an ANNOUNCE mail to solr-user@l.a.o and Solr website news that states the bad default and ask users of 8.1/8.2 to fix their config. Jason, would you be able to author and send such an email? I’m not at work until Monday.. PS: should the project have a security-announce list, RSS, slack channel or whatever that users could subscribe to for such notifications as well as CVE announcements? Jan Høydahl > 24. jul. 2019 kl. 17:18 skrev Jason Gerlowski : > > To throw my 2 cents in on SOLR-13647. > > Yes, users can fix the problem trivially by updating their solr.in.sh > _if_ they're aware of the issue. And we recommend all users examine > their config carefully when upgrading Solr versions, so users _should_ > be aware of the issue. But at the same time, the expectation/promise > in previous releases has been that solr.in.sh has no effect (is > entirely commented out) by default. So while we tell users to check > all config files for themselves, we also tell them elsewhere that > solr.in.sh is a bit of an exception out of the box. I think the "well > the users should have checked" stance is a little simplistic in this > case. > > I wouldn't be against a respin, though I won't scuttle the vote if no > one else feels strongly about it. But if there's no respin I think we > should make an effort to highlight this potential issue either in the > release announcement, release notes, or CHANGES.txt. > > Jason > >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 9:36 AM Andrzej Białecki wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> SUCCESS! [1:51:04.098987] >> >>> On 23 Jul 2019, at 14:01, Adrien Grand wrote: >>> >>> +1 SUCCESS! [2:34:16.487011] >>> >>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 8:35 PM Ignacio Vera wrote: >>>> >>>> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 >>>> >>>> >>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >>>> >>>> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe >>>> >>>> >>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >>>> >>>> >>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >>>> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe >>>> >>>> Here is my +1 >>>> >>>> SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Adrien >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
To throw my 2 cents in on SOLR-13647. Yes, users can fix the problem trivially by updating their solr.in.sh _if_ they're aware of the issue. And we recommend all users examine their config carefully when upgrading Solr versions, so users _should_ be aware of the issue. But at the same time, the expectation/promise in previous releases has been that solr.in.sh has no effect (is entirely commented out) by default. So while we tell users to check all config files for themselves, we also tell them elsewhere that solr.in.sh is a bit of an exception out of the box. I think the "well the users should have checked" stance is a little simplistic in this case. I wouldn't be against a respin, though I won't scuttle the vote if no one else feels strongly about it. But if there's no respin I think we should make an effort to highlight this potential issue either in the release announcement, release notes, or CHANGES.txt. Jason On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 9:36 AM Andrzej Białecki wrote: > > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:51:04.098987] > > > On 23 Jul 2019, at 14:01, Adrien Grand wrote: > > > > +1 SUCCESS! [2:34:16.487011] > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 8:35 PM Ignacio Vera wrote: > >> > >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 > >> > >> > >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: > >> > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > >> > >> > >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > >> > >> > >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > >> > >> Here is my +1 > >> > >> SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] > > > > > > > > -- > > Adrien > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
+1 SUCCESS! [1:51:04.098987] > On 23 Jul 2019, at 14:01, Adrien Grand wrote: > > +1 SUCCESS! [2:34:16.487011] > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 8:35 PM Ignacio Vera wrote: >> >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 >> >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe >> >> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >> >> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe >> >> Here is my +1 >> >> SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] > > > > -- > Adrien > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
Hi, Two issues have been raised: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13647: This is something that has always been released (included in 8.1.0 and 8.1.1). It is a bad default parameter when starting Solr in Linux machines and can be easily corrected by a user by commenting out the default or changing the value. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13545: As I understand this change has introduced some flakiness in a tests but has no practical impact to the users. I believe those issues are not affecting the functionality of Lucene / Solr and therefore I will continue with this vote without respin, otherwise someone state the opposite. I will be closing the vote tomorrow so please speak up before then if you have any concern. On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 9:59 AM Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > Agree with you. > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:29 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> Does it have a practical impact to users, or is the fact that it >> triggers test failures the main annoyance? We have been trying to >> release what was 8.1.2 at the time since June 12th and kept postponing >> to the point that we decided to cancel 8.1.2 and focus on 8.2.0 >> instead. In my opinion we should set the bar very high for blockers >> now. >> >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 9:02 AM Mikhail Khludnev wrote: >> > >> > Hello, >> > Please be informed about BasicAuthIntegrationTest failures >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13545?focusedCommentId=16891389&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-16891389 >> > I'll check it today. I propose to revert SOLR-13545 from branch_8_2 >> just to unblock respin, WDYT? >> > >> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:43 PM Jan Høydahl >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hmm, have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13647. >> I think it warrants a respin. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect >> >> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com >> >> >> >> 22. jul. 2019 kl. 23:46 skrev Michael Sokolov : >> >> >> >> I keep getting ssl.SSLError: [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] >> >> >> >> Maybe the system I am trying to run on is lacking a CA cert that is >> needed? >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:40 PM Kevin Risden >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> SUCCESS! [1:37:46.956358] >> >> >> >> Kevin Risden >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:41 AM Atri Sharma wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> +1 (non binding) >> >> >> >> +1 SUCCESS! [1:17:24.828393] >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 7:07 PM Adrien Grand >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Non binding indeed, but we appreciate help with testing releases! >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:03 PM Tomoko Uchida >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> +1 SUCCESS! [1:31:37.834967] >> >> (maybe non-binding) >> >> >> >> And Luke works fine. >> >> >> >> 2019年7月21日(日) 21:52 Uwe Schindler : >> >> >> >> >> >> Java 13 also worked. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - >> >> >> >> Uwe Schindler >> >> >> >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >> >> >> >> https://www.thetaphi.de >> >> >> >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Uwe Schindler >> >> Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:49 PM >> >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> >> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see >> here: >> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and >> index example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also >
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
Agree with you. On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:29 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > Does it have a practical impact to users, or is the fact that it > triggers test failures the main annoyance? We have been trying to > release what was 8.1.2 at the time since June 12th and kept postponing > to the point that we decided to cancel 8.1.2 and focus on 8.2.0 > instead. In my opinion we should set the bar very high for blockers > now. > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 9:02 AM Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > > > > Hello, > > Please be informed about BasicAuthIntegrationTest failures > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13545?focusedCommentId=16891389&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-16891389 > > I'll check it today. I propose to revert SOLR-13545 from branch_8_2 just > to unblock respin, WDYT? > > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:43 PM Jan Høydahl > wrote: > >> > >> Hmm, have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13647. > I think it warrants a respin. > >> > >> -- > >> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > >> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > >> > >> 22. jul. 2019 kl. 23:46 skrev Michael Sokolov : > >> > >> I keep getting ssl.SSLError: [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] > >> > >> Maybe the system I am trying to run on is lacking a CA cert that is > needed? > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:40 PM Kevin Risden > wrote: > >> > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> SUCCESS! [1:37:46.956358] > >> > >> Kevin Risden > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:41 AM Atri Sharma wrote: > >> > >> > >> +1 (non binding) > >> > >> +1 SUCCESS! [1:17:24.828393] > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 7:07 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> > >> > >> Non binding indeed, but we appreciate help with testing releases! > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:03 PM Tomoko Uchida > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> +1 SUCCESS! [1:31:37.834967] > >> (maybe non-binding) > >> > >> And Luke works fine. > >> > >> 2019年7月21日(日) 21:52 Uwe Schindler : > >> > >> > >> Java 13 also worked. > >> > >> > >> > >> - > >> > >> Uwe Schindler > >> > >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > >> > >> https://www.thetaphi.de > >> > >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Uwe Schindler > >> Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:49 PM > >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org > >> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > >> > >> > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> > >> > >> I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: > >> > >> > >> > >> SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] > >> > >> > >> > >> (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see > here: > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console > >> > >> > >> > >> I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and > index example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also > tried to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one of my > customers: worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that the analysis > factory backwards break was prevented. > >> > >> > >> > >> So +1 to release this. > >> > >> > >> > >> Uwe > >> > >> > >> > >> - > >> > >> Uwe Schindler > >> > >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > >> > >> https://www.thetaphi.de > >> > >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Ignacio Vera > >> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM > >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org > >> Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > >> > >> > >> > >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 > >> > >> > >> > >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: > >> > >> > >> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > >> > >> > >> > >> You can run the smoke t
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
Does it have a practical impact to users, or is the fact that it triggers test failures the main annoyance? We have been trying to release what was 8.1.2 at the time since June 12th and kept postponing to the point that we decided to cancel 8.1.2 and focus on 8.2.0 instead. In my opinion we should set the bar very high for blockers now. On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 9:02 AM Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > > Hello, > Please be informed about BasicAuthIntegrationTest failures > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13545?focusedCommentId=16891389&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-16891389 > I'll check it today. I propose to revert SOLR-13545 from branch_8_2 just to > unblock respin, WDYT? > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:43 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: >> >> Hmm, have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13647. I >> think it warrants a respin. >> >> -- >> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect >> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com >> >> 22. jul. 2019 kl. 23:46 skrev Michael Sokolov : >> >> I keep getting ssl.SSLError: [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] >> >> Maybe the system I am trying to run on is lacking a CA cert that is needed? >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:40 PM Kevin Risden wrote: >> >> >> +1 >> >> SUCCESS! [1:37:46.956358] >> >> Kevin Risden >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:41 AM Atri Sharma wrote: >> >> >> +1 (non binding) >> >> +1 SUCCESS! [1:17:24.828393] >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 7:07 PM Adrien Grand wrote: >> >> >> Non binding indeed, but we appreciate help with testing releases! >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:03 PM Tomoko Uchida >> wrote: >> >> >> +1 SUCCESS! [1:31:37.834967] >> (maybe non-binding) >> >> And Luke works fine. >> >> 2019年7月21日(日) 21:52 Uwe Schindler : >> >> >> Java 13 also worked. >> >> >> >> - >> >> Uwe Schindler >> >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >> >> https://www.thetaphi.de >> >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >> >> >> From: Uwe Schindler >> Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:49 PM >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: >> >> >> >> SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] >> >> >> >> (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see here: >> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console >> >> >> >> I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and index >> example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also tried >> to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one of my customers: >> worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that the analysis factory >> backwards break was prevented. >> >> >> >> So +1 to release this. >> >> >> >> Uwe >> >> >> >> - >> >> Uwe Schindler >> >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >> >> https://www.thetaphi.de >> >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >> >> >> From: Ignacio Vera >> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 >> >> >> >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 >> >> >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> >> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe >> >> >> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >> >> >> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe >> >> Here is my +1 >> >> SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> >> -- >> Adrien >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Atri >> Apache Concerted >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> > > > -- > Sincerely yours > Mikhail Khludnev -- Adrien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
Hello, Please be informed about BasicAuthIntegrationTest failures https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13545?focusedCommentId=16891389&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-16891389 I'll check it today. I propose to revert SOLR-13545 from branch_8_2 just to unblock respin, WDYT? On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:43 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > Hmm, have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13647. I > think it warrants a respin. > > -- > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > > 22. jul. 2019 kl. 23:46 skrev Michael Sokolov : > > I keep getting ssl.SSLError: [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] > > Maybe the system I am trying to run on is lacking a CA cert that is needed? > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:40 PM Kevin Risden wrote: > > > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:37:46.956358] > > Kevin Risden > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:41 AM Atri Sharma wrote: > > > +1 (non binding) > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:17:24.828393] > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 7:07 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > > > Non binding indeed, but we appreciate help with testing releases! > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:03 PM Tomoko Uchida > wrote: > > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:31:37.834967] > (maybe non-binding) > > And Luke works fine. > > 2019年7月21日(日) 21:52 Uwe Schindler : > > > Java 13 also worked. > > > > - > > Uwe Schindler > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > From: Uwe Schindler > Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:49 PM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > > > > Hi, > > > > I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: > > > > SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] > > > > (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see > here: > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console > > > > I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and index > example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also tried > to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one of my > customers: worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that the analysis > factory backwards break was prevented. > > > > So +1 to release this. > > > > Uwe > > > > - > > Uwe Schindler > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > From: Ignacio Vera > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > > > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > Here is my +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > -- > Adrien > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > -- > Regards, > > Atri > Apache Concerted > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
+1 SUCCESS! [2:34:16.487011] On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 8:35 PM Ignacio Vera wrote: > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > Here is my +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] -- Adrien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
+1 to release (non-binding) Tested Lucene with my dailyjob application. Regards, Martin On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 3:49 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi, > > > > I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: > > > > SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] > > > > (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see > here: > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console > > > > I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and index > example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also tried > to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one of my > customers: worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that the analysis > factory backwards break was prevented. > > > > So +1 to release this. > > > > Uwe > > > > - > > Uwe Schindler > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > *From:* Ignacio Vera > *Sent:* Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM > *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org > *Subject:* [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > > > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > Here is my +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] >
RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
Are you sure? This already existed in 8.1, so its not a regression introduced by 8.2. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Jan Høydahl Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2019 12:43 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 Hmm, have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13647. I think it warrants a respin. -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com <http://www.cominvent.com> 22. jul. 2019 kl. 23:46 skrev Michael Sokolov mailto:msoko...@gmail.com> >: I keep getting ssl.SSLError: [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] Maybe the system I am trying to run on is lacking a CA cert that is needed? On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:40 PM Kevin Risden mailto:kris...@apache.org> > wrote: +1 SUCCESS! [1:37:46.956358] Kevin Risden On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:41 AM Atri Sharma mailto:a...@apache.org> > wrote: +1 (non binding) +1 SUCCESS! [1:17:24.828393] On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 7:07 PM Adrien Grand mailto:jpou...@gmail.com> > wrote: Non binding indeed, but we appreciate help with testing releases! On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:03 PM Tomoko Uchida mailto:tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com> > wrote: +1 SUCCESS! [1:31:37.834967] (maybe non-binding) And Luke works fine. 2019年7月21日(日) 21:52 Uwe Schindler mailto:u...@thetaphi.de> >: Java 13 also worked. - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de <mailto:u...@thetaphi.de> From: Uwe Schindler mailto:u...@thetaphi.de> > Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:49 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 Hi, I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see here: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and index example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also tried to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one of my customers: worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that the analysis factory backwards break was prevented. So +1 to release this. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de <mailto:u...@thetaphi.de> From: Ignacio Vera mailto:iver...@gmail.com> > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org> Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe Here is my +1 SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org> -- Adrien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org> -- Regards, Atri Apache Concerted - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
Hmm, have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13647. I think it warrants a respin. -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > 22. jul. 2019 kl. 23:46 skrev Michael Sokolov : > > I keep getting ssl.SSLError: [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] > > Maybe the system I am trying to run on is lacking a CA cert that is needed? > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:40 PM Kevin Risden wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> SUCCESS! [1:37:46.956358] >> >> Kevin Risden >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:41 AM Atri Sharma wrote: >>> >>> +1 (non binding) >>> >>> +1 SUCCESS! [1:17:24.828393] >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 7:07 PM Adrien Grand wrote: >>>> >>>> Non binding indeed, but we appreciate help with testing releases! >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:03 PM Tomoko Uchida >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 SUCCESS! [1:31:37.834967] >>>>> (maybe non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> And Luke works fine. >>>>> >>>>> 2019年7月21日(日) 21:52 Uwe Schindler : >>>>>> >>>>>> Java 13 also worked. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> - >>>>>> >>>>>> Uwe Schindler >>>>>> >>>>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.thetaphi.de >>>>>> >>>>>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> From: Uwe Schindler >>>>>> Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:49 PM >>>>>> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >>>>>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see >>>>>> here: >>>>>> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and index >>>>>> example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also >>>>>> tried to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one of my >>>>>> customers: worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that the >>>>>> analysis factory backwards break was prevented. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> So +1 to release this. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Uwe >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> - >>>>>> >>>>>> Uwe Schindler >>>>>> >>>>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.thetaphi.de >>>>>> >>>>>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> From: Ignacio Vera >>>>>> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM >>>>>> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe >>>>>> >>>>>> Here is my +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Adrien >>>> >>>> - >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> >>> Atri >>> Apache Concerted >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
I keep getting ssl.SSLError: [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] Maybe the system I am trying to run on is lacking a CA cert that is needed? On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:40 PM Kevin Risden wrote: > > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:37:46.956358] > > Kevin Risden > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:41 AM Atri Sharma wrote: >> >> +1 (non binding) >> >> +1 SUCCESS! [1:17:24.828393] >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 7:07 PM Adrien Grand wrote: >> > >> > Non binding indeed, but we appreciate help with testing releases! >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:03 PM Tomoko Uchida >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:31:37.834967] >> > > (maybe non-binding) >> > > >> > > And Luke works fine. >> > > >> > > 2019年7月21日(日) 21:52 Uwe Schindler : >> > > > >> > > > Java 13 also worked. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > - >> > > > >> > > > Uwe Schindler >> > > > >> > > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >> > > > >> > > > https://www.thetaphi.de >> > > > >> > > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > From: Uwe Schindler >> > > > Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:49 PM >> > > > To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> > > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Hi, >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see >> > > > here: >> > > > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and >> > > > index example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I >> > > > also tried to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one >> > > > of my customers: worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that >> > > > the analysis factory backwards break was prevented. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > So +1 to release this. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Uwe >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > - >> > > > >> > > > Uwe Schindler >> > > > >> > > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >> > > > >> > > > https://www.thetaphi.de >> > > > >> > > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > From: Ignacio Vera >> > > > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM >> > > > To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> > > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >> > > > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe >> > > > >> > > > Here is my +1 >> > > > >> > > > SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] >> > > >> > > - >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Adrien >> > >> > - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Atri >> Apache Concerted >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
+1 SUCCESS! [1:37:46.956358] Kevin Risden On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:41 AM Atri Sharma wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:17:24.828393] > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 7:07 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > > > > Non binding indeed, but we appreciate help with testing releases! > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:03 PM Tomoko Uchida > > wrote: > > > > > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:31:37.834967] > > > (maybe non-binding) > > > > > > And Luke works fine. > > > > > > 2019年7月21日(日) 21:52 Uwe Schindler : > > > > > > > > Java 13 also worked. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > Uwe Schindler > > > > > > > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > > > > > > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > > > > > > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Uwe Schindler > > > > Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:49 PM > > > > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > > > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, > see here: > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and > index example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also > tried to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one of my > customers: worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that the analysis > factory backwards break was prevented. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So +1 to release this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Uwe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > Uwe Schindler > > > > > > > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > > > > > > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > > > > > > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Ignacio Vera > > > > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM > > > > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > > > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > > > > > > > Here is my +1 > > > > > > > > SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > > > > -- > > Adrien > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > -- > Regards, > > Atri > Apache Concerted > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
+1 (non binding) +1 SUCCESS! [1:17:24.828393] On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 7:07 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > > Non binding indeed, but we appreciate help with testing releases! > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:03 PM Tomoko Uchida > wrote: > > > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:31:37.834967] > > (maybe non-binding) > > > > And Luke works fine. > > > > 2019年7月21日(日) 21:52 Uwe Schindler : > > > > > > Java 13 also worked. > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > Uwe Schindler > > > > > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > > > > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > > > > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Uwe Schindler > > > Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:49 PM > > > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: > > > > > > > > > > > > SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] > > > > > > > > > > > > (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see > > > here: > > > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console > > > > > > > > > > > > I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and index > > > example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also > > > tried to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one of my > > > customers: worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that the > > > analysis factory backwards break was prevented. > > > > > > > > > > > > So +1 to release this. > > > > > > > > > > > > Uwe > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > Uwe Schindler > > > > > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > > > > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > > > > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Ignacio Vera > > > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM > > > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > > > > > > > > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > > > > > > > > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > > > > > Here is my +1 > > > > > > SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > -- > Adrien > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > -- Regards, Atri Apache Concerted - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
Non binding indeed, but we appreciate help with testing releases! On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:03 PM Tomoko Uchida wrote: > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:31:37.834967] > (maybe non-binding) > > And Luke works fine. > > 2019年7月21日(日) 21:52 Uwe Schindler : > > > > Java 13 also worked. > > > > > > > > - > > > > Uwe Schindler > > > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > > > > > From: Uwe Schindler > > Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:49 PM > > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: > > > > > > > > SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] > > > > > > > > (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see here: > > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console > > > > > > > > I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and index > > example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also tried > > to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one of my > > customers: worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that the analysis > > factory backwards break was prevented. > > > > > > > > So +1 to release this. > > > > > > > > Uwe > > > > > > > > - > > > > Uwe Schindler > > > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > > > > > From: Ignacio Vera > > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM > > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > > > > > > > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 > > > > > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > > > > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > > > > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > > > Here is my +1 > > > > SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > -- Adrien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
+1 SUCCESS! [1:31:37.834967] (maybe non-binding) And Luke works fine. 2019年7月21日(日) 21:52 Uwe Schindler : > > Java 13 also worked. > > > > - > > Uwe Schindler > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > From: Uwe Schindler > Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:49 PM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > > > > Hi, > > > > I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: > > > > SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] > > > > (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see here: > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console > > > > I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and index > example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also tried > to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one of my customers: > worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that the analysis factory > backwards break was prevented. > > > > So +1 to release this. > > > > Uwe > > > > - > > Uwe Schindler > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > From: Ignacio Vera > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > > > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > Here is my +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
Java 13 also worked. - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Uwe Schindler Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:49 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 Hi, I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see here: <https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and index example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also tried to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one of my customers: worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that the analysis factory backwards break was prevented. So +1 to release this. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de <mailto:u...@thetaphi.de> From: Ignacio Vera mailto:iver...@gmail.com> > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org> Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe Here is my +1 SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595]
RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
Hi, I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see here: <https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and index example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also tried to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one of my customers: worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that the analysis factory backwards break was prevented. So +1 to release this. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Ignacio Vera Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe Here is my +1 SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595]
[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe Here is my +1 SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595]
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
("write int @pos=" +
>> >>> > > > (fixedArrayStart-4) +
>> >>> > > > " numArcs=" + nodeIn.numArcs);
>> >>> > > >// create the header
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 2:33 PM Michael Sokolov
>> >>> > > > wrote:
>> >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > > > OK, both LUCENE-8781 and LUCENE-8895 were introduced in 8.2.0. I
>> >>> > > > > see
>> >>> > > > > most of the other data sets report an increase more in the 10-15%
>> >>> > > > > range, which is expected. I'm curious what the makeup of that
>> >>> > > > > http
>> >>> > > > > logs data set is -- I guess it's HTTP logs :) Is the data public?
>> >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 7:23 AM Ignacio Vera
>> >>> > > > > wrote:
>> >>> > > > > >
>> >>> > > > > > The change to Lucene 8.2.0 snapshot was done on July 10th.
>> >>> > > > > > Previous to that the Lucene version was 8.1.0.
>> >>> > > > > >
>> >>> > > > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 12:53 PM Michael Sokolov
>> >>> > > > > > wrote:
>> >>> > > > > >>
>> >>> > > > > >> Hmm that's possible, although the jump is bigger than
>> >>> > > > > >> anything I
>> >>> > > > > >> observed while testing. I assume these charts are building
>> >>> > > > > >> off of
>> >>> > > > > >> apache/master, or something close to that? If so, then the
>> >>> > > > > >> timing is
>> >>> > > > > >> off a bit. LUCENE-8781 was pushed quite a while before that,
>> >>> > > > > >> and then
>> >>> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8895 which
>> >>> > > > > >> extended the
>> >>> > > > > >> encoding to be the default (not just for postings) was pushed
>> >>> > > > > >> on July
>> >>> > > > > >> 2 or so, but the chart shows a jump on July 10?
>> >>> > > > > >>
>> >>> > > > > >> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 4:03 AM Ignacio Vera
>> >>> > > > > >> wrote:
>> >>> > > > > >> >
>> >>> > > > > >> > Hi,
>> >>> > > > > >> >
>> >>> > > > > >> > We observed using a snapshot of Lucene 8.2 that there is an
>> >>> > > > > >> > increase of around 30% on the memory usage of IndexReaders
>> >>> > > > > >> > for some of the test datasets, for example:
>> >>> > > > > >> >
>> >>> > > > > >> > https://elasticsearch-benchmarks.elastic.co/#tracks/http-logs/nightly/default/30d
>> >>> > > > > >> >
>> >>> > > > > >> > We suspect this is due to this change:
>> >>> > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8781
>> >>> > > > > >> >
>> >>> > > > > >> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 7:10 AM David Smiley
>> >>> > > > > >> > wrote:
>> >>> > > > > >> >>
>> >>> > > > > >> >> Since there won't be any 8.1.2 yet some issues got fixed
>> >>> > > > > >> >> for 8.1.2 and there is an 8.1.2 section in CHANGES.txt
>> >>> > > > > >> >> those issues might not be very noticeable to users that
>> >>> > > > > >> >> only look at the published HTML version (e.g.
>> >>> > > > > >> >> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/8_1_1/changes/Changes.html
>> >>> > > > > >> >>
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
t; > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 7:23 AM Ignacio Vera < > iver...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > The change to Lucene 8.2.0 snapshot was done on July 10th. > Previous to that the Lucene version was 8.1.0. > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 12:53 PM Michael Sokolov < > msoko...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> Hmm that's possible, although the jump is bigger than > anything I > >>> > > > > >> observed while testing. I assume these charts are building > off of > >>> > > > > >> apache/master, or something close to that? If so, then the > timing is > >>> > > > > >> off a bit. LUCENE-8781 was pushed quite a while before > that, and then > >>> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8895 which > extended the > >>> > > > > >> encoding to be the default (not just for postings) was > pushed on July > >>> > > > > >> 2 or so, but the chart shows a jump on July 10? > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 4:03 AM Ignacio Vera < > iver...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > Hi, > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > We observed using a snapshot of Lucene 8.2 that there is > an increase of around 30% on the memory usage of IndexReaders for some of > the test datasets, for example: > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > https://elasticsearch-benchmarks.elastic.co/#tracks/http-logs/nightly/default/30d > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > We suspect this is due to this change: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8781 > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 7:10 AM David Smiley < > david.w.smi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > > > > >> >> > >>> > > > > >> >> Since there won't be any 8.1.2 yet some issues got fixed > for 8.1.2 and there is an 8.1.2 section in CHANGES.txt those issues might > not be very noticeable to users that only look at the published HTML > version (e.g. https://lucene.apache.org/solr/8_1_1/changes/Changes.html > ). Maybe 8.1.2 should be integrated into 8.2.0 in CHANGES.txt? Despite > this, I see at least one of those issues got into the curated release notes > / highlights any way -- thanks Ignacio. > >>> > > > > >> >> > >>> > > > > >> >> ~ David Smiley > >>> > > > > >> >> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > >>> > > > > >> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > >>> > > > > >> >> > >>> > > > > >> >> > >>> > > > > >> >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 9:40 AM Jan Høydahl < > jan@cominvent.com> wrote: > >>> > > > > >> >>> > >>> > > > > >> >>> Please use HTTPS in the links to download pages. > >>> > > > > >> >>> > >>> > > > > >> >>> Jan Høydahl > >>> > > > > >> >>> > >>> > > > > >> >>> 12. jul. 2019 kl. 09:04 skrev Ignacio Vera < > iver...@gmail.com>: > >>> > > > > >> >>> > >>> > > > > >> >>> Ishan: I had a look into the issues and I have no > objections as far as they get properly reviewed if possible. It will be > good to commit the shortly so they go through a few CI iterations in case > something gets broken. I am planning to build the first RC early next week > as there are no blockers for the release. > >>> > > > > >> >>> > >>> > > > > >> >>> Steve: Than you so much, I need to work on getting the > right permissions. > >>> > > > > >> >>> > >>> > > > > >> >>> Finally I wrote a draft
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8895 which extended >>> > > > > >> the >>> > > > > >> encoding to be the default (not just for postings) was pushed on >>> > > > > >> July >>> > > > > >> 2 or so, but the chart shows a jump on July 10? >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 4:03 AM Ignacio Vera >>> > > > > >> wrote: >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > Hi, >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > We observed using a snapshot of Lucene 8.2 that there is an >>> > > > > >> > increase of around 30% on the memory usage of IndexReaders for >>> > > > > >> > some of the test datasets, for example: >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > https://elasticsearch-benchmarks.elastic.co/#tracks/http-logs/nightly/default/30d >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > We suspect this is due to this change: >>> > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8781 >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 7:10 AM David Smiley >>> > > > > >> > wrote: >>> > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > >> >> Since there won't be any 8.1.2 yet some issues got fixed for >>> > > > > >> >> 8.1.2 and there is an 8.1.2 section in CHANGES.txt those >>> > > > > >> >> issues might not be very noticeable to users that only look >>> > > > > >> >> at the published HTML version (e.g. >>> > > > > >> >> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/8_1_1/changes/Changes.html ). >>> > > > > >> >> Maybe 8.1.2 should be integrated into 8.2.0 in CHANGES.txt? >>> > > > > >> >> Despite this, I see at least one of those issues got into the >>> > > > > >> >> curated release notes / highlights any way -- thanks Ignacio. >>> > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > >> >> ~ David Smiley >>> > > > > >> >> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >>> > > > > >> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >>> > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > >> >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 9:40 AM Jan Høydahl >>> > > > > >> >> wrote: >>> > > > > >> >>> >>> > > > > >> >>> Please use HTTPS in the links to download pages. >>> > > > > >> >>> >>> > > > > >> >>> Jan Høydahl >>> > > > > >> >>> >>> > > > > >> >>> 12. jul. 2019 kl. 09:04 skrev Ignacio Vera >>> > > > > >> >>> : >>> > > > > >> >>> >>> > > > > >> >>> Ishan: I had a look into the issues and I have no objections >>> > > > > >> >>> as far as they get properly reviewed if possible. It will be >>> > > > > >> >>> good to commit the shortly so they go through a few CI >>> > > > > >> >>> iterations in case something gets broken. I am planning to >>> > > > > >> >>> build the first RC early next week as there are no blockers >>> > > > > >> >>> for the release. >>> > > > > >> >>> >>> > > > > >> >>> Steve: Than you so much, I need to work on getting the right >>> > > > > >> >>> permissions. >>> > > > > >> >>> >>> > > > > >> >>> Finally I wrote a draft for the release notes for Lucene and >>> > > > > >> >>> Solr. It would be good if someone with more experience in >>> > > > > >> >>> Solr can review/modify my attempt as it is difficult for me >>> > > > > >> >>> to k
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
>> > > > > >> > >> https://elasticsearch-benchmarks.elastic.co/#tracks/http-logs/nightly/default/30d >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > We suspect this is due to this change: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8781 >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 7:10 AM David Smiley < >> david.w.smi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> Since there won't be any 8.1.2 yet some issues got fixed >> for 8.1.2 and there is an 8.1.2 section in CHANGES.txt those issues might >> not be very noticeable to users that only look at the published HTML >> version (e.g. https://lucene.apache.org/solr/8_1_1/changes/Changes.html >> ). Maybe 8.1.2 should be integrated into 8.2.0 in CHANGES.txt? Despite >> this, I see at least one of those issues got into the curated release notes >> / highlights any way -- thanks Ignacio. >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> ~ David Smiley >> > > > > >> >> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >> > > > > >> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 9:40 AM Jan Høydahl < >> jan@cominvent.com> wrote: >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> Please use HTTPS in the links to download pages. >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> Jan Høydahl >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> 12. jul. 2019 kl. 09:04 skrev Ignacio Vera < >> iver...@gmail.com>: >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> Ishan: I had a look into the issues and I have no >> objections as far as they get properly reviewed if possible. It will be >> good to commit the shortly so they go through a few CI iterations in case >> something gets broken. I am planning to build the first RC early next week >> as there are no blockers for the release. >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> Steve: Than you so much, I need to work on getting the >> right permissions. >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> Finally I wrote a draft for the release notes for Lucene >> and Solr. It would be good if someone with more experience in Solr can >> review/modify my attempt as it is difficult for me to know which are the >> most important bits. Here are the links to the drafts (not they are in >> wiki, let me know if you have problems accessing them): >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> Lucene: >> > > > > >> >>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732808&draftShareId=cb366dc4-c136-4505-9c37-60bde5db2550&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914476369 >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> Solr: >> > > > > >> >>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732972&draftShareId=5cace703-b80b-49c4-a07f-55b891683f90&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914529931 >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 6:36 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > > >> >>>> >> > > > > >> >>>> Hi Ignacio, >> > > > > >> >>>> I wish to include two security bug fixes (not >> vulnerabilities, but feature regressions due to Authorization plugin), >> SOLR-13472 and SOLR-13619. I can commit both shortly, attempting to write a >> unit test for it (which is proving harder to do than reproducing, fixing >> and testing manually). Please let me know if you have any concerns. >> > > > > >> >>>> Regards, >> > > > > >> >>>> Ishan >> > > > > >> >>>> >> > > > > >> >>>> On Thu, 11 Jul, 2019, 9:12 PM Tomoko Uchida, < >> tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
; > > >> >> 8.1.2 and there is an 8.1.2 section in CHANGES.txt those issues > > > > > >> >> might not be very noticeable to users that only look at the > > > > > >> >> published HTML version (e.g. > > > > > >> >> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/8_1_1/changes/Changes.html ). > > > > > >> >> Maybe 8.1.2 should be integrated into 8.2.0 in CHANGES.txt? > > > > > >> >> Despite this, I see at least one of those issues got into the > > > > > >> >> curated release notes / highlights any way -- thanks Ignacio. > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> ~ David Smiley > > > > > >> >> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > > > > >> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 9:40 AM Jan Høydahl > > > > > >> >> wrote: > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> Please use HTTPS in the links to download pages. > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> Jan Høydahl > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> 12. jul. 2019 kl. 09:04 skrev Ignacio Vera : > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> Ishan: I had a look into the issues and I have no objections > > > > > >> >>> as far as they get properly reviewed if possible. It will be > > > > > >> >>> good to commit the shortly so they go through a few CI > > > > > >> >>> iterations in case something gets broken. I am planning to > > > > > >> >>> build the first RC early next week as there are no blockers > > > > > >> >>> for the release. > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> Steve: Than you so much, I need to work on getting the right > > > > > >> >>> permissions. > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> Finally I wrote a draft for the release notes for Lucene and > > > > > >> >>> Solr. It would be good if someone with more experience in Solr > > > > > >> >>> can review/modify my attempt as it is difficult for me to know > > > > > >> >>> which are the most important bits. Here are the links to the > > > > > >> >>> drafts (not they are in wiki, let me know if you have problems > > > > > >> >>> accessing them): > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> Lucene: > > > > > >> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732808&draftShareId=cb366dc4-c136-4505-9c37-60bde5db2550&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914476369 > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> Solr: > > > > > >> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732972&draftShareId=5cace703-b80b-49c4-a07f-55b891683f90&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914529931 > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 6:36 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > > > > > >> >>> wrote: > > > > > >> >>>> > > > > > >> >>>> Hi Ignacio, > > > > > >> >>>> I wish to include two security bug fixes (not > > > > > >> >>>> vulnerabilities, but feature regressions due to Authorization > > > > > >> >>>> plugin), SOLR-13472 and SOLR-13619. I can commit both > > > > > >> >>>> shortly, attempting to write a unit test for it (which is > > > > > >> >>>> proving harder to do than reproducing, fixing and testing > > > > > >> >>>> manually). Please let me know if you have any concerns. > > > > > >> >>>> Regards, > > > > > >> >>>> Ishan > > > > > >> >>>> > > > > > >> >>>> On Thu, 11 Jul, 2019, 9:12 PM Tomoko Uchida, > > > >
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
gnacio. > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> ~ David Smiley > > > > > >> >> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > > > > >> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 9:40 AM Jan Høydahl < > jan@cominvent.com> wrote: > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> Please use HTTPS in the links to download pages. > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> Jan Høydahl > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> 12. jul. 2019 kl. 09:04 skrev Ignacio Vera < > iver...@gmail.com>: > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> Ishan: I had a look into the issues and I have no > objections as far as they get properly reviewed if possible. It will be > good to commit the shortly so they go through a few CI iterations in case > something gets broken. I am planning to build the first RC early next week > as there are no blockers for the release. > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> Steve: Than you so much, I need to work on getting the > right permissions. > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> Finally I wrote a draft for the release notes for Lucene > and Solr. It would be good if someone with more experience in Solr can > review/modify my attempt as it is difficult for me to know which are the > most important bits. Here are the links to the drafts (not they are in > wiki, let me know if you have problems accessing them): > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> Lucene: > > > > > >> >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732808&draftShareId=cb366dc4-c136-4505-9c37-60bde5db2550&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914476369 > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> Solr: > > > > > >> >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732972&draftShareId=5cace703-b80b-49c4-a07f-55b891683f90&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914529931 > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 6:36 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> >>>> > > > > > >> >>>> Hi Ignacio, > > > > > >> >>>> I wish to include two security bug fixes (not > vulnerabilities, but feature regressions due to Authorization plugin), > SOLR-13472 and SOLR-13619. I can commit both shortly, attempting to write a > unit test for it (which is proving harder to do than reproducing, fixing > and testing manually). Please let me know if you have any concerns. > > > > > >> >>>> Regards, > > > > > >> >>>> Ishan > > > > > >> >>>> > > > > > >> >>>> On Thu, 11 Jul, 2019, 9:12 PM Tomoko Uchida, < > tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>>>> Hi Ignacio, > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>>>> LUCENE-8907 was fixed. (I have reverted a series of > commits which > > > > > >> >>>>> cause backwards incompatibility on Lucene 8.x.) > > > > > >> >>>>> Thank you for waiting for that! > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>>>> Tomoko > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>>>> 2019年7月11日(木) 22:44 Uwe Schindler : > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>> > Hi, > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>> > I enabled the policeman Jenkins Jobs for 8.2 branch. > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
use HTTPS in the links to download pages. > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Jan Høydahl > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> 12. jul. 2019 kl. 09:04 skrev Ignacio Vera : > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Ishan: I had a look into the issues and I have no objections as > > > > >> >>> far as they get properly reviewed if possible. It will be good > > > > >> >>> to commit the shortly so they go through a few CI iterations in > > > > >> >>> case something gets broken. I am planning to build the first RC > > > > >> >>> early next week as there are no blockers for the release. > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Steve: Than you so much, I need to work on getting the right > > > > >> >>> permissions. > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Finally I wrote a draft for the release notes for Lucene and > > > > >> >>> Solr. It would be good if someone with more experience in Solr > > > > >> >>> can review/modify my attempt as it is difficult for me to know > > > > >> >>> which are the most important bits. Here are the links to the > > > > >> >>> drafts (not they are in wiki, let me know if you have problems > > > > >> >>> accessing them): > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Lucene: > > > > >> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732808&draftShareId=cb366dc4-c136-4505-9c37-60bde5db2550&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914476369 > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Solr: > > > > >> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732972&draftShareId=5cace703-b80b-49c4-a07f-55b891683f90&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914529931 > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 6:36 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > > > > >> >>> wrote: > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> Hi Ignacio, > > > > >> >>>> I wish to include two security bug fixes (not vulnerabilities, > > > > >> >>>> but feature regressions due to Authorization plugin), > > > > >> >>>> SOLR-13472 and SOLR-13619. I can commit both shortly, > > > > >> >>>> attempting to write a unit test for it (which is proving harder > > > > >> >>>> to do than reproducing, fixing and testing manually). Please > > > > >> >>>> let me know if you have any concerns. > > > > >> >>>> Regards, > > > > >> >>>> Ishan > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> On Thu, 11 Jul, 2019, 9:12 PM Tomoko Uchida, > > > > >> >>>> wrote: > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > >> >>>>> Hi Ignacio, > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > >> >>>>> LUCENE-8907 was fixed. (I have reverted a series of commits > > > > >> >>>>> which > > > > >> >>>>> cause backwards incompatibility on Lucene 8.x.) > > > > >> >>>>> Thank you for waiting for that! > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > >> >>>>> Tomoko > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > >> >>>>> 2019年7月11日(木) 22:44 Uwe Schindler : > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > Hi, > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > I enabled the policeman Jenkins Jobs for 8.2 branch. > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > Uwe > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > &
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
> > > > > > > > The change to Lucene 8.2.0 snapshot was done on July 10th. Previous to > > > > that the Lucene version was 8.1.0. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 12:53 PM Michael Sokolov > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Hmm that's possible, although the jump is bigger than anything I > > > >> observed while testing. I assume these charts are building off of > > > >> apache/master, or something close to that? If so, then the timing is > > > >> off a bit. LUCENE-8781 was pushed quite a while before that, and then > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8895 which extended the > > > >> encoding to be the default (not just for postings) was pushed on July > > > >> 2 or so, but the chart shows a jump on July 10? > > > >> > > > >> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 4:03 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > Hi, > > > >> > > > > >> > We observed using a snapshot of Lucene 8.2 that there is an increase > > > >> > of around 30% on the memory usage of IndexReaders for some of the > > > >> > test datasets, for example: > > > >> > > > > >> > https://elasticsearch-benchmarks.elastic.co/#tracks/http-logs/nightly/default/30d > > > >> > > > > >> > We suspect this is due to this change: > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8781 > > > >> > > > > >> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 7:10 AM David Smiley > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Since there won't be any 8.1.2 yet some issues got fixed for 8.1.2 > > > >> >> and there is an 8.1.2 section in CHANGES.txt those issues might not > > > >> >> be very noticeable to users that only look at the published HTML > > > >> >> version (e.g. > > > >> >> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/8_1_1/changes/Changes.html ). Maybe > > > >> >> 8.1.2 should be integrated into 8.2.0 in CHANGES.txt? Despite > > > >> >> this, I see at least one of those issues got into the curated > > > >> >> release notes / highlights any way -- thanks Ignacio. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> ~ David Smiley > > > >> >> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > > >> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 9:40 AM Jan Høydahl > > > >> >> wrote: > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> Please use HTTPS in the links to download pages. > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> Jan Høydahl > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> 12. jul. 2019 kl. 09:04 skrev Ignacio Vera : > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> Ishan: I had a look into the issues and I have no objections as > > > >> >>> far as they get properly reviewed if possible. It will be good to > > > >> >>> commit the shortly so they go through a few CI iterations in case > > > >> >>> something gets broken. I am planning to build the first RC early > > > >> >>> next week as there are no blockers for the release. > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> Steve: Than you so much, I need to work on getting the right > > > >> >>> permissions. > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> Finally I wrote a draft for the release notes for Lucene and Solr. > > > >> >>> It would be good if someone with more experience in Solr can > > > >> >>> review/modify my attempt as it is difficult for me to know which > > > >> >>> are the most important bits. Here are the links to the drafts (not > > > >> >>> they are in wiki, let me know if you have problems accessing them): > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> Lucene: > > > >> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732808&draftShareId=cb366dc4-c136-4505-9c37-60bde5db2550&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914476369 > > > >&g
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
; > >> > datasets, for example: > > >> > > > >> > https://elasticsearch-benchmarks.elastic.co/#tracks/http-logs/nightly/default/30d > > >> > > > >> > We suspect this is due to this change: > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8781 > > >> > > > >> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 7:10 AM David Smiley > > >> > wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> Since there won't be any 8.1.2 yet some issues got fixed for 8.1.2 > > >> >> and there is an 8.1.2 section in CHANGES.txt those issues might not > > >> >> be very noticeable to users that only look at the published HTML > > >> >> version (e.g. > > >> >> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/8_1_1/changes/Changes.html ). Maybe > > >> >> 8.1.2 should be integrated into 8.2.0 in CHANGES.txt? Despite this, > > >> >> I see at least one of those issues got into the curated release notes > > >> >> / highlights any way -- thanks Ignacio. > > >> >> > > >> >> ~ David Smiley > > >> >> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > >> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 9:40 AM Jan Høydahl > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Please use HTTPS in the links to download pages. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Jan Høydahl > > >> >>> > > >> >>> 12. jul. 2019 kl. 09:04 skrev Ignacio Vera : > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Ishan: I had a look into the issues and I have no objections as far > > >> >>> as they get properly reviewed if possible. It will be good to commit > > >> >>> the shortly so they go through a few CI iterations in case something > > >> >>> gets broken. I am planning to build the first RC early next week as > > >> >>> there are no blockers for the release. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Steve: Than you so much, I need to work on getting the right > > >> >>> permissions. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Finally I wrote a draft for the release notes for Lucene and Solr. > > >> >>> It would be good if someone with more experience in Solr can > > >> >>> review/modify my attempt as it is difficult for me to know which are > > >> >>> the most important bits. Here are the links to the drafts (not they > > >> >>> are in wiki, let me know if you have problems accessing them): > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Lucene: > > >> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732808&draftShareId=cb366dc4-c136-4505-9c37-60bde5db2550&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914476369 > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Solr: > > >> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732972&draftShareId=5cace703-b80b-49c4-a07f-55b891683f90&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914529931 > > >> >>> > > >> >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 6:36 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > > >> >>> wrote: > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> Hi Ignacio, > > >> >>>> I wish to include two security bug fixes (not vulnerabilities, but > > >> >>>> feature regressions due to Authorization plugin), SOLR-13472 and > > >> >>>> SOLR-13619. I can commit both shortly, attempting to write a unit > > >> >>>> test for it (which is proving harder to do than reproducing, fixing > > >> >>>> and testing manually). Please let me know if you have any concerns. > > >> >>>> Regards, > > >> >>>> Ishan > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> On Thu, 11 Jul, 2019, 9:12 PM Tomoko Uchida, > > >> >>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> Hi Ignacio, > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> LUCENE-8907 was fixed. (I have reverted a series of commits which > > >> >>>>> cause backwards incompatibility on Lucene 8.x.) >
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
gt; 8.1.2 should be integrated into 8.2.0 in CHANGES.txt? Despite this, I > >> >> see at least one of those issues got into the curated release notes / > >> >> highlights any way -- thanks Ignacio. > >> >> > >> >> ~ David Smiley > >> >> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > >> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 9:40 AM Jan Høydahl > >> >> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> Please use HTTPS in the links to download pages. > >> >>> > >> >>> Jan Høydahl > >> >>> > >> >>> 12. jul. 2019 kl. 09:04 skrev Ignacio Vera : > >> >>> > >> >>> Ishan: I had a look into the issues and I have no objections as far as > >> >>> they get properly reviewed if possible. It will be good to commit the > >> >>> shortly so they go through a few CI iterations in case something gets > >> >>> broken. I am planning to build the first RC early next week as there > >> >>> are no blockers for the release. > >> >>> > >> >>> Steve: Than you so much, I need to work on getting the right > >> >>> permissions. > >> >>> > >> >>> Finally I wrote a draft for the release notes for Lucene and Solr. It > >> >>> would be good if someone with more experience in Solr can > >> >>> review/modify my attempt as it is difficult for me to know which are > >> >>> the most important bits. Here are the links to the drafts (not they > >> >>> are in wiki, let me know if you have problems accessing them): > >> >>> > >> >>> Lucene: > >> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732808&draftShareId=cb366dc4-c136-4505-9c37-60bde5db2550&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914476369 > >> >>> > >> >>> Solr: > >> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732972&draftShareId=5cace703-b80b-49c4-a07f-55b891683f90&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914529931 > >> >>> > >> >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 6:36 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Hi Ignacio, > >> >>>> I wish to include two security bug fixes (not vulnerabilities, but > >> >>>> feature regressions due to Authorization plugin), SOLR-13472 and > >> >>>> SOLR-13619. I can commit both shortly, attempting to write a unit > >> >>>> test for it (which is proving harder to do than reproducing, fixing > >> >>>> and testing manually). Please let me know if you have any concerns. > >> >>>> Regards, > >> >>>> Ishan > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On Thu, 11 Jul, 2019, 9:12 PM Tomoko Uchida, > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Hi Ignacio, > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> LUCENE-8907 was fixed. (I have reverted a series of commits which > >> >>>>> cause backwards incompatibility on Lucene 8.x.) > >> >>>>> Thank you for waiting for that! > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Tomoko > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> 2019年7月11日(木) 22:44 Uwe Schindler : > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > Hi, > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > I enabled the policeman Jenkins Jobs for 8.2 branch. > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > Uwe > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > - > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > Uwe Schindler > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > https://www.thetaphi.de > >> >>>>> > > >> >>
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
xes (not vulnerabilities, but > feature regressions due to Authorization plugin), SOLR-13472 and > SOLR-13619. I can commit both shortly, attempting to write a unit test for > it (which is proving harder to do than reproducing, fixing and testing > manually). Please let me know if you have any concerns. > >> >>>> Regards, > >> >>>> Ishan > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On Thu, 11 Jul, 2019, 9:12 PM Tomoko Uchida, < > tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Hi Ignacio, > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> LUCENE-8907 was fixed. (I have reverted a series of commits which > >> >>>>> cause backwards incompatibility on Lucene 8.x.) > >> >>>>> Thank you for waiting for that! > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Tomoko > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> 2019年7月11日(木) 22:44 Uwe Schindler : > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > Hi, > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > I enabled the policeman Jenkins Jobs for 8.2 branch. > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > Uwe > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > - > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > Uwe Schindler > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > https://www.thetaphi.de > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > From: Ignacio Vera > >> >>>>> > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 1:05 PM > >> >>>>> > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > >> >>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > Hi, > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > The branch has been created, As a reminder, this branch is on > feature freeze and only documentation or build patches should be committed. > I will be waiting for LUCENE-8907 to start building the first release > candidate. > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > Let me know if there is any other blocker before we can start > the release process. > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > It seems I do not have the permissions to create the Jenkins > jobs for this branch, maybe Steve can help here? > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > Thanks, > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > Ignacio > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 4:51 AM David Smiley < > david.w.smi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > BTW for 8.2.0 I updated Solr's CHANGES.txt to split out issues > that seemed to be Improvements that were not really New Features. > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > ~ David Smiley > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > On Wed, Jul 10, 20
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
ng manually). Please let me know if you have any concerns. >> >>>> Regards, >> >>>> Ishan >> >>>> >> >>>> On Thu, 11 Jul, 2019, 9:12 PM Tomoko Uchida, >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Hi Ignacio, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> LUCENE-8907 was fixed. (I have reverted a series of commits which >> >>>>> cause backwards incompatibility on Lucene 8.x.) >> >>>>> Thank you for waiting for that! >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Tomoko >> >>>>> >> >>>>> 2019年7月11日(木) 22:44 Uwe Schindler : >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > Hi, >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > I enabled the policeman Jenkins Jobs for 8.2 branch. >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > Uwe >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > - >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > Uwe Schindler >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > https://www.thetaphi.de >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > From: Ignacio Vera >> >>>>> > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 1:05 PM >> >>>>> > To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> >>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > Hi, >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > The branch has been created, As a reminder, this branch is on >> >>>>> > feature freeze and only documentation or build patches should be >> >>>>> > committed. I will be waiting for LUCENE-8907 to start building the >> >>>>> > first release candidate. >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > Let me know if there is any other blocker before we can start the >> >>>>> > release process. >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > It seems I do not have the permissions to create the Jenkins jobs >> >>>>> > for this branch, maybe Steve can help here? >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > Thanks, >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > Ignacio >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 4:51 AM David Smiley >> >>>>> > wrote: >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > BTW for 8.2.0 I updated Solr's CHANGES.txt to split out issues that >> >>>>> > seemed to be Improvements that were not really New Features. >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > ~ David Smiley >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:38 AM Ignacio Vera >> >>>>> > wrote: >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > Thanks Tomoko for taking care of that. >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 4:03 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh >> >>>>> > wrote: >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > Hi Ignacio, >> >>>>> > >>
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
The change to Lucene 8.2.0 snapshot was done on July 10th. Previous to that the Lucene version was 8.1.0. On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 12:53 PM Michael Sokolov wrote: > Hmm that's possible, although the jump is bigger than anything I > observed while testing. I assume these charts are building off of > apache/master, or something close to that? If so, then the timing is > off a bit. LUCENE-8781 was pushed quite a while before that, and then > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8895 which extended the > encoding to be the default (not just for postings) was pushed on July > 2 or so, but the chart shows a jump on July 10? > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 4:03 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > We observed using a snapshot of Lucene 8.2 that there is an increase of > around 30% on the memory usage of IndexReaders for some of the test > datasets, for example: > > > > > https://elasticsearch-benchmarks.elastic.co/#tracks/http-logs/nightly/default/30d > > > > We suspect this is due to this change: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8781 > > > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 7:10 AM David Smiley > wrote: > >> > >> Since there won't be any 8.1.2 yet some issues got fixed for 8.1.2 and > there is an 8.1.2 section in CHANGES.txt those issues might not be very > noticeable to users that only look at the published HTML version (e.g. > https://lucene.apache.org/solr/8_1_1/changes/Changes.html ). Maybe 8.1.2 > should be integrated into 8.2.0 in CHANGES.txt? Despite this, I see at > least one of those issues got into the curated release notes / highlights > any way -- thanks Ignacio. > >> > >> ~ David Smiley > >> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 9:40 AM Jan Høydahl > wrote: > >>> > >>> Please use HTTPS in the links to download pages. > >>> > >>> Jan Høydahl > >>> > >>> 12. jul. 2019 kl. 09:04 skrev Ignacio Vera : > >>> > >>> Ishan: I had a look into the issues and I have no objections as far as > they get properly reviewed if possible. It will be good to commit the > shortly so they go through a few CI iterations in case something gets > broken. I am planning to build the first RC early next week as there are no > blockers for the release. > >>> > >>> Steve: Than you so much, I need to work on getting the right > permissions. > >>> > >>> Finally I wrote a draft for the release notes for Lucene and Solr. It > would be good if someone with more experience in Solr can review/modify my > attempt as it is difficult for me to know which are the most important > bits. Here are the links to the drafts (not they are in wiki, let me know > if you have problems accessing them): > >>> > >>> Lucene: > >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732808&draftShareId=cb366dc4-c136-4505-9c37-60bde5db2550&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914476369 > >>> > >>> Solr: > >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732972&draftShareId=5cace703-b80b-49c4-a07f-55b891683f90&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914529931 > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 6:36 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi Ignacio, > >>>> I wish to include two security bug fixes (not vulnerabilities, but > feature regressions due to Authorization plugin), SOLR-13472 and > SOLR-13619. I can commit both shortly, attempting to write a unit test for > it (which is proving harder to do than reproducing, fixing and testing > manually). Please let me know if you have any concerns. > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Ishan > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, 11 Jul, 2019, 9:12 PM Tomoko Uchida, < > tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Ignacio, > >>>>> > >>>>> LUCENE-8907 was fixed. (I have reverted a series of commits which > >>>>> cause backwards incompatibility on Lucene 8.x.) > >>>>> Thank you for waiting for that! > >>>>> > >>>>> Tomoko > >>>>> > >>>>> 2019年7月11日(木) 22:44 Uwe Schindler : > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Hi, > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>&
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
Hmm that's possible, although the jump is bigger than anything I observed while testing. I assume these charts are building off of apache/master, or something close to that? If so, then the timing is off a bit. LUCENE-8781 was pushed quite a while before that, and then https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8895 which extended the encoding to be the default (not just for postings) was pushed on July 2 or so, but the chart shows a jump on July 10? On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 4:03 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > > Hi, > > We observed using a snapshot of Lucene 8.2 that there is an increase of > around 30% on the memory usage of IndexReaders for some of the test datasets, > for example: > > https://elasticsearch-benchmarks.elastic.co/#tracks/http-logs/nightly/default/30d > > We suspect this is due to this change: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8781 > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 7:10 AM David Smiley wrote: >> >> Since there won't be any 8.1.2 yet some issues got fixed for 8.1.2 and there >> is an 8.1.2 section in CHANGES.txt those issues might not be very noticeable >> to users that only look at the published HTML version (e.g. >> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/8_1_1/changes/Changes.html ). Maybe 8.1.2 >> should be integrated into 8.2.0 in CHANGES.txt? Despite this, I see at >> least one of those issues got into the curated release notes / highlights >> any way -- thanks Ignacio. >> >> ~ David Smiley >> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 9:40 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: >>> >>> Please use HTTPS in the links to download pages. >>> >>> Jan Høydahl >>> >>> 12. jul. 2019 kl. 09:04 skrev Ignacio Vera : >>> >>> Ishan: I had a look into the issues and I have no objections as far as they >>> get properly reviewed if possible. It will be good to commit the shortly so >>> they go through a few CI iterations in case something gets broken. I am >>> planning to build the first RC early next week as there are no blockers for >>> the release. >>> >>> Steve: Than you so much, I need to work on getting the right permissions. >>> >>> Finally I wrote a draft for the release notes for Lucene and Solr. It would >>> be good if someone with more experience in Solr can review/modify my >>> attempt as it is difficult for me to know which are the most important >>> bits. Here are the links to the drafts (not they are in wiki, let me know >>> if you have problems accessing them): >>> >>> Lucene: >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732808&draftShareId=cb366dc4-c136-4505-9c37-60bde5db2550&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914476369 >>> >>> Solr: >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732972&draftShareId=5cace703-b80b-49c4-a07f-55b891683f90&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914529931 >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 6:36 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Ignacio, >>>> I wish to include two security bug fixes (not vulnerabilities, but feature >>>> regressions due to Authorization plugin), SOLR-13472 and SOLR-13619. I can >>>> commit both shortly, attempting to write a unit test for it (which is >>>> proving harder to do than reproducing, fixing and testing manually). >>>> Please let me know if you have any concerns. >>>> Regards, >>>> Ishan >>>> >>>> On Thu, 11 Jul, 2019, 9:12 PM Tomoko Uchida, >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Ignacio, >>>>> >>>>> LUCENE-8907 was fixed. (I have reverted a series of commits which >>>>> cause backwards incompatibility on Lucene 8.x.) >>>>> Thank you for waiting for that! >>>>> >>>>> Tomoko >>>>> >>>>> 2019年7月11日(木) 22:44 Uwe Schindler : >>>>> > >>>>> > Hi, >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > I enabled the policeman Jenkins Jobs for 8.2 branch. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Uwe >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > - >>>>> > >>>>> > Uwe Schindler >>>>> > >>>>> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Br
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
Raised a PR: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/784 On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 2:10 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > > FYI I added a note to > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8811, I think it's too > breaking for 8.2 and should wait for 9.0. We can mitigate LUCENE-8810 > in 8.x by disabling the flattening of inner disjunctions when this > would create too many clauses in a single BooleanQuery. I'll work with > Atri on getting LUCENE-8811 reverted from 8.x and 8.2 and the separate > mitigation for LUCENE-8810 in if there are no objections. > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 10:03 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > We observed using a snapshot of Lucene 8.2 that there is an increase of > > around 30% on the memory usage of IndexReaders for some of the test > > datasets, for example: > > > > https://elasticsearch-benchmarks.elastic.co/#tracks/http-logs/nightly/default/30d > > > > We suspect this is due to this change: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8781 > > > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 7:10 AM David Smiley > > wrote: > >> > >> Since there won't be any 8.1.2 yet some issues got fixed for 8.1.2 and > >> there is an 8.1.2 section in CHANGES.txt those issues might not be very > >> noticeable to users that only look at the published HTML version (e.g. > >> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/8_1_1/changes/Changes.html ). Maybe 8.1.2 > >> should be integrated into 8.2.0 in CHANGES.txt? Despite this, I see at > >> least one of those issues got into the curated release notes / highlights > >> any way -- thanks Ignacio. > >> > >> ~ David Smiley > >> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 9:40 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > >>> > >>> Please use HTTPS in the links to download pages. > >>> > >>> Jan Høydahl > >>> > >>> 12. jul. 2019 kl. 09:04 skrev Ignacio Vera : > >>> > >>> Ishan: I had a look into the issues and I have no objections as far as > >>> they get properly reviewed if possible. It will be good to commit the > >>> shortly so they go through a few CI iterations in case something gets > >>> broken. I am planning to build the first RC early next week as there are > >>> no blockers for the release. > >>> > >>> Steve: Than you so much, I need to work on getting the right permissions. > >>> > >>> Finally I wrote a draft for the release notes for Lucene and Solr. It > >>> would be good if someone with more experience in Solr can review/modify > >>> my attempt as it is difficult for me to know which are the most important > >>> bits. Here are the links to the drafts (not they are in wiki, let me know > >>> if you have problems accessing them): > >>> > >>> Lucene: > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732808&draftShareId=cb366dc4-c136-4505-9c37-60bde5db2550&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914476369 > >>> > >>> Solr: > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732972&draftShareId=5cace703-b80b-49c4-a07f-55b891683f90&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914529931 > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 6:36 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi Ignacio, > >>>> I wish to include two security bug fixes (not vulnerabilities, but > >>>> feature regressions due to Authorization plugin), SOLR-13472 and > >>>> SOLR-13619. I can commit both shortly, attempting to write a unit test > >>>> for it (which is proving harder to do than reproducing, fixing and > >>>> testing manually). Please let me know if you have any concerns. > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Ishan > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, 11 Jul, 2019, 9:12 PM Tomoko Uchida, > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Ignacio, > >>>>> > >>>>> LUCENE-8907 was fixed. (I have reverted a series of commits which > >>>>> cause backwards incompatibility on Lucene 8.x.) > >>>>> Thank you for waiting for that! > >>>>> > >>>>> Tomoko > >>>>> > >>>>> 2019年7月11日(木) 22:44 Uwe Schindler : > >>>
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
FYI I added a note to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8811, I think it's too breaking for 8.2 and should wait for 9.0. We can mitigate LUCENE-8810 in 8.x by disabling the flattening of inner disjunctions when this would create too many clauses in a single BooleanQuery. I'll work with Atri on getting LUCENE-8811 reverted from 8.x and 8.2 and the separate mitigation for LUCENE-8810 in if there are no objections. On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 10:03 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > > Hi, > > We observed using a snapshot of Lucene 8.2 that there is an increase of > around 30% on the memory usage of IndexReaders for some of the test datasets, > for example: > > https://elasticsearch-benchmarks.elastic.co/#tracks/http-logs/nightly/default/30d > > We suspect this is due to this change: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8781 > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 7:10 AM David Smiley wrote: >> >> Since there won't be any 8.1.2 yet some issues got fixed for 8.1.2 and there >> is an 8.1.2 section in CHANGES.txt those issues might not be very noticeable >> to users that only look at the published HTML version (e.g. >> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/8_1_1/changes/Changes.html ). Maybe 8.1.2 >> should be integrated into 8.2.0 in CHANGES.txt? Despite this, I see at >> least one of those issues got into the curated release notes / highlights >> any way -- thanks Ignacio. >> >> ~ David Smiley >> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 9:40 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: >>> >>> Please use HTTPS in the links to download pages. >>> >>> Jan Høydahl >>> >>> 12. jul. 2019 kl. 09:04 skrev Ignacio Vera : >>> >>> Ishan: I had a look into the issues and I have no objections as far as they >>> get properly reviewed if possible. It will be good to commit the shortly so >>> they go through a few CI iterations in case something gets broken. I am >>> planning to build the first RC early next week as there are no blockers for >>> the release. >>> >>> Steve: Than you so much, I need to work on getting the right permissions. >>> >>> Finally I wrote a draft for the release notes for Lucene and Solr. It would >>> be good if someone with more experience in Solr can review/modify my >>> attempt as it is difficult for me to know which are the most important >>> bits. Here are the links to the drafts (not they are in wiki, let me know >>> if you have problems accessing them): >>> >>> Lucene: >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732808&draftShareId=cb366dc4-c136-4505-9c37-60bde5db2550&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914476369 >>> >>> Solr: >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732972&draftShareId=5cace703-b80b-49c4-a07f-55b891683f90&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914529931 >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 6:36 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Ignacio, >>>> I wish to include two security bug fixes (not vulnerabilities, but feature >>>> regressions due to Authorization plugin), SOLR-13472 and SOLR-13619. I can >>>> commit both shortly, attempting to write a unit test for it (which is >>>> proving harder to do than reproducing, fixing and testing manually). >>>> Please let me know if you have any concerns. >>>> Regards, >>>> Ishan >>>> >>>> On Thu, 11 Jul, 2019, 9:12 PM Tomoko Uchida, >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Ignacio, >>>>> >>>>> LUCENE-8907 was fixed. (I have reverted a series of commits which >>>>> cause backwards incompatibility on Lucene 8.x.) >>>>> Thank you for waiting for that! >>>>> >>>>> Tomoko >>>>> >>>>> 2019年7月11日(木) 22:44 Uwe Schindler : >>>>> > >>>>> > Hi, >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > I enabled the policeman Jenkins Jobs for 8.2 branch. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Uwe >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > - >>>>> > >>>>> > Uwe Schindler >>>>> > >>>>> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >>>>> &
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
Hi, We observed using a snapshot of Lucene 8.2 that there is an increase of around 30% on the memory usage of IndexReaders for some of the test datasets, for example: https://elasticsearch-benchmarks.elastic.co/#tracks/http-logs/nightly/default/30d We suspect this is due to this change: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8781 On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 7:10 AM David Smiley wrote: > Since there won't be any 8.1.2 yet some issues got fixed for 8.1.2 and > there is an 8.1.2 section in CHANGES.txt those issues might not be very > noticeable to users that only look at the published HTML version (e.g. > https://lucene.apache.org/solr/8_1_1/changes/Changes.html ). Maybe 8.1.2 > should be integrated into 8.2.0 in CHANGES.txt? Despite this, I see at > least one of those issues got into the curated release notes / highlights > any way -- thanks Ignacio. > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 9:40 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > >> Please use HTTPS in the links to download pages. >> >> Jan Høydahl >> >> 12. jul. 2019 kl. 09:04 skrev Ignacio Vera : >> >> Ishan: I had a look into the issues and I have no objections as far as >> they get properly reviewed if possible. It will be good to commit the >> shortly so they go through a few CI iterations in case something gets >> broken. I am planning to build the first RC early next week as there are no >> blockers for the release. >> >> Steve: Than you so much, I need to work on getting the right permissions. >> >> Finally I wrote a draft for the release notes for Lucene and Solr. It >> would be good if someone with more experience in Solr can review/modify my >> attempt as it is difficult for me to know which are the most important >> bits. Here are the links to the drafts (not they are in wiki, let me know >> if you have problems accessing them): >> >> Lucene: >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732808&draftShareId=cb366dc4-c136-4505-9c37-60bde5db2550&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914476369 >> >> Solr: >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732972&draftShareId=5cace703-b80b-49c4-a07f-55b891683f90&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914529931 >> >> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 6:36 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Ignacio, >>> I wish to include two security bug fixes (not vulnerabilities, but >>> feature regressions due to Authorization plugin), SOLR-13472 and >>> SOLR-13619. I can commit both shortly, attempting to write a unit test for >>> it (which is proving harder to do than reproducing, fixing and testing >>> manually). Please let me know if you have any concerns. >>> Regards, >>> Ishan >>> >>> On Thu, 11 Jul, 2019, 9:12 PM Tomoko Uchida, < >>> tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Ignacio, >>>> >>>> LUCENE-8907 was fixed. (I have reverted a series of commits which >>>> cause backwards incompatibility on Lucene 8.x.) >>>> Thank you for waiting for that! >>>> >>>> Tomoko >>>> >>>> 2019年7月11日(木) 22:44 Uwe Schindler : >>>> > >>>> > Hi, >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > I enabled the policeman Jenkins Jobs for 8.2 branch. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Uwe >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > - >>>> > >>>> > Uwe Schindler >>>> > >>>> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >>>> > >>>> > https://www.thetaphi.de >>>> > >>>> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > From: Ignacio Vera >>>> > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 1:05 PM >>>> > To: dev@lucene.apache.org >>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Hi, >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > The branch has been created, As a reminder, this branch is on feature >>>> freeze and only documentation or build patches should be committed. I will >>>> be waiting for LUCENE-8907 to start building the first release candidate. >>>> >
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
Since there won't be any 8.1.2 yet some issues got fixed for 8.1.2 and there is an 8.1.2 section in CHANGES.txt those issues might not be very noticeable to users that only look at the published HTML version (e.g. https://lucene.apache.org/solr/8_1_1/changes/Changes.html ). Maybe 8.1.2 should be integrated into 8.2.0 in CHANGES.txt? Despite this, I see at least one of those issues got into the curated release notes / highlights any way -- thanks Ignacio. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 9:40 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > Please use HTTPS in the links to download pages. > > Jan Høydahl > > 12. jul. 2019 kl. 09:04 skrev Ignacio Vera : > > Ishan: I had a look into the issues and I have no objections as far as > they get properly reviewed if possible. It will be good to commit the > shortly so they go through a few CI iterations in case something gets > broken. I am planning to build the first RC early next week as there are no > blockers for the release. > > Steve: Than you so much, I need to work on getting the right permissions. > > Finally I wrote a draft for the release notes for Lucene and Solr. It > would be good if someone with more experience in Solr can review/modify my > attempt as it is difficult for me to know which are the most important > bits. Here are the links to the drafts (not they are in wiki, let me know > if you have problems accessing them): > > Lucene: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732808&draftShareId=cb366dc4-c136-4505-9c37-60bde5db2550&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914476369 > > Solr: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732972&draftShareId=5cace703-b80b-49c4-a07f-55b891683f90&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914529931 > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 6:36 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Ignacio, >> I wish to include two security bug fixes (not vulnerabilities, but >> feature regressions due to Authorization plugin), SOLR-13472 and >> SOLR-13619. I can commit both shortly, attempting to write a unit test for >> it (which is proving harder to do than reproducing, fixing and testing >> manually). Please let me know if you have any concerns. >> Regards, >> Ishan >> >> On Thu, 11 Jul, 2019, 9:12 PM Tomoko Uchida, < >> tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Ignacio, >>> >>> LUCENE-8907 was fixed. (I have reverted a series of commits which >>> cause backwards incompatibility on Lucene 8.x.) >>> Thank you for waiting for that! >>> >>> Tomoko >>> >>> 2019年7月11日(木) 22:44 Uwe Schindler : >>> > >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > I enabled the policeman Jenkins Jobs for 8.2 branch. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Uwe >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > - >>> > >>> > Uwe Schindler >>> > >>> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >>> > >>> > https://www.thetaphi.de >>> > >>> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > From: Ignacio Vera >>> > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 1:05 PM >>> > To: dev@lucene.apache.org >>> > Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > The branch has been created, As a reminder, this branch is on feature >>> freeze and only documentation or build patches should be committed. I will >>> be waiting for LUCENE-8907 to start building the first release candidate. >>> > >>> > Let me know if there is any other blocker before we can start the >>> release process. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > It seems I do not have the permissions to create the Jenkins jobs for >>> this branch, maybe Steve can help here? >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Ignacio >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 4:51 AM David Smiley >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > BTW for 8.2.0 I updated Solr's CHANGES.txt to split out issues that >>> seemed to be Improvements that were not really New Features. >>> > >>> > >
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
Please use HTTPS in the links to download pages. Jan Høydahl > 12. jul. 2019 kl. 09:04 skrev Ignacio Vera : > > Ishan: I had a look into the issues and I have no objections as far as they > get properly reviewed if possible. It will be good to commit the shortly so > they go through a few CI iterations in case something gets broken. I am > planning to build the first RC early next week as there are no blockers for > the release. > > Steve: Than you so much, I need to work on getting the right permissions. > > Finally I wrote a draft for the release notes for Lucene and Solr. It would > be good if someone with more experience in Solr can review/modify my attempt > as it is difficult for me to know which are the most important bits. Here are > the links to the drafts (not they are in wiki, let me know if you have > problems accessing them): > > Lucene: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732808&draftShareId=cb366dc4-c136-4505-9c37-60bde5db2550&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914476369 > > Solr: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732972&draftShareId=5cace703-b80b-49c4-a07f-55b891683f90&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914529931 > >> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 6:36 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya >> wrote: >> Hi Ignacio, >> I wish to include two security bug fixes (not vulnerabilities, but feature >> regressions due to Authorization plugin), SOLR-13472 and SOLR-13619. I can >> commit both shortly, attempting to write a unit test for it (which is >> proving harder to do than reproducing, fixing and testing manually). Please >> let me know if you have any concerns. >> Regards, >> Ishan >> >>> On Thu, 11 Jul, 2019, 9:12 PM Tomoko Uchida, >>> wrote: >>> Hi Ignacio, >>> >>> LUCENE-8907 was fixed. (I have reverted a series of commits which >>> cause backwards incompatibility on Lucene 8.x.) >>> Thank you for waiting for that! >>> >>> Tomoko >>> >>> 2019年7月11日(木) 22:44 Uwe Schindler : >>> > >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > I enabled the policeman Jenkins Jobs for 8.2 branch. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Uwe >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > - >>> > >>> > Uwe Schindler >>> > >>> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >>> > >>> > https://www.thetaphi.de >>> > >>> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > From: Ignacio Vera >>> > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 1:05 PM >>> > To: dev@lucene.apache.org >>> > Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > The branch has been created, As a reminder, this branch is on feature >>> > freeze and only documentation or build patches should be committed. I >>> > will be waiting for LUCENE-8907 to start building the first release >>> > candidate. >>> > >>> > Let me know if there is any other blocker before we can start the release >>> > process. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > It seems I do not have the permissions to create the Jenkins jobs for >>> > this branch, maybe Steve can help here? >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Ignacio >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 4:51 AM David Smiley >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > BTW for 8.2.0 I updated Solr's CHANGES.txt to split out issues that >>> > seemed to be Improvements that were not really New Features. >>> > >>> > >>> > ~ David Smiley >>> > >>> > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >>> > >>> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:38 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: >>> > >>> > Thanks Tomoko for taking care of that. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 4:03 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi Ignacio, >>> > >>> &g
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
Ishan: I had a look into the issues and I have no objections as far as they get properly reviewed if possible. It will be good to commit the shortly so they go through a few CI iterations in case something gets broken. I am planning to build the first RC early next week as there are no blockers for the release. Steve: Than you so much, I need to work on getting the right permissions. Finally I wrote a draft for the release notes for Lucene and Solr. It would be good if someone with more experience in Solr can review/modify my attempt as it is difficult for me to know which are the most important bits. Here are the links to the drafts (not they are in wiki, let me know if you have problems accessing them): Lucene: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732808&draftShareId=cb366dc4-c136-4505-9c37-60bde5db2550&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914476369 Solr: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=120732972&draftShareId=5cace703-b80b-49c4-a07f-55b891683f90&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1562914529931 On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 6:36 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ignacio, > I wish to include two security bug fixes (not vulnerabilities, but feature > regressions due to Authorization plugin), SOLR-13472 and SOLR-13619. I can > commit both shortly, attempting to write a unit test for it (which is > proving harder to do than reproducing, fixing and testing manually). Please > let me know if you have any concerns. > Regards, > Ishan > > On Thu, 11 Jul, 2019, 9:12 PM Tomoko Uchida, > wrote: > >> Hi Ignacio, >> >> LUCENE-8907 was fixed. (I have reverted a series of commits which >> cause backwards incompatibility on Lucene 8.x.) >> Thank you for waiting for that! >> >> Tomoko >> >> 2019年7月11日(木) 22:44 Uwe Schindler : >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > >> > >> > I enabled the policeman Jenkins Jobs for 8.2 branch. >> > >> > >> > >> > Uwe >> > >> > >> > >> > - >> > >> > Uwe Schindler >> > >> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >> > >> > https://www.thetaphi.de >> > >> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> > >> > >> > >> > From: Ignacio Vera >> > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 1:05 PM >> > To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> > Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 >> > >> > >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > >> > >> > The branch has been created, As a reminder, this branch is on feature >> freeze and only documentation or build patches should be committed. I will >> be waiting for LUCENE-8907 to start building the first release candidate. >> > >> > Let me know if there is any other blocker before we can start the >> release process. >> > >> > >> > >> > It seems I do not have the permissions to create the Jenkins jobs for >> this branch, maybe Steve can help here? >> > >> > >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > >> > >> > Ignacio >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 4:51 AM David Smiley >> wrote: >> > >> > BTW for 8.2.0 I updated Solr's CHANGES.txt to split out issues that >> seemed to be Improvements that were not really New Features. >> > >> > >> > ~ David Smiley >> > >> > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >> > >> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:38 AM Ignacio Vera >> wrote: >> > >> > Thanks Tomoko for taking care of that. >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 4:03 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Ignacio, >> > >> > >> > >> > 8.1.2 bugfix release will cancelled. You can go ahead with 8.2 release. >> > >> > >> > >> > Thanks! >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 20:38, Tomoko Uchida < >> tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > I opened a blocker issue a while ago for release 8.2: >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8907 >> > >> > Sorry about that, I noticed the backwards incompatibility we have to >> > deal with today. If there are no objections, I will revert the all >> > relat
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
Hi Ignacio, I wish to include two security bug fixes (not vulnerabilities, but feature regressions due to Authorization plugin), SOLR-13472 and SOLR-13619. I can commit both shortly, attempting to write a unit test for it (which is proving harder to do than reproducing, fixing and testing manually). Please let me know if you have any concerns. Regards, Ishan On Thu, 11 Jul, 2019, 9:12 PM Tomoko Uchida, wrote: > Hi Ignacio, > > LUCENE-8907 was fixed. (I have reverted a series of commits which > cause backwards incompatibility on Lucene 8.x.) > Thank you for waiting for that! > > Tomoko > > 2019年7月11日(木) 22:44 Uwe Schindler : > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I enabled the policeman Jenkins Jobs for 8.2 branch. > > > > > > > > Uwe > > > > > > > > - > > > > Uwe Schindler > > > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > > > > > From: Ignacio Vera > > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 1:05 PM > > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > The branch has been created, As a reminder, this branch is on feature > freeze and only documentation or build patches should be committed. I will > be waiting for LUCENE-8907 to start building the first release candidate. > > > > Let me know if there is any other blocker before we can start the > release process. > > > > > > > > It seems I do not have the permissions to create the Jenkins jobs for > this branch, maybe Steve can help here? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Ignacio > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 4:51 AM David Smiley > wrote: > > > > BTW for 8.2.0 I updated Solr's CHANGES.txt to split out issues that > seemed to be Improvements that were not really New Features. > > > > > > ~ David Smiley > > > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:38 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > > > > Thanks Tomoko for taking care of that. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 4:03 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh > wrote: > > > > Hi Ignacio, > > > > > > > > 8.1.2 bugfix release will cancelled. You can go ahead with 8.2 release. > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 20:38, Tomoko Uchida < > tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > I opened a blocker issue a while ago for release 8.2: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8907 > > > > Sorry about that, I noticed the backwards incompatibility we have to > > deal with today. If there are no objections, I will revert the all > > related commits from the branch_8x and 8_2 in a few days. > > > > Thanks, > > Tomoko > > > > 2019年7月10日(水) 22:02 Ignacio Vera : > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > All the issues listed above has been already committed and I see no > blockers for release 8.2. I will cut the branch tomorrow around 10am CEST > and I will wait for the decision on the bug release 8.1.2 to schedule the > build of the first release candidate. Please let us know if this is > troublesome for you. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Ignacio > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 2:59 AM Joel Bernstein > wrote: > > >> > > >> I've got one issue that I'd like to get in ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13589), which I should have > wrapped up in a day or two. +1 for around July 10th. > > >> > > >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 5:14 PM Nicholas Knize > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> +1 for starting the 8.2 release process. I think it would be good to > get the LUCENE-8632 feature into 8.2 along with the BKD improvements and > changes in LUCENE- and LUCENE-8896 > > >>> > > >>> Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP > > >>> Geospatial Software Guy | Elasticsearch > > >>> Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer > > >>> nkn...@apache.org > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 9:34 AM Ignacio Vera > wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Hi all, > > >>>> > > >>>> 8.1 has been released on May 16th and we have new features, > enhancements and fixes that are not released yet so I'd like to start > thinking in releasing Lucene/Solr 8.2.0. > > >>>> > > >>>> I can create the 8.2 branch in two weeks time (around July 10th) > and build the first RC by the end of that week if that works for everyone. > Please let me know if there are bug fixes that needs to be fixed in 8.2 and > might not be ready by then. > > >>>> > > >>>> Cheers, > > >>>> > > >>>> Ignacio > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > -- > > > > Best regards, > > > > Cao Mạnh Đạt > > > > E-mail: caomanhdat...@gmail.com > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
And I created (cloned from branch_8x jobs) and enabled the ASF Jenkins branch_8_2 jobs. -- Steve > On Jul 11, 2019, at 9:43 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > > Hi, > > I enabled the policeman Jenkins Jobs for 8.2 branch. > > Uwe > > - > Uwe Schindler > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > https://www.thetaphi.de <https://www.thetaphi.de/> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de <mailto:u...@thetaphi.de> > > From: Ignacio Vera > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 1:05 PM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 > > Hi, > > The branch has been created, As a reminder, this branch is on feature freeze > and only documentation or build patches should be committed. I will be > waiting for LUCENE-8907 to start building the first release candidate. > Let me know if there is any other blocker before we can start the release > process. > > It seems I do not have the permissions to create the Jenkins jobs for this > branch, maybe Steve can help here? > > Thanks, > > Ignacio > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 4:51 AM David Smiley <mailto:david.w.smi...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> BTW for 8.2.0 I updated Solr's CHANGES.txt to split out issues that seemed >> to be Improvements that were not really New Features. >> >> ~ David Smiley >> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley> >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:38 AM Ignacio Vera > <mailto:iver...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> Thanks Tomoko for taking care of that. >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 4:03 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh >> <mailto:caomanhdat...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> Hi Ignacio, >>>> >>>> 8.1.2 bugfix release will cancelled. You can go ahead with 8.2 release. >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 20:38, Tomoko Uchida >>> <mailto:tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> I opened a blocker issue a while ago for release 8.2: >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8907 >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8907> >>>>> >>>>> Sorry about that, I noticed the backwards incompatibility we have to >>>>> deal with today. If there are no objections, I will revert the all >>>>> related commits from the branch_8x and 8_2 in a few days. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Tomoko >>>>> >>>>> 2019年7月10日(水) 22:02 Ignacio Vera >>>> <mailto:iver...@gmail.com>>: >>>>> > >>>>> > Hi, >>>>> > >>>>> > All the issues listed above has been already committed and I see no >>>>> > blockers for release 8.2. I will cut the branch tomorrow around 10am >>>>> > CEST and I will wait for the decision on the bug release 8.1.2 to >>>>> > schedule the build of the first release candidate. Please let us know >>>>> > if this is troublesome for you. >>>>> > >>>>> > Thanks, >>>>> > >>>>> > Ignacio >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 2:59 AM Joel Bernstein >>>> > <mailto:joels...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I've got one issue that I'd like to get in >>>>> >> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13589 >>>>> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13589>), which I should >>>>> >> have wrapped up in a day or two. +1 for around July 10th. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 5:14 PM Nicholas Knize >>>> >> <mailto:nkn...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> +1 for starting the 8.2 release process. I think it would be good to >>>>> >>> get the LUCENE-8632 feature into 8.2 along with the BKD improvements >>>>> >>> and changes in LUCENE- and LUCENE-8896 >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP >>>>> >>> Geospatial Software Guy | Elasticsearch >>>>> >>> Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer >>>>> >>> nkn...@apache.org <mailto:nkn...@apache.org> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 9:34 AM Ignacio Vera >>>> >>> <mailto:iver...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> 8.1 has been released on May 16th and we have new features, >>>>> >>>> enhancements and fixes that are not released yet so I'd like to >>>>> >>>> start thinking in releasing Lucene/Solr 8.2.0. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> I can create the 8.2 branch in two weeks time (around July 10th) and >>>>> >>>> build the first RC by the end of that week if that works for >>>>> >>>> everyone. Please let me know if there are bug fixes that needs to be >>>>> >>>> fixed in 8.2 and might not be ready by then. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> Ignacio >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>> <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org> >>>> -- >>>> Best regards, >>>> Cao Mạnh Đạt >>>> E-mail: caomanhdat...@gmail.com <mailto:caomanhdat...@gmail.com>
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
Hi Ignacio, LUCENE-8907 was fixed. (I have reverted a series of commits which cause backwards incompatibility on Lucene 8.x.) Thank you for waiting for that! Tomoko 2019年7月11日(木) 22:44 Uwe Schindler : > > Hi, > > > > I enabled the policeman Jenkins Jobs for 8.2 branch. > > > > Uwe > > > > - > > Uwe Schindler > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > From: Ignacio Vera > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 1:05 PM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 > > > > Hi, > > > > The branch has been created, As a reminder, this branch is on feature freeze > and only documentation or build patches should be committed. I will be > waiting for LUCENE-8907 to start building the first release candidate. > > Let me know if there is any other blocker before we can start the release > process. > > > > It seems I do not have the permissions to create the Jenkins jobs for this > branch, maybe Steve can help here? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ignacio > > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 4:51 AM David Smiley wrote: > > BTW for 8.2.0 I updated Solr's CHANGES.txt to split out issues that seemed to > be Improvements that were not really New Features. > > > ~ David Smiley > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:38 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > > Thanks Tomoko for taking care of that. > > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 4:03 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh wrote: > > Hi Ignacio, > > > > 8.1.2 bugfix release will cancelled. You can go ahead with 8.2 release. > > > > Thanks! > > > > On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 20:38, Tomoko Uchida > wrote: > > Hi, > I opened a blocker issue a while ago for release 8.2: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8907 > > Sorry about that, I noticed the backwards incompatibility we have to > deal with today. If there are no objections, I will revert the all > related commits from the branch_8x and 8_2 in a few days. > > Thanks, > Tomoko > > 2019年7月10日(水) 22:02 Ignacio Vera : > > > > Hi, > > > > All the issues listed above has been already committed and I see no > > blockers for release 8.2. I will cut the branch tomorrow around 10am CEST > > and I will wait for the decision on the bug release 8.1.2 to schedule the > > build of the first release candidate. Please let us know if this is > > troublesome for you. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ignacio > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 2:59 AM Joel Bernstein wrote: > >> > >> I've got one issue that I'd like to get in > >> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13589), which I should have > >> wrapped up in a day or two. +1 for around July 10th. > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 5:14 PM Nicholas Knize wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 for starting the 8.2 release process. I think it would be good to get > >>> the LUCENE-8632 feature into 8.2 along with the BKD improvements and > >>> changes in LUCENE- and LUCENE-8896 > >>> > >>> Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP > >>> Geospatial Software Guy | Elasticsearch > >>> Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer > >>> nkn...@apache.org > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 9:34 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> 8.1 has been released on May 16th and we have new features, enhancements > >>>> and fixes that are not released yet so I'd like to start thinking in > >>>> releasing Lucene/Solr 8.2.0. > >>>> > >>>> I can create the 8.2 branch in two weeks time (around July 10th) and > >>>> build the first RC by the end of that week if that works for everyone. > >>>> Please let me know if there are bug fixes that needs to be fixed in 8.2 > >>>> and might not be ready by then. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> > >>>> Ignacio > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > -- > > Best regards, > > Cao Mạnh Đạt > > E-mail: caomanhdat...@gmail.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
RE: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
Hi, I enabled the policeman Jenkins Jobs for 8.2 branch. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Ignacio Vera Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 1:05 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 Hi, The branch has been created, As a reminder, this branch is on feature freeze and only documentation or build patches should be committed. I will be waiting for LUCENE-8907 to start building the first release candidate. Let me know if there is any other blocker before we can start the release process. It seems I do not have the permissions to create the Jenkins jobs for this branch, maybe Steve can help here? Thanks, Ignacio On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 4:51 AM David Smiley mailto:david.w.smi...@gmail.com> > wrote: BTW for 8.2.0 I updated Solr's CHANGES.txt to split out issues that seemed to be Improvements that were not really New Features. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:38 AM Ignacio Vera mailto:iver...@gmail.com> > wrote: Thanks Tomoko for taking care of that. On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 4:03 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh mailto:caomanhdat...@gmail.com> > wrote: Hi Ignacio, 8.1.2 bugfix release will cancelled. You can go ahead with 8.2 release. Thanks! On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 20:38, Tomoko Uchida mailto:tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com> > wrote: Hi, I opened a blocker issue a while ago for release 8.2: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8907 Sorry about that, I noticed the backwards incompatibility we have to deal with today. If there are no objections, I will revert the all related commits from the branch_8x and 8_2 in a few days. Thanks, Tomoko 2019年7月10日(水) 22:02 Ignacio Vera mailto:iver...@gmail.com> >: > > Hi, > > All the issues listed above has been already committed and I see no blockers > for release 8.2. I will cut the branch tomorrow around 10am CEST and I will > wait for the decision on the bug release 8.1.2 to schedule the build of the > first release candidate. Please let us know if this is troublesome for you. > > Thanks, > > Ignacio > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 2:59 AM Joel Bernstein <mailto:joels...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> I've got one issue that I'd like to get in >> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13589), which I should have >> wrapped up in a day or two. +1 for around July 10th. >> >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 5:14 PM Nicholas Knize > <mailto:nkn...@gmail.com> > wrote: >>> >>> +1 for starting the 8.2 release process. I think it would be good to get >>> the LUCENE-8632 feature into 8.2 along with the BKD improvements and >>> changes in LUCENE- and LUCENE-8896 >>> >>> Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP >>> Geospatial Software Guy | Elasticsearch >>> Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer >>> nkn...@apache.org <mailto:nkn...@apache.org> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 9:34 AM Ignacio Vera >> <mailto:iver...@gmail.com> > wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> 8.1 has been released on May 16th and we have new features, enhancements >>>> and fixes that are not released yet so I'd like to start thinking in >>>> releasing Lucene/Solr 8.2.0. >>>> >>>> I can create the 8.2 branch in two weeks time (around July 10th) and build >>>> the first RC by the end of that week if that works for everyone. Please >>>> let me know if there are bug fixes that needs to be fixed in 8.2 and might >>>> not be ready by then. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Ignacio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org> -- Best regards, Cao Mạnh Đạt E-mail: <mailto:caomanhdat...@gmail.com> caomanhdat...@gmail.com
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
Indeed that fixed it. Thanks Cassandra! On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 3:33 PM Cassandra Targett wrote: > I fixed it, I think - you needed to be added to the PMC group for the > LUCENE project. Please try it again. > > Cassandra > On Jul 11, 2019, 6:21 AM -0500, Ignacio Vera , wrote: > > In addition I could add a new Jira version for Solr: > > - > https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/project-config/SOLR/versions > > > But it seems I do not have privileges for Lucene: > > > - > https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/project-config/LUCENE/versions > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 1:04 PM Ignacio Vera wrote: > > Hi, > > The branch has been created, As a reminder, this branch is on feature > freeze and only documentation or build patches should be committed. I will > be waiting for LUCENE-8907 to start building the first release candidate. > Let me know if there is any other blocker before we can start the release > process. > > It seems I do not have the permissions to create the Jenkins jobs for this > branch, maybe Steve can help here? > > Thanks, > > Ignacio > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 4:51 AM David Smiley > wrote: > > BTW for 8.2.0 I updated Solr's CHANGES.txt to split out issues that seemed > to be Improvements that were not really New Features. > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:38 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > > Thanks Tomoko for taking care of that. > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 4:03 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh > wrote: > > Hi Ignacio, > > 8.1.2 bugfix release will cancelled. You can go ahead with 8.2 release. > > Thanks! > > On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 20:38, Tomoko Uchida > wrote: > > Hi, > I opened a blocker issue a while ago for release 8.2: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8907 > > Sorry about that, I noticed the backwards incompatibility we have to > deal with today. If there are no objections, I will revert the all > related commits from the branch_8x and 8_2 in a few days. > > Thanks, > Tomoko > > 2019年7月10日(水) 22:02 Ignacio Vera : > > > > Hi, > > > > All the issues listed above has been already committed and I see no > blockers for release 8.2. I will cut the branch tomorrow around 10am CEST > and I will wait for the decision on the bug release 8.1.2 to schedule the > build of the first release candidate. Please let us know if this is > troublesome for you. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ignacio > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 2:59 AM Joel Bernstein > wrote: > >> > >> I've got one issue that I'd like to get in ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13589), which I should have > wrapped up in a day or two. +1 for around July 10th. > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 5:14 PM Nicholas Knize wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 for starting the 8.2 release process. I think it would be good to > get the LUCENE-8632 feature into 8.2 along with the BKD improvements and > changes in LUCENE- and LUCENE-8896 > >>> > >>> Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP > >>> Geospatial Software Guy | Elasticsearch > >>> Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer > >>> nkn...@apache.org > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 9:34 AM Ignacio Vera > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> 8.1 has been released on May 16th and we have new features, > enhancements and fixes that are not released yet so I'd like to start > thinking in releasing Lucene/Solr 8.2.0. > >>>> > >>>> I can create the 8.2 branch in two weeks time (around July 10th) and > build the first RC by the end of that week if that works for everyone. > Please let me know if there are bug fixes that needs to be fixed in 8.2 and > might not be ready by then. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> > >>>> Ignacio > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > -- > *Best regards,* > *Cao Mạnh Đạt* > *E-mail: caomanhdat...@gmail.com * > >
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
I fixed it, I think - you needed to be added to the PMC group for the LUCENE project. Please try it again. Cassandra On Jul 11, 2019, 6:21 AM -0500, Ignacio Vera , wrote: > In addition I could add a new Jira version for Solr: > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/project-config/SOLR/versions > > But it seems I do not have privileges for Lucene: > > - > https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/project-config/LUCENE/versions > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 1:04 PM Ignacio Vera wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > The branch has been created, As a reminder, this branch is on feature > > > freeze and only documentation or build patches should be committed. I > > > will be waiting for LUCENE-8907 to start building the first release > > > candidate. > > > Let me know if there is any other blocker before we can start the release > > > process. > > > > > > It seems I do not have the permissions to create the Jenkins jobs for > > > this branch, maybe Steve can help here? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Ignacio > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 4:51 AM David Smiley > > > > wrote: > > > > > BTW for 8.2.0 I updated Solr's CHANGES.txt to split out issues that > > > > > seemed to be Improvements that were not really New Features. > > > > > > > > > > ~ David Smiley > > > > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > > > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:38 AM Ignacio Vera > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks Tomoko for taking care of that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 4:03 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Ignacio, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 8.1.2 bugfix release will cancelled. You can go ahead with > > > > > > > > > 8.2 release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 20:38, Tomoko Uchida > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > I opened a blocker issue a while ago for release 8.2: > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8907 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry about that, I noticed the backwards incompatibility > > > > > > > > > > > we have to > > > > > > > > > > > deal with today. If there are no objections, I will > > > > > > > > > > > revert the all > > > > > > > > > > > related commits from the branch_8x and 8_2 in a few days. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > Tomoko > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2019年7月10日(水) 22:02 Ignacio Vera : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All the issues listed above has been already committed > > > > > > > > > > > > and I see no blockers for release 8.2. I will cut the > > > > > > > > > > > > branch tomorrow around 10am CEST and I will wait for > > > > > > > > > > > > the decision on the bug release 8.1.2 to schedule the > > > > > > > > > > > > build of the first release candidate. Please let us > > > > > > > > > > > > know if this is troublesome for you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ignacio > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
In addition I could add a new Jira version for Solr: - https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/project-config/SOLR/versions But it seems I do not have privileges for Lucene: - https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/project-config/LUCENE/versions On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 1:04 PM Ignacio Vera wrote: > Hi, > > The branch has been created, As a reminder, this branch is on feature > freeze and only documentation or build patches should be committed. I will > be waiting for LUCENE-8907 to start building the first release candidate. > Let me know if there is any other blocker before we can start the release > process. > > It seems I do not have the permissions to create the Jenkins jobs for this > branch, maybe Steve can help here? > > Thanks, > > Ignacio > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 4:51 AM David Smiley > wrote: > >> BTW for 8.2.0 I updated Solr's CHANGES.txt to split out issues that >> seemed to be Improvements that were not really New Features. >> >> ~ David Smiley >> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:38 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: >> >>> Thanks Tomoko for taking care of that. >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 4:03 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Ignacio, >>>> >>>> 8.1.2 bugfix release will cancelled. You can go ahead with 8.2 release. >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 20:38, Tomoko Uchida < >>>> tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> I opened a blocker issue a while ago for release 8.2: >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8907 >>>>> >>>>> Sorry about that, I noticed the backwards incompatibility we have to >>>>> deal with today. If there are no objections, I will revert the all >>>>> related commits from the branch_8x and 8_2 in a few days. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Tomoko >>>>> >>>>> 2019年7月10日(水) 22:02 Ignacio Vera : >>>>> > >>>>> > Hi, >>>>> > >>>>> > All the issues listed above has been already committed and I see no >>>>> blockers for release 8.2. I will cut the branch tomorrow around 10am CEST >>>>> and I will wait for the decision on the bug release 8.1.2 to schedule the >>>>> build of the first release candidate. Please let us know if this is >>>>> troublesome for you. >>>>> > >>>>> > Thanks, >>>>> > >>>>> > Ignacio >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 2:59 AM Joel Bernstein >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I've got one issue that I'd like to get in ( >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13589), which I should >>>>> have wrapped up in a day or two. +1 for around July 10th. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 5:14 PM Nicholas Knize >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> +1 for starting the 8.2 release process. I think it would be good >>>>> to get the LUCENE-8632 feature into 8.2 along with the BKD improvements >>>>> and >>>>> changes in LUCENE- and LUCENE-8896 >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP >>>>> >>> Geospatial Software Guy | Elasticsearch >>>>> >>> Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer >>>>> >>> nkn...@apache.org >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 9:34 AM Ignacio Vera >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> 8.1 has been released on May 16th and we have new features, >>>>> enhancements and fixes that are not released yet so I'd like to start >>>>> thinking in releasing Lucene/Solr 8.2.0. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> I can create the 8.2 branch in two weeks time (around July 10th) >>>>> and build the first RC by the end of that week if that works for everyone. >>>>> Please let me know if there are bug fixes that needs to be fixed in 8.2 >>>>> and >>>>> might not be ready by then. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> Ignacio >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> *Best regards,* >>>> *Cao Mạnh Đạt* >>>> *E-mail: caomanhdat...@gmail.com * >>>> >>>
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
Hi, The branch has been created, As a reminder, this branch is on feature freeze and only documentation or build patches should be committed. I will be waiting for LUCENE-8907 to start building the first release candidate. Let me know if there is any other blocker before we can start the release process. It seems I do not have the permissions to create the Jenkins jobs for this branch, maybe Steve can help here? Thanks, Ignacio On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 4:51 AM David Smiley wrote: > BTW for 8.2.0 I updated Solr's CHANGES.txt to split out issues that seemed > to be Improvements that were not really New Features. > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:38 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > >> Thanks Tomoko for taking care of that. >> >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 4:03 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Ignacio, >>> >>> 8.1.2 bugfix release will cancelled. You can go ahead with 8.2 release. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 20:38, Tomoko Uchida < >>> tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> I opened a blocker issue a while ago for release 8.2: >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8907 >>>> >>>> Sorry about that, I noticed the backwards incompatibility we have to >>>> deal with today. If there are no objections, I will revert the all >>>> related commits from the branch_8x and 8_2 in a few days. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Tomoko >>>> >>>> 2019年7月10日(水) 22:02 Ignacio Vera : >>>> > >>>> > Hi, >>>> > >>>> > All the issues listed above has been already committed and I see no >>>> blockers for release 8.2. I will cut the branch tomorrow around 10am CEST >>>> and I will wait for the decision on the bug release 8.1.2 to schedule the >>>> build of the first release candidate. Please let us know if this is >>>> troublesome for you. >>>> > >>>> > Thanks, >>>> > >>>> > Ignacio >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 2:59 AM Joel Bernstein >>>> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> I've got one issue that I'd like to get in ( >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13589), which I should have >>>> wrapped up in a day or two. +1 for around July 10th. >>>> >> >>>> >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 5:14 PM Nicholas Knize >>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> +1 for starting the 8.2 release process. I think it would be good >>>> to get the LUCENE-8632 feature into 8.2 along with the BKD improvements and >>>> changes in LUCENE- and LUCENE-8896 >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP >>>> >>> Geospatial Software Guy | Elasticsearch >>>> >>> Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer >>>> >>> nkn...@apache.org >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 9:34 AM Ignacio Vera >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 8.1 has been released on May 16th and we have new features, >>>> enhancements and fixes that are not released yet so I'd like to start >>>> thinking in releasing Lucene/Solr 8.2.0. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I can create the 8.2 branch in two weeks time (around July 10th) >>>> and build the first RC by the end of that week if that works for everyone. >>>> Please let me know if there are bug fixes that needs to be fixed in 8.2 and >>>> might not be ready by then. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Ignacio >>>> >>>> - >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>> >>>> -- >>> *Best regards,* >>> *Cao Mạnh Đạt* >>> *E-mail: caomanhdat...@gmail.com * >>> >>
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
BTW for 8.2.0 I updated Solr's CHANGES.txt to split out issues that seemed to be Improvements that were not really New Features. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:38 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > Thanks Tomoko for taking care of that. > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 4:03 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh > wrote: > >> Hi Ignacio, >> >> 8.1.2 bugfix release will cancelled. You can go ahead with 8.2 release. >> >> Thanks! >> >> On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 20:38, Tomoko Uchida >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> I opened a blocker issue a while ago for release 8.2: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8907 >>> >>> Sorry about that, I noticed the backwards incompatibility we have to >>> deal with today. If there are no objections, I will revert the all >>> related commits from the branch_8x and 8_2 in a few days. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Tomoko >>> >>> 2019年7月10日(水) 22:02 Ignacio Vera : >>> > >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > All the issues listed above has been already committed and I see no >>> blockers for release 8.2. I will cut the branch tomorrow around 10am CEST >>> and I will wait for the decision on the bug release 8.1.2 to schedule the >>> build of the first release candidate. Please let us know if this is >>> troublesome for you. >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > >>> > Ignacio >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 2:59 AM Joel Bernstein >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> I've got one issue that I'd like to get in ( >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13589), which I should have >>> wrapped up in a day or two. +1 for around July 10th. >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 5:14 PM Nicholas Knize >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> +1 for starting the 8.2 release process. I think it would be good to >>> get the LUCENE-8632 feature into 8.2 along with the BKD improvements and >>> changes in LUCENE- and LUCENE-8896 >>> >>> >>> >>> Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP >>> >>> Geospatial Software Guy | Elasticsearch >>> >>> Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer >>> >>> nkn...@apache.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 9:34 AM Ignacio Vera >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Hi all, >>> >>>> >>> >>>> 8.1 has been released on May 16th and we have new features, >>> enhancements and fixes that are not released yet so I'd like to start >>> thinking in releasing Lucene/Solr 8.2.0. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I can create the 8.2 branch in two weeks time (around July 10th) >>> and build the first RC by the end of that week if that works for everyone. >>> Please let me know if there are bug fixes that needs to be fixed in 8.2 and >>> might not be ready by then. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Cheers, >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Ignacio >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> >>> -- >> *Best regards,* >> *Cao Mạnh Đạt* >> *E-mail: caomanhdat...@gmail.com * >> >
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
Thanks Tomoko for taking care of that. On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 4:03 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh wrote: > Hi Ignacio, > > 8.1.2 bugfix release will cancelled. You can go ahead with 8.2 release. > > Thanks! > > On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 20:38, Tomoko Uchida > wrote: > >> Hi, >> I opened a blocker issue a while ago for release 8.2: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8907 >> >> Sorry about that, I noticed the backwards incompatibility we have to >> deal with today. If there are no objections, I will revert the all >> related commits from the branch_8x and 8_2 in a few days. >> >> Thanks, >> Tomoko >> >> 2019年7月10日(水) 22:02 Ignacio Vera : >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > All the issues listed above has been already committed and I see no >> blockers for release 8.2. I will cut the branch tomorrow around 10am CEST >> and I will wait for the decision on the bug release 8.1.2 to schedule the >> build of the first release candidate. Please let us know if this is >> troublesome for you. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Ignacio >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 2:59 AM Joel Bernstein >> wrote: >> >> >> >> I've got one issue that I'd like to get in ( >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13589), which I should have >> wrapped up in a day or two. +1 for around July 10th. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 5:14 PM Nicholas Knize >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> +1 for starting the 8.2 release process. I think it would be good to >> get the LUCENE-8632 feature into 8.2 along with the BKD improvements and >> changes in LUCENE- and LUCENE-8896 >> >>> >> >>> Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP >> >>> Geospatial Software Guy | Elasticsearch >> >>> Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer >> >>> nkn...@apache.org >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 9:34 AM Ignacio Vera >> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> Hi all, >> >>>> >> >>>> 8.1 has been released on May 16th and we have new features, >> enhancements and fixes that are not released yet so I'd like to start >> thinking in releasing Lucene/Solr 8.2.0. >> >>>> >> >>>> I can create the 8.2 branch in two weeks time (around July 10th) and >> build the first RC by the end of that week if that works for everyone. >> Please let me know if there are bug fixes that needs to be fixed in 8.2 and >> might not be ready by then. >> >>>> >> >>>> Cheers, >> >>>> >> >>>> Ignacio >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> -- > *Best regards,* > *Cao Mạnh Đạt* > *E-mail: caomanhdat...@gmail.com * >
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
Hi Ignacio, 8.1.2 bugfix release will cancelled. You can go ahead with 8.2 release. Thanks! On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 20:38, Tomoko Uchida wrote: > Hi, > I opened a blocker issue a while ago for release 8.2: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8907 > > Sorry about that, I noticed the backwards incompatibility we have to > deal with today. If there are no objections, I will revert the all > related commits from the branch_8x and 8_2 in a few days. > > Thanks, > Tomoko > > 2019年7月10日(水) 22:02 Ignacio Vera : > > > > Hi, > > > > All the issues listed above has been already committed and I see no > blockers for release 8.2. I will cut the branch tomorrow around 10am CEST > and I will wait for the decision on the bug release 8.1.2 to schedule the > build of the first release candidate. Please let us know if this is > troublesome for you. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ignacio > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 2:59 AM Joel Bernstein > wrote: > >> > >> I've got one issue that I'd like to get in ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13589), which I should have > wrapped up in a day or two. +1 for around July 10th. > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 5:14 PM Nicholas Knize wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 for starting the 8.2 release process. I think it would be good to > get the LUCENE-8632 feature into 8.2 along with the BKD improvements and > changes in LUCENE- and LUCENE-8896 > >>> > >>> Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP > >>> Geospatial Software Guy | Elasticsearch > >>> Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer > >>> nkn...@apache.org > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 9:34 AM Ignacio Vera > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> 8.1 has been released on May 16th and we have new features, > enhancements and fixes that are not released yet so I'd like to start > thinking in releasing Lucene/Solr 8.2.0. > >>>> > >>>> I can create the 8.2 branch in two weeks time (around July 10th) and > build the first RC by the end of that week if that works for everyone. > Please let me know if there are bug fixes that needs to be fixed in 8.2 and > might not be ready by then. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> > >>>> Ignacio > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > -- *Best regards,* *Cao Mạnh Đạt* *E-mail: caomanhdat...@gmail.com *
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
Hi, I opened a blocker issue a while ago for release 8.2: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8907 Sorry about that, I noticed the backwards incompatibility we have to deal with today. If there are no objections, I will revert the all related commits from the branch_8x and 8_2 in a few days. Thanks, Tomoko 2019年7月10日(水) 22:02 Ignacio Vera : > > Hi, > > All the issues listed above has been already committed and I see no blockers > for release 8.2. I will cut the branch tomorrow around 10am CEST and I will > wait for the decision on the bug release 8.1.2 to schedule the build of the > first release candidate. Please let us know if this is troublesome for you. > > Thanks, > > Ignacio > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 2:59 AM Joel Bernstein wrote: >> >> I've got one issue that I'd like to get in >> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13589), which I should have >> wrapped up in a day or two. +1 for around July 10th. >> >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 5:14 PM Nicholas Knize wrote: >>> >>> +1 for starting the 8.2 release process. I think it would be good to get >>> the LUCENE-8632 feature into 8.2 along with the BKD improvements and >>> changes in LUCENE- and LUCENE-8896 >>> >>> Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP >>> Geospatial Software Guy | Elasticsearch >>> Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer >>> nkn...@apache.org >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 9:34 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> 8.1 has been released on May 16th and we have new features, enhancements >>>> and fixes that are not released yet so I'd like to start thinking in >>>> releasing Lucene/Solr 8.2.0. >>>> >>>> I can create the 8.2 branch in two weeks time (around July 10th) and build >>>> the first RC by the end of that week if that works for everyone. Please >>>> let me know if there are bug fixes that needs to be fixed in 8.2 and might >>>> not be ready by then. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Ignacio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
Hi, All the issues listed above has been already committed and I see no blockers for release 8.2. I will cut the branch tomorrow around 10am CEST and I will wait for the decision on the bug release 8.1.2 to schedule the build of the first release candidate. Please let us know if this is troublesome for you. Thanks, Ignacio On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 2:59 AM Joel Bernstein wrote: > I've got one issue that I'd like to get in ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13589), which I should have > wrapped up in a day or two. +1 for around July 10th. > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 5:14 PM Nicholas Knize wrote: > >> +1 for starting the 8.2 release process. I think it would be good to get >> the LUCENE-8632 <https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/726> feature >> into 8.2 along with the BKD improvements and changes in LUCENE- >> <https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/747> and LUCENE-8896 >> <https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/756> >> >> Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP >> Geospatial Software Guy | Elasticsearch >> Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer >> nkn...@apache.org >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 9:34 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> 8.1 has been released on May 16th and we have new features, enhancements >>> and fixes that are not released yet so I'd like to start thinking in >>> releasing Lucene/Solr 8.2.0. >>> >>> I can create the 8.2 branch in two weeks time (around July 10th) and >>> build the first RC by the end of that week if that works for everyone. >>> Please let me know if there are bug fixes that needs to be fixed in 8.2 and >>> might not be ready by then. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Ignacio >>> >>
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
I've got one issue that I'd like to get in ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13589), which I should have wrapped up in a day or two. +1 for around July 10th. On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 5:14 PM Nicholas Knize wrote: > +1 for starting the 8.2 release process. I think it would be good to get > the LUCENE-8632 <https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/726> feature > into 8.2 along with the BKD improvements and changes in LUCENE- > <https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/747> and LUCENE-8896 > <https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/756> > > Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP > Geospatial Software Guy | Elasticsearch > Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer > nkn...@apache.org > > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 9:34 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> 8.1 has been released on May 16th and we have new features, enhancements >> and fixes that are not released yet so I'd like to start thinking in >> releasing Lucene/Solr 8.2.0. >> >> I can create the 8.2 branch in two weeks time (around July 10th) and >> build the first RC by the end of that week if that works for everyone. >> Please let me know if there are bug fixes that needs to be fixed in 8.2 and >> might not be ready by then. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Ignacio >> >
Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
+1 for starting the 8.2 release process. I think it would be good to get the LUCENE-8632 <https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/726> feature into 8.2 along with the BKD improvements and changes in LUCENE- <https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/747> and LUCENE-8896 <https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/756> Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP Geospatial Software Guy | Elasticsearch Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer nkn...@apache.org On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 9:34 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > Hi all, > > 8.1 has been released on May 16th and we have new features, enhancements > and fixes that are not released yet so I'd like to start thinking in > releasing Lucene/Solr 8.2.0. > > I can create the 8.2 branch in two weeks time (around July 10th) and build > the first RC by the end of that week if that works for everyone. Please let > me know if there are bug fixes that needs to be fixed in 8.2 and might not > be ready by then. > > Cheers, > > Ignacio >
Lucene/Solr 8.2.0
Hi all, 8.1 has been released on May 16th and we have new features, enhancements and fixes that are not released yet so I'd like to start thinking in releasing Lucene/Solr 8.2.0. I can create the 8.2 branch in two weeks time (around July 10th) and build the first RC by the end of that week if that works for everyone. Please let me know if there are bug fixes that needs to be fixed in 8.2 and might not be ready by then. Cheers, Ignacio
