Re: [VOTE] release 3.3 (take two)

2011-06-29 Thread Robert Muir
It looks like the vote has passed... I'll work on getting these artifacts out.

Thanks everyone for voting.

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
 +1

 -Yonik
 http://www.lucidimagination.com

 On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
 Artifacts here:

 http://s.apache.org/lusolr330rc1

 working release notes here:

 http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote33
 http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote33

 To see the changes between the previous release candidate (rc0):
 svn diff -r 1139028:1139775
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_3_3

 Here is my +1

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] release 3.3 (take two)

2011-06-28 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
 - Extracted Lucene and Solr binary packages and checked contents for 
 completeness (Licenses, Javadocs,...) - fine! Solr.WAR file contains correct 
 artifact versions, unfortunately the lucene jar files are not available in 
 the dist folder inside solr binary - is that wanted?

I think that's fine for a binary release.  The lucene jars are in the solr.war
Anyone developing a custom solr plugin could just use the source
distro, or explode the war.

-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] release 3.3 (take two)

2011-06-28 Thread Yonik Seeley
+1

-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com

On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
 Artifacts here:

 http://s.apache.org/lusolr330rc1

 working release notes here:

 http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote33
 http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote33

 To see the changes between the previous release candidate (rc0):
 svn diff -r 1139028:1139775
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_3_3

 Here is my +1

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



RE: [VOTE] release 3.3 (take two)

2011-06-27 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi,

This time, all is fine:

- Smoke tests with tests.iter=100,tests.multiplicator=100,tests.nightly on Sun 
Java 1.5.0_22 Solaris-64 passed for Lucene-Core (using Lucene-Src package, so 
even compiles fine). Lucene-Contrib failed somehow, but with iter=1 passed. One 
core dump on testing contrib/analysis-common/ (Portuguese), seems Java 5 bug 
happens sometimes (unfortunately log  hs_err is gone), not reproducible. So 
all fine, don't want to accuse Java 5 - but policeman is angry and wants an 
expensive ticket + driver license removed from Java 5 :-)
- All signatures are fine, signatures are all from Robert Muir who I know 
personally: find . -name '*.asc' | xargs -L1 gpg --verify
- Artifact META-INFs are correct, versions and revno are correct
- Lucene-core-3.3.0.jar from Maven plugged into PANGAEA was successfully 
without recompiling. No Hotspot issues - MMap is fine
- Extracted Solr src package, ant test with iter=1 and multiplicator=100 and 
nightly passes from root folder (includes lucene tests)
- Extracted Lucene and Solr binary packages and checked contents for 
completeness (Licenses, Javadocs,...) - fine! Solr.WAR file contains correct 
artifact versions, unfortunately the lucene jar files are not available in the 
dist folder inside solr binary - is that wanted?

Small issue:

- systemrequirements.html: The JUNIT version as requirement is ahm, ah, huho 
very old. We should remove that in future, as JUnit is bundled with src package.

So here is my PMC +1 !

Uwe
- Generics|Java5|Signature|Manifest Policeman with PMC vote -

-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de


 -Original Message-
 From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2011 5:12 PM
 To: dev@lucene.apache.org
 Subject: [VOTE] release 3.3 (take two)
 
 Artifacts here:
 
 http://s.apache.org/lusolr330rc1
 
 working release notes here:
 
 http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote33
 http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote33
 
 To see the changes between the previous release candidate (rc0):
 svn diff -r 1139028:1139775
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_3_3
 
 Here is my +1
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional
 commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] release 3.3 (take two)

2011-06-26 Thread Michael McCandless
+1

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com

On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
 Artifacts here:

 http://s.apache.org/lusolr330rc1

 working release notes here:

 http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote33
 http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote33

 To see the changes between the previous release candidate (rc0):
 svn diff -r 1139028:1139775
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_3_3

 Here is my +1

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



RE: [VOTE] release 3.3 (take two)

2011-06-26 Thread Steven A Rowe
+1

I looked at the differences, and then just ran tests on the Solr and Lucene 
source tarballs.

Steve

 -Original Message-
 From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2011 11:12 AM
 To: dev@lucene.apache.org
 Subject: [VOTE] release 3.3 (take two)
 
 Artifacts here:
 
 http://s.apache.org/lusolr330rc1
 
 working release notes here:
 
 http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote33
 http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote33
 
 To see the changes between the previous release candidate (rc0):
 svn diff -r 1139028:1139775
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_3_3
 
 Here is my +1
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] release 3.3 (take two)

2011-06-26 Thread Sanne Grinovero
+1

All tests are fine on both Infinispan and Hibernate Search.

While I understand that often APIs needed changes, I'm very happy to
state that for the first time three mayor releases are fully API
compatible!
(As far as tested on these projects, Lucene versions 3.1.0, 3.2.0,
3.3.0 are drop-in compatible replacements)

Regards,
Sanne

2011/6/26 Steven A Rowe sar...@syr.edu:
 +1

 I looked at the differences, and then just ran tests on the Solr and Lucene 
 source tarballs.

 Steve

 -Original Message-
 From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2011 11:12 AM
 To: dev@lucene.apache.org
 Subject: [VOTE] release 3.3 (take two)

 Artifacts here:

 http://s.apache.org/lusolr330rc1

 working release notes here:

 http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote33
 http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote33

 To see the changes between the previous release candidate (rc0):
 svn diff -r 1139028:1139775
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_3_3

 Here is my +1

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] release 3.3 (take two)

2011-06-26 Thread Chris Male
+1

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Sanne Grinovero
sanne.grinov...@gmail.comwrote:

 +1

 All tests are fine on both Infinispan and Hibernate Search.

 While I understand that often APIs needed changes, I'm very happy to
 state that for the first time three mayor releases are fully API
 compatible!
 (As far as tested on these projects, Lucene versions 3.1.0, 3.2.0,
 3.3.0 are drop-in compatible replacements)

 Regards,
 Sanne

 2011/6/26 Steven A Rowe sar...@syr.edu:
  +1
 
  I looked at the differences, and then just ran tests on the Solr and
 Lucene source tarballs.
 
  Steve
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
  Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2011 11:12 AM
  To: dev@lucene.apache.org
  Subject: [VOTE] release 3.3 (take two)
 
  Artifacts here:
 
  http://s.apache.org/lusolr330rc1
 
  working release notes here:
 
  http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote33
  http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote33
 
  To see the changes between the previous release candidate (rc0):
  svn diff -r 1139028:1139775
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_3_3
 
  Here is my +1
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
 
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org




-- 
Chris Male | Software Developer | JTeam BV.| www.jteam.nl