Re: [PROPOSAL] Reporting plugins should require Maven 2.2.1

2012-01-14 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 Now that Java 1.5 has already seen EOL for some years it is funny that
most plugins even are still working with 1.4.

Regards Mirko
-- 
Sent from my phone
http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com
http://github.com/mfriedenhagen/
https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/
On Jan 12, 2012 12:22 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:

 I tend to feel that this community is a bit whelmed, and that we'd do
 better service to the world at large if we drew a line in the sand at
 2.2.1. Anyone who really wants new functionality with older core maven
 can step up and volunteer to maintain branches of plugins.


 On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Robert Scholte
 apa...@sourcegrounds.com wrote:
  What about plugins containing both build and report goals?
  If the suggested shading of Doxia will work, I'd prefer that option.
 
  -Robert
 
  On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:53:57 +0100, Barrie Treloar baerr...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Stephen Connolly
  stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  +1
 
 
  +1
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org




Re: [VOTE] Release Maven EAR Plugin version 2.7

2012-01-14 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1

2012/1/12 Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org:
 Hi,

 We solved 4 issues, including
 [MEAR-60] Improve support for skinny war files
 which has 50 votes:
 http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11132styleName=Htmlversion=17293

 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
 http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=11132status=1

 Staging repo:
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-060/

 Staging site:
 http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-ear-plugin-2.7/

 Guide to testing staged releases:
 http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html

 Vote open for 72 hours.

 [ ] +1
 [ ] +0
 [ ] -1

 --
 Dennis Lundberg

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org




-- 
Olivier Lamy
Talend: http://coders.talend.com
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [PROPOSAL] Reporting plugins should require Maven 2.2.1

2012-01-14 Thread Robert Scholte

I've fixed MCHECKSTYLE-170 and tried to apply some shading.
The separation of api/interfaces versus implementation is not done well in  
Doxia.
This would mean, that the shade-plugin will need a lot of configuration,  
which also needs to be maintained if there are new Doxia-classes.
So for plugins with only reporting-goals the requirement for Maven-2.2.1  
seems to be the best solution.


-Robert

On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 00:10:45 +0100, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org  
wrote:



On 2012-01-13 20:43, Robert Scholte wrote:

My guess would be that with relocation it wouldn't matter.[1]
I'd like to confirm this with the maven-checkstyle-plugin project, but
unfortunately a lot of unit-tests are failing on my machine (win7 + jdk6
+ any M2/M3)


I can confirm these test errors and failures on Win 7, Java 5 and Maven
2.2.1/3.0.3.

On Ubuntu with Java 5 and Maven 2.2.1/3.0.3 it works though.

Created an issue in JIRA to track it:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHECKSTYLE-170



-Robert

[1]
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/examples/class-relocation.html


On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:59:36 +0100, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org
wrote:


Hi

Can it work? I haven't had much experience with shading, but I was  
under

the impression that it is a way to hide classes from Maven's class
loader. What we really want in this case is a way to *insert* newer
versions of classes into Maven's class loader. Don't know if that can  
be

done...

On 2012-01-12 00:12, Robert Scholte wrote:

What about plugins containing both build and report goals?
If the suggested shading of Doxia will work, I'd prefer that option.

-Robert

On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:53:57 +0100, Barrie Treloar  
baerr...@gmail.com

wrote:


On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:

+1


+1

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [PROPOSAL] Reporting plugins should require Maven 2.2.1

2012-01-14 Thread Stephen Connolly
personally i think we need to draw a line in the sand for all plugins...
2.2.1 is the best line at the moment imho...

2.1.0 and 2.2.0 are not recommended versions, and drawing a line above them
makes our message to users that much cleaner.

the only other thing we maybe should do is roll a 2.2.2 that doesn't bomb
out if 3.0.3 has pulled snapshot dependencies into the same local repo... i
may look into that myself... i think it would be fine for it to ignore that
extra xml entries in the metadata (least change in behaviour) so only
change from 2.2.1 would be the more relaxed metadata parsing... if anyone
knows any criticals i would more likely see those in a 2.2.3 or 2.3 ie i
wouldn't be release manager for such a release ;-)

- Stephen

---
Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense
words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the
screen
On 14 Jan 2012 15:45, Robert Scholte apa...@sourcegrounds.com wrote:

 I've fixed MCHECKSTYLE-170 and tried to apply some shading.
 The separation of api/interfaces versus implementation is not done well in
 Doxia.
 This would mean, that the shade-plugin will need a lot of configuration,
 which also needs to be maintained if there are new Doxia-classes.
 So for plugins with only reporting-goals the requirement for Maven-2.2.1
 seems to be the best solution.

 -Robert

 On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 00:10:45 +0100, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org
 wrote:

  On 2012-01-13 20:43, Robert Scholte wrote:

 My guess would be that with relocation it wouldn't matter.[1]
 I'd like to confirm this with the maven-checkstyle-plugin project, but
 unfortunately a lot of unit-tests are failing on my machine (win7 + jdk6
 + any M2/M3)


 I can confirm these test errors and failures on Win 7, Java 5 and Maven
 2.2.1/3.0.3.

 On Ubuntu with Java 5 and Maven 2.2.1/3.0.3 it works though.

 Created an issue in JIRA to track it:
 http://jira.codehaus.org/**browse/MCHECKSTYLE-170http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHECKSTYLE-170


  -Robert

 [1]
 http://maven.apache.org/**plugins/maven-shade-plugin/**
 examples/class-relocation.htmlhttp://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/examples/class-relocation.html


 On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:59:36 +0100, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org
 wrote:

  Hi

 Can it work? I haven't had much experience with shading, but I was under
 the impression that it is a way to hide classes from Maven's class
 loader. What we really want in this case is a way to *insert* newer
 versions of classes into Maven's class loader. Don't know if that can be
 done...

 On 2012-01-12 00:12, Robert Scholte wrote:

 What about plugins containing both build and report goals?
 If the suggested shading of Doxia will work, I'd prefer that option.

 -Robert

 On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:53:57 +0100, Barrie Treloar baerr...@gmail.com
 
 wrote:

  On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Stephen Connolly
 stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.**com stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 +1


 +1

 --**--**
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
 dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.**orgdev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


 --**--**
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
 dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.**orgdev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org




 --**--**
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
 dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.**orgdev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org




 --**--**-
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
 dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.**orgdev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org