Re: Q: Maven-Enforcer-Plugin - Release 1.3.2 ?
Hello Karl-Heinz, I added a patch at the MENFORCER-182. Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen) https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hello Mirko, > >> Hello, >> >> >> I am afraid the only documentation is in the ticket, right now. I could >> try >> to find a place this evening and submit a patch. > > > It would be great if you find the time, but take your time, cause there are > other issues which have to be fixed first > > I have created an issue for the documentation > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-182 > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Q: Maven-Enforcer-Plugin - Release 1.3.2 ?
Hi Hervé, > I just fixed it Thanks. while testing, I found that there is an IT failure with Maven 3.1.1: I added a Jenkins job to reproduce, and it failed as expected Seen it...I have created a separate issue for it http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-181 But unfortunately i can't take a look into the workspace of the Jenkins I saw too that actual trunk is numbered 2.0-SNAPSHOT: I don't know if some substantial changes have been done or not There some changes which are related to WARN/ERROR behaviour ...i don't know if it's worth to make a jump from 1.3 to 2.0 currently we go from 1.3.1 to 1.4 ...but it's no problem to change that into 2.0... I just want to summarize some changes for the next release what ever how we name it ;-) Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Q: Maven-Enforcer-Plugin - Release 1.3.2 ?
Hello Mirko, > Hello, I am afraid the only documentation is in the ticket, right now. I could try to find a place this evening and submit a patch. It would be great if you find the time, but take your time, cause there are other issues which have to be fixed first I have created an issue for the documentation http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-182 Kind regards Karl Heinz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Q: Maven-Enforcer-Plugin - Release 1.3.2 ?
I just fixed it while testing, I found that there is an IT failure with Maven 3.1.1: I added a Jenkins job to reproduce, and it failed as expected I saw too that actual trunk is numbered 2.0-SNAPSHOT: I don't know if some substantial changes have been done or not Regards, Hervé Le vendredi 24 janvier 2014 15:53:01 Robert Scholte a écrit : > Karl Heinz, > > you might hit MENFORCER-161[1], unless Hervé did a fix regarding the > scm-publish on this project. > > Robert > > [1] https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-161 > > Op Fri, 24 Jan 2014 10:22:59 +0100 schreef Karl Heinz Marbaise > > : > > Hi, > > > > i just want to know on what basis releases will be created... > > > > Currently i would suggest to create a Release 1.3.2 of the > > maven-enforcer-plugin... > > > > In Jira the list > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11530&version=1 > > 9935 > > > > for 1.3.2 contains a number of bug fixes... > > > > Are there any objections to get a release 1.3.2 out of the door... > > > > I would like to fix one or two more issues...but i want to know how the > > mood is about creating a new release of Maven-Enforcer-Plugin > > > > Kind Regards > > Karl Heinz Marbaise > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Q: Maven-Enforcer-Plugin - Release 1.3.2 ?
Hello, I am afraid the only documentation is in the ticket, right now. I could try to find a place this evening and submit a patch. Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On Jan 24, 2014 11:31 PM, "Karl Heinz Marbaise" wrote: > Hi Robert, > Hi Mirko, > > > > Indeed, I couldn't remember the reason for 1.4 (nor with a quick scan > >> through Jira), but this was it. >> > > Thanks for the hint... > > Ok. i will move the issues to 1.4 ...so new functionality isdefinitely > a good reason for 1.4 instead of 1.3.2 ... > > So MENFORCER-160 is implemented based on a quick dive into the code (and > based on your hints) and MENFORCER-159 not...so i remove MENFORCER-159 from > the view for 1.4 release... > > > Thanks for clearing up things... > > BTW: Do you know if the new behaviour is documented for the user somewhere > ? I couldn't find something...may be lose sight of it. > > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz > > > >> Robert >> >> Op Fri, 24 Jan 2014 22:30:38 +0100 schreef Mirko Friedenhagen >> : >> >> Karl Heinz, >>> >>> another thing: because MENFORCER-160 introduces a new interface which >>> is implemented by AbstractStandardEnforcerRule maybe version 1.4 would >>> be a better version number than 1.3.2, as it introduces a new >>> functionality. >>> Regards Mirko >>> -- >>> http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ >>> https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen) >>> https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Mirko Friedenhagen >>> wrote: >>> Karl Heinz, one thing: MENFORCER-159 is a duplicate of MENFORCER-160 (or better it is an alternative approach), so probably should not be mentioned. Regards Mirko Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen) https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: > Karl Heinz, > > you might hit MENFORCER-161[1], unless Hervé did a fix regarding the > scm-publish on this project. > > Robert > > [1] https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-161 > > Op Fri, 24 Jan 2014 10:22:59 +0100 schreef Karl Heinz Marbaise > : > > > Hi, >> >> i just want to know on what basis releases will be created... >> >> Currently i would suggest to create a Release 1.3.2 of the >> maven-enforcer-plugin... >> >> In Jira the list >> >> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? >> projectId=11530&version=19935 >> >> >> for 1.3.2 contains a number of bug fixes... >> >> Are there any objections to get a release 1.3.2 out of the door... >> >> I would like to fix one or two more issues...but i want to know how >> the >> mood is about creating a new release of Maven-Enforcer-Plugin >> >> Kind Regards >> Karl Heinz Marbaise >> > > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz Marbaise > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
Re: Q: Maven-Enforcer-Plugin - Release 1.3.2 ?
Hi Robert, Hi Mirko, > Indeed, I couldn't remember the reason for 1.4 (nor with a quick scan through Jira), but this was it. Thanks for the hint... Ok. i will move the issues to 1.4 ...so new functionality is definitely a good reason for 1.4 instead of 1.3.2 ... So MENFORCER-160 is implemented based on a quick dive into the code (and based on your hints) and MENFORCER-159 not...so i remove MENFORCER-159 from the view for 1.4 release... Thanks for clearing up things... BTW: Do you know if the new behaviour is documented for the user somewhere ? I couldn't find something...may be lose sight of it. Kind regards Karl Heinz Robert Op Fri, 24 Jan 2014 22:30:38 +0100 schreef Mirko Friedenhagen : Karl Heinz, another thing: because MENFORCER-160 introduces a new interface which is implemented by AbstractStandardEnforcerRule maybe version 1.4 would be a better version number than 1.3.2, as it introduces a new functionality. Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen) https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Mirko Friedenhagen wrote: Karl Heinz, one thing: MENFORCER-159 is a duplicate of MENFORCER-160 (or better it is an alternative approach), so probably should not be mentioned. Regards Mirko Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen) https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: Karl Heinz, you might hit MENFORCER-161[1], unless Hervé did a fix regarding the scm-publish on this project. Robert [1] https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-161 Op Fri, 24 Jan 2014 10:22:59 +0100 schreef Karl Heinz Marbaise : Hi, i just want to know on what basis releases will be created... Currently i would suggest to create a Release 1.3.2 of the maven-enforcer-plugin... In Jira the list http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11530&version=19935 for 1.3.2 contains a number of bug fixes... Are there any objections to get a release 1.3.2 out of the door... I would like to fix one or two more issues...but i want to know how the mood is about creating a new release of Maven-Enforcer-Plugin Kind Regards Karl Heinz Marbaise Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Q: Maven-Enforcer-Plugin - Release 1.3.2 ?
Indeed, I couldn't remember the reason for 1.4 (nor with a quick scan through Jira), but this was it. Robert Op Fri, 24 Jan 2014 22:30:38 +0100 schreef Mirko Friedenhagen : Karl Heinz, another thing: because MENFORCER-160 introduces a new interface which is implemented by AbstractStandardEnforcerRule maybe version 1.4 would be a better version number than 1.3.2, as it introduces a new functionality. Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen) https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Mirko Friedenhagen wrote: Karl Heinz, one thing: MENFORCER-159 is a duplicate of MENFORCER-160 (or better it is an alternative approach), so probably should not be mentioned. Regards Mirko Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen) https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: Karl Heinz, you might hit MENFORCER-161[1], unless Hervé did a fix regarding the scm-publish on this project. Robert [1] https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-161 Op Fri, 24 Jan 2014 10:22:59 +0100 schreef Karl Heinz Marbaise : Hi, i just want to know on what basis releases will be created... Currently i would suggest to create a Release 1.3.2 of the maven-enforcer-plugin... In Jira the list http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11530&version=19935 for 1.3.2 contains a number of bug fixes... Are there any objections to get a release 1.3.2 out of the door... I would like to fix one or two more issues...but i want to know how the mood is about creating a new release of Maven-Enforcer-Plugin Kind Regards Karl Heinz Marbaise - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Q: Maven-Enforcer-Plugin - Release 1.3.2 ?
Karl Heinz, another thing: because MENFORCER-160 introduces a new interface which is implemented by AbstractStandardEnforcerRule maybe version 1.4 would be a better version number than 1.3.2, as it introduces a new functionality. Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen) https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Mirko Friedenhagen wrote: > Karl Heinz, > > one thing: MENFORCER-159 is a duplicate of MENFORCER-160 (or better it > is an alternative approach), so probably should not be mentioned. > > Regards > Mirko > Regards Mirko > -- > http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ > https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen) > https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: >> Karl Heinz, >> >> you might hit MENFORCER-161[1], unless Hervé did a fix regarding the >> scm-publish on this project. >> >> Robert >> >> [1] https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-161 >> >> Op Fri, 24 Jan 2014 10:22:59 +0100 schreef Karl Heinz Marbaise >> : >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> i just want to know on what basis releases will be created... >>> >>> Currently i would suggest to create a Release 1.3.2 of the >>> maven-enforcer-plugin... >>> >>> In Jira the list >>> >>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11530&version=19935 >>> >>> for 1.3.2 contains a number of bug fixes... >>> >>> Are there any objections to get a release 1.3.2 out of the door... >>> >>> I would like to fix one or two more issues...but i want to know how the >>> mood is about creating a new release of Maven-Enforcer-Plugin >>> >>> Kind Regards >>> Karl Heinz Marbaise >>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Q: Maven-Enforcer-Plugin - Release 1.3.2 ?
Karl Heinz, one thing: MENFORCER-159 is a duplicate of MENFORCER-160 (or better it is an alternative approach), so probably should not be mentioned. Regards Mirko Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen) https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: > Karl Heinz, > > you might hit MENFORCER-161[1], unless Hervé did a fix regarding the > scm-publish on this project. > > Robert > > [1] https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-161 > > Op Fri, 24 Jan 2014 10:22:59 +0100 schreef Karl Heinz Marbaise > : > > >> Hi, >> >> i just want to know on what basis releases will be created... >> >> Currently i would suggest to create a Release 1.3.2 of the >> maven-enforcer-plugin... >> >> In Jira the list >> >> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11530&version=19935 >> >> for 1.3.2 contains a number of bug fixes... >> >> Are there any objections to get a release 1.3.2 out of the door... >> >> I would like to fix one or two more issues...but i want to know how the >> mood is about creating a new release of Maven-Enforcer-Plugin >> >> Kind Regards >> Karl Heinz Marbaise >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Q: Maven-Enforcer-Plugin - Release 1.3.2 ?
Karl Heinz, you might hit MENFORCER-161[1], unless Hervé did a fix regarding the scm-publish on this project. Robert [1] https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-161 Op Fri, 24 Jan 2014 10:22:59 +0100 schreef Karl Heinz Marbaise : Hi, i just want to know on what basis releases will be created... Currently i would suggest to create a Release 1.3.2 of the maven-enforcer-plugin... In Jira the list http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11530&version=19935 for 1.3.2 contains a number of bug fixes... Are there any objections to get a release 1.3.2 out of the door... I would like to fix one or two more issues...but i want to know how the mood is about creating a new release of Maven-Enforcer-Plugin Kind Regards Karl Heinz Marbaise - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Q: Maven-Enforcer-Plugin - Release 1.3.2 ?
Well the biggest blocker for cutting releases is getting your binding votes... My policy is cut releases until the PMC starts complaining that you are cutting too many releases... ;-) I haven't seen any of us complain about releases being too frequent *ever*... If you think it is ready for a release now, then as a committer you only have to stand up and say I am cutting a release... Good manners is to give 24-72hr notice that you will be cutting a release... but for a single plugin with nobody else having committed anything in the past 72hr and no sign of activity other than your own in JIRA, a quick ping on IRC and the mailing list with a 1-4h wait is probably fine... after all it's only a plugin and the release builds of those are fast... If you were cutting a release of core or a shared component, then I would think a 72h heads up to ensure that nobody else is working on patching something would be strongly encouraged... OTOH if you have an issue you see as critical... This should be self governing... if you cut too often or with too little improvement... attracting PMC binding votes will become harder over time... But as I already said... we are not at the stage of even 1 release vote per week... so you shouldn't have issues getting 3 PMC members to at least take a look at a plugin release candidate for a vote -Stephen On 24 January 2014 09:22, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > i just want to know on what basis releases will be created... > > Currently i would suggest to create a Release 1.3.2 of the > maven-enforcer-plugin... > > In Jira the list > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=11530&version=19935 > > for 1.3.2 contains a number of bug fixes... > > Are there any objections to get a release 1.3.2 out of the door... > > I would like to fix one or two more issues...but i want to know how the > mood is about creating a new release of Maven-Enforcer-Plugin > > Kind Regards > Karl Heinz Marbaise > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
Q: Maven-Enforcer-Plugin - Release 1.3.2 ?
Hi, i just want to know on what basis releases will be created... Currently i would suggest to create a Release 1.3.2 of the maven-enforcer-plugin... In Jira the list http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11530&version=19935 for 1.3.2 contains a number of bug fixes... Are there any objections to get a release 1.3.2 out of the door... I would like to fix one or two more issues...but i want to know how the mood is about creating a new release of Maven-Enforcer-Plugin Kind Regards Karl Heinz Marbaise - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Maven Enforcer Plugin Release Request
While that sounds enticing... I'll stick with the enforcer release :-) Happy to take a look later in the week once all the Maven 3.1.0 dependencies are dealt with. On Nov 20, 2012, at 1:28 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Hey Jason, > > I can knock off an enforcer release even intoxicated by acute turkey > poisoning. On the other hand, I don't know enough to look for a better > solution to the forked execution issue that we've been discussing with > respect to the site plugin. Can I interest you in swapping? > > --benson > > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: >> Sure, I can take a look as I'm doing releases this week. >> >> Hervé, you mind if I push out MENFORCER-144 to the next version so I can >> stage a release? >> >> https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?fixfor=18491&pid=11530&reset=true&show=View+%26gt%3B%26gt%3B >> >> On Nov 20, 2012, at 11:54 AM, Josh Beitelspacher wrote: >> >>> Would it be possible to get a new release of the maven enforcer plugin >>> sometime soon? I've been eagerly awaiting a release with the fix for >>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-135. >>> >>> Currently my build output is 2139 lines, of which 1701 lines (~80%) is INFO >>> messages from the enforcer plugin. A brief sample is included below: >>> >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-transports-local 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-ws-security 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> >>> The bug that caused this has been fixed since July, but has yet to be >>> included in a new release. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Josh >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jason >> >> -- >> Jason van Zyl >> Founder & CTO, Sonatype >> Founder, Apache Maven >> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl >> - >> >> The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral >> philosophy; that is, >> the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. >> >> -- John Kenneth Galbraith >> >> >> >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > Thanks, Jason -- Jason van Zyl Founder & CTO, Sonatype Founder, Apache Maven http://twitter.com/jvanzyl -
Re: Maven Enforcer Plugin Release Request
No rush. Just figured while I'm in the release monkey seat I would try to push it out. On Nov 20, 2012, at 2:53 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > MENFORCER-144 fixed > > I'd like to MENFORCER-145 before the release, please wait a few more hours > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le mardi 20 novembre 2012 12:02:40 Jason van Zyl a écrit : >> Sure, I can take a look as I'm doing releases this week. >> >> Hervé, you mind if I push out MENFORCER-144 to the next version so I can >> stage a release? >> >> https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?fixfor=18491&pid=11530&; >> reset=true&show=View+%26gt%3B%26gt%3B >> On Nov 20, 2012, at 11:54 AM, Josh Beitelspacher wrote: >>> Would it be possible to get a new release of the maven enforcer plugin >>> sometime soon? I've been eagerly awaiting a release with the fix for >>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-135. >>> >>> Currently my build output is 2139 lines, of which 1701 lines (~80%) is >>> INFO >>> messages from the enforcer plugin. A brief sample is included below: >>> >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-transports-local 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-ws-security 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >>> >>> The bug that caused this has been fixed since July, but has yet to be >>> included in a new release. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Josh >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jason >> >> -- >> Jason van Zyl >> Founder & CTO, Sonatype >> Founder, Apache Maven >> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl >> - >> >> The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral >> philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for >> selfishness. >> >> -- John Kenneth Galbraith > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > Thanks, Jason -- Jason van Zyl Founder & CTO, Sonatype Founder, Apache Maven http://twitter.com/jvanzyl - Selfish deeds are the shortest path to self destruction. -- The Seven Samuari, Akira Kurosawa
Re: Maven Enforcer Plugin Release Request
MENFORCER-144 fixed I'd like to MENFORCER-145 before the release, please wait a few more hours Regards, Hervé Le mardi 20 novembre 2012 12:02:40 Jason van Zyl a écrit : > Sure, I can take a look as I'm doing releases this week. > > Hervé, you mind if I push out MENFORCER-144 to the next version so I can > stage a release? > > https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?fixfor=18491&pid=11530&; > reset=true&show=View+%26gt%3B%26gt%3B > On Nov 20, 2012, at 11:54 AM, Josh Beitelspacher wrote: > > Would it be possible to get a new release of the maven enforcer plugin > > sometime soon? I've been eagerly awaiting a release with the fix for > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-135. > > > > Currently my build output is 2139 lines, of which 1701 lines (~80%) is > > INFO > > messages from the enforcer plugin. A brief sample is included below: > > > > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-transports-local 2.7.0 2.7.0 > > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 > > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 > > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 > > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 > > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 > > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 > > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 > > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 > > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 > > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 > > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 > > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 > > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 > > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-ws-security 2.7.0 2.7.0 > > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 > > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 > > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 > > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 > > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 > > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 > > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 > > > > The bug that caused this has been fixed since July, but has yet to be > > included in a new release. > > > > Thanks, > > Josh > > Thanks, > > Jason > > -- > Jason van Zyl > Founder & CTO, Sonatype > Founder, Apache Maven > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > - > > The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral > philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for > selfishness. > > -- John Kenneth Galbraith - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Maven Enforcer Plugin Release Request
Hey Jason, I can knock off an enforcer release even intoxicated by acute turkey poisoning. On the other hand, I don't know enough to look for a better solution to the forked execution issue that we've been discussing with respect to the site plugin. Can I interest you in swapping? --benson On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Sure, I can take a look as I'm doing releases this week. > > Hervé, you mind if I push out MENFORCER-144 to the next version so I can > stage a release? > > https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?fixfor=18491&pid=11530&reset=true&show=View+%26gt%3B%26gt%3B > > On Nov 20, 2012, at 11:54 AM, Josh Beitelspacher wrote: > >> Would it be possible to get a new release of the maven enforcer plugin >> sometime soon? I've been eagerly awaiting a release with the fix for >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-135. >> >> Currently my build output is 2139 lines, of which 1701 lines (~80%) is INFO >> messages from the enforcer plugin. A brief sample is included below: >> >> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-transports-local 2.7.0 2.7.0 >> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 >> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 >> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 >> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 >> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 >> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-ws-security 2.7.0 2.7.0 >> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 >> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 >> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 >> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >> [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 >> >> The bug that caused this has been fixed since July, but has yet to be >> included in a new release. >> >> Thanks, >> Josh > > Thanks, > > Jason > > -- > Jason van Zyl > Founder & CTO, Sonatype > Founder, Apache Maven > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > - > > The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral > philosophy; that is, > the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. > > -- John Kenneth Galbraith > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Maven Enforcer Plugin Release Request
Sure, I can take a look as I'm doing releases this week. Hervé, you mind if I push out MENFORCER-144 to the next version so I can stage a release? https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?fixfor=18491&pid=11530&reset=true&show=View+%26gt%3B%26gt%3B On Nov 20, 2012, at 11:54 AM, Josh Beitelspacher wrote: > Would it be possible to get a new release of the maven enforcer plugin > sometime soon? I've been eagerly awaiting a release with the fix for > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-135. > > Currently my build output is 2139 lines, of which 1701 lines (~80%) is INFO > messages from the enforcer plugin. A brief sample is included below: > > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-transports-local 2.7.0 2.7.0 > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-ws-security 2.7.0 2.7.0 > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 > > The bug that caused this has been fixed since July, but has yet to be > included in a new release. > > Thanks, > Josh Thanks, Jason -- Jason van Zyl Founder & CTO, Sonatype Founder, Apache Maven http://twitter.com/jvanzyl - The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. -- John Kenneth Galbraith
Maven Enforcer Plugin Release Request
Would it be possible to get a new release of the maven enforcer plugin sometime soon? I've been eagerly awaiting a release with the fix for http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-135. Currently my build output is 2139 lines, of which 1701 lines (~80%) is INFO messages from the enforcer plugin. A brief sample is included below: [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-transports-local 2.7.0 2.7.0 [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-ws-security 2.7.0 2.7.0 [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api 2.7.0 2.7.0 [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core 2.7.0 2.7.0 The bug that caused this has been fixed since July, but has yet to be included in a new release. Thanks, Josh
Enforcer plugin release
Hi, What's the status on the Enforcer plugin release these days? Is it possible to get another alpha out if the pending JIRAs have to be fixed for 1.0.0? Seems to me that none of the outstanding issues are bugs which prevents releasing the current work. WDYT? -- - Jan Fredrik Wedén - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
