Re: javasvn license
Is that really the only problem with the license? Since noone would be making changes to the source, does that condition apply at all? On 5/17/06, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FYI seems that we won't be able of having a java implementation of svn. In fact I think we have to remove it from apache -- Forwarded message -- From: Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: May 16, 2006 12:28 PM Subject: Re: javasvn license To: Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: legal-discuss@apache.org On 5/16/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to know if the JavaSVN license [1] if compatible with ASF so that I can add it as dependency for the jakarta commons VFS project. No - it's a Category X in Cliff's policy. It requires source distribution of changes (clause 3). -- justin - DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and policies of the ASF. See http://www.apache.org/licenses/ for official ASF policies and documents. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is afraid of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris
RE: javasvn license
Where is the license problem? With JavaSVN or SVN? According to tigris.org, svn is using an apache compatible license. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carlos Sanchez Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 2:47 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Fwd: javasvn license FYI seems that we won't be able of having a java implementation of svn. In fact I think we have to remove it from apache -- Forwarded message -- From: Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: May 16, 2006 12:28 PM Subject: Re: javasvn license To: Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: legal-discuss@apache.org On 5/16/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to know if the JavaSVN license [1] if compatible with ASF so that I can add it as dependency for the jakarta commons VFS project. No - it's a Category X in Cliff's policy. It requires source distribution of changes (clause 3). -- justin - DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and policies of the ASF. See http://www.apache.org/licenses/ for official ASF policies and documents. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: javasvn license
Where is the license problem? With JavaSVN or SVN? According to tigris.org, svn is using an apache compatible license. Maybe they are not aware that it is not? Maybe this can be resolved by talking to them ...so they might fix that. cheers -- Torsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: javasvn license
Either way if they give you guys trouble you can try sending chuck norris in ;) (sorry, just loved that signature..heh) On 5/16/06, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where is the license problem? With JavaSVN or SVN? According to tigris.org, svn is using an apache compatible license. Maybe they are not aware that it is not? Maybe this can be resolved by talking to them ...so they might fix that. cheers -- Torsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
Re: javasvn license
tmatesoft JavaSVN is the problem, not SVN per se http://tmate.org/svn/licensing/index.html Please join legal discussion if you want to discuss the legal terms, but as I understand it's pretty clear. It's similar case as GPL, where apache software can't depend on it, no matter if we just use it. On 5/16/06, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where is the license problem? With JavaSVN or SVN? According to tigris.org, svn is using an apache compatible license. Maybe they are not aware that it is not? Maybe this can be resolved by talking to them ...so they might fix that. cheers -- Torsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: javasvn license
On 5/17/06, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tmatesoft JavaSVN is the problem, not SVN per se http://tmate.org/svn/licensing/index.html Ah, thought the previous post was referring to JavaSVN. Maybe still worth talking to them. Please join legal discussion if you want to discuss the legal terms, but as I understand it's pretty clear. It's similar case as GPL, where apache software can't depend on it, no matter if we just use it. I am on legal ...responded to the wrong list, sorry cheers -- Torsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
