The later, I think.
Is it reasonable to simply ditch FastMap from the bridge, and plan to
add a javolution dependency to each place we find a use of FastMap?
That would be my recommendation now that you ask.
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> why not copy their tests... or are you suggesting that the replacement
> is to use the class directly?
>
> On 12 June 2011 21:01, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> This is just a copy of a class from javolution with the package name
>> changed. Javolution is BSD licensed. So, I propose to add the
>> dependency, create a pass-through class in the plexus package, and
>> write no tests, on the theory that the javolution people have adequate
>> tests for themselves.
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org