Standard role names (was RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/abbot project.xml)

2004-09-28 Thread Vincent Massol


 -Original Message-
 From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: mardi 28 septembre 2004 05:52
 To: Maven Developers List
 Subject: Re: cvs commit: maven-plugins/abbot project.xml
 
 That's the instructions I added to the releasing plugins document this
 morning.
 
 I think it would make more sense to use a developer role if you are going
 to
 automatically pick one that the use the first one found.
 

Yeah, it would be a good idea to pick the Release Manager. The only
problem is that we don't have these role names clearly defined. It should be
a combox box instead of textfield so that we can only pick valid role
names... Not sure how to implement this in XML apart from using nonexplicit
figures (0 = developer, 1 = release manager, etc). Yuck!

Maybe simply using the POM validator and the associated XML schema would be
enough?

Thanks
-Vincent

 - Brett
 
 Quoting Felipe Leme [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
  Or you can set the maven.announcement.mail.from property in your
  build.properties :-)
 
  On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 10:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Put my name before Christian's so that next time I run maven
  announcement:mail, the mail comes from me.
   Makes sense as I am the main maintainer of this plugin...
 
 
 
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: cvs commit: maven-plugins/abbot project.xml

2004-09-27 Thread Felipe Leme
Or you can set the maven.announcement.mail.from property in your
build.properties :-)

On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 10:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Put my name before Christian's so that next time I run maven announcement:mail, 
 the mail comes from me. 
 Makes sense as I am the main maintainer of this plugin...
 




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: cvs commit: maven-plugins/abbot project.xml

2004-09-27 Thread Brett Porter
That's the instructions I added to the releasing plugins document this morning.

I think it would make more sense to use a developer role if you are going to
automatically pick one that the use the first one found.

- Brett

Quoting Felipe Leme [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Or you can set the maven.announcement.mail.from property in your
 build.properties :-)
 
 On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 10:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Put my name before Christian's so that next time I run maven
 announcement:mail, the mail comes from me. 
  Makes sense as I am the main maintainer of this plugin...
  
 
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: cvs commit: maven-plugins/abbot project.xml

2004-09-27 Thread Felipe Leme
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 00:52, Brett Porter wrote:
 That's the instructions I added to the releasing plugins document this morning.

I didn't know that. Anyways, I was just joking with the fact that I
submit the patch for the mail announcement and Vincent committed it :-)

 I think it would make more sense to use a developer role if you are going to
 automatically pick one that the use the first one found.

Ok, that's doable. We could have a new property for the 'plugin herald'
(whose default value would be 'Release Manager') and then search for the
first user with that role.

-- Felipe



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/abbot project.xml

2004-06-15 Thread Brett Porter
The main reason not to do so is that anything in there basically can't have
another version running.

- Brett

Quoting Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Ok cool. Thanks for the explanation. That said wouldn't it be nice that
 we put all jelly tags in the mavenhome/lib so that plugin developers can
 rely on having them already in the classpath? (I'm sure there must be a
 reason for not doing so...) :-)
 
 Thanks
 -Vincent
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 15 June 2004 04:46
  To: Maven Developers List
  Subject: Re: cvs commit: maven-plugins/abbot project.xml
  
  If it is used by the script it is always required. If you are getting
  different
  behaviour on HEAD and 1.0, it's possibly because of a different plugin
  installation set where one puts the tags into root for some reason.
  
  - Brett
  
  Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
  
   vmassol 2004/06/14 09:45:07
  
 Modified:abbotproject.xml
 Log:
 Added xml jelly tag dependeny as it seems to be required by maven
 rc3
  (but
   not by Maven 1.0 head).
  
 Revision  ChangesPath
 1.3   +10 -1 maven-plugins/abbot/project.xml
  
 Index: project.xml
  
 ===
 RCS file: /home/cvs/maven-plugins/abbot/project.xml,v
 retrieving revision 1.2
 retrieving revision 1.3
 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
 --- project.xml 13 Jun 2004 10:08:38 -  1.2
 +++ project.xml 14 Jun 2004 16:45:07 -  1.3
 @@ -152,7 +152,16 @@
  abbot.webstarttrue/abbot.webstart
/properties
  /dependency
 -
 +
 +!-- Note: It seems this is required only by some versions of
  Maven
 + (Maven rc3 for example). --
 +dependency
 +  groupIdcommons-jelly/groupId
 +  artifactIdcommons-jelly-tags-xml/artifactId
 +  version20030211.142705/version
 +
 urlhttp://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jelly/libs/xml//url
 +/dependency
 +
/dependencies
reports
  reportmaven-changes-plugin/report
  
  
  
  
  
 -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
  
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: cvs commit: maven-plugins/abbot project.xml

2004-06-14 Thread Brett Porter
If it is used by the script it is always required. If you are getting different
behaviour on HEAD and 1.0, it's possibly because of a different plugin
installation set where one puts the tags into root for some reason.

- Brett

Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 vmassol 2004/06/14 09:45:07
 
   Modified:abbotproject.xml
   Log:
   Added xml jelly tag dependeny as it seems to be required by maven rc3 (but
 not by Maven 1.0 head).
   
   Revision  ChangesPath
   1.3   +10 -1 maven-plugins/abbot/project.xml
   
   Index: project.xml
   ===
   RCS file: /home/cvs/maven-plugins/abbot/project.xml,v
   retrieving revision 1.2
   retrieving revision 1.3
   diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
   --- project.xml 13 Jun 2004 10:08:38 -  1.2
   +++ project.xml 14 Jun 2004 16:45:07 -  1.3
   @@ -152,7 +152,16 @@
abbot.webstarttrue/abbot.webstart
  /properties  
/dependency
   -
   +
   +!-- Note: It seems this is required only by some versions of Maven
   + (Maven rc3 for example). --
   +dependency
   +  groupIdcommons-jelly/groupId
   +  artifactIdcommons-jelly-tags-xml/artifactId
   +  version20030211.142705/version
   +  urlhttp://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jelly/libs/xml//url
   +/dependency
   +
  /dependencies
  reports
reportmaven-changes-plugin/report
   
   
   
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]