Re: [ASYNCWEB] What's the plan regarding it's leaving the sandbox?
The reason why AsyncWeb is still in the sandbox is because there's no dedicated active committer for it. Jeff and many others have a lot of interest on the project, so it should get a new life soon, considering Dave's current absence. However, it's just too early to say that it's ready to get out of the sandbox. It is also needed to clarify that MINA core doesn't contain HTTP codec. One submodule of MINA does, and this inclusion has been agreed when AsyncWeb is imported at the very initial discussion. Moreover, AsyncWeb is not the only module that depends on the HTTP codec submodule. AHC (AsyncHttpClient) also depends on it. And, merging AsyncWeb and AHC into one module was discussed before and we decided to stay as in the current state. The bottom line is that we are still in the course of evolution and we can discuss about project segmentation after some visible changes in AsyncWeb or AHC occurs. Trustin On Jan 21, 2008 3:15 AM, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Jeff. Actually I was going to start refactoring it tomorrow while > checking various legal matters so we can start releasing some candidates. > I'll keep you updated. > > I'd love to see a rich community start to grow around asyncweb as it did > around MINA. It's got a lot of potential and there are many users out there > even as it is. However the present direction with pushing protocols into > MINA core is somewhat of an issue which will distract from this goal. > > Alex > > > On Jan 20, 2008 1:07 PM, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I personally don't know what is going on but I really like AsyncWeb and > > would love to see it come out of the sandbox. I would be happy to also > > help refactoring it. > > > > Jeff > > > > Alex Karasulu wrote: > > >> Do you have any idea on when we can release MINA proper 2.0 M1. I ask > > >> this because I would like to see at least some beta release of asyncweb > > >> which depends on it? Furthermore we probably need to move it out of > > the > > >> sandbox now that the IP has been cleared but it needs some work. I > > will > > >> start cleaning it up to get it ready for some kind of beta release. > > >> > > >> Also are we bound to maintain the MINA API between milestone releases? > > >> > > > > > > Any comment? Anyone besides Trustin know what's going on? > > > > > > If releases without freezing the API are not possible then we might have > > an > > > issue with this model. > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
Re: [ASYNCWEB] What's the plan regarding it's leaving the sandbox?
Thanks Jeff. Actually I was going to start refactoring it tomorrow while checking various legal matters so we can start releasing some candidates. I'll keep you updated. I'd love to see a rich community start to grow around asyncweb as it did around MINA. It's got a lot of potential and there are many users out there even as it is. However the present direction with pushing protocols into MINA core is somewhat of an issue which will distract from this goal. Alex On Jan 20, 2008 1:07 PM, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I personally don't know what is going on but I really like AsyncWeb and > would love to see it come out of the sandbox. I would be happy to also > help refactoring it. > > Jeff > > Alex Karasulu wrote: > >> Do you have any idea on when we can release MINA proper 2.0 M1. I ask > >> this because I would like to see at least some beta release of asyncweb > >> which depends on it? Furthermore we probably need to move it out of > the > >> sandbox now that the IP has been cleared but it needs some work. I > will > >> start cleaning it up to get it ready for some kind of beta release. > >> > >> Also are we bound to maintain the MINA API between milestone releases? > >> > > > > Any comment? Anyone besides Trustin know what's going on? > > > > If releases without freezing the API are not possible then we might have > an > > issue with this model. > > > > Alex > > >
Re: [ASYNCWEB] What's the plan regarding it's leaving the sandbox?
I personally don't know what is going on but I really like AsyncWeb and would love to see it come out of the sandbox. I would be happy to also help refactoring it. Jeff Alex Karasulu wrote: Do you have any idea on when we can release MINA proper 2.0 M1. I ask this because I would like to see at least some beta release of asyncweb which depends on it? Furthermore we probably need to move it out of the sandbox now that the IP has been cleared but it needs some work. I will start cleaning it up to get it ready for some kind of beta release. Also are we bound to maintain the MINA API between milestone releases? Any comment? Anyone besides Trustin know what's going on? If releases without freezing the API are not possible then we might have an issue with this model. Alex
Re: [ASYNCWEB] What's the plan regarding it's leaving the sandbox?
> Do you have any idea on when we can release MINA proper 2.0 M1. I ask > this because I would like to see at least some beta release of asyncweb > which depends on it? Furthermore we probably need to move it out of the > sandbox now that the IP has been cleared but it needs some work. I will > start cleaning it up to get it ready for some kind of beta release. > > Also are we bound to maintain the MINA API between milestone releases? > Any comment? Anyone besides Trustin know what's going on? If releases without freezing the API are not possible then we might have an issue with this model. Alex
[ASYNCWEB] What's the plan regarding it's leaving the sandbox?
Sorry I should have posted this to the dev list ... -- Forwarded message -- From: Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Jan 19, 2008 6:57 PM Subject: [ASYNCWEB] What's the plan regarding it's leaving the sandbox? To: Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi Trustin, Do you have any idea on when we can release MINA proper 2.0 M1. I ask this because I would like to see at least some beta release of asyncweb which depends on it? Furthermore we probably need to move it out of the sandbox now that the IP has been cleared but it needs some work. I will start cleaning it up to get it ready for some kind of beta release. Also are we bound to maintain the MINA API between milestone releases? Alex
