Re: testing mina
another testing tool: Grinder http://grinder.sourceforge.net/ Mark Webb wrote: exactly. I think we should agree on a test tool and write test plans that can go into the baseline. On 3/8/07, James Im [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Webb wrote: What does everyone use to test the throughput/load/etc of MINA. I have always had a love/hate relationship with jmeter, and wondered if anyone uses anything else. Thank you. I think that Mina should have some performance tests included so that code changes' impact on performance can be evaluated. With some tests, you can test on the previous version and the newer one and see the relative difference. I don't answer your question I know. _ Ta' pÃ¥ udsalg Ã¥ret rundt pÃ¥ MSN Shopping: http://shopping.msn.dk - her finder du altid de bedste priser _ Del dine store filer uden problemer på MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.dk/
Re: testing mina
I just don't understand the graphing of jmeter. Some people get nice pretty graphs, and I just seem to get garbled graphs that look meaningless. The other problem I have with jmeter is that to extend jmeter takes much more work that I think is necessary. I tried to write an SMTP send tester and it took forever and still did not work. On 3/8/07, Monajit Choudhury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried grinder, but its not as versatile as jmeter. I would go for Jmeter. I have done some loadtesting of the MINA examples thru jmeter it did pretty well. Regds Monajit -Original Message- From: James Im [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/8/2007 10:05 AM To: dev@mina.apache.org Subject: Re: testing mina another testing tool: Grinder http://grinder.sourceforge.net/ Mark Webb wrote: exactly. I think we should agree on a test tool and write test plans that can go into the baseline. On 3/8/07, James Im [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Webb wrote: What does everyone use to test the throughput/load/etc of MINA. I have always had a love/hate relationship with jmeter, and wondered if anyone uses anything else. Thank you. I think that Mina should have some performance tests included so that code changes' impact on performance can be evaluated. With some tests, you can test on the previous version and the newer one and see the relative difference. I don't answer your question I know. _ Ta' pÃ¥ udsalg Ã¥ret rundt pÃ¥ MSN Shopping: http://shopping.msn.dk - her finder du altid de bedste priser _ Del dine store filer uden problemer på MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.dk/ -- ..Cheers Mark
RE: testing mina
Ya the spine graph or whatever takes time refreshing. What I use is the aggregate graph.It does the job for me.Its simple and lays down the result in a tabular format.I have modified the sumup client to work as a Jmeter sampler and it worked pretty neat.If you need I can send the file to you. Regds Monajit -Original Message- From: Mark Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/8/2007 11:05 AM To: dev@mina.apache.org Subject: Re: testing mina I just don't understand the graphing of jmeter. Some people get nice pretty graphs, and I just seem to get garbled graphs that look meaningless. The other problem I have with jmeter is that to extend jmeter takes much more work that I think is necessary. I tried to write an SMTP send tester and it took forever and still did not work. On 3/8/07, Monajit Choudhury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried grinder, but its not as versatile as jmeter. I would go for Jmeter. I have done some loadtesting of the MINA examples thru jmeter it did pretty well. Regds Monajit -Original Message- From: James Im [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/8/2007 10:05 AM To: dev@mina.apache.org Subject: Re: testing mina another testing tool: Grinder http://grinder.sourceforge.net/ Mark Webb wrote: exactly. I think we should agree on a test tool and write test plans that can go into the baseline. On 3/8/07, James Im [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Webb wrote: What does everyone use to test the throughput/load/etc of MINA. I have always had a love/hate relationship with jmeter, and wondered if anyone uses anything else. Thank you. I think that Mina should have some performance tests included so that code changes' impact on performance can be evaluated. With some tests, you can test on the previous version and the newer one and see the relative difference. I don't answer your question I know. _ Ta' pÃ¥ udsalg Ã¥ret rundt pÃ¥ MSN Shopping: http://shopping.msn.dk - her finder du altid de bedste priser _ Del dine store filer uden problemer på MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.dk/ -- ..Cheers Mark
Re: testing mina
sure. I'd take a look at it. Do you have the jmeter config file as well? Thanks. On 3/8/07, Monajit Choudhury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ya the spine graph or whatever takes time refreshing. What I use is the aggregate graph.It does the job for me.Its simple and lays down the result in a tabular format.I have modified the sumup client to work as a Jmeter sampler and it worked pretty neat.If you need I can send the file to you. Regds Monajit -Original Message- From: Mark Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/8/2007 11:05 AM To: dev@mina.apache.org Subject: Re: testing mina I just don't understand the graphing of jmeter. Some people get nice pretty graphs, and I just seem to get garbled graphs that look meaningless. The other problem I have with jmeter is that to extend jmeter takes much more work that I think is necessary. I tried to write an SMTP send tester and it took forever and still did not work. On 3/8/07, Monajit Choudhury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried grinder, but its not as versatile as jmeter. I would go for Jmeter. I have done some loadtesting of the MINA examples thru jmeter it did pretty well. Regds Monajit -Original Message- From: James Im [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/8/2007 10:05 AM To: dev@mina.apache.org Subject: Re: testing mina another testing tool: Grinder http://grinder.sourceforge.net/ Mark Webb wrote: exactly. I think we should agree on a test tool and write test plans that can go into the baseline. On 3/8/07, James Im [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Webb wrote: What does everyone use to test the throughput/load/etc of MINA. I have always had a love/hate relationship with jmeter, and wondered if anyone uses anything else. Thank you. I think that Mina should have some performance tests included so that code changes' impact on performance can be evaluated. With some tests, you can test on the previous version and the newer one and see the relative difference. I don't answer your question I know. _ Ta' pÃ¥ udsalg Ã¥ret rundt pÃ¥ MSN Shopping: http://shopping.msn.dk - her finder du altid de bedste priser _ Del dine store filer uden problemer på MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.dk/ -- ..Cheers Mark -- ..Cheers Mark
RE: testing mina
Here it is. Replace the sumup client with this client , jar up and dump the jar in jmeter/lib/ext dir.I am sending you a sample testplan(JavaRequest.jmx) too. Just open it with jmeter and you will be good to go. Regds Monajit -Original Message- From: Mark Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/8/2007 11:20 AM To: dev@mina.apache.org Subject: Re: testing mina sure. I'd take a look at it. Do you have the jmeter config file as well? Thanks. On 3/8/07, Monajit Choudhury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ya the spine graph or whatever takes time refreshing. What I use is the aggregate graph.It does the job for me.Its simple and lays down the result in a tabular format.I have modified the sumup client to work as a Jmeter sampler and it worked pretty neat.If you need I can send the file to you. Regds Monajit -Original Message- From: Mark Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/8/2007 11:05 AM To: dev@mina.apache.org Subject: Re: testing mina I just don't understand the graphing of jmeter. Some people get nice pretty graphs, and I just seem to get garbled graphs that look meaningless. The other problem I have with jmeter is that to extend jmeter takes much more work that I think is necessary. I tried to write an SMTP send tester and it took forever and still did not work. On 3/8/07, Monajit Choudhury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried grinder, but its not as versatile as jmeter. I would go for Jmeter. I have done some loadtesting of the MINA examples thru jmeter it did pretty well. Regds Monajit -Original Message- From: James Im [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/8/2007 10:05 AM To: dev@mina.apache.org Subject: Re: testing mina another testing tool: Grinder http://grinder.sourceforge.net/ Mark Webb wrote: exactly. I think we should agree on a test tool and write test plans that can go into the baseline. On 3/8/07, James Im [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Webb wrote: What does everyone use to test the throughput/load/etc of MINA. I have always had a love/hate relationship with jmeter, and wondered if anyone uses anything else. Thank you. I think that Mina should have some performance tests included so that code changes' impact on performance can be evaluated. With some tests, you can test on the previous version and the newer one and see the relative difference. I don't answer your question I know. _ Ta' pÃ¥ udsalg Ã¥ret rundt pÃ¥ MSN Shopping: http://shopping.msn.dk - her finder du altid de bedste priser _ Del dine store filer uden problemer på MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.dk/ -- ..Cheers Mark -- ..Cheers Mark
RE: testing mina
Sorry about that. Here it is again. -Original Message- From: Mark Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/8/2007 11:56 AM To: dev@mina.apache.org Subject: Re: testing mina Sorry, I did not get any attachment.. On 3/8/07, Monajit Choudhury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here it is. Replace the sumup client with this client , jar up and dump the jar in jmeter/lib/ext dir.I am sending you a sample testplan( JavaRequest.jmx) too. Just open it with jmeter and you will be good to go. Regds Monajit -Original Message- From: Mark Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/8/2007 11:20 AM To: dev@mina.apache.org Subject: Re: testing mina sure. I'd take a look at it. Do you have the jmeter config file as well? Thanks. On 3/8/07, Monajit Choudhury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ya the spine graph or whatever takes time refreshing. What I use is the aggregate graph.It does the job for me.Its simple and lays down the result in a tabular format.I have modified the sumup client to work as a Jmeter sampler and it worked pretty neat.If you need I can send the file to you. Regds Monajit -Original Message- From: Mark Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/8/2007 11:05 AM To: dev@mina.apache.org Subject: Re: testing mina I just don't understand the graphing of jmeter. Some people get nice pretty graphs, and I just seem to get garbled graphs that look meaningless. The other problem I have with jmeter is that to extend jmeter takes much more work that I think is necessary. I tried to write an SMTP send tester and it took forever and still did not work. On 3/8/07, Monajit Choudhury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried grinder, but its not as versatile as jmeter. I would go for Jmeter. I have done some loadtesting of the MINA examples thru jmeter it did pretty well. Regds Monajit -Original Message- From: James Im [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/8/2007 10:05 AM To: dev@mina.apache.org Subject: Re: testing mina another testing tool: Grinder http://grinder.sourceforge.net/ Mark Webb wrote: exactly. I think we should agree on a test tool and write test plans that can go into the baseline. On 3/8/07, James Im [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Webb wrote: What does everyone use to test the throughput/load/etc of MINA. I have always had a love/hate relationship with jmeter, and wondered if anyone uses anything else. Thank you. I think that Mina should have some performance tests included so that code changes' impact on performance can be evaluated. With some tests, you can test on the previous version and the newer one and see the relative difference. I don't answer your question I know. _ Ta' pÃ¥ udsalg Ã¥ret rundt pÃ¥ MSN Shopping: http://shopping.msn.dk - her finder du altid de bedste priser _ Del dine store filer uden problemer på MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.dk/ -- ..Cheers Mark -- ..Cheers Mark -- ..Cheers Mark
RE: testing mina
Well, I guess, this list doesnt support attachments. -Original Message- From: Monajit Choudhury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/8/2007 11:57 AM To: dev@mina.apache.org Subject: RE: testing mina Sorry about that. Here it is again. -Original Message- From: Mark Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/8/2007 11:56 AM To: dev@mina.apache.org Subject: Re: testing mina Sorry, I did not get any attachment.. On 3/8/07, Monajit Choudhury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here it is. Replace the sumup client with this client , jar up and dump the jar in jmeter/lib/ext dir.I am sending you a sample testplan( JavaRequest.jmx) too. Just open it with jmeter and you will be good to go. Regds Monajit -Original Message- From: Mark Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/8/2007 11:20 AM To: dev@mina.apache.org Subject: Re: testing mina sure. I'd take a look at it. Do you have the jmeter config file as well? Thanks. On 3/8/07, Monajit Choudhury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ya the spine graph or whatever takes time refreshing. What I use is the aggregate graph.It does the job for me.Its simple and lays down the result in a tabular format.I have modified the sumup client to work as a Jmeter sampler and it worked pretty neat.If you need I can send the file to you. Regds Monajit -Original Message- From: Mark Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/8/2007 11:05 AM To: dev@mina.apache.org Subject: Re: testing mina I just don't understand the graphing of jmeter. Some people get nice pretty graphs, and I just seem to get garbled graphs that look meaningless. The other problem I have with jmeter is that to extend jmeter takes much more work that I think is necessary. I tried to write an SMTP send tester and it took forever and still did not work. On 3/8/07, Monajit Choudhury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried grinder, but its not as versatile as jmeter. I would go for Jmeter. I have done some loadtesting of the MINA examples thru jmeter it did pretty well. Regds Monajit -Original Message- From: James Im [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/8/2007 10:05 AM To: dev@mina.apache.org Subject: Re: testing mina another testing tool: Grinder http://grinder.sourceforge.net/ Mark Webb wrote: exactly. I think we should agree on a test tool and write test plans that can go into the baseline. On 3/8/07, James Im [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Webb wrote: What does everyone use to test the throughput/load/etc of MINA. I have always had a love/hate relationship with jmeter, and wondered if anyone uses anything else. Thank you. I think that Mina should have some performance tests included so that code changes' impact on performance can be evaluated. With some tests, you can test on the previous version and the newer one and see the relative difference. I don't answer your question I know. _ Ta' pÃ¥ udsalg Ã¥ret rundt pÃ¥ MSN Shopping: http://shopping.msn.dk - her finder du altid de bedste priser _ Del dine store filer uden problemer på MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.dk/ -- ..Cheers Mark -- ..Cheers Mark -- ..Cheers Mark
Re: testing mina
Apache ML don't support attachements, for many reasons. Just use JIRA for that. On 3/8/07, Monajit Choudhury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I guess, this list doesnt support attachments. -- Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
Re: testing mina
Monajit - You could send them to me [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you On 3/8/07, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Apache ML don't support attachements, for many reasons. Just use JIRA for that. On 3/8/07, Monajit Choudhury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I guess, this list doesnt support attachments. -- Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com -- ..Cheers Mark
RE: testing mina
Just did that. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-355 -Original Message- From: Maarten Bosteels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/8/2007 3:29 PM To: dev@mina.apache.org Subject: Re: testing mina Would you please consider to create a JIRA issue and attach the files. That way, everybody can learn from it. thanks, Maarten On 3/8/07, Mark Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Monajit - You could send them to me [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you On 3/8/07, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Apache ML don't support attachements, for many reasons. Just use JIRA for that. On 3/8/07, Monajit Choudhury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I guess, this list doesnt support attachments. -- Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com -- ..Cheers Mark
Re: testing mina
Mark Webb wrote: What does everyone use to test the throughput/load/etc of MINA. I have always had a love/hate relationship with jmeter, and wondered if anyone uses anything else. Thank you. I think that Mina should have some performance tests included so that code changes' impact on performance can be evaluated. With some tests, you can test on the previous version and the newer one and see the relative difference. I don't answer your question I know. _ Ta' på udsalg året rundt på MSN Shopping: http://shopping.msn.dk - her finder du altid de bedste priser
