Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program
Thanks Gary, I have already joined slack channel. Thanks Avinash On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Gang(Gary) Wangwrote: > Hi Avinash, Welcome to join us. please register in the-asf.slack.com and > join our channel #storage-class-memory as well, Thanks! > > Best > Gary. > > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Avinash Dongre > wrote: > > > I'd like to participate in this as well. > > > > Thanks > > Avinash > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang > wrote: > > > > > looks I'm not able to invite you by email in Slack, so please register > on > > > https://the-asf.slack.com and then join our channel > > #storage-class-memory, > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Yes, it is another great communication for real-time chat, Debo also > > > > mentioned it, so let's create one if desired and we still need to > post > > > > major findings and summary on Apache mail list... > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Clebert Suconic < > > > > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> What about IRC. A lot of projects use it at Apache. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:51 PM Gang(Gary) Wang > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Yes, I'm working on preparing necessary resources for our > workgroup. > > > the > > > >> > progress is > > > >> > > > > >> > 1) Slack channel #Storage-class-memory - created > > > >> > 2) Invite project representatives and active contributors to this > > > Slack > > > >> > channel - not yet but soon later > > > >> > 3) Request a dedicated mail list for our workgroup - request sent > > > >> > 4) Request typical platform equipped with storage-class memory > > > resource > > > >> - > > > >> > trying but not guaranteed > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Clebert Suconic < > > > >> > clebert.suco...@gmail.com > > > >> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > I am also waiting the dev list to be created before we can have > a > > > >> > > discussion... > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Hitesh Shah > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > Hello Gary, > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Would it be better to create a mailing list for this workgroup > > (I > > > am > > > >> > > > guessing it is too early to be thinking about a new podling > for > > > >> this) > > > >> > > where > > > >> > > > any interested folks could subscribe to? > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > thanks > > > >> > > > -- Hitesh > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang < > > > ga...@apache.org > > > >> > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and > APIs > > > for > > > >> > > >> storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application, > > > >> please go > > > >> > > >> ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks! > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta < > > > ddu...@gmail.com > > > >> > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Would love to help out in any way including working towards > > > >> common > > > >> > > >> > benchmarks, APIs etc. > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > Debo > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > Sent from my iPhone > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang < > > > ga...@apache.org > > > >> > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > - Sharing idea and good practice > > > >> > > >> > > - Identifying common opportunities > > > >> > > >> > > - Promoting storage-class memory application > > > >> > > >> > > - Delivering solid solution > > > >> > > >> > > - Avoiding reinvent the wheel > > > >> > > >> > > - Integrating one another > > > >> > > >> > > - Coordinating the progress > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang < > > > >> > ga...@apache.org > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> Add ORC > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda > > > >> > > >> > >> - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney > > > >> > > >> > >> - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John > > > >> > > >> > >> - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi* > > > >> > > >> > >> - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley* > > > >> > > >> > >> - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary* > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory > > > >> oriented > > > >> > > >> > *Distributed > > > >> > > >> > >> Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, > > Distributed > > > >> Data > > > >> > > >> Store, > > > >> > > >> > >> Columnar
Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program
Hi Amit and Atri, The invitations have been sent to your mailbox, please accept to join our channel #storage-class-memory. thanks. Best, Gary. On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Atri Sharmawrote: > I would like to participate as well > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang wrote: > > Hi Avinash, Welcome to join us. please register in the-asf.slack.com and > > join our channel #storage-class-memory as well, Thanks! > > > > Best > > Gary. > > > > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Avinash Dongre > wrote: > > > >> I'd like to participate in this as well. > >> > >> Thanks > >> Avinash > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang > wrote: > >> > >> > looks I'm not able to invite you by email in Slack, so please > register on > >> > https://the-asf.slack.com and then join our channel > >> #storage-class-memory, > >> > Thanks! > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Yes, it is another great communication for real-time chat, Debo also > >> > > mentioned it, so let's create one if desired and we still need to > post > >> > > major findings and summary on Apache mail list... > >> > > > >> > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Clebert Suconic < > >> > > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> What about IRC. A lot of projects use it at Apache. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:51 PM Gang(Gary) Wang > >> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > Yes, I'm working on preparing necessary resources for our > workgroup. > >> > the > >> > >> > progress is > >> > >> > > >> > >> > 1) Slack channel #Storage-class-memory - created > >> > >> > 2) Invite project representatives and active contributors to this > >> > Slack > >> > >> > channel - not yet but soon later > >> > >> > 3) Request a dedicated mail list for our workgroup - request sent > >> > >> > 4) Request typical platform equipped with storage-class memory > >> > resource > >> > >> - > >> > >> > trying but not guaranteed > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Clebert Suconic < > >> > >> > clebert.suco...@gmail.com > >> > >> > > wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > I am also waiting the dev list to be created before we can > have a > >> > >> > > discussion... > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Hitesh Shah < > hit...@apache.org> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > > > Hello Gary, > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > Would it be better to create a mailing list for this > workgroup > >> (I > >> > am > >> > >> > > > guessing it is too early to be thinking about a new podling > for > >> > >> this) > >> > >> > > where > >> > >> > > > any interested folks could subscribe to? > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > thanks > >> > >> > > > -- Hitesh > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang < > >> > ga...@apache.org > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > wrote: > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > >> It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and > APIs > >> > for > >> > >> > > >> storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application, > >> > >> please go > >> > >> > > >> ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. > Thanks! > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta < > >> > ddu...@gmail.com > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > Would love to help out in any way including working > towards > >> > >> common > >> > >> > > >> > benchmarks, APIs etc. > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Debo > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Sent from my iPhone > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang < > >> > ga...@apache.org > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > > - Sharing idea and good practice > >> > >> > > >> > > - Identifying common opportunities > >> > >> > > >> > > - Promoting storage-class memory application > >> > >> > > >> > > - Delivering solid solution > >> > >> > > >> > > - Avoiding reinvent the wheel > >> > >> > > >> > > - Integrating one another > >> > >> > > >> > > - Coordinating the progress > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang < > >> > >> > ga...@apache.org > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > >> > wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> Add ORC > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda > >> > >> > > >> > >> - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney > >> > >> > > >> > >> - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John > >> > >> > > >> > >> - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi* > >> > >> > > >> > >> - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley* > >> > >> > > >> > >> -
Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program
Hi Avinash, Welcome to join us. please register in the-asf.slack.com and join our channel #storage-class-memory as well, Thanks! Best Gary. On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Avinash Dongrewrote: > I'd like to participate in this as well. > > Thanks > Avinash > > > On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang wrote: > > > looks I'm not able to invite you by email in Slack, so please register on > > https://the-asf.slack.com and then join our channel > #storage-class-memory, > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang > > wrote: > > > > > Yes, it is another great communication for real-time chat, Debo also > > > mentioned it, so let's create one if desired and we still need to post > > > major findings and summary on Apache mail list... > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Clebert Suconic < > > > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> What about IRC. A lot of projects use it at Apache. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:51 PM Gang(Gary) Wang > > wrote: > > >> > > >> > Yes, I'm working on preparing necessary resources for our workgroup. > > the > > >> > progress is > > >> > > > >> > 1) Slack channel #Storage-class-memory - created > > >> > 2) Invite project representatives and active contributors to this > > Slack > > >> > channel - not yet but soon later > > >> > 3) Request a dedicated mail list for our workgroup - request sent > > >> > 4) Request typical platform equipped with storage-class memory > > resource > > >> - > > >> > trying but not guaranteed > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Clebert Suconic < > > >> > clebert.suco...@gmail.com > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > I am also waiting the dev list to be created before we can have a > > >> > > discussion... > > >> > > > > >> > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Hitesh Shah > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > Hello Gary, > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Would it be better to create a mailing list for this workgroup > (I > > am > > >> > > > guessing it is too early to be thinking about a new podling for > > >> this) > > >> > > where > > >> > > > any interested folks could subscribe to? > > >> > > > > > >> > > > thanks > > >> > > > -- Hitesh > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang < > > ga...@apache.org > > >> > > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and APIs > > for > > >> > > >> storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application, > > >> please go > > >> > > >> ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks! > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta < > > ddu...@gmail.com > > >> > > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Would love to help out in any way including working towards > > >> common > > >> > > >> > benchmarks, APIs etc. > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Debo > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Sent from my iPhone > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang < > > ga...@apache.org > > >> > > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > - Sharing idea and good practice > > >> > > >> > > - Identifying common opportunities > > >> > > >> > > - Promoting storage-class memory application > > >> > > >> > > - Delivering solid solution > > >> > > >> > > - Avoiding reinvent the wheel > > >> > > >> > > - Integrating one another > > >> > > >> > > - Coordinating the progress > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang < > > >> > ga...@apache.org > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> Add ORC > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda > > >> > > >> > >> - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney > > >> > > >> > >> - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John > > >> > > >> > >> - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi* > > >> > > >> > >> - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley* > > >> > > >> > >> - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary* > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory > > >> oriented > > >> > > >> > *Distributed > > >> > > >> > >> Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, > Distributed > > >> Data > > >> > > >> Store, > > >> > > >> > >> Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable > Computing > > >> > Model* > > >> > > for > > >> > > >> > >> new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data > > >> querying, > > >> > > >> > >> processing, and analytics. > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen O'Malley < > > >> > > >> owen.omal...@gmail.com> > > >> > > >> > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >>> I can
Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program
I'd like to participate in this as well. Thanks Avinash On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Gang(Gary) Wangwrote: > looks I'm not able to invite you by email in Slack, so please register on > https://the-asf.slack.com and then join our channel #storage-class-memory, > Thanks! > > > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang > wrote: > > > Yes, it is another great communication for real-time chat, Debo also > > mentioned it, so let's create one if desired and we still need to post > > major findings and summary on Apache mail list... > > > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Clebert Suconic < > > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> What about IRC. A lot of projects use it at Apache. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:51 PM Gang(Gary) Wang > wrote: > >> > >> > Yes, I'm working on preparing necessary resources for our workgroup. > the > >> > progress is > >> > > >> > 1) Slack channel #Storage-class-memory - created > >> > 2) Invite project representatives and active contributors to this > Slack > >> > channel - not yet but soon later > >> > 3) Request a dedicated mail list for our workgroup - request sent > >> > 4) Request typical platform equipped with storage-class memory > resource > >> - > >> > trying but not guaranteed > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Clebert Suconic < > >> > clebert.suco...@gmail.com > >> > > wrote: > >> > > >> > > I am also waiting the dev list to be created before we can have a > >> > > discussion... > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Hitesh Shah > >> wrote: > >> > > > Hello Gary, > >> > > > > >> > > > Would it be better to create a mailing list for this workgroup (I > am > >> > > > guessing it is too early to be thinking about a new podling for > >> this) > >> > > where > >> > > > any interested folks could subscribe to? > >> > > > > >> > > > thanks > >> > > > -- Hitesh > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang < > ga...@apache.org > >> > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > >> It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and APIs > for > >> > > >> storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application, > >> please go > >> > > >> ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks! > >> > > >> > >> > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta < > ddu...@gmail.com > >> > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Would love to help out in any way including working towards > >> common > >> > > >> > benchmarks, APIs etc. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Debo > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Sent from my iPhone > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang < > ga...@apache.org > >> > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > - Sharing idea and good practice > >> > > >> > > - Identifying common opportunities > >> > > >> > > - Promoting storage-class memory application > >> > > >> > > - Delivering solid solution > >> > > >> > > - Avoiding reinvent the wheel > >> > > >> > > - Integrating one another > >> > > >> > > - Coordinating the progress > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang < > >> > ga...@apache.org > >> > > > > >> > > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> Add ORC > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda > >> > > >> > >> - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney > >> > > >> > >> - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John > >> > > >> > >> - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi* > >> > > >> > >> - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley* > >> > > >> > >> - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary* > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory > >> oriented > >> > > >> > *Distributed > >> > > >> > >> Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed > >> Data > >> > > >> Store, > >> > > >> > >> Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing > >> > Model* > >> > > for > >> > > >> > >> new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data > >> querying, > >> > > >> > >> processing, and analytics. > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen O'Malley < > >> > > >> owen.omal...@gmail.com> > >> > > >> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >>> I can represent ORC within the group. > >> > > >> > >>> > >> > > >> > >>> .. Owen > >> > > >> > >>> > >> > > >> > On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang < > >> > ga...@apache.org> > >> > > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > We can expect more and more projects will take the huge > >> > potential > >> > > >> > advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and > >> > > analytics > >> > > >> > because silicon companies are
Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program
looks I'm not able to invite you by email in Slack, so please register on https://the-asf.slack.com and then join our channel #storage-class-memory, Thanks! On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Gang(Gary) Wangwrote: > Yes, it is another great communication for real-time chat, Debo also > mentioned it, so let's create one if desired and we still need to post > major findings and summary on Apache mail list... > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Clebert Suconic < > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> What about IRC. A lot of projects use it at Apache. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:51 PM Gang(Gary) Wang wrote: >> >> > Yes, I'm working on preparing necessary resources for our workgroup. the >> > progress is >> > >> > 1) Slack channel #Storage-class-memory - created >> > 2) Invite project representatives and active contributors to this Slack >> > channel - not yet but soon later >> > 3) Request a dedicated mail list for our workgroup - request sent >> > 4) Request typical platform equipped with storage-class memory resource >> - >> > trying but not guaranteed >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Clebert Suconic < >> > clebert.suco...@gmail.com >> > > wrote: >> > >> > > I am also waiting the dev list to be created before we can have a >> > > discussion... >> > > >> > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Hitesh Shah >> wrote: >> > > > Hello Gary, >> > > > >> > > > Would it be better to create a mailing list for this workgroup (I am >> > > > guessing it is too early to be thinking about a new podling for >> this) >> > > where >> > > > any interested folks could subscribe to? >> > > > >> > > > thanks >> > > > -- Hitesh >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang > > >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and APIs for >> > > >> storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application, >> please go >> > > >> ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks! >> > > >> >> > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta > > >> > > wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >> > Would love to help out in any way including working towards >> common >> > > >> > benchmarks, APIs etc. >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Debo >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Sent from my iPhone >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang > > >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > - Sharing idea and good practice >> > > >> > > - Identifying common opportunities >> > > >> > > - Promoting storage-class memory application >> > > >> > > - Delivering solid solution >> > > >> > > - Avoiding reinvent the wheel >> > > >> > > - Integrating one another >> > > >> > > - Coordinating the progress >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang < >> > ga...@apache.org >> > > > >> > > >> > wrote: >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> Add ORC >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda >> > > >> > >> - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney >> > > >> > >> - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John >> > > >> > >> - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi* >> > > >> > >> - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley* >> > > >> > >> - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary* >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory >> oriented >> > > >> > *Distributed >> > > >> > >> Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed >> Data >> > > >> Store, >> > > >> > >> Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing >> > Model* >> > > for >> > > >> > >> new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data >> querying, >> > > >> > >> processing, and analytics. >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen O'Malley < >> > > >> owen.omal...@gmail.com> >> > > >> > >> wrote: >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >>> I can represent ORC within the group. >> > > >> > >>> >> > > >> > >>> .. Owen >> > > >> > >>> >> > > >> > On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang < >> > ga...@apache.org> >> > > >> > wrote: >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Hi all, >> > > >> > >> > > >> > We can expect more and more projects will take the huge >> > potential >> > > >> > advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and >> > > analytics >> > > >> > because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity >> > > >> > non-volatile >> > > >> > memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will >> > > fundamentally >> > > >> > >>> change >> > > >> > the way to construct high performance applications similar >> to >> > > what >> > > >> > >>> happened >> > > >> > when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. >> so if >> > > >> > >>> possible, I >> > > >> > advocate
Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program
Yes, it is another great communication for real-time chat, Debo also mentioned it, so let's create one if desired and we still need to post major findings and summary on Apache mail list... On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Clebert Suconicwrote: > What about IRC. A lot of projects use it at Apache. > > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:51 PM Gang(Gary) Wang wrote: > > > Yes, I'm working on preparing necessary resources for our workgroup. the > > progress is > > > > 1) Slack channel #Storage-class-memory - created > > 2) Invite project representatives and active contributors to this Slack > > channel - not yet but soon later > > 3) Request a dedicated mail list for our workgroup - request sent > > 4) Request typical platform equipped with storage-class memory resource - > > trying but not guaranteed > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Clebert Suconic < > > clebert.suco...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > > > I am also waiting the dev list to be created before we can have a > > > discussion... > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Hitesh Shah > wrote: > > > > Hello Gary, > > > > > > > > Would it be better to create a mailing list for this workgroup (I am > > > > guessing it is too early to be thinking about a new podling for this) > > > where > > > > any interested folks could subscribe to? > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > -- Hitesh > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and APIs for > > > >> storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application, please > go > > > >> ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks! > > > >> > > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Would love to help out in any way including working towards common > > > >> > benchmarks, APIs etc. > > > >> > > > > >> > Debo > > > >> > > > > >> > Sent from my iPhone > > > >> > > > > >> > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup > > > >> > > > > > >> > > - Sharing idea and good practice > > > >> > > - Identifying common opportunities > > > >> > > - Promoting storage-class memory application > > > >> > > - Delivering solid solution > > > >> > > - Avoiding reinvent the wheel > > > >> > > - Integrating one another > > > >> > > - Coordinating the progress > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang < > > ga...@apache.org > > > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> Add ORC > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda > > > >> > >> - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney > > > >> > >> - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John > > > >> > >> - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi* > > > >> > >> - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley* > > > >> > >> - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary* > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory > oriented > > > >> > *Distributed > > > >> > >> Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed > Data > > > >> Store, > > > >> > >> Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing > > Model* > > > for > > > >> > >> new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data > querying, > > > >> > >> processing, and analytics. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen O'Malley < > > > >> owen.omal...@gmail.com> > > > >> > >> wrote: > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >>> I can represent ORC within the group. > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> .. Owen > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang < > > ga...@apache.org> > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > Hi all, > > > >> > > > > >> > We can expect more and more projects will take the huge > > potential > > > >> > advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and > > > analytics > > > >> > because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity > > > >> > non-volatile > > > >> > memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will > > > fundamentally > > > >> > >>> change > > > >> > the way to construct high performance applications similar to > > > what > > > >> > >>> happened > > > >> > when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so > if > > > >> > >>> possible, I > > > >> > advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the > > > >> > >>> collaboration > > > >> > and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class > > > memory > > > >> > technology-oriented projects. > > > >> > > > > >> > Best. > > > >> > Gary. > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program
Add *ActiveMQ and Geode* - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi* - *Hive/LLAP *represented by *Gopal Vijayaraghavan* - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley* - *RocketMQ *represented by *Von Gosling* - *ActiveMQ *represented by *Clebert Suconic* - *Geode *represented by *Swapnil Bawaskar* - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary* With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory oriented *Distributed Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed Data Store, Columnar Storage, **Live Long And Process, Distributed Messaging and Streaming, High Performance Data Management, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing Model* for new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data querying, processing, and analytics. On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar < swapnil.bawas...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would be happy to represent Apache Geode. > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta)> wrote: > > > BTW should we name this group “Apache Durable Computing Initiative”? > > > > debo > > > > On 10/24/17, 11:18 AM, "Debo Dutta (dedutta)" wrote: > > > > Yes, the moment we have the workgroup mailer setup, will send out a > > DISCUSS thread. > > > > debo > > > > On 10/24/17, 10:14 AM, "Gang(Gary) Wang" wrote: > > > > It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and APIs > for > > storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application, > > please go > > ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks! > > > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta < > ddu...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Would love to help out in any way including working towards > > common > > > benchmarks, APIs etc. > > > > > > Debo > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang < > ga...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup > > > > > > > > - Sharing idea and good practice > > > > - Identifying common opportunities > > > > - Promoting storage-class memory application > > > > - Delivering solid solution > > > > - Avoiding reinvent the wheel > > > > - Integrating one another > > > > - Coordinating the progress > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang < > > ga...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Add ORC > > > >> > > > >> - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda > > > >> - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney > > > >> - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John > > > >> - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi* > > > >> - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley* > > > >> - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary* > > > >> > > > >> With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory > > oriented > > > *Distributed > > > >> Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed > > Data Store, > > > >> Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing > > Model* for > > > >> new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data > > querying, > > > >> processing, and analytics. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen O'Malley < > > owen.omal...@gmail.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> I can represent ORC within the group. > > > >>> > > > >>> .. Owen > > > >>> > > > On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang < > > ga...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > We can expect more and more projects will take the huge > > potential > > > advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and > > analytics > > > because silicon companies are able to produce high > capacity > > > non-volatile > > > memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will > > fundamentally > > > >>> change > > > the way to construct high performance applications similar > > to what > > > >>> happened > > > when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. > > so if > > > >>> possible, I > > > advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance > the > > > >>> collaboration > > > and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for > storage-class > > memory > > > technology-oriented projects. > > > > > > Best. > > > Gary.
Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program
I didn’t know I could represent a project. In that case I’m representing ActiveMQ. On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:33 AM Von Goslingwrote: > I'm happy to represent Apache RocketMQ on this storage collaboration > effort. This is a very key in low latency messaging. > > Best Regards, > Von Gosling > > > > > 在 2017年10月20日,02:55,Gang(Gary) Wang 写道: > > > > Hi all, > > > > We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential > > advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics > > because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity non-volatile > > memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally > change > > the way to construct high performance applications similar to what > happened > > when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if > possible, I > > advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the > collaboration > > and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory > > technology-oriented projects. > > > > Best. > > Gary. > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Clebert Suconic
Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program
Add *Hive/LLAP and RocketMQ* - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi* - *Hive/LLAP *represented by *Gopal Vijayaraghavan* - *RocketMQ *represented by *Von Gosling* - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley* - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary* With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory oriented *Distributed Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed Data Store, Columnar Storage, **Live Long And Process, Distributed Messaging and Streaming, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing Model* for new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data querying, processing, and analytics. On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 9:32 PM, Von Goslingwrote: > I'm happy to represent Apache RocketMQ on this storage collaboration > effort. This is a very key in low latency messaging. > > Best Regards, > Von Gosling > > > > > 在 2017年10月20日,02:55,Gang(Gary) Wang 写道: > > > > Hi all, > > > > We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential > > advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics > > because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity non-volatile > > memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally > change > > the way to construct high performance applications similar to what > happened > > when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if > possible, I > > advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the > collaboration > > and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory > > technology-oriented projects. > > > > Best. > > Gary. > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program
I'm happy to represent Apache RocketMQ on this storage collaboration effort. This is a very key in low latency messaging. Best Regards, Von Gosling > 在 2017年10月20日,02:55,Gang(Gary) Wang写道: > > Hi all, > > We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential > advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics > because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity non-volatile > memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally change > the way to construct high performance applications similar to what happened > when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if possible, I > advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the collaboration > and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory > technology-oriented projects. > > Best. > Gary.
Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program
Would love to help out in any way including working towards common benchmarks, APIs etc. Debo Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wangwrote: > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup > > - Sharing idea and good practice > - Identifying common opportunities > - Promoting storage-class memory application > - Delivering solid solution > - Avoiding reinvent the wheel > - Integrating one another > - Coordinating the progress > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang wrote: >> >> Add ORC >> >> - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda >> - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney >> - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John >> - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi* >> - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley* >> - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary* >> >> With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory oriented >> *Distributed >> Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed Data Store, >> Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing Model* for >> new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data querying, >> processing, and analytics. >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen O'Malley >> wrote: >> >>> I can represent ORC within the group. >>> >>> .. Owen >>> On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang wrote: Hi all, We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity non-volatile memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally >>> change the way to construct high performance applications similar to what >>> happened when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if >>> possible, I advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the >>> collaboration and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory technology-oriented projects. Best. Gary. >>> >>> >>
Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program
Add ORC - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi* - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley* - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary* With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory oriented *Distributed Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed Data Store, Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing Model* for new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data querying, processing, and analytics. On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen O'Malleywrote: > I can represent ORC within the group. > > .. Owen > > > On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential > > advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics > > because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity non-volatile > > memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally > change > > the way to construct high performance applications similar to what > happened > > when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if > possible, I > > advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the > collaboration > > and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory > > technology-oriented projects. > > > > Best. > > Gary. > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program
I can represent ORC within the group. .. Owen > On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wangwrote: > > Hi all, > > We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential > advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics > because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity non-volatile > memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally change > the way to construct high performance applications similar to what happened > when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if possible, I > advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the collaboration > and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory > technology-oriented projects. > > Best. > Gary.
Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program
It is wonderful, as of now, we have the following projects and their communities. - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary* With above projects, we can cover Storage-class memory oriented Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Durable Object Model, Durable Computing Model for new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data querying, processing, and analytics. On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Atri Sharmawrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Anoop John > wrote: > > +1..Am there to represent Apache HBase. > > > > -Anoop- > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Wes McKinney > wrote: > >> I'm happy to represent Apache Arrow on this. This is very much in line > >> with our focus on zero-copy / memory-mapped data access of structured > >> data sets and cache-efficient memory layout. > >> > >> - Wes > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Debojyoti Dutta > wrote: > >>> This is a great idea. Storage class memory will have a big impact on > many of the Apache projects. > >>> > >>> Debo > >>> > >>> Sent from my iPhone > >>> > On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang > wrote: > > Hi all, > > We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential > advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics > because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity > non-volatile > memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally > change > the way to construct high performance applications similar to what > happened > when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if > possible, I > advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the > collaboration > and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory > technology-oriented projects. > > Best. > Gary. > >>> > >>> - > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >>> > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >> > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > -- > Regards, > > Atri > l'apprenant > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program
Interested. I agree with Gary. Great to see the collaboration effort. On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Anoop Johnwrote: > +1..Am there to represent Apache HBase. > > -Anoop- > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Wes McKinney wrote: >> I'm happy to represent Apache Arrow on this. This is very much in line >> with our focus on zero-copy / memory-mapped data access of structured >> data sets and cache-efficient memory layout. >> >> - Wes >> >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Debojyoti Dutta wrote: >>> This is a great idea. Storage class memory will have a big impact on many >>> of the Apache projects. >>> >>> Debo >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang wrote: Hi all, We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity non-volatile memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally change the way to construct high performance applications similar to what happened when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if possible, I advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the collaboration and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory technology-oriented projects. Best. Gary. >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>
Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program
+1..Am there to represent Apache HBase. -Anoop- On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Wes McKinneywrote: > I'm happy to represent Apache Arrow on this. This is very much in line > with our focus on zero-copy / memory-mapped data access of structured > data sets and cache-efficient memory layout. > > - Wes > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Debojyoti Dutta wrote: >> This is a great idea. Storage class memory will have a big impact on many of >> the Apache projects. >> >> Debo >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential >>> advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics >>> because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity non-volatile >>> memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally change >>> the way to construct high performance applications similar to what happened >>> when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if possible, I >>> advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the collaboration >>> and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory >>> technology-oriented projects. >>> >>> Best. >>> Gary. >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >
Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program
I'm happy to represent Apache Arrow on this. This is very much in line with our focus on zero-copy / memory-mapped data access of structured data sets and cache-efficient memory layout. - Wes On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Debojyoti Duttawrote: > This is a great idea. Storage class memory will have a big impact on many of > the Apache projects. > > Debo > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential >> advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics >> because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity non-volatile >> memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally change >> the way to construct high performance applications similar to what happened >> when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if possible, I >> advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the collaboration >> and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory >> technology-oriented projects. >> >> Best. >> Gary. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >
Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program
Hi Gary, I’m ready to represent Apache Ignite [1] community within the group. Some of our community folks have already benchmarked Intel Optane (3D XP) and there are plans to integrate with this technology natively. [1] https://ignite.apache.org — Denis > On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wangwrote: > > Hi all, > > We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential > advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics > because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity non-volatile > memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally change > the way to construct high performance applications similar to what happened > when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if possible, I > advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the collaboration > and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory > technology-oriented projects. > > Best. > Gary.