Re: [JSF2] absolute-ordering warning
HEy Christian, I will take a look. I think I have not seen this issue w/ Trinidad, which has a similar entry: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/trinidad-impl/src/main/conf/META-INF/faces-config-base.xml -M On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Christian Kaltepoth christ...@kaltepoth.de wrote: Hello, I'm committer on the PrettyFaces project and we are currently preparing our next release. While testing the release in different environments I discovered that MyFaces 2.0.1 prints a warning to the console: WARNING: absolute-ordering element found in application configuration resource prettyfaces. This description will be ignored and the actions described in ordering elements will be taken into account instead. The weird thing about this is that we DON'T use absolute-ordering in our faces-config.xml at all. Our ordering configuration looks like this: ordering before others/ /before /ordering See: https://prettyfaces.googlecode.com/svn/prettyfaces/trunk/impl-jsf2/src/main/resources/META-INF/faces-config.xml I looked at the MyFaces code and found the code emitting this warning: http://myfaces.apache.org/core20/myfaces-impl/xref/org/apache/myfaces/config/FacesConfigurator.html#982 We discussed this issue on the prettyfaces-dev list. We think that it is a bug in MyFaces. http://groups.google.com/group/prettyfaces-dev/msg/da44e1e6660887c6 What do you think? Is it a bug? Christian -- Christian Kaltepoth Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [JSF2] absolute-ordering warning
Hey Matthias, thank you very much. You can use this sample app to reproduce this issue: http://github.com/chkal/prettyfaces-tests Just checkout the jsf2 branch and run via mvn tomcat:run-war and you will see the warning. Christian 2010/9/2 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org: HEy Christian, I will take a look. I think I have not seen this issue w/ Trinidad, which has a similar entry: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/trinidad-impl/src/main/conf/META-INF/faces-config-base.xml -M On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Christian Kaltepoth christ...@kaltepoth.de wrote: Hello, I'm committer on the PrettyFaces project and we are currently preparing our next release. While testing the release in different environments I discovered that MyFaces 2.0.1 prints a warning to the console: WARNING: absolute-ordering element found in application configuration resource prettyfaces. This description will be ignored and the actions described in ordering elements will be taken into account instead. The weird thing about this is that we DON'T use absolute-ordering in our faces-config.xml at all. Our ordering configuration looks like this: ordering before others/ /before /ordering See: https://prettyfaces.googlecode.com/svn/prettyfaces/trunk/impl-jsf2/src/main/resources/META-INF/faces-config.xml I looked at the MyFaces code and found the code emitting this warning: http://myfaces.apache.org/core20/myfaces-impl/xref/org/apache/myfaces/config/FacesConfigurator.html#982 We discussed this issue on the prettyfaces-dev list. We think that it is a bug in MyFaces. http://groups.google.com/group/prettyfaces-dev/msg/da44e1e6660887c6 What do you think? Is it a bug? Christian -- Christian Kaltepoth Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Christian Kaltepoth Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
Re: [JSF2] absolute-ordering warning
I think I need new glasses... WARNING: absolute-ordering element found in application configuration resource trinidad. This description will be ignored and the actions described in ordering elements will be taken into account instead. -M On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Christian Kaltepoth christ...@kaltepoth.de wrote: Hey Matthias, thank you very much. You can use this sample app to reproduce this issue: http://github.com/chkal/prettyfaces-tests Just checkout the jsf2 branch and run via mvn tomcat:run-war and you will see the warning. Christian 2010/9/2 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org: HEy Christian, I will take a look. I think I have not seen this issue w/ Trinidad, which has a similar entry: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/trinidad-impl/src/main/conf/META-INF/faces-config-base.xml -M On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Christian Kaltepoth christ...@kaltepoth.de wrote: Hello, I'm committer on the PrettyFaces project and we are currently preparing our next release. While testing the release in different environments I discovered that MyFaces 2.0.1 prints a warning to the console: WARNING: absolute-ordering element found in application configuration resource prettyfaces. This description will be ignored and the actions described in ordering elements will be taken into account instead. The weird thing about this is that we DON'T use absolute-ordering in our faces-config.xml at all. Our ordering configuration looks like this: ordering before others/ /before /ordering See: https://prettyfaces.googlecode.com/svn/prettyfaces/trunk/impl-jsf2/src/main/resources/META-INF/faces-config.xml I looked at the MyFaces code and found the code emitting this warning: http://myfaces.apache.org/core20/myfaces-impl/xref/org/apache/myfaces/config/FacesConfigurator.html#982 We discussed this issue on the prettyfaces-dev list. We think that it is a bug in MyFaces. http://groups.google.com/group/prettyfaces-dev/msg/da44e1e6660887c6 What do you think? Is it a bug? Christian -- Christian Kaltepoth Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Christian Kaltepoth Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [JSF2] absolute-ordering warning
Should be easy fix -M On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: I think I need new glasses... WARNING: absolute-ordering element found in application configuration resource trinidad. This description will be ignored and the actions described in ordering elements will be taken into account instead. -M On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Christian Kaltepoth christ...@kaltepoth.de wrote: Hey Matthias, thank you very much. You can use this sample app to reproduce this issue: http://github.com/chkal/prettyfaces-tests Just checkout the jsf2 branch and run via mvn tomcat:run-war and you will see the warning. Christian 2010/9/2 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org: HEy Christian, I will take a look. I think I have not seen this issue w/ Trinidad, which has a similar entry: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/trinidad-impl/src/main/conf/META-INF/faces-config-base.xml -M On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Christian Kaltepoth christ...@kaltepoth.de wrote: Hello, I'm committer on the PrettyFaces project and we are currently preparing our next release. While testing the release in different environments I discovered that MyFaces 2.0.1 prints a warning to the console: WARNING: absolute-ordering element found in application configuration resource prettyfaces. This description will be ignored and the actions described in ordering elements will be taken into account instead. The weird thing about this is that we DON'T use absolute-ordering in our faces-config.xml at all. Our ordering configuration looks like this: ordering before others/ /before /ordering See: https://prettyfaces.googlecode.com/svn/prettyfaces/trunk/impl-jsf2/src/main/resources/META-INF/faces-config.xml I looked at the MyFaces code and found the code emitting this warning: http://myfaces.apache.org/core20/myfaces-impl/xref/org/apache/myfaces/config/FacesConfigurator.html#982 We discussed this issue on the prettyfaces-dev list. We think that it is a bug in MyFaces. http://groups.google.com/group/prettyfaces-dev/msg/da44e1e6660887c6 What do you think? Is it a bug? Christian -- Christian Kaltepoth Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Christian Kaltepoth Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [JSF2] absolute-ordering warning
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2905 On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: Should be easy fix -M On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: I think I need new glasses... WARNING: absolute-ordering element found in application configuration resource trinidad. This description will be ignored and the actions described in ordering elements will be taken into account instead. -M On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Christian Kaltepoth christ...@kaltepoth.de wrote: Hey Matthias, thank you very much. You can use this sample app to reproduce this issue: http://github.com/chkal/prettyfaces-tests Just checkout the jsf2 branch and run via mvn tomcat:run-war and you will see the warning. Christian 2010/9/2 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org: HEy Christian, I will take a look. I think I have not seen this issue w/ Trinidad, which has a similar entry: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/trinidad-impl/src/main/conf/META-INF/faces-config-base.xml -M On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Christian Kaltepoth christ...@kaltepoth.de wrote: Hello, I'm committer on the PrettyFaces project and we are currently preparing our next release. While testing the release in different environments I discovered that MyFaces 2.0.1 prints a warning to the console: WARNING: absolute-ordering element found in application configuration resource prettyfaces. This description will be ignored and the actions described in ordering elements will be taken into account instead. The weird thing about this is that we DON'T use absolute-ordering in our faces-config.xml at all. Our ordering configuration looks like this: ordering before others/ /before /ordering See: https://prettyfaces.googlecode.com/svn/prettyfaces/trunk/impl-jsf2/src/main/resources/META-INF/faces-config.xml I looked at the MyFaces code and found the code emitting this warning: http://myfaces.apache.org/core20/myfaces-impl/xref/org/apache/myfaces/config/FacesConfigurator.html#982 We discussed this issue on the prettyfaces-dev list. We think that it is a bug in MyFaces. http://groups.google.com/group/prettyfaces-dev/msg/da44e1e6660887c6 What do you think? Is it a bug? Christian -- Christian Kaltepoth Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Christian Kaltepoth Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [JSF2] absolute-ordering warning
Thank you very much! :-) Christian 2010/9/2 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2905 On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: Should be easy fix -M On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: I think I need new glasses... WARNING: absolute-ordering element found in application configuration resource trinidad. This description will be ignored and the actions described in ordering elements will be taken into account instead. -M On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Christian Kaltepoth christ...@kaltepoth.de wrote: Hey Matthias, thank you very much. You can use this sample app to reproduce this issue: http://github.com/chkal/prettyfaces-tests Just checkout the jsf2 branch and run via mvn tomcat:run-war and you will see the warning. Christian 2010/9/2 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org: HEy Christian, I will take a look. I think I have not seen this issue w/ Trinidad, which has a similar entry: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/trinidad-impl/src/main/conf/META-INF/faces-config-base.xml -M On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Christian Kaltepoth christ...@kaltepoth.de wrote: Hello, I'm committer on the PrettyFaces project and we are currently preparing our next release. While testing the release in different environments I discovered that MyFaces 2.0.1 prints a warning to the console: WARNING: absolute-ordering element found in application configuration resource prettyfaces. This description will be ignored and the actions described in ordering elements will be taken into account instead. The weird thing about this is that we DON'T use absolute-ordering in our faces-config.xml at all. Our ordering configuration looks like this: ordering before others/ /before /ordering See: https://prettyfaces.googlecode.com/svn/prettyfaces/trunk/impl-jsf2/src/main/resources/META-INF/faces-config.xml I looked at the MyFaces code and found the code emitting this warning: http://myfaces.apache.org/core20/myfaces-impl/xref/org/apache/myfaces/config/FacesConfigurator.html#982 We discussed this issue on the prettyfaces-dev list. We think that it is a bug in MyFaces. http://groups.google.com/group/prettyfaces-dev/msg/da44e1e6660887c6 What do you think? Is it a bug? Christian -- Christian Kaltepoth Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Christian Kaltepoth Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Christian Kaltepoth Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
