date:20171113

Re: Small application for demoing the platform?

2017-11-13 Thread Antonio


We could also add a "landing page" in this demo application with links to:

- Platform APIs.
- Platform tutorials.
- Introduction to the mailing lists.
- A "module browser", with a list of modules by name and what they do.
- Guidelines for NetBeans contributors (we should create a NetBeans 
developer guidelines as well).

- What else?

Thanks,
Antonio


El 14/11/17 a las 01:32, Geertjan Wielenga escribió:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/rest/api/2/search?jql=project=netbeans

Gj

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:


And maybe not just Apache NetBeans JIRA, but all of the Apache JIRA, i.e.,
for all Apache projects, so that we end up with something generically
useful for all of Apache... while at the same time being as simple and
light as possible.

Gj

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 at 23:17, Antonio Vieiro  wrote:


Well, that’s a great and useful idea!


El 14 nov 2017, a las 0:05, Geertjan Wielenga <

geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> escribió:


Good plan.

Maybe something that parses, e.g., our JIRA into a node hierarchy with

a tc

for displaying basic details...

Gj


On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 at 23:00, Antonio  wrote:

Hi all,

Would it be a good idea to have a small application to demonstrate the
capabilities of the platform? Maybe with some OSGI modules and some
editing capabilities?

If so, any ideas on what this application should do?

Thanks,
Antonio

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt

2017-11-13 Thread Emilian Bold

+1

--emi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt

2017-11-13 Thread Michael Müller

+1

Am 13. November 2017 23:01:57 MEZ schrieb Geertjan Wielenga 
:
>Hi all,
>
>Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If
>this
>voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
>gene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can
>release
>this version.
>
>Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) constitutes the modules of
>Apache
>NetBeans that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is,
>the
>NetBeans Platform.
>
>Build artifacts available here:
>
>https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
>incubator-netbeans-release/
>
>The artifact to be voted on:
>
>https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/79/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
>
>MD5: 85891881d48ffd9037ad731594488227
>
>Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
>
>https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
>incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
>rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt
>
>Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll
>see
>the NetBeans Platform:
>
>https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/79/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-bin-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
>
>MD5: cd73c738a321dd3c55fcfef49429e0e2
>
>Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and
>NOTICE
>files.
>
>Notable changes based on comments in the previous vote thread:
>-no IDE launchers (bin/netbeans), this is only the platform
>-jsearch.jar (GPLv2-CPE) removed from the binary (and the source
>dependency)
>-tests enhanced to fail on non-optional/non-compile-time/non-CPE GPL
>dependency
>-basic readmes on both source and binary builds
>-for CDDL+GPL dual licensed libraries, changed the licenses to CDDL
>-source builds have the cluster.config set to the value used to produce
>the
>zip, so that there is no need to provide command line parameters, i.e.,
>simply run 'ant'
>
>Please try out the package and vote!
>
>The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary
>number of
>votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>
>[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
>[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
>[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
>Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
>NetBeans committer, i.e., your name is on this page:
>https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal
>
>Geertjan
>on behalf of the Apache NetBeans team



Herzliche Grüße - Best Regards, 

Michael Müller
Brühl, Germany
blog.mueller-bruehl.de
it-rezension.de
@muellermi


Read my books
  "Web Development with Java and JSF": https://leanpub.com/jsf
  "Java Lambdas and Parallel Streams": 
http://www.apress.com/de/book/9781484224861
  "Visitors" a photographic image book: https://leanpub.com/visitors

Re: Small application for demoing the platform?

2017-11-13 Thread Geertjan Wielenga

https://issues.apache.org/jira/rest/api/2/search?jql=project=netbeans

Gj

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> And maybe not just Apache NetBeans JIRA, but all of the Apache JIRA, i.e.,
> for all Apache projects, so that we end up with something generically
> useful for all of Apache... while at the same time being as simple and
> light as possible.
>
> Gj
>
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 at 23:17, Antonio Vieiro  wrote:
>
>> Well, that’s a great and useful idea!
>>
>> > El 14 nov 2017, a las 0:05, Geertjan Wielenga <
>> geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> escribió:
>> >
>> > Good plan.
>> >
>> > Maybe something that parses, e.g., our JIRA into a node hierarchy with
>> a tc
>> > for displaying basic details...
>> >
>> > Gj
>> >
>> >> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 at 23:00, Antonio  wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> Would it be a good idea to have a small application to demonstrate the
>> >> capabilities of the platform? Maybe with some OSGI modules and some
>> >> editing capabilities?
>> >>
>> >> If so, any ideas on what this application should do?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Antonio
>> >>
>>
>

Re: Small application for demoing the platform?

2017-11-13 Thread Geertjan Wielenga

And maybe not just Apache NetBeans JIRA, but all of the Apache JIRA, i.e.,
for all Apache projects, so that we end up with something generically
useful for all of Apache... while at the same time being as simple and
light as possible.

Gj

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 at 23:17, Antonio Vieiro  wrote:

> Well, that’s a great and useful idea!
>
> > El 14 nov 2017, a las 0:05, Geertjan Wielenga <
> geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> escribió:
> >
> > Good plan.
> >
> > Maybe something that parses, e.g., our JIRA into a node hierarchy with a
> tc
> > for displaying basic details...
> >
> > Gj
> >
> >> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 at 23:00, Antonio  wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Would it be a good idea to have a small application to demonstrate the
> >> capabilities of the platform? Maybe with some OSGI modules and some
> >> editing capabilities?
> >>
> >> If so, any ideas on what this application should do?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Antonio
> >>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt

2017-11-13 Thread Ludovic HOCHET

+1
built from source
then ant tryme
then confirmed with the test project from Antonio

On 13 November 2017 at 23:34, Antonio  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm attaching a very small 2Kb example NetBeans project that uses the
> platform for running.
>
> Instructions:
> a) Unzip the platform at X somewhere.
> b) Open the NetBeans IDE and choose Tools/NetBeans Platforms. Add the
> platform at 'X' to the list of platforms.
> c) Unzip the TEST.tgz attached project somewhere.
> d) Open the TEST project in the NetBeans IDE, choose project/properties, and
> set the platform to "nbdev" (aka NetBeans 9 Alpha).
> e) Run the TEST project.
> f) A new application should launch.
>
> Let me know if you have any issues.
>
> Cheers,
> Antonio
>
>
>
> El 13/11/17 a las 23:17, John McDonnell escribió:
>
>>> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
>>> the NetBeans Platform:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/79/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-bin-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
>>
>>
>>
>> How does one "run" the platform?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> John
>>
>



-- 
Ludovic
-

"Les formes qui differencient les etres importent peu
 si leur pensees s'unissent pour batir un univers..."
 Yoko Tsuno (in 'Les titans' by Roger Leloup)
 [The shapes that differenciate beings are not important
 if their thoughts unite to build a universe]

Re: Small application for demoing the platform?

2017-11-13 Thread Antonio Vieiro

Well, that’s a great and useful idea!

> El 14 nov 2017, a las 0:05, Geertjan Wielenga 
>  escribió:
> 
> Good plan.
> 
> Maybe something that parses, e.g., our JIRA into a node hierarchy with a tc
> for displaying basic details...
> 
> Gj
> 
>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 at 23:00, Antonio  wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Would it be a good idea to have a small application to demonstrate the
>> capabilities of the platform? Maybe with some OSGI modules and some
>> editing capabilities?
>> 
>> If so, any ideas on what this application should do?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Antonio
>>

Re: Small application for demoing the platform?

2017-11-13 Thread Geertjan Wielenga

Good plan.

Maybe something that parses, e.g., our JIRA into a node hierarchy with a tc
for displaying basic details...

Gj

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 at 23:00, Antonio  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Would it be a good idea to have a small application to demonstrate the
> capabilities of the platform? Maybe with some OSGI modules and some
> editing capabilities?
>
> If so, any ideas on what this application should do?
>
> Thanks,
> Antonio
>

Small application for demoing the platform?

2017-11-13 Thread Antonio


Hi all,

Would it be a good idea to have a small application to demonstrate the 
capabilities of the platform? Maybe with some OSGI modules and some 
editing capabilities?


If so, any ideas on what this application should do?

Thanks,
Antonio

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt

2017-11-13 Thread Antonio


Hi,

I'm attaching a very small 2Kb example NetBeans project that uses the 
platform for running.


Instructions:
a) Unzip the platform at X somewhere.
b) Open the NetBeans IDE and choose Tools/NetBeans Platforms. Add the 
platform at 'X' to the list of platforms.

c) Unzip the TEST.tgz attached project somewhere.
d) Open the TEST project in the NetBeans IDE, choose project/properties, 
and set the platform to "nbdev" (aka NetBeans 9 Alpha).

e) Run the TEST project.
f) A new application should launch.

Let me know if you have any issues.

Cheers,
Antonio



El 13/11/17 a las 23:17, John McDonnell escribió:

Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
the NetBeans Platform:

https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/79/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-bin-platform-9.0-alpha.zip



How does one "run" the platform?

Regards

John



TEST.tgz
Description: application/compressed-tar

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt

2017-11-13 Thread John McDonnell

Never mind, found it:

>From Linux:
$ cd netbeans/platform/lib/
$ ./nbexec


Don't see any issues, so +1 (non binding)

On 13 November 2017 at 22:17, John McDonnell  wrote:
>> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
>> the NetBeans Platform:
>>
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/79/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-bin-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
>
>
> How does one "run" the platform?
>
> Regards
>
> John
>
>
>
> On 13 November 2017 at 22:01, Geertjan Wielenga
>  wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
>> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
>> gene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
>> this version.
>>
>> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) constitutes the modules of Apache
>> NetBeans that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the
>> NetBeans Platform.
>>
>> Build artifacts available here:
>>
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
>> incubator-netbeans-release/
>>
>> The artifact to be voted on:
>>
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/79/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
>>
>> MD5: 85891881d48ffd9037ad731594488227
>>
>> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
>>
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
>> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
>> rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt
>>
>> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
>> the NetBeans Platform:
>>
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/79/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-bin-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
>>
>> MD5: cd73c738a321dd3c55fcfef49429e0e2
>>
>> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE
>> files.
>>
>> Notable changes based on comments in the previous vote thread:
>> -no IDE launchers (bin/netbeans), this is only the platform
>> -jsearch.jar (GPLv2-CPE) removed from the binary (and the source dependency)
>> -tests enhanced to fail on non-optional/non-compile-time/non-CPE GPL
>> dependency
>> -basic readmes on both source and binary builds
>> -for CDDL+GPL dual licensed libraries, changed the licenses to CDDL
>> -source builds have the cluster.config set to the value used to produce the
>> zip, so that there is no need to provide command line parameters, i.e.,
>> simply run 'ant'
>>
>> Please try out the package and vote!
>>
>> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of
>> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
>> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>
>> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
>> NetBeans committer, i.e., your name is on this page:
>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal
>>
>> Geertjan
>> on behalf of the Apache NetBeans team

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt

2017-11-13 Thread Antonio


+1

El 13/11/17 a las 23:01, Geertjan Wielenga escribió:

Hi all,

Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
gene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
this version.

Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) constitutes the modules of Apache
NetBeans that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the
NetBeans Platform.

Build artifacts available here:

https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
incubator-netbeans-release/

The artifact to be voted on:

https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/79/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha.zip

MD5: 85891881d48ffd9037ad731594488227

Rat report shows no unknown licenses:

https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt

Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
the NetBeans Platform:

https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/79/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-bin-platform-9.0-alpha.zip

MD5: cd73c738a321dd3c55fcfef49429e0e2

Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE
files.

Notable changes based on comments in the previous vote thread:
-no IDE launchers (bin/netbeans), this is only the platform
-jsearch.jar (GPLv2-CPE) removed from the binary (and the source dependency)
-tests enhanced to fail on non-optional/non-compile-time/non-CPE GPL
dependency
-basic readmes on both source and binary builds
-for CDDL+GPL dual licensed libraries, changed the licenses to CDDL
-source builds have the cluster.config set to the value used to produce the
zip, so that there is no need to provide command line parameters, i.e.,
simply run 'ant'

Please try out the package and vote!

The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of
votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
NetBeans committer, i.e., your name is on this page:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal

Geertjan
on behalf of the Apache NetBeans team

[VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt

2017-11-13 Thread Geertjan Wielenga

Hi all,

Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
gene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
this version.

Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) constitutes the modules of Apache
NetBeans that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the
NetBeans Platform.

Build artifacts available here:

https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
incubator-netbeans-release/

The artifact to be voted on:

https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/79/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha.zip

MD5: 85891881d48ffd9037ad731594488227

Rat report shows no unknown licenses:

https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt

Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
the NetBeans Platform:

https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/79/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-bin-platform-9.0-alpha.zip

MD5: cd73c738a321dd3c55fcfef49429e0e2

Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE
files.

Notable changes based on comments in the previous vote thread:
-no IDE launchers (bin/netbeans), this is only the platform
-jsearch.jar (GPLv2-CPE) removed from the binary (and the source dependency)
-tests enhanced to fail on non-optional/non-compile-time/non-CPE GPL
dependency
-basic readmes on both source and binary builds
-for CDDL+GPL dual licensed libraries, changed the licenses to CDDL
-source builds have the cluster.config set to the value used to produce the
zip, so that there is no need to provide command line parameters, i.e.,
simply run 'ant'

Please try out the package and vote!

The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of
votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
NetBeans committer, i.e., your name is on this page:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal

Geertjan
on behalf of the Apache NetBeans team

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans HTML/Java API version 1.5.1

2017-11-13 Thread Jaroslav Tulach

Hello Bertrand,
> For a non-lazy vote, 72 hours is a minimum and there's no formal maximum.

I closed the community vote after 72h 2min, but

(busy now, should be able to review within next 24 hours)
>

please do take a look. Your opinion is important in the general incubator
vote that has just started.
-jt

Re: How to analyse the debugger performance

2017-11-13 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen

In my experience working with many open projects is not per se something
which is slowing NetBeans down. However, working with many open projects
*and* not enough memory is. If NetBeans doesn't have enough memory to work
with then things will become slow.

Do you have enough RAM on your machine and - just as important - are you
letting NetBeans have enough of it?  If I remember correctly, on JDK8 the
default max heap setting is 1/4 of the physical RAM. So if your workstation
has 16 GB then NetBeans will by default not be allowed to use more than 4
GB of those. Give it some more! Fix memory allocation in etc/netbeans.conf
if needed.

At least this is worth looking into before you start more time consuming
adventures. :-)

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:38 PM, Martin Dindoffer 
wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> Do you also observe very long durations of debugging session
> initialization?
> I'm asking, because that's what I'm dealing with every day when I try to
> attach the debugger to a process.
> JPDA seems to connect and then it stays stuck for a few seconds until the
> thread lists gets populated.
> And yes, it seems that a big number of opened projects / maven modules is
> a common denominator.
>
> Martin
>
>
> Hi,
>>
>> At work, I have in my project group with just over 100 open projects.
>> Whenever I attempt to debug the application, I find the
>> debugger/NetBeans slow and sluggish.
>>
>> Now I'm not sure if this is related to the number of open projects,
>> the number of breakpoints I have, or indeed the webapp I'm debugging,
>> but unfortunately, I sit next to an IntelliJ user and they don't seem
>> to have the same issues, with an identical machine. So I must assume
>> its NetBeans related
>>
>> I want to start to analyse why this is happening, maybe get enough
>> content to raise/fix? a defect etc.
>>
>> What would be the first set of steps?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> John
>>
>
>

Re: How to analyse the debugger performance

2017-11-13 Thread Martin Dindoffer


Hi John,

Do you also observe very long durations of debugging session initialization?
I'm asking, because that's what I'm dealing with every day when I try to 
attach the debugger to a process.
JPDA seems to connect and then it stays stuck for a few seconds until 
the thread lists gets populated.
And yes, it seems that a big number of opened projects / maven modules 
is a common denominator.


Martin


Hi,

At work, I have in my project group with just over 100 open projects.
Whenever I attempt to debug the application, I find the
debugger/NetBeans slow and sluggish.

Now I'm not sure if this is related to the number of open projects,
the number of breakpoints I have, or indeed the webapp I'm debugging,
but unfortunately, I sit next to an IntelliJ user and they don't seem
to have the same issues, with an identical machine. So I must assume
its NetBeans related

I want to start to analyse why this is happening, maybe get enough
content to raise/fix? a defect etc.

What would be the first set of steps?

Regards

John

How to analyse the debugger performance

2017-11-13 Thread John McDonnell

Hi,

At work, I have in my project group with just over 100 open projects.
Whenever I attempt to debug the application, I find the
debugger/NetBeans slow and sluggish.

Now I'm not sure if this is related to the number of open projects,
the number of breakpoints I have, or indeed the webapp I'm debugging,
but unfortunately, I sit next to an IntelliJ user and they don't seem
to have the same issues, with an identical machine. So I must assume
its NetBeans related

I want to start to analyse why this is happening, maybe get enough
content to raise/fix? a defect etc.

What would be the first set of steps?

Regards

John

[GitHub] matthiasblaesing commented on issue #271: [NETBEANS-54] excluding specific files, e.g., licenses via Rat

2017-11-13 Thread GitBox

matthiasblaesing commented on issue #271: [NETBEANS-54] excluding specific 
files, e.g., licenses via Rat
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/271#issuecomment-343998973
 
 
   No, #272 makes the exclude you introduced in 2033 obsolete, so that should 
be removed, The `VERSIONS.txt` excludes can be replaced with a single wildcard 
exclude as shown above.


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Re: Clarity on NetBeans mailing lists

2017-11-13 Thread John McDonnell

If we are closing down the mailing lists from netbeans.org, can we
also configure bugzilla to not accept any new defects?

Or at least new defects in the areas that are covered in the first
donation? (not sure how possible this one is)

Regards

John



On 13 November 2017 at 14:35, Glenn Holmer  wrote:
> On 11/13/2017 06:55 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>> While Wade brings his proposal and plans for moving the NetBeans.org
>> website to Apache, we should I think make a change on this page:
>>
>> https://netbeans.org/community/lists/index.html
>>
>> I.e., a key aspect we should focus on, I propose, is not having people
>> write to netbeans.org mailing lists anymore.
>
> Yes, it's time.
>
> --
> Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682)
> "After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe."

Re: Lombok (and perhaps other broken annotation processors) makes Netbeans nuts.

2017-11-13 Thread Emilian Bold

Could you share a minimal project where the bug reproduces? I don't use Gradle 
nor Lombok so it's kind of hard to figure how to duplicate it.

My impression is that perhaps this is a Gradle plugin bug, but I'm not certain 
what it hooks into.

This issue (http://statistics.netbeans.org/analytics/exception.do?id=864040 ) 
should be posted to https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NETBEANS with more 
details (and maybe the reproducible project I mentioned).

--emi

>  Original Message 
> Subject: Re: Lombok (and perhaps other broken annotation processors) makes 
> Netbeans nuts.
> Local Time: November 13, 2017 3:54 PM
> UTC Time: November 13, 2017 1:54 PM
> From: victorwssi...@gmail.com
> To: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org, Emilian Bold 
> 
>
> See the edge release. Although the original issue was something that also
> broke IntelliJ, now the edge release moved on and smacked at
> org.netbeans.modules.java.source.parsing.PatchModuleFileManager because
> some URI was not absolute. I don't know enough of internal NetBeans stuff
> to make much sense on this nor understanding what is really wrong with
> those URIs.
>
> The project that triggers the error uses Gradle for building for me, did
> not tested on anything else, but I'm considering testing that. As such,
> NetBeans do no ever shows me the "Compile On Save" option in the project
> properties.
>
> Victor Williams Stafusa da Silva
>
> 2017-11-11 3:52 GMT-02:00 Emilian Bold emilian.b...@protonmail.ch:
>
>> The issue mentions IntelliJ IDEA being also broken so it seems like a
>> general Lombok problem, not something NetBeans specific.
>> Are you using an Ant or a Maven project? Did you disable Compile On Save
>> from the project settings (as I assume this might impact Lombok
>> postprocessing)?
>> --emi
>>
>>>  Original Message 
>>> Subject: Lombok (and perhaps other broken annotation processors) makes
>>> Netbeans nuts.
>>> Local Time: November 10, 2017 8:49 PM
>>> UTC Time: November 10, 2017 6:49 PM
>>> From: victorwssi...@gmail.com
>>> To: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>>> I am an user (not a dev) of Lombok, and I'm facing issues with using
>>> Lombok
>>> in Netbeans.
>>> Currently, lombok do not works (at least for me) with Netbeans if using
>>> Java 9. It does seem to work when I compile it by using Gradle at the
>>> command line. See this:
>>> https://github.com/rzwitserloot/lombok/issues/1435
>>> Also, if lombok, when doing its back-magic annotation processing is able
>>> to
>>> mess up netbeans, so something else would probably also be. Although the
>>> lombok guys will eventually fix this issue on their side and even if it
>>> is
>>> unfeasible to handle every case of a broken annotation processor messing
>>> with the IDE for whichever reason, Netbeans should at least try to handle
>>> this issue graciously.
>>> Victor Williams Stafusa da Silva

Re: Clarity on NetBeans mailing lists

2017-11-13 Thread Glenn Holmer

On 11/13/2017 06:55 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> While Wade brings his proposal and plans for moving the NetBeans.org
> website to Apache, we should I think make a change on this page:
> 
> https://netbeans.org/community/lists/index.html
> 
> I.e., a key aspect we should focus on, I propose, is not having people
> write to netbeans.org mailing lists anymore.

Yes, it's time.

-- 
Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682)
"After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe."

Maven bits was: Release Apache NetBeans HTML/Java API version 1.5.1

2017-11-13 Thread Jaroslav Tulach

FYI: The vote is going well, so I have uploaded the binary bits to staging
Maven repository - the URL is:
https://maven.java.net/content/repositories/orgapidesign-1072/
-jt

2017-11-10 22:24 GMT+01:00 Jaroslav Tulach :

> Dear members of Apache NetBeans community.
> I've prepared a bugfix release of HTML/Java API. It is available as build
> #20 at
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-html4j-release/20/
>
> The above URL contains the ZIP file with sources, its MD5 and SHA1
> checksum files and content of the .asc file.
>
> The list of changes made since version 1.5 can be found here:
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-html4j-release/20/changes
>
> It contains licensing related fixes (JSON library change and #98) as well
> as essential functionality fixes (bug #99 - the cause of random test
> failures of previous version 1.5)
>
> I've done the basic testing on Linux and Mac, as well as I tried to use
> the version
> 1.5.1 in Bck2Brwsr VM (works fine). I believe the new version of HTML/Java
> API is releasable at this point.
>
> Please take the ZIP file for a spin and vote to approve the release
> and to request the approval of the Incubator PMC to publish it on our site.
>
> Everyone is encouraged to vote, including non-committers.
>
> This vote shall close in the usual 72 hours.
> -jt
>
> PS:
>

Re: Using the Autoupdate libraries in a non-Platform app (specifically, Apache JMeter)

2017-11-13 Thread Emilian Bold

JMeter on top of the NetBeans Platform already exists: yameter.com

But JMeter is moving slowly so it seems faster to add a Plugin manager first.

--emi

>  Original Message 
> Subject: Re: Using the Autoupdate libraries in a non-Platform app 
> (specifically, Apache JMeter)
> Local Time: November 13, 2017 3:16 PM
> UTC Time: November 13, 2017 1:16 PM
> From: lbruunhan...@gmail.com
> To: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org, Emilian Bold 
> 
>
>> The downside seems to be that the autoupdate code is really hairy and
>> more complex than what I need initially.
>>
>> True. But it is one of those modules where it - in my experience - pays off
>> to read the arch doc.
>> (
>> http://bits.netbeans.org/dev/javadoc/org-netbeans-modules-autoupdate-services/overview-summary.html
>> )
>>
>> Also, JMeter seems to me like the type of application that would benefit
>> greatly from being build on top of the NetBeans Platform. In fact it is
>> kinda spot on! But that's another discussion.
>>
>> Can't comment on the "wiseness" of your idea, although I fully understand
>> why. I'm guessing that you may be able to re-use the AutoUpdate Services
>> part, but the AutoUpdate UI is probably tied very much to the Platform.
>> Just a guess. I could be concerned that the time you'll spend on getting
>> AutoUpdate untangled from NB would be better used to by re-implementing
>> JMeter on top of NB Platform.
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Emilian Bold emilian.b...@protonmail.ch
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> Apache JMeter does not have a Plugin Manager and I was thinking of making
>> one for them.
>> They use no module system, just plain Java JARs.
>> So, I figured a first step would be to transplant the NetBeans Platform
>> autoupdate UI and impl, except with a simpler filesystem layout.
>> Does this seem wise?
>> What I hope to gain is just some dependency resolution, download code and
>> the update manager UI. Maybe, have a path for a migration to the Platform,
>> but not necessarily.
>> The downside seems to be that the autoupdate code is really hairy and more
>> complex than what I need initially.
>> Anybody tried this before?
>> Alternatively: is there some way to use the Platform in a 'hybrid'
>> classpath + module system mode? I don't think so, but it's worth asking.
>> --emi

Re: Clarity on NetBeans mailing lists

2017-11-13 Thread Delfi Ramirez


agreed Geertjan


On 13/11/2017 13:55, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:

Hi all,

While Wade brings his proposal and plans for moving the NetBeans.org
website to Apache, we should I think make a change on this page:

https://netbeans.org/community/lists/index.html

I.e., a key aspect we should focus on, I propose, is not having people
write to netbeans.org mailing lists anymore.

Instead, this is the info they should have when subscribing to NetBeans
mailing lists:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/How+to+Participate

I propose that either the first link above redirects to the second link or
that the content of the first link is completely rewritten to refer to the
new Apache mailing lists.

Thanks,

Gj



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[GitHub] jlahoda closed pull request #270: Let the Travis build really fail on Rat or verify-libs-and-licenses f?

2017-11-13 Thread GitBox

jlahoda closed pull request #270: Let the Travis build really fail on Rat or 
verify-libs-and-licenses f?
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/270
 
 
   

This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:

As this is a foreign pull request (from a fork), the diff is supplied
below (as it won't show otherwise due to GitHub magic):

diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml
index 2c20a2757..d455e5891 100644
--- a/.travis.yml
+++ b/.travis.yml
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ language: java
 jdk:
   - oraclejdk8
 script:
-  - ant -quiet rat -Dcluster.config=platform
+  - (ant -quiet -Dcluster.config=platform build-source-config && mkdir scratch 
&& cd scratch && unzip -qq ../nbbuild/build/platform-src* && ant -quiet rat 
-Dcluster.config=platform -Drat-report.haltonfailure=true && cd .. && rm -rf 
scratch)
   - ant -quiet build -Djavac.compilerargs=-nowarn 
-Dbuild.compiler.deprecation=false
   - ant -quiet test -Djavac.compilerargs=-nowarn 
-Dbuild.compiler.deprecation=false -Dtest.includes=NoTestsJustBuild
-  - ant -quiet verify-libs-and-licenses -Dcluster.config=platform
+  - ant -quiet verify-libs-and-licenses -Dcluster.config=platform 
-Dverify-libs-and-licenses.haltonfailure=true
diff --git a/nbbuild/antsrc/org/netbeans/nbbuild/RatReportTask.java 
b/nbbuild/antsrc/org/netbeans/nbbuild/RatReportTask.java
index 350757bfb..6fa4c33a4 100644
--- a/nbbuild/antsrc/org/netbeans/nbbuild/RatReportTask.java
+++ b/nbbuild/antsrc/org/netbeans/nbbuild/RatReportTask.java
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
 import java.util.Set;
 import java.util.TreeMap;
 import java.util.TreeSet;
+import java.util.stream.Collectors;
+import java.util.stream.Stream;
 import javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilder;
 import javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory;
 import javax.xml.parsers.ParserConfigurationException;
@@ -81,6 +83,12 @@ public void setReport(File report) {
 this.reportFile = report;
 }
 
+private boolean haltonfailure;
+/** JUnit-format XML result file to generate, rather than halting the 
build. */
+public void setHaltonfailure(boolean haltonfailure) {
+this.haltonfailure = haltonfailure;
+}
+
 @Override
 public void execute() throws BuildException {
 root = sourceFile.getParentFile().getParentFile().getParentFile();
@@ -93,6 +101,7 @@ public void execute() throws BuildException {
 commandAndArgs.add("config");
 commandAndArgs.add("--get");
 commandAndArgs.add("remote.origin.url");
+Stream allFailures = Stream.empty();
 try {
 Process p = new 
ProcessBuilder(commandAndArgs).directory(root).start();
 try (BufferedReader r = new BufferedReader(new 
InputStreamReader(p.getInputStream( {
@@ -192,6 +201,14 @@ public void execute() throws BuildException {
 
 }
 JUnitReportWriter.writeReport(this, "Cluster: " + clusterName, 
file, pseudoTests);
+allFailures = Stream.concat(allFailures, 
pseudoTests.values().stream().filter(err -> err != null));
+}
+if (haltonfailure) {
+String failuresString = 
allFailures.collect(Collectors.joining("\n"));
+if (!failuresString.isEmpty()) {
+throw new BuildException("Failed Rat test(s):\n" + 
failuresString,
+ getLocation());
+}
 }
 }
 
diff --git 
a/nbbuild/antsrc/org/netbeans/nbbuild/extlibs/VerifyLibsAndLicenses.java 
b/nbbuild/antsrc/org/netbeans/nbbuild/extlibs/VerifyLibsAndLicenses.java
index bc6e7d2be..20df810c9 100644
--- a/nbbuild/antsrc/org/netbeans/nbbuild/extlibs/VerifyLibsAndLicenses.java
+++ b/nbbuild/antsrc/org/netbeans/nbbuild/extlibs/VerifyLibsAndLicenses.java
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
 import java.util.TreeSet;
 import java.util.regex.Matcher;
 import java.util.regex.Pattern;
+import java.util.stream.Collectors;
 import java.util.zip.CRC32;
 import java.util.zip.ZipEntry;
 import java.util.zip.ZipFile;
@@ -70,6 +71,12 @@ public void setReport(File report) {
 this.reportFile = report;
 }
 
+private boolean haltonfailure;
+/** JUnit-format XML result file to generate, rather than halting the 
build. */
+public void setHaltonfailure(boolean haltonfailure) {
+this.haltonfailure = haltonfailure;
+}
+
 private Map pseudoTests;
 private Set modules;
 
@@ -89,6 +96,11 @@ public void setReport(File report) {
 throw new BuildException(x, getLocation());
 }
 JUnitReportWriter.writeReport(this, null, reportFile, pseudoTests);
+if (haltonfailure && pseudoTests.values().stream().anyMatch(err -> err 
!= null)) {
+throw new BuildException("Failed VerifyLibsAndLicenses test(s):\n" 
+
+ pseudoTests.values().stream().filter(err 
-> err != null).collect(Collectors.joining("\n")),
+

Re: Using the Autoupdate libraries in a non-Platform app (specifically, Apache JMeter)

2017-11-13 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen

> The downside seems to be that the autoupdate code is really hairy and
> more complex than what I need initially.

True. But it is one of those modules where it - in my experience - pays off
to read the arch doc.
(
http://bits.netbeans.org/dev/javadoc/org-netbeans-modules-autoupdate-services/overview-summary.html
)

Also, JMeter seems to me like the type of application that would benefit
greatly from being build on top of the NetBeans Platform. In fact it is
kinda spot on! But that's another discussion.

Can't comment on the "wiseness" of your idea, although I fully understand
why. I'm guessing that you *may* be able to re-use the AutoUpdate Services
part, but the AutoUpdate UI is probably tied very much to the Platform.
Just a guess. I could be concerned that the time you'll spend on getting
AutoUpdate untangled from NB would be better used to by re-implementing
JMeter on top of NB Platform.

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Emilian Bold 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Apache JMeter does not have a Plugin Manager and I was thinking of making
> one for them.
>
> They use no module system, just plain Java JARs.
>
> So, I figured a first step would be to transplant the NetBeans Platform
> autoupdate UI and impl, except with a simpler filesystem layout.
>
> Does this seem wise?
>
> What I hope to gain is just some dependency resolution, download code and
> the update manager UI. Maybe, have a path for a migration to the Platform,
> but not necessarily.
>
> The downside seems to be that the autoupdate code is really hairy and more
> complex than what I need initially.
>
> Anybody tried this before?
>
> Alternatively: is there some way to use the Platform in a 'hybrid'
> classpath + module system mode?  I don't think so, but it's worth asking.
>
> --emi

Clarity on NetBeans mailing lists

2017-11-13 Thread Geertjan Wielenga

Hi all,

While Wade brings his proposal and plans for moving the NetBeans.org
website to Apache, we should I think make a change on this page:

https://netbeans.org/community/lists/index.html

I.e., a key aspect we should focus on, I propose, is not having people
write to netbeans.org mailing lists anymore.

Instead, this is the info they should have when subscribing to NetBeans
mailing lists:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/How+to+Participate

I propose that either the first link above redirects to the second link or
that the content of the first link is completely rewritten to refer to the
new Apache mailing lists.

Thanks,

Gj

Re: [platform-dev] YouTube: status of NetBeans move to Apache

2017-11-13 Thread Geertjan Wielenga

Excellent and welcome!

Join the mailing list as described here:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/How+to+Participate

Gj

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Prasad Sooriyaarachchi <
prasad.soor...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Moderators,
>
> I volunteered in Netbeans Sinhalese translation project and came to know
> there is a transition to Apache NB.
> I like to continue working on it and for other modules at the same time.
> How can I enroll in Confluence as a contributor/coder or editor.
>
> I have no access to my old confluence account
> prasad.sooriyaarach...@oracle.com anymore.
>
> Hope, anyone can guide me regarding this.
> Thanks,
> Prasad
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 6:07 PM, geertjan.wiele...@oracle.com <
> geertjan.wiele...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Yesterday at Devoxx in Belgium, a short session was held where the
>> current status of the NetBeans move to Apache is outlined and discussed:
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9uKRYGfTd8=9h40s
>>
>> Speakers are me, Sven Reimers, Kirk Pepperdine, Johan Vos, and Ate Douma
>> (who is an Apache mentor working on Apache NetBeans).
>>
>> How to participate:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/How+to+Participate
>>
>> Any questions, welcome.
>>
>>
>>
>> Geertjan Wielenga | Principal Product Manager
>> Phone: +31620320056 <+31%206%2020320056> |
>> Oracle Developer Tools
>>
>> ORACLE Netherlands | Hertogswetering 163-167 | 3543 AS Utrecht |
>> Netherlands
>> 
>>
>>
>> Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help
>> protect the environment
>>
>>
>

Re: [mentors] Next Steps: Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha

2017-11-13 Thread Geertjan Wielenga

Yes, OK, let's not waste time on voting on whether there should be another
vote. :-)

Clearly, a new vote thread is needed.

Gj

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Christian Lenz 
wrote:

> +1 again.
>
> Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
>
> Von: Mark Struberg
> Gesendet: Montag, 13. November 2017 13:16
> An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [mentors] Next Steps: Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha
>
> +1 to re-roll the realease after the stuff Ate catched got fixed.
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 13.11.2017 um 13:11 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz <
> bdelacre...@apache.org>:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
> >  wrote:
> >> ...Do we need to list the items that came up in the first vote, in the
> 2nd
> >> vote thread, together with how those items were resolved?..
> >
> > Yes it's good to indicate that concerns have been resolved.
> >
> > A new vote thread is needed anyway every time something's changed in
> > the release - votes are valid for a specific release archive only,
> > ideally identified by its digest.
> >
> > -Bertrand
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans HTML/Java API version 1.5.1

2017-11-13 Thread Mark Struberg

Hi folks!

I'm currently 

* RAT passes
* dependency licenses ok
* builds fine
* sha1 ok
* signature ok (jtulach@a.o) (although the .asc was just cat and not explicitly 
listed as build artifact)


+1 (binding)

LieGrue,
strub




> Am 10.11.2017 um 22:24 schrieb Jaroslav Tulach :
> 
> Dear members of Apache NetBeans community.
> I've prepared a bugfix release of HTML/Java API. It is available as build
> #20 at
> 
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-html4j-release/20/
> 
> The above URL contains the ZIP file with sources, its MD5 and SHA1 checksum
> files and content of the .asc file.
> 
> The list of changes made since version 1.5 can be found here:
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-html4j-release/20/changes
> 
> It contains licensing related fixes (JSON library change and #98) as well
> as essential functionality fixes (bug #99 - the cause of random test
> failures of previous version 1.5)
> 
> I've done the basic testing on Linux and Mac, as well as I tried to use the
> version
> 1.5.1 in Bck2Brwsr VM (works fine). I believe the new version of HTML/Java
> API is releasable at this point.
> 
> Please take the ZIP file for a spin and vote to approve the release
> and to request the approval of the Incubator PMC to publish it on our site.
> 
> Everyone is encouraged to vote, including non-committers.
> 
> This vote shall close in the usual 72 hours.
> -jt
> 
> PS:

AW: [mentors] Next Steps: Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha

2017-11-13 Thread Christian Lenz

+1 again.

Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10

Von: Mark Struberg
Gesendet: Montag, 13. November 2017 13:16
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [mentors] Next Steps: Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha

+1 to re-roll the realease after the stuff Ate catched got fixed.


LieGrue,
strub

> Am 13.11.2017 um 13:11 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz :
> 
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
>  wrote:
>> ...Do we need to list the items that came up in the first vote, in the 2nd
>> vote thread, together with how those items were resolved?..
> 
> Yes it's good to indicate that concerns have been resolved.
> 
> A new vote thread is needed anyway every time something's changed in
> the release - votes are valid for a specific release archive only,
> ideally identified by its digest.
> 
> -Bertrand

[GitHub] geertjanw commented on issue #270: Let the Travis build really fail on Rat or verify-libs-and-licenses f?

2017-11-13 Thread GitBox

geertjanw commented on issue #270: Let the Travis build really fail on Rat or 
verify-libs-and-licenses f?
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/270#issuecomment-343906908
 
 
   Looks good to me too.


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Re: [mentors] Next Steps: Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha

2017-11-13 Thread Mark Struberg

+1 to re-roll the realease after the stuff Ate catched got fixed.


LieGrue,
strub

> Am 13.11.2017 um 13:11 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz :
> 
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
>  wrote:
>> ...Do we need to list the items that came up in the first vote, in the 2nd
>> vote thread, together with how those items were resolved?..
> 
> Yes it's good to indicate that concerns have been resolved.
> 
> A new vote thread is needed anyway every time something's changed in
> the release - votes are valid for a specific release archive only,
> ideally identified by its digest.
> 
> -Bertrand

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans HTML/Java API version 1.5.1

2017-11-13 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Jaroslav Tulach
 wrote:
> ...What happens when there are no +1 votes during 72h?
> Approved?...

That would be the case for a LAZY vote but release votes are usually
explicit, not lazy.

For a non-lazy vote, 72 hours is a minimum and there's no formal maximum.

-Bertrand (busy now, should be able to review within next 24 hours)

Re: [mentors] Next Steps: Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha

2017-11-13 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
 wrote:
> ...Do we need to list the items that came up in the first vote, in the 2nd
> vote thread, together with how those items were resolved?..

Yes it's good to indicate that concerns have been resolved.

A new vote thread is needed anyway every time something's changed in
the release - votes are valid for a specific release archive only,
ideally identified by its digest.

-Bertrand

Re: [mentors] Next Steps: Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha

2017-11-13 Thread Geertjan Wielenga

OK, that means, since there were one or two -1 on the dev@ list, we’ll need
to start a new vote thread there.

Do we need to list the items that came up in the first vote, in the 2nd
vote thread, together with how those items were resolved?

Gj

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 at 11:02, Daniel Gruno  wrote:

> On 11/13/2017 10:57 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > In the vote thread:
> >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f02d0ea43e506c919cb5621e374acbd3abadc2ac050740d786d0bd68@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E
> >
> > There are many +1s.
> >
> > In the meantime, the various items have been discussed and fixed.
> >
> > Do we need to have a new vote thread for the PPMC? Or do we go directly
> to
> > the IPMC at this point? I.e., must a vote thread be restarted at the PPMC
> > or started from scratch at the IPMC?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Geertjan
> >
>
> First you vote on the dev@ list. If that gets approved, you carry that
> over to a new vote on general@incubator where only IPMC votes count.
> IPMC members that have voted in the original vote on dev@ count towards
> the 3x+1 you need on general@incubator.
>
> With regards,
> Daniel.
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans HTML/Java API version 1.5.1

2017-11-13 Thread Timon Veenstra

+1

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Anton Epple 
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Am 13.11.17, 11:35 schrieb "Jaroslav Tulach"  >:
> >
> > Last 12h to cast your vote...
> > -jt
> >
> > PS: No votes so far. What happens when there are no +1 votes during
> > 72h?
> > Approved?
> >
> >
> > >> Jaroslav Tulach : 10.11.17 @ 22:24 <<
> > > Dear members of Apache NetBeans community.
> > > I've prepared a bugfix release of HTML/Java API. It is available as
> > build
> > > #20 at
> > >
> > > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> > incubator-netbeans-h
> > > tml4j-release/20/
> > >
> > > The above URL contains the ZIP file with sources, its MD5 and SHA1
> > checksum
> > > files and content of the .asc file.
> > >
> > > The list of changes made since version 1.5 can be found here:
> > > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> > incubator-netbeans-h
> > > tml4j-release/20/changes
> > >
> > > It contains licensing related fixes (JSON library change and #98)
> as
> > well
> > > as essential functionality fixes (bug #99 - the cause of random
> test
> > > failures of previous version 1.5)
> > >
> > > I've done the basic testing on Linux and Mac, as well as I tried to
> > use the
> > > version
> > > 1.5.1 in Bck2Brwsr VM (works fine). I believe the new version of
> > HTML/Java
> > > API is releasable at this point.
> > >
> > > Please take the ZIP file for a spin and vote to approve the release
> > > and to request the approval of the Incubator PMC to publish it on
> > our site.
> > >
> > > Everyone is encouraged to vote, including non-committers.
> > >
> > > This vote shall close in the usual 72 hours.
> > > -jt
> > >
> > > PS:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans HTML/Java API version 1.5.1

2017-11-13 Thread Geertjan Wielenga

+1



On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Anton Epple 
wrote:

> +1
>
> Am 13.11.17, 11:35 schrieb "Jaroslav Tulach" :
>
> Last 12h to cast your vote...
> -jt
>
> PS: No votes so far. What happens when there are no +1 votes during
> 72h?
> Approved?
>
>
> >> Jaroslav Tulach : 10.11.17 @ 22:24 <<
> > Dear members of Apache NetBeans community.
> > I've prepared a bugfix release of HTML/Java API. It is available as
> build
> > #20 at
> >
> > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-h
> > tml4j-release/20/
> >
> > The above URL contains the ZIP file with sources, its MD5 and SHA1
> checksum
> > files and content of the .asc file.
> >
> > The list of changes made since version 1.5 can be found here:
> > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-h
> > tml4j-release/20/changes
> >
> > It contains licensing related fixes (JSON library change and #98) as
> well
> > as essential functionality fixes (bug #99 - the cause of random test
> > failures of previous version 1.5)
> >
> > I've done the basic testing on Linux and Mac, as well as I tried to
> use the
> > version
> > 1.5.1 in Bck2Brwsr VM (works fine). I believe the new version of
> HTML/Java
> > API is releasable at this point.
> >
> > Please take the ZIP file for a spin and vote to approve the release
> > and to request the approval of the Incubator PMC to publish it on
> our site.
> >
> > Everyone is encouraged to vote, including non-committers.
> >
> > This vote shall close in the usual 72 hours.
> > -jt
> >
> > PS:
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans HTML/Java API version 1.5.1

2017-11-13 Thread Anton Epple

+1

Am 13.11.17, 11:35 schrieb "Jaroslav Tulach" :

Last 12h to cast your vote...
-jt

PS: No votes so far. What happens when there are no +1 votes during 72h? 
Approved?


>> Jaroslav Tulach : 10.11.17 @ 22:24 <<
> Dear members of Apache NetBeans community.
> I've prepared a bugfix release of HTML/Java API. It is available as build
> #20 at
> 
> 
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-h
> tml4j-release/20/
> 
> The above URL contains the ZIP file with sources, its MD5 and SHA1 
checksum
> files and content of the .asc file.
> 
> The list of changes made since version 1.5 can be found here:
> 
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-h
> tml4j-release/20/changes
> 
> It contains licensing related fixes (JSON library change and #98) as well
> as essential functionality fixes (bug #99 - the cause of random test
> failures of previous version 1.5)
> 
> I've done the basic testing on Linux and Mac, as well as I tried to use 
the
> version
> 1.5.1 in Bck2Brwsr VM (works fine). I believe the new version of HTML/Java
> API is releasable at this point.
> 
> Please take the ZIP file for a spin and vote to approve the release
> and to request the approval of the Incubator PMC to publish it on our 
site.
> 
> Everyone is encouraged to vote, including non-committers.
> 
> This vote shall close in the usual 72 hours.
> -jt
> 
> PS:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans HTML/Java API version 1.5.1

2017-11-13 Thread Jaroslav Tulach

Last 12h to cast your vote...
-jt

PS: No votes so far. What happens when there are no +1 votes during 72h? 
Approved?


>> Jaroslav Tulach : 10.11.17 @ 22:24 <<
> Dear members of Apache NetBeans community.
> I've prepared a bugfix release of HTML/Java API. It is available as build
> #20 at
> 
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-h
> tml4j-release/20/
> 
> The above URL contains the ZIP file with sources, its MD5 and SHA1 checksum
> files and content of the .asc file.
> 
> The list of changes made since version 1.5 can be found here:
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-h
> tml4j-release/20/changes
> 
> It contains licensing related fixes (JSON library change and #98) as well
> as essential functionality fixes (bug #99 - the cause of random test
> failures of previous version 1.5)
> 
> I've done the basic testing on Linux and Mac, as well as I tried to use the
> version
> 1.5.1 in Bck2Brwsr VM (works fine). I believe the new version of HTML/Java
> API is releasable at this point.
> 
> Please take the ZIP file for a spin and vote to approve the release
> and to request the approval of the Incubator PMC to publish it on our site.
> 
> Everyone is encouraged to vote, including non-committers.
> 
> This vote shall close in the usual 72 hours.
> -jt
> 
> PS:

Re: [mentors] Next Steps: Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha

2017-11-13 Thread Daniel Gruno

On 11/13/2017 10:57 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> In the vote thread:
> 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f02d0ea43e506c919cb5621e374acbd3abadc2ac050740d786d0bd68@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E
> 
> There are many +1s.
> 
> In the meantime, the various items have been discussed and fixed.
> 
> Do we need to have a new vote thread for the PPMC? Or do we go directly to
> the IPMC at this point? I.e., must a vote thread be restarted at the PPMC
> or started from scratch at the IPMC?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Geertjan
> 

First you vote on the dev@ list. If that gets approved, you carry that
over to a new vote on general@incubator where only IPMC votes count.
IPMC members that have voted in the original vote on dev@ count towards
the 3x+1 you need on general@incubator.

With regards,
Daniel.

[mentors] Next Steps: Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha

2017-11-13 Thread Geertjan Wielenga

Hi all,

In the vote thread:

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f02d0ea43e506c919cb5621e374acbd3abadc2ac050740d786d0bd68@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E

There are many +1s.

In the meantime, the various items have been discussed and fixed.

Do we need to have a new vote thread for the PPMC? Or do we go directly to
the IPMC at this point? I.e., must a vote thread be restarted at the PPMC
or started from scratch at the IPMC?

Thanks,

Geertjan

[GitHub] jtulach commented on issue #270: Let the Travis build really fail on Rat or verify-libs-and-licenses f?

2017-11-13 Thread GitBox

jtulach commented on issue #270: Let the Travis build really fail on Rat or 
verify-libs-and-licenses f?
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/270#issuecomment-343866750
 
 
   Looks good to me. I would integrate the change.


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

[GitHub] geertjanw commented on issue #271: [NETBEANS-54] excluding specific files, e.g., licenses via Rat

2017-11-13 Thread GitBox

geertjanw commented on issue #271: [NETBEANS-54] excluding specific files, 
e.g., licenses via Rat
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/271#issuecomment-343864526
 
 
   So, should I simply close this one, is everything handled in #272?


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Re: [platform-dev] YouTube: status of NetBeans move to Apache

2017-11-13 Thread Prasad Sooriyaarachchi

Hi Moderators,

I volunteered in Netbeans Sinhalese translation project and came to know
there is a transition to Apache NB.
I like to continue working on it and for other modules at the same time.
How can I enroll in Confluence as a contributor/coder or editor.

I have no access to my old confluence account
prasad.sooriyaarach...@oracle.com anymore.

Hope, anyone can guide me regarding this.
Thanks,
Prasad

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 6:07 PM, geertjan.wiele...@oracle.com <
geertjan.wiele...@oracle.com> wrote:

>
> Hi all,
>
> Yesterday at Devoxx in Belgium, a short session was held where the current
> status of the NetBeans move to Apache is outlined and discussed:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9uKRYGfTd8=9h40s
>
> Speakers are me, Sven Reimers, Kirk Pepperdine, Johan Vos, and Ate Douma
> (who is an Apache mentor working on Apache NetBeans).
>
> How to participate:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/How+to+Participate
>
> Any questions, welcome.
>
>
>
> Geertjan Wielenga | Principal Product Manager
> Phone: +31620320056 <+31%206%2020320056> |
> Oracle Developer Tools
>
> ORACLE Netherlands | Hertogswetering 163-167 | 3543 AS Utrecht |
> Netherlands
> 
>
>
> Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect
> the environment
>
>

45 matches

Mail list logo