Re: Re: minimal funcational acceptance for a new port
Hi yf: Kendryte K230 sounds really cool! (Dual-core T-Head C908 64-bit RISC-V with NPU) I'm now upstreaming to NuttX Mainline a similar board (Pine64 Ox64 SBC with Bouffalo Lab BL808 SoC and T-Head C906). These links might be helpful: PR for BL808 SoC: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11371 PR for Ox64 Board: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11377 T-Head C9xx might need Supervisor-Mode MMU Flags for Strongly-Ordered Memory Type: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11365 Adding a new SoC and Board: https://lupyuen.github.io/articles/release#add-the-nuttx-arch-and-board PR Tips: https://lupyuen.github.io/articles/pr Please drop me a note if you have any questions. Thanks! :-) Lup On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 10:03 PM yfliu2008 wrote: > Alan, > > > Thanks for the advices. > > > I just have ostest passed after minor tweak in > 'risc-v/src/common/riscv_mtimer.c' with a new case bring by this SoC. So I > think it is better to discuss using a PR. > > > Regards, > > yf > > > > > > > > > > > Original > > > > From:"Alan C. Assis"< acas...@gmail.com ; > > Date:2023/12/12 21:42 > > To:"dev"< dev@nuttx.apache.org ; > > Subject:Re: minimal funcational acceptance for a new port > > > Hi yf, > Since you already got the nsh working and even some applications running, > it is fine to submit to the mainline. > > About these issues, please include that information in your board > documentation (just below the picture and the features of the board) in an > section like: "Known issues". > > Best Regards, > > Alan > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 2:25 AM yfliu2008 wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > I am trying NuttX with a CanMV board based on Kendryte K230 > SoC. > > > > > So far I can use the nsh and a few simple apps (like hello). The > ostest > still isn't fully working, probably due to time related details. > > > > > as a NuttX newbie, there must be a lot learning that takes time, also > the > k230 SoC has many features and there will be a long way to support > more of > it. So I guess it will be a long journey. > > > > > I am wondering if I should submit PR now or wait until some > functional acceptance are passed? > > > > > Regards, > > yf
Re: Legal help to (Apache) NuttX RTOS: adding licenseed driver
Hello everybody, thanks for discussion. I understand that licesing, preventing damages by misbehavior etc. are quite wide area and I have some general interrest in these topics. But for actual case, my original question and point is simple. If we contribute the work (our work) with next the SPDX-License-Identifier line, could it be included in mainline NuttX tree (if we reach technical and other criteria)? // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-2-Clause OR Apache-2.0 We have (at this moment) rights and agreement in the original author group to change license in this direction from GPL-2.0. We do not expect to rely or reuse any third party GPL licensed code (the ported/reused code fragments are fully independent of Linux SocketCAN and networking layer) in NuttX case. We are aware that if some major contributor does not agree with some of the OR clauses later, they can be removed without our consent. But this arrangement would help us to prevent obstacles to contribute in the single stream to all three OSes. - Linux kernel, which is GPL-2.0-only but has no problem to accept combined licenses with BSD-2-Clause (3k+ files), even Apache-2.0 OR MIT without GPL are accepted/found in the sources. - RTEMS, which is primarily BSD-2-Clause, but has more SPDX lines with Apache-2.0, other combined with GPL - NuttX, Apache-2.0 and as long as there is no opposition and removal clauses of the SPDX-License-Identifier line, we can freely copy RTOS independent parts of the sources between systems. Best wishes, Pavel -- Pavel Pisa phone: +420 603531357 e-mail: p...@cmp.felk.cvut.cz Department of Control Engineering FEE CVUT Karlovo namesti 13, 121 35, Prague 2 university: http://control.fel.cvut.cz/ personal: http://cmp.felk.cvut.cz/~pisa company:https://pikron.com/ PiKRON s.r.o. Kankovskeho 1235, 182 00 Praha 8, Czech Republic projects: https://www.openhub.net/accounts/ppisa social: https://social.kernel.org/ppisa CAN related:http://canbus.pages.fel.cvut.cz/ RISC-V education: https://comparch.edu.cvut.cz/ Open Technologies Research Education and Exchange Services https://gitlab.fel.cvut.cz/otrees/org/-/wikis/home
Re: minimal funcational acceptance for a new port
Hi yf, Since you already got the nsh working and even some applications running, it is fine to submit to the mainline. About these issues, please include that information in your board documentation (just below the picture and the features of the board) in an section like: "Known issues". Best Regards, Alan On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 2:25 AM yfliu2008 wrote: > Hi, > > > > > I am trying NuttX with a CanMV board based on Kendryte K230 > SoC. > > > > > So far I can use the nsh and a few simple apps (like hello). The ostest > still isn't fully working, probably due to time related details. > > > > > as a NuttX newbie, there must be a lot learning that takes time, also the > k230 SoC has many features and there will be a long way to support more of > it. So I guess it will be a long journey. > > > > > I am wondering if I should submit PR now or wait until some > functional acceptance are passed? > > > > > Regards, > > yf
