Re: Confluence/Repos (Was Atomic git tagging)
Hi, > Hehe.. nutty-apps :-D That was autocorrect I think. It was [1] so I didn’t mistype it when creating it this time :-) Thanks, Justin 1. https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-nuttx-apps.git
Re: Confluence/Repos (Was Atomic git tagging)
Justin, do you mind to rename it from app to apps ? I’ve created an incubator-nutty-apps one and asked Infra how to remove the other one. Hehe.. nutty-apps :-D There are some pretty crazy applications in there. G
Re: Confluence/Repos (Was Atomic git tagging)
Hi, > There would be less confusion if the repository were called apps instead of > nuttx-apps[s], but it appears the the project name on the front of the > repository is an Apache convention. Yes as is incubating for incubating projects. > In the release tarballs, the names have been apps-x.y/ and nuttx-x.y/ where > x.y is the major.minor version number. You can number your releases however you want. The name does need to number “incubating” and it’s a good idea to also put “apache” in there so something like apache-nuttx-incubating-x.y.tag,gz and apache-nuttx-apps-incubating-x.y.tag,gz would be fine. But other variations on this would also be fine. Thanks, Justin
Re: Confluence/Repos (Was Atomic git tagging)
Alan, Hmm, I think it could create some confusion because all docs and even the build system expects to find the applications directory at ../apps/ Justin, do you mind to rename it from app to apps ? You note that the git clone with no argument will create nuttx-app/ (or nuttx-apps/), right? So there is going to be confusion in any event. nuttx-apps/ is a little closer to expectations, however. The directory name can, of course, be set to anything you like in the 'git clone' command. There would be less confusion if the repository were called apps instead of nuttx-apps[s], but it appears the the project name on the front of the repository is an Apache convention. In the release tarballs, the names have been apps-x.y/ and nuttx-x.y/ where x.y is the major.minor version number. I suppose that those are not affected (other than we will likely need to go to an x.y.z version number where z is the revision number. Greg
Re: Confluence/Repos (Was Atomic git tagging)
So I created: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx.git https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx-app.git At nit: Historically, the directory is call apps/ not app/. That is the way it is referred to in all of the documentation of and the consciousness of NuttX users. But I am flexible if others are too.
Re: Confluence/Repos (Was Atomic git tagging)
HI, I created the repos there was an issue in that it didn’t like incubator-nuttx-nuttx, which I guess is a bit silly. So I created: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx.git https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx-app.git You can see the mirror repos here: https://github.com/apache?q=nuttx You can use the above GitHub clones or you can use the Apache ones, everything syncs up between them. To use the GitHub one you need to sync your accounts as described here [1] Thanks, Justin 1. https://gitbox.apache.org
Re: Confluence/Repos (Was Atomic git tagging)
Hi, > I am unsure of the terminology "report". I assume this is the name of the > GIT repository? For consistency, the name of the repositories should be > apps/ and nuttx/. Sorry I meant repos. I’ll go ahead and create them. Thanks, Justin
Re: Confluence/Repos (Was Atomic git tagging)
This doesn't seem to accept my LDAP credentials. Actually, it does. I can log in but I don't seem to have authority to do anything. Fixed - any NuttX committer will now be able to add/edit/comment on pages. Opening it wider than that may attract spam. Thanks! I had to limit the DocuWiki's too. Not because I wanted to, but because it was constantly under attack. One day I noticed 37 thousand+ new subscribers in a span a a couple of weeks. Now that the SGA has been filed we can also request that the repositories be set up well, correct? They are easy to set up, from the other documentation it seems we want two reports right. what should they be called? I am unsure of the terminology "report". I assume this is the name of the GIT repository? For consistency, the name of the repositories should be apps/ and nuttx/. Greg
Re: Confluence/Repos (Was Atomic git tagging)
Hi, > This doesn't seem to accept my LDAP credentials. Actually, it does. I can > log in but I don't seem to have authority to do anything. Fixed - any NuttX committer will now be able to add/edit/comment on pages. Opening it wider than that may attract spam. > Now that the SGA has been filed we can also request that the repositories be > set up well, correct? They are easy to set up, from the other documentation it seems we want two reports right. what should they be called? Thanks, Justin
