Re: jquey

2010-12-02 Thread Hans Bakker
I would be in favor to merge quickly, like the replacing of the ftl
macroprocessor, the system only get properly tested when it is in the
trunk.

If it is in the trunk, we will help debugging it.

Regards,
Hans

On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 00:18 -0500, Anil Patel wrote:
 Hans,
 On other thread Jacques indicated that work of migrating to JQuery is 
 complete. 
 
 Do you think, it will be good idea to merge JQuery branch with trunk quickly 
 so you can add additional features much more easily? 
 
 
 Thanks and Regards
 Anil Patel
 HotWax Media Inc
 Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword ofbiz
 
 On Dec 1, 2010, at 10:21 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
 
  We have a number of new ofbiz features lined up, however they use
  jquery...
  
  is it possble to add the jquery libraries earlier then waiting for the
  merge of the jquery branch?
  
  -- 
  Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz
  Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak
  Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.
  
 

-- 
Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz
Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak
Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.



Re: jquey

2010-12-02 Thread Jacques Le Roux

Looks like, apart Bruno, we are all on the same page so far

Other opinions, ideas?

Thanks

Jacques

From: Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com

I would be in favor to merge quickly, like the replacing of the ftl
macroprocessor, the system only get properly tested when it is in the
trunk.

If it is in the trunk, we will help debugging it.

Regards,
Hans

On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 00:18 -0500, Anil Patel wrote:

Hans,
On other thread Jacques indicated that work of migrating to JQuery is complete.

Do you think, it will be good idea to merge JQuery branch with trunk quickly so 
you can add additional features much more easily?


Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword ofbiz

On Dec 1, 2010, at 10:21 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:

 We have a number of new ofbiz features lined up, however they use
 jquery...

 is it possble to add the jquery libraries earlier then waiting for the
 merge of the jquery branch?

 -- 
 Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz

 Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak
 Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.




--
Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz
Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak
Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.






Re: jquey

2010-12-02 Thread Erwan de FERRIERES

Le 02/12/2010 10:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :

Looks like, apart Bruno, we are all on the same page so far

Other opinions, ideas?

Thanks

Jacques



The sooner the better !

Thanks for all your work, Jacques and Sascha

--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz


Re: OpenID Integration for OFBiz

2010-12-02 Thread Naveen Kumar B V
Hi Tim,

  I think Crowd is a centralized authentication server, which can be
used across many applications, but does it support gmail,aol, etc...

A simple scenario i need is, a customer who is having Gmail Account, AOL
Account, myopenid account, should be granted access to our
ecommerce application. How is it possible. Can we achieve it using Crowd???

Regards,
Naveen Kumar B.V




On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Tim Ruppert tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.comwrote:

 It's single sign on, but I'm not sure if it ready for CrowdID:

 http://www.atlassian.com/software/crowd/features/openid.jsp

 Cheers,
 Ruppert

 On Dec 1, 2010, at 4:34 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:

  Isn't the component 'crowd' in the specialpurpose directory provide
  openId?
 
 
  --
  Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz
  Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak
  Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.
 
 
  On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:54 +0530, Naveen Kumar B V wrote:
  Hi,
 
Does OFBiz provide OpenId integration. As per my knowledge, and after
  looking at the code. there is no such functionality.
  Can anyone help me regarding this? How can i integrate OpenId (Gmail,
  MyOpenId, AOL, etc) into my application?
 
  Regards,
  Naveen Kumar B.V
 
 




Re: jquey

2010-12-02 Thread Sascha Rodekamp
You're welcome 
+1 

Would be a great Xmas present to merge all the stuff into the trunk :-)  

Am 02.12.2010 um 10:59 schrieb Erwan de FERRIERES 
erwan.de-ferrie...@nereide.fr:

 Le 02/12/2010 10:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
 Looks like, apart Bruno, we are all on the same page so far
 
 Other opinions, ideas?
 
 Thanks
 
 Jacques
 
 
 The sooner the better !
 
 Thanks for all your work, Jacques and Sascha
 
 -- 
 Erwan de FERRIERES
 www.nereide.biz


Re: jquey

2010-12-02 Thread Marc Morin
+1, always better to merge sooner, get more testing on it...

Marc Morin
Emforium Group Inc. 
ALL-IN Software
519-772-6824 ext 201 
mmo...@emforium.com 

- Original Message -
 You're welcome
 +1
 
 Would be a great Xmas present to merge all the stuff into the trunk
 :-)
 
 Am 02.12.2010 um 10:59 schrieb Erwan de FERRIERES
 erwan.de-ferrie...@nereide.fr:
 
  Le 02/12/2010 10:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
  Looks like, apart Bruno, we are all on the same page so far
 
  Other opinions, ideas?
 
  Thanks
 
  Jacques
 
 
  The sooner the better !
 
  Thanks for all your work, Jacques and Sascha
 
  -- Erwan de FERRIERES
  www.nereide.biz


Re: jquey

2010-12-02 Thread Michael Xu (xudong)
+1

Yeah, I would love such a great Xmas present :-)

--
Regards,
Michael Xu (xudong)


On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Sascha Rodekamp sascha.rodekamp.lynx.de@
googlemail.com wrote:

 You're welcome
 +1

 Would be a great Xmas present to merge all the stuff into the trunk :-)

 Am 02.12.2010 um 10:59 schrieb Erwan de FERRIERES 
 erwan.de-ferrie...@nereide.fr:

  Le 02/12/2010 10:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
  Looks like, apart Bruno, we are all on the same page so far
 
  Other opinions, ideas?
 
  Thanks
 
  Jacques
 
 
  The sooner the better !
 
  Thanks for all your work, Jacques and Sascha
 
  --
  Erwan de FERRIERES
  www.nereide.biz



Re: Configuring LDAP with OFBiz

2010-12-02 Thread Naveen Kumar B V
Thank you guys for your support,
   So is it final that, we should write a Custom Groovy Script to save
details in LDAP also, while
the details are being saved in OFBiz during registration process.
And no such functionality is already implemented??

Please comment on this..

Regards,
Naveen Kumar B.V

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Jacques Le Roux 
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote:

 Then I'd prefer to use Groovy than BSH and please, as already requested by
 Adrian, use users ML than dev ML for such dicussions

 Thanks

 Jacques

 From: Abhishake Agarwal abhishake.agar...@gmail.com

 Hi,

 I would have prefer to call the service from minilang through bsh script
 which can be embedded in minilang.

 You cab refer:
 http://www.opensourcestrategies.com/ofbiz/ofbiz_minilang_cookbook.txt

 Regards,
 Abhishake


 On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Naveen Kumar B V 
 naveen.whishwo...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Abhishek,
   Yes true, modifying both the files you mentioned will ensure that the
 details will be saved from both store-front and
 backoffice. But, how is the actual implementation logic written. I
 suppose
 it cannot be done only with OFBiz Mini-Lang in the xml files.
 Should a separate service be written for example in Java (using JLDAP).
   Can you throw some light on the implementation and some sample code.
 Thank you once again for your time. Your inputs are really taking me
 forward.

 Regards,
 Naveen Kumar B.V




 On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Abhishake Agarwal 
 abhishake.agar...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi,
 
  Also if you want party userlogin created from ofbiz backoffice should
 be
  stored in ldap, you should also modify  ofbiz/applications/party/
  script/org/ofbiz/party/customer/CustomerEvents.xml
 
  Regards,
  Abhishake
 
  On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Abhishake Agarwal 
   abhishake.agar...@gmail.com wrote:
 
   Hi,
  
   I think you have to use :
  
  
  
  
 

 ofbiz/specialpurpose/ecommerce/script/org/ofbiz/ecommerce/customer/CustomerEvents.xml
  
   Regards,
   Abhishake
  
  
   On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Naveen Kumar B V 
   naveen.whishwo...@gmail.com wrote:
  
   Hi Abhishek,
  
Thanks for your reply, that gives me some hope that while user
   registration,  details can be stored
   in LDAP also.
   When i tried to figure out how to do this,  i found
 CustomerEvents.xml
   file
   in 3 locations as below:
  
   *
  
  
 

  ofbiz/applications/order/script/org/ofbiz/order/customer/CustomerEvents.xml
   *
   *
  
  
 

  ofbiz/applications/party/script/org/ofbiz/party/customer/CustomerEvents.xml
   *
   *
  
  
 

  
 ofbiz/specialpurpose/ecommerce/script/org/ofbiz/ecommerce/customer/CustomerEvents.xml
   *
   *
   *
   Can you help me in identifying which is the file to be modified so
 that
   user
   details can be stored in LDAP,
   also how do we actually specify other details related to LDAP like
   Distinguished Name(DN), Organizational Unit(OU), username, password,
  LDAP
   location,  etc
  
   Some sample code.. to do this.. would really be helping me..
  
   Thanks  Regards,
   Naveen Kumar B.V
  
  
  
   On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Abhishake Agarwal 
   abhishake.agar...@gmail.com wrote:
  
Hi,
   
You have to modify createCustomer events in CustomerEvents.xml to
  store
user
details in LDAP when user gets registered.
   
Regards,
Abhishake
   
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Naveen Bahatam 
naveen.baha...@whishworks.com wrote:
   
 Hi Adrian,

Thanks for your reply. If at all the users data is to be
 stored
  in
LDAP,
 when the user is getting registered, or for password
 updations, can you tell me how can it be done.??. Is it possible
  with
   the
 current implementation in OFBiz, or should we write a service to
   perform
 such an operation.
 And yes, i will make sure to post these questions on user
 mailing
   list.
 Thank you once again.


 Regards,
 Naveen Kumar B.V




 On 26 November 2010 21:20, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com
  wrote:

  The current LDAP integration is used for authentication only.
 User
   data
 is
  not stored in LDAP.
 
  By the way, this type of question should be posted on the user
   mailing
  list.
 
  -Adrian
 
  --- On Fri, 11/26/10, Naveen Bahatam 
  naveen.baha...@whishworks.com
   
  wrote:
 
   From: Naveen Bahatam naveen.baha...@whishworks.com
   Subject: Configuring LDAP with OFBiz
   To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
   Date: Friday, November 26, 2010, 2:27 AM
Hi,
  
   I have understood configuring LDAP with OFBiz
   by editing two properties
   file as below:
  
   *jndiLdap.properties file:*
   *
   *
   # OFBiz LDAP Authentication Settings
   
  
   # JNDI LDAP settings. Change the following line to
   # point to your LDAP server.
   

Re: svn commit: r1041400 - /ofbiz/branches/jquery/framework/base/lib/etl/

2010-12-02 Thread Jacques Le Roux

Thanks Erwan,

Sorry for the wrong commit. Also I must say that Opentaps messed things up when 
they added those libs there. Anyway not an excuse :/

Jacques

From: er...@apache.org

Author: erwan
Date: Thu Dec  2 15:01:20 2010
New Revision: 1041400

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1041400view=rev
Log:
This should not have been added in OFBiz, license issues

Removed:
   ofbiz/branches/jquery/framework/base/lib/etl/






Re: Configuring LDAP with OFBiz

2010-12-02 Thread Adrian Crum
If it is something that is going into the project, then it would be best 
if the data sharing was bidirectional - so that changes in LDAP are be 
copied to OFBiz.


-Adrian

On 12/2/2010 7:16 AM, Naveen Kumar B V wrote:

Thank you guys for your support,
So is it final that, we should write a Custom Groovy Script to save
details in LDAP also, while
the details are being saved in OFBiz during registration process.
And no such functionality is already implemented??

Please comment on this..

Regards,
Naveen Kumar B.V

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Jacques Le Roux
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com  wrote:


Then I'd prefer to use Groovy than BSH and please, as already requested by
Adrian, use users ML than dev ML for such dicussions

Thanks

Jacques

From: Abhishake Agarwalabhishake.agar...@gmail.com

Hi,


I would have prefer to call the service from minilang through bsh script
which can be embedded in minilang.

You cab refer:
http://www.opensourcestrategies.com/ofbiz/ofbiz_minilang_cookbook.txt

Regards,
Abhishake


On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Naveen Kumar B V
naveen.whishwo...@gmail.com  wrote:

Hi Abhishek,

   Yes true, modifying both the files you mentioned will ensure that the
details will be saved from both store-front and
backoffice. But, how is the actual implementation logic written. I
suppose
it cannot be done only with OFBiz Mini-Lang in the xml files.
Should a separate service be written for example in Java (using JLDAP).
   Can you throw some light on the implementation and some sample code.
Thank you once again for your time. Your inputs are really taking me
forward.

Regards,
Naveen Kumar B.V




On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Abhishake Agarwal
abhishake.agar...@gmail.com  wrote:


Hi,

Also if you want party userlogin created from ofbiz backoffice should

be

stored in ldap, you should also modify  ofbiz/applications/party/
script/org/ofbiz/party/customer/CustomerEvents.xml

Regards,
Abhishake

On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Abhishake Agarwal
  abhishake.agar...@gmail.com  wrote:


Hi,

I think you have to use :








ofbiz/specialpurpose/ecommerce/script/org/ofbiz/ecommerce/customer/CustomerEvents.xml


Regards,
Abhishake


On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Naveen Kumar B V
naveen.whishwo...@gmail.com  wrote:


Hi Abhishek,

  Thanks for your reply, that gives me some hope that while user
registration,  details can be stored
in LDAP also.
When i tried to figure out how to do this,  i found

CustomerEvents.xml

file
in 3 locations as below:

*






  ofbiz/applications/order/script/org/ofbiz/order/customer/CustomerEvents.xml

*
*






  ofbiz/applications/party/script/org/ofbiz/party/customer/CustomerEvents.xml

*
*






  
ofbiz/specialpurpose/ecommerce/script/org/ofbiz/ecommerce/customer/CustomerEvents.xml

*
*
*
Can you help me in identifying which is the file to be modified so

that

user
details can be stored in LDAP,
also how do we actually specify other details related to LDAP like
Distinguished Name(DN), Organizational Unit(OU), username, password,

LDAP

location,  etc

Some sample code.. to do this.. would really be helping me..

Thanks  Regards,
Naveen Kumar B.V



On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Abhishake Agarwal
abhishake.agar...@gmail.com  wrote:


Hi,

You have to modify createCustomer events in CustomerEvents.xml to

store

user
details in LDAP when user gets registered.

Regards,
Abhishake

On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Naveen Bahatam
naveen.baha...@whishworks.com  wrote:


Hi Adrian,

Thanks for your reply. If at all the users data is to be

stored

in

LDAP,

when the user is getting registered, or for password
updations, can you tell me how can it be done.??. Is it possible

with

the

current implementation in OFBiz, or should we write a service to

perform

such an operation.
And yes, i will make sure to post these questions on user

mailing

list.

Thank you once again.


Regards,
Naveen Kumar B.V




On 26 November 2010 21:20, Adrian Crumadrian.c...@yahoo.com

wrote:



The current LDAP integration is used for authentication only.

User

data

is

not stored in LDAP.

By the way, this type of question should be posted on the user

mailing

list.

-Adrian

--- On Fri, 11/26/10, Naveen Bahatam

naveen.baha...@whishworks.com



wrote:


From: Naveen Bahatamnaveen.baha...@whishworks.com
Subject: Configuring LDAP with OFBiz
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Friday, November 26, 2010, 2:27 AM

Hi,


 I have understood configuring LDAP with OFBiz
by editing two properties
file as below:

*jndiLdap.properties file:*
*
*
# OFBiz LDAP Authentication Settings


# JNDI LDAP settings. Change the following line to
# point to your LDAP server.
java.naming.provider.url=ldap://localhost:389
java.naming.factory.initial=com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtxFactory
java.naming.security.authentication=simple
com.sun.jndi.ldap.connect.timeout=5000

# Distinguished Name template. This is used as a default
if
# UserLogin.userLdapDn is empty.
# The %u placeholder 

Re: [jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-4006) jQuery Test and Bug fixing

2010-12-02 Thread rohit

Hi Jacques,

I will be glad to help, however we work with the code in the trunk only.

If the code is reasonably complete as it appears from the discussions, i
would like to see it merged in the trunk. As that will allow more people to
test it and detect and report bugs if any.

Thanks,

Rohit
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/jira-Created-OFBIZ-4006-jQuery-Test-and-Bug-fixing-tp3016706p3068562.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: jquey

2010-12-02 Thread Jacques Le Roux

I'm sorry for Bruno, but it seems everybody is looking forward for this 
merging. So hopefully I will do it soon.
If you are interested you can already check 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3814

Jacques

Michael Xu (xudong) wrote:

+1

Yeah, I would love such a great Xmas present :-)



You're welcome
+1

Would be a great Xmas present to merge all the stuff into the trunk :-)

Am 02.12.2010 um 10:59 schrieb Erwan de FERRIERES 
erwan.de-ferrie...@nereide.fr:


Le 02/12/2010 10:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :

Looks like, apart Bruno, we are all on the same page so far

Other opinions, ideas?

Thanks

Jacques



The sooner the better !

Thanks for all your work, Jacques and Sascha

--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz





Re: jquey

2010-12-02 Thread BJ Freeman

sigh so all work on Selenium screens will have to be re-done.

Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 12/2/2010 1:35 AM:


=
BJ Freeman
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation  
http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52
Specialtymarket.com  http://www.specialtymarket.com/
Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist

Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man


Looks like, apart Bruno, we are all on the same page so far

Other opinions, ideas?

Thanks

Jacques

From: Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com

I would be in favor to merge quickly, like the replacing of the ftl
macroprocessor, the system only get properly tested when it is in the
trunk.

If it is in the trunk, we will help debugging it.

Regards,
Hans

On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 00:18 -0500, Anil Patel wrote:

Hans,
On other thread Jacques indicated that work of migrating to JQuery is
complete.

Do you think, it will be good idea to merge JQuery branch with trunk
quickly so you can add additional features much more easily?


Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword ofbiz

On Dec 1, 2010, at 10:21 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:

 We have a number of new ofbiz features lined up, however they use
 jquery...

 is it possble to add the jquery libraries earlier then waiting for the
 merge of the jquery branch?

 --  Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz
 Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak
 Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.




--
Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz
Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak
Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.







Re: jquey

2010-12-02 Thread Ryan Foster
What about creating a tag or branch before the merge so that users who have 
custom projects or applications based on the trunk have a reference point in 
the event that they want to freeze their applications at a particular revision?

Oh and +1 on merging in JQuery.  I am all for consolidating/simplifying our 
Javascript libraries.  No reason to have 3 libraries that all essentially do 
the same thing.  In the end, Javascript is Javascript.  My heart says we should 
have chosen Prototype as that one (as anyone who knows me would agree, I'm a 
big Prototype JS evangelist).  But, my head says that JQuery is the right 
choice for the long-term growth and success of the project, as it has 
definitely become the drug of choice for a majority of developers and has much 
more wide-spread community involvement as far as development of plugins is 
concerned.

Ryan L. Foster
801.671.0769
cont...@ryanlfoster.com

On Dec 2, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

 I'm sorry for Bruno, but it seems everybody is looking forward for this 
 merging. So hopefully I will do it soon.
 If you are interested you can already check 
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3814
 
 Jacques
 
 Michael Xu (xudong) wrote:
 +1
 
 Yeah, I would love such a great Xmas present :-)
 
 
 You're welcome
 +1
 
 Would be a great Xmas present to merge all the stuff into the trunk :-)
 
 Am 02.12.2010 um 10:59 schrieb Erwan de FERRIERES 
 erwan.de-ferrie...@nereide.fr:
 
 Le 02/12/2010 10:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
 Looks like, apart Bruno, we are all on the same page so far
 
 Other opinions, ideas?
 
 Thanks
 
 Jacques
 
 
 The sooner the better !
 
 Thanks for all your work, Jacques and Sascha
 
 --
 Erwan de FERRIERES
 www.nereide.biz
 
 



[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-1262) Complete the support for VAT (Value-Added-Tax)

2010-12-02 Thread Marco Risaliti (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12966263#action_12966263
 ] 

Marco Risaliti commented on OFBIZ-1262:
---

Hi David  Jacques,

I have tested last trunk revision that includes the improvements done by David 
and it seems to me a better and easy way compare to what I have proposed here 
in this task some years ago.
So I could close this issue has won't be fix.
A small difference I have noticed is that normally in e-commerce site that sell 
products with VAT taxes when you add products to cart the taxes are normally 
included or showed immediately and not like now that they are calculated when 
you select the shipment destination address.
Normally the taxes are calculated basically from the shipment origin once 
selected the product.
This can be considered as another improvement can be done later.

Thanks
Marco


 Complete the support for VAT (Value-Added-Tax)
 --

 Key: OFBIZ-1262
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1262
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: order, specialpurpose/ecommerce
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter: Marco Risaliti
Assignee: Marco Risaliti
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: SVN trunk

 Attachments: CalculateVatTax2.patch, ecommerceEu.zip


 I have tried to implement a different of VAT Tax calculation without total 
 change the actual calculation of tax for USA.
 I have add a new field into the ProductStore to understand if for a store the 
 vat tax has to be calculated (calculateVatTax).
 The old field showPricesWithVatTax it will be used only if the 
 calculateVatTax will be set to yes for show the prices with tax included or 
 excluded.
 I have created a sample application (ecommerceEu) to show how it's working.
 For the moment I have used only two product with vat tax calculated (GZ-1000 
 and GZ-1001).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



Re: jquey

2010-12-02 Thread Jacques Le Roux

Ryan Foster wrote:

What about creating a tag or branch before the merge so that users who have 
custom projects or applications based on the trunk
have a reference point in the event that they want to freeze their applications 
at a particular revision?


Yes, that's what I have proposed. With another option: to have a branch. But I 
think the later is more a fork and I prefer the 1st.


Oh and +1 on merging in JQuery.  I am all for consolidating/simplifying our 
Javascript libraries.  No reason to have 3 libraries
that all essentially do the same thing.  In the end, Javascript is Javascript.  
My heart says we should have chosen Prototype as
that one (as anyone who knows me would agree, I'm a big Prototype JS 
evangelist).  But, my head says that JQuery is the right
choice for the long-term growth and success of the project, as it has 
definitely become the drug of choice for a majority of
developers and has much more wide-spread community involvement as far as 
development of plugins is concerned.


I think we now all agree on that

Jacques


Ryan L. Foster
801.671.0769
cont...@ryanlfoster.com

On Dec 2, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:


I'm sorry for Bruno, but it seems everybody is looking forward for this 
merging. So hopefully I will do it soon.
If you are interested you can already check 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3814

Jacques

Michael Xu (xudong) wrote:

+1

Yeah, I would love such a great Xmas present :-)



You're welcome
+1

Would be a great Xmas present to merge all the stuff into the trunk :-)

Am 02.12.2010 um 10:59 schrieb Erwan de FERRIERES 
erwan.de-ferrie...@nereide.fr:


Le 02/12/2010 10:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :

Looks like, apart Bruno, we are all on the same page so far

Other opinions, ideas?

Thanks

Jacques



The sooner the better !

Thanks for all your work, Jacques and Sascha

--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz





Re: jquey

2010-12-02 Thread Jacques Le Roux

Why? Did you use Dojo or Prototype?

Jacques

BJ Freeman wrote:

sigh so all work on Selenium screens will have to be re-done.

Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 12/2/2010 1:35 AM:


=
BJ Freeman
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation  
http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52
Specialtymarket.com  http://www.specialtymarket.com/
Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist

Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man


Looks like, apart Bruno, we are all on the same page so far

Other opinions, ideas?

Thanks

Jacques

From: Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com

I would be in favor to merge quickly, like the replacing of the ftl
macroprocessor, the system only get properly tested when it is in the
trunk.

If it is in the trunk, we will help debugging it.

Regards,
Hans

On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 00:18 -0500, Anil Patel wrote:

Hans,
On other thread Jacques indicated that work of migrating to JQuery is
complete.

Do you think, it will be good idea to merge JQuery branch with trunk
quickly so you can add additional features much more easily?


Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword ofbiz

On Dec 1, 2010, at 10:21 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:


We have a number of new ofbiz features lined up, however they use
jquery...

is it possble to add the jquery libraries earlier then waiting for the
merge of the jquery branch?

--  Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz
Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak
Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.





--
Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz
Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak
Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.




[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-1262) Complete the support for VAT (Value-Added-Tax)

2010-12-02 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-1262.
--

Resolution: Won't Fix

Hi Marco,

This is a possibility when you work on a sole country but consider the case 
were you sell globaly. Then the VAT taxes depend on the destination, notably in 
EU. And also (and especially) consider that the same mechanism is used for 
sales taxes in general and in US in particular where it's more complicated 
(many levels). So we decided a while ago to keep this general mechanism OOTB. I 
agree that it may be improved when you are sure of the VAT taxes values that 
will be applied.

Thanks for your comment, I'm closing...

 Complete the support for VAT (Value-Added-Tax)
 --

 Key: OFBIZ-1262
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1262
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: order, specialpurpose/ecommerce
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter: Marco Risaliti
Assignee: Marco Risaliti
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: SVN trunk

 Attachments: CalculateVatTax2.patch, ecommerceEu.zip


 I have tried to implement a different of VAT Tax calculation without total 
 change the actual calculation of tax for USA.
 I have add a new field into the ProductStore to understand if for a store the 
 vat tax has to be calculated (calculateVatTax).
 The old field showPricesWithVatTax it will be used only if the 
 calculateVatTax will be set to yes for show the prices with tax included or 
 excluded.
 I have created a sample application (ecommerceEu) to show how it's working.
 For the moment I have used only two product with vat tax calculated (GZ-1000 
 and GZ-1001).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



Re: jquey

2010-12-02 Thread BJ Freeman

before I jump I guess I should test.
my thinking was the screens as Selenium would see them be changed, so 
the tests would fail.


will try over the weekend

=
BJ Freeman
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation  
http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52
Specialtymarket.com  http://www.specialtymarket.com/
Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist

Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man


Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 12/2/2010 12:27 PM:

Why? Did you use Dojo or Prototype?

Jacques

BJ Freeman wrote:

sigh so all work on Selenium screens will have to be re-done.

Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 12/2/2010 1:35 AM:


=
BJ Freeman
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52
Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/
Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist

Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man


Looks like, apart Bruno, we are all on the same page so far

Other opinions, ideas?

Thanks

Jacques

From: Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com

I would be in favor to merge quickly, like the replacing of the ftl
macroprocessor, the system only get properly tested when it is in the
trunk.

If it is in the trunk, we will help debugging it.

Regards,
Hans

On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 00:18 -0500, Anil Patel wrote:

Hans,
On other thread Jacques indicated that work of migrating to JQuery is
complete.

Do you think, it will be good idea to merge JQuery branch with trunk
quickly so you can add additional features much more easily?


Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword ofbiz

On Dec 1, 2010, at 10:21 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:


We have a number of new ofbiz features lined up, however they use
jquery...

is it possble to add the jquery libraries earlier then waiting for
the
merge of the jquery branch?

--  Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz
Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak
Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.





--
Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz
Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak
Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.







[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-1262) Complete the support for VAT (Value-Added-Tax)

2010-12-02 Thread Marco Risaliti (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12966280#action_12966280
 ] 

Marco Risaliti commented on OFBIZ-1262:
---

Hi Jacques,

I agree with you to manage this general mechanism OOTB.

Thanks
Marco

 Complete the support for VAT (Value-Added-Tax)
 --

 Key: OFBIZ-1262
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1262
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: order, specialpurpose/ecommerce
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter: Marco Risaliti
Assignee: Marco Risaliti
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: SVN trunk

 Attachments: CalculateVatTax2.patch, ecommerceEu.zip


 I have tried to implement a different of VAT Tax calculation without total 
 change the actual calculation of tax for USA.
 I have add a new field into the ProductStore to understand if for a store the 
 vat tax has to be calculated (calculateVatTax).
 The old field showPricesWithVatTax it will be used only if the 
 calculateVatTax will be set to yes for show the prices with tax included or 
 excluded.
 I have created a sample application (ecommerceEu) to show how it's working.
 For the moment I have used only two product with vat tax calculated (GZ-1000 
 and GZ-1001).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-2589) New Shipment Gateway Config entities

2010-12-02 Thread Marco Risaliti (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12966283#action_12966283
 ] 

Marco Risaliti commented on OFBIZ-2589:
---

I will provide an example of shipment gateway that it will use the new shipment 
gateway config entities.

Thanks
Marco

 New Shipment Gateway Config entities
 

 Key: OFBIZ-2589
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2589
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: product
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter: Marco Risaliti
Assignee: Marco Risaliti
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: SVN trunk

 Attachments: ShipmentGatewayConfig.patch, ShipmentGatewayConfig2.patch


 Add some new entities/fields to move the shipment gateway config from 
 shipment.properties to the new entities.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



Re: jquey

2010-12-02 Thread Erwan de FERRIERES

Le 02/12/2010 21:48, BJ Freeman a écrit :

before I jump I guess I should test.
my thinking was the screens as Selenium would see them be changed, so
the tests would fail.


 Hi BJ,
maybe, but work should not be so important. Selenium are also broken 
when an elenent is changing its location, like a button-bar instead of a 
link, etc...
Anyway, the problem will be in finding the element, so very little 
change in the end.


Cheers,

--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz


Re: jquey

2010-12-02 Thread BJ Freeman

Chuckle
that is what I thought, and I dread more workload to just keep up.
at this point I think you and I are the only ones that have invested in 
Selenium


=
BJ Freeman
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation  
http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52
Specialtymarket.com  http://www.specialtymarket.com/
Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist

Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man


Erwan de FERRIERES sent the following on 12/2/2010 1:50 PM:

Le 02/12/2010 21:48, BJ Freeman a écrit :

before I jump I guess I should test.
my thinking was the screens as Selenium would see them be changed, so
the tests would fail.


Hi BJ,
maybe, but work should not be so important. Selenium are also broken
when an elenent is changing its location, like a button-bar instead of a
link, etc...
Anyway, the problem will be in finding the element, so very little
change in the end.

Cheers,





Re: jquey

2010-12-02 Thread Bruno Busco
Why you think that making a new release branch would create a fork?
It will be managed as we manage R10.04 and R9.04 right now.
Only bug fixes will be backported.

-Bruno


2010/12/2 Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com

 Ryan Foster wrote:

 What about creating a tag or branch before the merge so that users who
 have custom projects or applications based on the trunk
 have a reference point in the event that they want to freeze their
 applications at a particular revision?


 Yes, that's what I have proposed. With another option: to have a branch.
 But I think the later is more a fork and I prefer the 1st.


  Oh and +1 on merging in JQuery.  I am all for consolidating/simplifying
 our Javascript libraries.  No reason to have 3 libraries
 that all essentially do the same thing.  In the end, Javascript is
 Javascript.  My heart says we should have chosen Prototype as
 that one (as anyone who knows me would agree, I'm a big Prototype JS
 evangelist).  But, my head says that JQuery is the right
 choice for the long-term growth and success of the project, as it has
 definitely become the drug of choice for a majority of
 developers and has much more wide-spread community involvement as far as
 development of plugins is concerned.


 I think we now all agree on that

 Jacques


  Ryan L. Foster
 801.671.0769
 cont...@ryanlfoster.com

 On Dec 2, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

  I'm sorry for Bruno, but it seems everybody is looking forward for this
 merging. So hopefully I will do it soon.
 If you are interested you can already check
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3814

 Jacques

 Michael Xu (xudong) wrote:

 +1

 Yeah, I would love such a great Xmas present :-)


  You're welcome
 +1

 Would be a great Xmas present to merge all the stuff into the trunk :-)

 Am 02.12.2010 um 10:59 schrieb Erwan de FERRIERES 
 erwan.de-ferrie...@nereide.fr:

  Le 02/12/2010 10:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :

 Looks like, apart Bruno, we are all on the same page so far

 Other opinions, ideas?

 Thanks

 Jacques


 The sooner the better !

 Thanks for all your work, Jacques and Sascha

 --
 Erwan de FERRIERES
 www.nereide.biz






GenericValue.getRelatedOne/Cache

2010-12-02 Thread Adam Heath
A while back, I started adding more variants of
GenericDelegator.findByPrimaryKey.  The outcome of that was to remove
those variants, and reduce the methods.

However, while looking at unrelated code tonight, I thought we should
do the same to the lookup methods in GenericValue.  For instance, I
saw this pattern:

if (booleanValue) {
  nextValue = value.getRelatedOneCache(relation);
} else {
  nextValue = value.getRelatedOne(relation);
}

I think it would be better to change that to getRelatedOne(relation,
boolean).

Do others agree?  What about the other methods in that class?


Re: jquey

2010-12-02 Thread Adam Heath
BJ Freeman wrote:
 Chuckle
 that is what I thought, and I dread more workload to just keep up.
 at this point I think you and I are the only ones that have invested in
 Selenium

The solution there is to stop maintaining it outside of the normal
development pipeline.  Get it into trunk, make running selenium tests
automatic, with a simple call in build.xml.


Re: GenericValue.getRelatedOne/Cache

2010-12-02 Thread Jacques Le Roux

+1

Jacques

From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com

A while back, I started adding more variants of
GenericDelegator.findByPrimaryKey.  The outcome of that was to remove
those variants, and reduce the methods.

However, while looking at unrelated code tonight, I thought we should
do the same to the lookup methods in GenericValue.  For instance, I
saw this pattern:

if (booleanValue) {
 nextValue = value.getRelatedOneCache(relation);
} else {
 nextValue = value.getRelatedOne(relation);
}

I think it would be better to change that to getRelatedOne(relation,
boolean).

Do others agree?  What about the other methods in that class?





Re: svn commit: r1039887 - /ofbiz/site/doap_OFBiz.rdf

2010-12-02 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi, 


I have also sent a message with some enhancements in ofbiz.rdf to 
site-...@apache.org.
I have not received any answers and 
http://projects.apache.org/projects/ofbiz.html did not change
Is this not used anymore? Should I do something special?

Thanks

Jacques


From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
FYI:  for the PMC info we need to update 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site-tools/trunk/projects/data_files/ofbiz.rdf

But I have no rights for this. I will ask on site-...@apache.org

Jacques

From: jler...@apache.org

Author: jleroux
Date: Sun Nov 28 14:39:40 2010
New Revision: 1039887

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1039887view=rev
Log:
Adds some languages and releases information.
Also modify the link to the repository page in wiki.
I have tried to add PMC information but it's not quite clear to me

Modified:
   ofbiz/site/doap_OFBiz.rdf

Modified: ofbiz/site/doap_OFBiz.rdf
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/site/doap_OFBiz.rdf?rev=1039887r1=1039886r2=1039887view=diff
==
--- ofbiz/site/doap_OFBiz.rdf (original)
+++ ofbiz/site/doap_OFBiz.rdf Sun Nov 28 14:39:40 2010
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
!--
  ===

-   Copyright (c) 2006 The Apache Software Foundation.
+   Copyright (c) 2006-2010 The Apache Software Foundation.
   All rights reserved.

  ===
@@ -30,6 +30,9 @@
mailing-list rdf:resource=https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/L4B2; /
download-page rdf:resource=http://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html; /
programming-languageJava/programming-language
+programming-languageGroovy/programming-language
+programming-languageJavaScript/programming-language
+programming-languageXML/programming-language
category rdf:resource=http://projects.apache.org/category/web-framework; 
/
category rdf:resource=http://projects.apache.org/category/database; /
category rdf:resource=http://projects.apache.org/category/network-server; 
/
@@ -37,8 +40,8 @@
category rdf:resource=http://projects.apache.org/category/http; /
repository
  SVNRepository
-location rdf:resource=http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk//
-browse rdf:resource=http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/trunk/
+location rdf:resource=http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/trunk//
+browse rdf:resource=https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/BYB2/
  /SVNRepository
/repository
maintainer
@@ -47,6 +50,20 @@
foaf:mbox rdf:resource=mailto:jone...@apache.org/
  /foaf:Person
/maintainer
-
+release
+Version
+nameOld unofficial and not maintained/name
+created2007-04-01/created
+revision4.0/revision
+/Version
+/release
+release
+Version
+nameLast stable/name
+created2009-04-01/created
+revision9.04/revision
+/Version
+/release
+shortdesc xml:lang=enThe Open For Business Project (Apache OFBiz) is an open source enterprise automation software 
project/shortdesc

  /Project
/rdf:RDF