Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 11.04.05 (2nd vote)
+1 On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > This is the vote thread to release the last bug fix release for the 11.04 > branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 11.04.05" is the latest release in > the branch, after it we will stop backporting bugs to the 11.04 branch. > > The release files can be downloaded from here: > > http://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ > > and are: > > * apache-ofbiz-11.04.05.zip > * KEYS: text file with keys > * apache-ofbiz-11.04.05.zip.asc: the detached signature file > * apache-ofbiz-11.04.05.zip.md5, apache-ofbiz-11.04.05.zip.sha: hashes > > Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for instructions > on testing the signatures see http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html > ). > > Vote: > > [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 11.04.05 > [ -1] do not release > > This vote will be open for 5 days. > For more details about this process please read > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > Kind Regards, > > Jacopo
Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 12.04.04 (4th vote)
+1 On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the > release12.04 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 12.04.04" will > supersede all the previous releases from the same branch. > The release files can be downloaded from here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ > > and are: > > * apache-ofbiz-12.04.04.zip > * KEYS: text file with keys > * apache-ofbiz-12.04.04.zip.asc: the detached signature file > * apache-ofbiz-12.04.04.zip.md5, apache-ofbiz-12.04.04.zip.sha: hashes > > Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for instructions > on testing the signatures see http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html > ). > > Vote: > > [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 12.04.04 > [ -1] do not release > > This vote will be open for 5 days. > For more details about this process please read > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > Kind Regards, > > Jacopo > >
Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 12.04.03
+1 Regards, Medhat On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > This is the vote thread to release a new (bug fix) release for the 12.04 > branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 12.04.03" (major release number: > "12.04"; minor release number: "03"), will supersede the release "Apache > OFBiz 12.04.02". > > The release files can be downloaded from here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ > > (committers only) or from here: > > http://people.apache.org/~jacopoc/dist/ > > (everyone else) > > and are: > > * apache-ofbiz-12.04.03.zip: the release package, based on the 12.04 > branch at revision 1601320 (latest as of now) > * KEYS: text file with keys > * apache-ofbiz-12.04.03.zip.asc: the detached signature file > * apache-ofbiz-12.04.03.zip.md5, apache-ofbiz-12.04.03.zip.sha: hashes > > Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for instructions > on testing the signatures see http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html > ). > > Vote: > > [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 12.04.03 > [ -1] do not release > > This vote will be closed in 5 days. > For more details about this process please read > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > The following text is quoted from the above url: > "Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority approval > -- i.e. at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release, and > there must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may not be > vetoed. Generally the community will cancel the release vote if anyone > identifies serious problems, but in most cases the ultimate decision, lies > with the individual serving as release manager." > > Kind Regards, > > Jacopo
Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 11.04.04
+1 Regards, Medhat On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > Thanks, the vote is now closed. > This vote has passed with the following results: > > [+1] 3 > [+0] 1 > [-1] 1 > > The minimum (3) number of +1 votes from PMC members has been reached: 3 > votes from Ashish, Jacopo, Scott > > I will proceed with the remaining steps required to release the product. > > Jacopo > > On Feb 13, 2014, at 4:43 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < > jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > > > This is the vote thread to release the fourth release for the 11.04 > branch. This bug fix release, "Apache OFBiz 11.04.04" (major release > number: "11.04"; minor release number: "04"), will supersede the release > "Apache OFBiz 11.04.03". > > > > The release files can be downloaded from here: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ > > > > (committers only) or from here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacopoc/dist/ > > > > (everyone else) > > > > and are: > > > > * apache-ofbiz-11.04.04.zip: the release package, based on the 11.04 > branch at revision 1567869 (latest as of now) > > * KEYS: text file with keys > > * apache-ofbiz-11.04.04.zip.asc: the detached signature file > > * apache-ofbiz-11.04.04.zip.md5, apache-ofbiz-10.04.04.zip.sha: hashes > > > > Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for > instructions on testing the signatures see > http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html): it would be really useful > if, when you cast your vote, you specify if (and how) you have tested the > release. > > > > Vote: > > > > [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 11.04.04 > > [ -1] do not release > > > > This vote will be closed in 72 hours. > > For more details about this process please read > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > > > The following text is quoted from the above url: > > "Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority > approval -- i.e. at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for > release, and there must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may > not be vetoed. Generally the community will cancel the release vote if > anyone identifies serious problems, but in most cases the ultimate > decision, lies with the individual serving as release manager." > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > Jacopo > > > >
Re: Renaming .project release names
+1 No problem for more informative naming pattern. On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Do you mind if I rename releases .project inside names? > ie from > ofbiz > to eg > release13.07 > > This to reflect the real releases branch names and allow easier global > importing in Eclipse. > > Jacques > >
Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 12.04.02
+1 On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > This is the vote thread to release a new (bug fix) release for the 12.04 > branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 12.04.02" (major release number: > "12.04"; minor release number: "02"), will supersede the release "Apache > OFBiz 12.04.01". > > The release files can be downloaded from here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ > > (committers only) or from here: > > http://people.apache.org/~jacopoc/dist/ > > (everyone else) > > and are: > > * apache-ofbiz-12.04.02.zip: the release package, based on the 12.04 > branch (latest revision as of now) > * KEYS: text file with keys > * apache-ofbiz-12.04.02.zip.asc: the detached signature file > * apache-ofbiz-12.04.02.zip.md5, apache-ofbiz-12.04.02.zip.sha: hashes > > Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for instructions > on testing the signatures see http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html > ). > > Vote: > > [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 12.04.02 > [ -1] do not release > > This vote will be closed in Thursday, 18th of July. > For more details about this process please read > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > The following text is quoted from the above url: > "Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority approval > -- i.e. at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release, and > there must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may not be > vetoed. Generally the community will cancel the release vote if anyone > identifies serious problems, but in most cases the ultimate decision, lies > with the individual serving as release manager." > > Kind Regards, > > Jacopo
Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 11.04.03
+1 On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > This is the vote thread to release a new (bug fix) release for the 11.04 > branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 11.04.03" (major release number: > "11.04"; minor release number: "03"), will supersede the release "Apache > OFBiz 11.04.02". > > The release files can be downloaded from here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ > > (committers only) or from here: > > http://people.apache.org/~jacopoc/dist/ > > (everyone else) > > and are: > > * apache-ofbiz-11.04.03.zip: the release package, based on the 11.04 > branch (latest revision as of now) > * KEYS: text file with keys > * apache-ofbiz-11.04.03.zip.asc: the detached signature file > * apache-ofbiz-11.04.03.zip.md5, apache-ofbiz-11.04.03.zip.sha: hashes > > Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for instructions > on testing the signatures see http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html > ). > > Vote: > > [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 11.04.03 > [ -1] do not release > > This vote will be closed in Thursday, 18th of July. > For more details about this process please read > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > The following text is quoted from the above url: > "Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority approval > -- i.e. at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release, and > there must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may not be > vetoed. Generally the community will cancel the release vote if anyone > identifies serious problems, but in most cases the ultimate decision, lies > with the individual serving as release manager." > > Kind Regards, > > Jacopo
Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 10.04.06
+1 On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > This is the vote thread to release a new (bug fix) release for the 10.04 > branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 10.04.06" (major release number: > "10.04"; minor release number: "06"), will supersede the release "Apache > OFBiz 10.04.05". > > The release files can be downloaded from here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ > > (committers only) or from here: > > http://people.apache.org/~jacopoc/dist/ > > (everyone else) > > and are: > > * apache-ofbiz-10.04.06.zip: the release package, based on the 10.04 > branch (latest revision as of now) > * KEYS: text file with keys > * apache-ofbiz-10.04.06.zip.asc: the detached signature file > * apache-ofbiz-10.04.06.zip.md5, apache-ofbiz-10.04.06.zip.sha: hashes > > Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for instructions > on testing the signatures see http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html > ). > > Vote: > > [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 10.04.06 > [ -1] do not release > > This vote will be closed in Thursday, 18th of July. > For more details about this process please read > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > The following text is quoted from the above url: > "Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority approval > -- i.e. at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release, and > there must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may not be > vetoed. Generally the community will cancel the release vote if anyone > identifies serious problems, but in most cases the ultimate decision, lies > with the individual serving as release manager." > > Kind Regards, > > Jacopo
Re: Idea/proposal: merging the Confluence spaces EndUsers, Technical, Requirements into the public wiki
+1 On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > in order to start the process of cleaning up the mess in our Confluence > spaces, as a very first step I would like you to consider the idea of > merging the spaces: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBENDUSER/OFBiz+End+User+Docs+Home > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBTECH/Home > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBREQDES/Home > > into > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Home > > Then we will shut down the three old ones. > As a result, we will end up with two spaces: > > Public wiki (everyone can read/write): > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Home > Project Admin Space (only committers can write): > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/Home > > The consequence will be that most of the document will be editable by > everyone but I think it is fine and we could review our policies if this > experiment will fail. > > After this is done we will consider further cleanup. > > What do you think? > > Jacopo > >
Re: Test ALL screens automatically?
Hi Jacques, Using packages like Selenium WebDriver which is the successor of Selenium remote control or Selenium Grid which controls and distribute test cases load on many Selenium remote control needs a lot of configurations and environment settings. Do you think project like this will be part of the ofbiz distribution or will only done on the server holding the demo-trunk? Regards, Medhat On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Just had an idea: could we not build a mechanism which would test ALL > screens automatically? > Not to be run with run-tests but from time to time when we do major or > deep overhauls. > Of course this would not be JUnit tests but more using Selenium WebDriver > or the kind, like what Erwan was lastly working on. > > Maybe there is something already that I'm not aware of? > > This would be a good regression test, I believe > > Jacques >
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-5178) Add Configurable Product to Quote does not open "Configure Product Before Adding to Cart"
Medhat created OFBIZ-5178: - Summary: Add Configurable Product to Quote does not open "Configure Product Before Adding to Cart" Key: OFBIZ-5178 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5178 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: order Affects Versions: SVN trunk, Release Branch 12.04 Reporter: Medhat When you create a Quote, and try to add Configurable Product like "PC001 - Configurable PC" to Quote, it is added directly to the Quote without opening or go through "Configure Product Before Adding to Cart" page. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
"Look up Product and Price" Displays many empty options in the Combo Box "Primary Product Category Id"
Hi, When open "Look up Product and Price" Look up which is reached by the following Steps: Order >> Quotes >> find Quote or create new Quote >> Quote Items >> Create New Quote Item >> open look up beside "Product Id" The Combo Box "Primary Product Category Id" Contains many empty options when scroll down inside the Combo Box. This is because Combo box displays data in the "DESCRIPTION" field in the entity "ProductCategory" Which maybe contains empty values in many records. To solve this issue, I am suggesting the following: In the File : /applications/product/widget/catalog/FieldLookupForms.xml at lines 144 - 150, 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 Add the following line after line 146 ** Then the above code snippet becomes: 144 145 146 147** 148 149 150 151 This will remove any empty "DESCRIPTION" field's value from being listed in the Combo Box. This behavior is existing on "demo-trunk" and ofbiz version 12.04.01. What you think about that ? Regards, Medhat
Re: Add Configurable Product to Quote does not open "Configure Product Before Adding to Cart"
Hi, Regarding the bug, Shall I open a Jira for it, or it requires some permissions or role i do not have ? Regards, Medhat On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Atul Vani wrote: > Inline. > > > On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:28:07 +0530, Medhat AbdelBadie < > medhat7...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, >> >> When you create a Quote, and try to add Configurable Product like "PC001 - >> Configurable PC" to Quote, it is added directly to the Quote without >> opening or go through "Configure Product Before Adding to Cart" page. >> > > This is a bug. > > > Also, when this Configurable Product is added to Quote, no way to >> configure >> this product. >> > > This is not. > > > >> This behavior is existing on "demo-trunk" and ofbiz version 12.04.01. >> >> Does this behavior is Desired or not ? >> >> Regards, >> Medhat >> > > > -- > Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ >
Add Configurable Product to Quote does not open "Configure Product Before Adding to Cart"
Hi, When you create a Quote, and try to add Configurable Product like "PC001 - Configurable PC" to Quote, it is added directly to the Quote without opening or go through "Configure Product Before Adding to Cart" page. Also, when this Configurable Product is added to Quote, no way to configure this product. This behavior is existing on "demo-trunk" and ofbiz version 12.04.01. Does this behavior is Desired or not ? Regards, Medhat
Re: Disabling some of the specialpurpose components
+1 Medhat On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > We have recently discussed the idea of keeping all the specialpurpose > components in the trunk, remove them from future release branches (starting > with 13.04 that will probably still contain the ecommerce component because > a lot unit tests are based on demo data in it and because of some other > minor dependencies) but considering them as "optional", meaning that the > community may not maintain them updated. > This seems to be a good compromise between the advantage for the community > to have a smaller codebase to maintain to a good quality level (taking care > of bug fix releases etc...) and the interest in keeping in the official > trunk some specialized/experimental code that may be of interest to smaller > groups or that could be resurrected over time. > I would like to go ahead with this plan and disable (i.e. remove from the > default build/test process and disable as components) the following two > components: "crowd" and "birt". > The main reason is that they both require the very old Axis "1" jar files > (published in 2006) that are now in the framework/service component and are > not used anymore because a few years ago we upgraded the core components to > "Axis 2". In short I would like to: > 1) remove the old "Axis 1" jars from the framework > 2) disable "crowd" and "birt" components so that they are excluded by the > compile task by default; all the code will stay in the trunk > If someone is interested in upgrading them then we could re-enable them at > a later point (even if there are other disadvantages in both components > that we should address). > > WDYT? > > Jacopo > >
Re: Moving the "appserver" component from framework to specialpurpose
According to Jacopo clarification, i agree with this move. Thank u Jacopo for your clarification. Regards, Medhat On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > this is now done in rev. 1465276 and it should work as before the > migration. > @Medhat: the appserver component is used to automatically generate scripts > to deploy OFBiz to other non default application servers. > > Jacopo > > On Apr 3, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Jacques Le Roux > wrote: > > > It's hard to test the whole but why not moving it? > > Then maybe add a note in a readme to explain it was moved from framework > untested? > > > > Jacques > > > > From: "Jacopo Cappellato" > >> WDYT? > >> > >> Jacopo > >> > >
Re: Moving Jetty component from framework to specialpurpose
Hi, If the default installation will run ofbiz using tomcat, then i agree with moving Jetty to specialpurpose, because it is an alternative web server. If there is no default web server used to run ofbiz after build using the default configurations, then it is OK to move both Jetty and tomcat to another place, maybe it will be specialpurpose but after restructuring it. e.g .. to have a directory inside specialpurpose called webservers contains any webserver used with ofbiz. Regards, Medhat On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > What do you think? With the work I did some time ago now each component > has the ability to declare its containers and so it is technically possible > to move them outside of the framework. > Moving jetty out of the framework will remove from the core part of OFBiz > a good number of jars. > > Jacopo > >
Re: Moving the "appserver" component from framework to specialpurpose
Hi, I think it is place in framework is suitable. If you want to move it from framework, it is OK, but i think specialpurpose is not the suitable place, because we talked about specialpurpose as a place for additional components or optional components, which is not the case with the application server. I think it is a good idea to reorganize the structure of the framework, so we can place application server in a suitable place inside framework. Regards, Medhat On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > WDYT? > > Jacopo > >
Re: Some ideas for the future of the OFBiz
Hi Jacopo, +1 I hope there is a vote for prioritizing the implementation sequence of these amazing Ideas. Regards, Medhat -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Some-ideas-for-the-future-of-the-OFBiz-tp4639965p4640208.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 12.04.01
+1 Medhat On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > This is the vote thread to approve the first release for the 12.04 branch. > This new release, "Apache OFBiz 12.04.01" (major release number: "12.04"; > minor release number: "01") is the first release of the 12.04 series and > contains all the features of the trunk up to April 2012 and since then has > been stabilized with bug fixes. It will become the OFBiz current "stable" > release and users of the 11.04 series will be encouraged to migrate to this > release. > > The candidate release files can be downloaded from here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ > > (committers only) or from here: > > http://people.apache.org/~jacopoc/dist/ > > (everyone else) > > and are: > > * apache-ofbiz-12.04.01.zip: the release package, based on the 12.04 > branch at revision 1461136 (latest as of now) > * KEYS: text file with keys > * apache-ofbiz-12.04.01.zip.asc: the detached signature file > * apache-ofbiz-12.04.01.zip.md5, apache-ofbiz-12.04.01.zip.sha: hashes > > Please download the zip file and check its signatures (for instructions on > testing the signatures see http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html), > then test the release. > > Vote: > > [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 12.04.01 > [ -1] do not release > > This vote will be closed in Monday, 1st of April. > For more details about this process please read > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > The following text is quoted from the above url: > "Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority approval > -- i.e. at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release, and > there must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may not be > vetoed. Generally the community will cancel the release vote if anyone > identifies serious problems, but in most cases the ultimate decision, lies > with the individual serving as release manager." > > Jacopo Cappellato > >
Re: Please review these modifications to the OFBiz web site main page
I Agree, it looks interesting.
Regards,
Medhat
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Ashish Vijaywargiya <
vijaywargiya.ash...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Jacopo,
>
> This changes looks good to me. Thanks!
>
> --
> Kind Regards
> Ashish Vijaywargiya
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Jacopo Cappellato <
> jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > could you please review this proposal for some modifications to the OFBiz
> > web site main page?
> > Here is a summary of changes I did:
> > 1) removed two subsection titles that seemed redundant to me
> > 2) merged the content of the section "Who is Using Apache OFBiz?" to the
> > main section (with minor editing)
> > 3) added a new section "News" with two news entries for the last two
> > releases we have published; I know we did an experiment in the past with
> a
> > News section and then we have removed it because there was disagreement
> > about its content; however this time this should not be an issue because
> we
> > will only publish project news (typically posted to the ASF Announcement
> > list... basically OFBiz releases only)
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Jacopo
> >
> >
> > Index: index.html
> > ===
> > --- index.html (revision 1460606)
> > +++ index.html (working copy)
> > @@ -128,7 +128,6 @@
> >
> >
> > Apache OFBiz™
> > -What is Apache OFBiz?
> >
> >Apache OFBiz offers a great deal of functionality,
> > including:
> >
> > @@ -164,7 +163,8 @@
> > Apache OFBiz is a project of http://www.apache.org/
> ">The
> > Apache Software Foundation.
> >
> > Being open source under the Apache 2.0 license and driven by
> a
> > community Apache OFBiz offers both flexibility by design and by access to
> > code, and a solution where you're not alone but rather can work with many
> > others to get things done.
> > -
> > + It's hard to say who and how many organizations are using
> > Apache OFBiz because they don't have to tell us when they use it.
> > +In the documentation page
> you'll
> > find link to a Wiki page with the list of known sites and products based
> on
> > OFBiz we know about ("Users of Apache OFBiz").
> >
> > For answers to your questions you might find the following
> > documents useful:
> >
> > @@ -174,9 +174,21 @@
> >
> >
> >
> > -Who is Using Apache OFBiz?
> > -It's hard to say who and how many organizations are using
> > Apache OFBiz because you don't have to tell us when you use it, but there
> > are lots of public sites.
> > -In the documentation
> page
> > you'll find link to a Wiki page with the list of sites and products based
> > on OFBiz we know about ("Users of Apache OFBiz").
> > +
> > + News
> > + January 18, 2013
> > +
> > + The Apache OFBiz community is pleased to announce the new
> > release "Apache OFBiz 11.04.02".
> > + This is a bug fix release for the 11.04 series; all users of
> > "Apache OFBiz 11.04.01" are encouraged to upgrade to this latest release
> > because it contains bug fixes including fixes for a security
> vulnerability
> > (http://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html#vulnerabilities
> > ">CVE-2013-0177).
> > + The release files can be downloaded from the http://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html";>download page.
> > +
> > + January 17, 2013
> > +
> > + The Apache OFBiz community is pleased to announce the new
> > release "Apache OFBiz 10.04.05".
> > + This is a bug fix release for the 10.04 series; all users of
> > "Apache OFBiz 10.04.x" releases are encouraged to upgrade to this latest
> > release because it contains bug fixes including fixes for a security
> > vulnerability (http://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html#vulnerabilities
> > ">CVE-2013-0177).
> > + The release files can be downloaded from the http://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html";>download page.
> > +
> > +
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: In preparation for the 13.04 branch
Hi, No matter where you keep ecommerce component in releases, but the point is to exist in the release. >From my prospective, it should exist as part of the main product. Functionality like link to the "PRODUCT PAGE" in the Product page in catalog manager, will not exist if ecommerce component does not exist, and if it is added as a separate component, it will need a lot of work to integrate it again, taking into consideration we do not have a vision now regarding how additional component will be added to the main product or core functions. I think we need a thread discusses how additional or separate components will be installed/integrated with the main product. Regards, Medhat On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Anil Patel wrote: > I think we should not include anything from specialpurpose folder in next > release. > > Deepak mentioned about an item that we may have to move to application > folder, lets do that. In the process we may find few other similar things. > > Applications in specialpurpose folder can have their own release cycles. > At that point ecommerce application will compete with third party > applications like BigFish. Sometime in future either ecommerce application > will be upgraded and become popular or will loose its fans to better third > party application. > > Our goal should be to enhance the core and let service providers build > specialpurpose applications. > > Regards > Anil Patel > > > > > > On Mar 23, 2013, at 6:35 AM, Jacques Le Roux > wrote: > > > I'm also for keeping the specialpurpose/ecommerce component in releases, > it's an important part of the OFBiz brand. > > I'd also like we finalize its UI, tought I have not much time/energy to > put in it. At least 3 Jira are waiting for ages, 2 of them are important > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3037 > > > > BTW about our slim-down effort, > > In Jira I see > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OFBIZ%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20SlimDownthat > issues are done (I'd not want to change the Examples components more) > > What else? > > > > Jacques > > > > From: "Jacopo Cappellato" > >> Based on the feedback from Deepak and Medhat: what if we include > ecommerce only? > >> I mean: we remove from the 13.04 branch all the specialpurpose > components except the ecommerce component; we could also include the > "example" component, but that is probably less useful in a release. The > ecommerce component has been historically always present in all our > releases (as it has been implemented in the applications folder). > >> > >> Jacopo > >> > >> On Mar 23, 2013, at 6:59 AM, Medhat AbdelBadie > wrote: > >> > >>> It is OK, > >>> > >>> But Does this mean ecommerce application will be removed to another > >>> directory, or will be entirely suppressed from the new release and > >>> released separately? > >>> Does this mean we will have main release with core components, and any > >>> other components will be treated as plugins or something like that? > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Medhat > >>> > >>> > >>> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Deepak Dixit > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> +1 > >>>> > >>>> One thing will need to move convertProductPriceCurrency property from > >>>> ecommerce.properies file, may be place it in catalog.properties or in > some > >>>> other property file. > >>>> As this is used for automatic product price currency conversion > (r1125215). > >>>> > >>>> Thanks & Regards > >>>> -- > >>>> Deepak Dixit > >>>> > >>>> On Mar 23, 2013, at 2:40 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Agreed > >>>>> > >>>>> Jacques > >>>>> > >>>>> From: "Adrian Crum" > >>>>>> That seems pretty harmless. Anyone wanting to use specialpurpose can > >>>>>> just add it to their local copy. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -Adrian > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 3/22/2013 4:19 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > >>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> the next month is the month of the creation of our annual branch > >>>> release: release13.04. > >>>>>>&g
Re: In preparation for the 13.04 branch
It is OK, But Does this mean ecommerce application will be removed to another directory, or will be entirely suppressed from the new release and released separately? Does this mean we will have main release with core components, and any other components will be treated as plugins or something like that? Regards, Medhat On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Deepak Dixit wrote: > +1 > > One thing will need to move convertProductPriceCurrency property from > ecommerce.properies file, may be place it in catalog.properties or in some > other property file. > As this is used for automatic product price currency conversion (r1125215). > > Thanks & Regards > -- > Deepak Dixit > > On Mar 23, 2013, at 2:40 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > > Agreed > > > > Jacques > > > > From: "Adrian Crum" > >> That seems pretty harmless. Anyone wanting to use specialpurpose can > >> just add it to their local copy. > >> > >> -Adrian > >> > >> On 3/22/2013 4:19 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> the next month is the month of the creation of our annual branch > release: release13.04. > >>> In preparation for this, I would like to propose to exclude from the > upcoming new branch the specialpurpose folder and some of the themes > components: this is inline with what we have discussed recently for the > trunk (and there seemed to be a good consensus/interest about this), i.e. > separating the specialpurpose folders into an optional module that is not > built and deployed by default: for the trunk this requires some work to > make the build scripts more flexible, but for the branch it is much simpler > (we can simply remove the folders from the branch). > >>> This will help a lot to avoid the risk to receive vulnerability > reports for the future releases, that require a good amount of work for us; > in fact there are a lot of external jars in specialpurpose and if we > deliver them in our releases we should also take care of making sure that, > if the external projects issue new releases with fixes for vulnerabilities > then we should also issue a new release as well: maintaining this is time > consuming and also reviewing all the code to make sure it meets good > standard of quality and it is clear from license issues when a release is > issued is becoming an overwhelming effort. If we deliver in releases a > smaller codebase, everything will be easier and more manageable. > >>> Of course we can still decide to issue a release of "specialpurpose" > components separately. > >>> > >>> WDYT? > >>> > >>> Jacopo > >> > >
Re: Releasing 12.04.01
Hi, Does this release preserves all commits and bug fixes in Release 11.04.02 ? Does this release preserves existing tables in data model implemented in Release 11.04.02, so the upgrade will be safe, no matter if new tables are added ? If Both are Yes, so, I am waiting for it, many enhancements exist on Trunk and i hope they are included in the official release. I am appreciating your Great Efforts and role. Regards, Medhat -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Releasing-12-04-01-tp4639595p4639767.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 11.04.02
+1 Thank you for your Efforts. Regards, Medhat On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Anil K Patel wrote: > +1 > > Thanks and Regards > Anil Patel > Hotwax Media Inc > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com/ > > On Jan 14, 2013, at 7:36 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < > jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > > > This is the vote thread to release a new (bug fix) release for the 11.04 > branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 11.04.02" (major release number: > "11.04"; minor release number: "02"), will supersede the release "Apache > OFBiz 11.04.01". > > > > The release files can be downloaded from here: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ > > > > (committers only) or from here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacopoc/dist/ > > > > (everyone else) > > > > and are: > > > > * apache-ofbiz-11.04.02.zip: the release package, based on the 11.04 > branch at revision 1432855 (latest as of now) > > * KEYS: text file with keys > > * apache-ofbiz-11.04.02.zip.asc: the detached signature file > > * apache-ofbiz-11.04.02.zip.md5, apache-ofbiz-11.04.02.zip.sha: hashes > > > > Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for > instructions on testing the signatures see > http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html). > > > > Vote: > > > > [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 11.04.02 > > [ -1] do not release > > > > This vote will be closed in 72 hours. > > For more details about this process please read > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > > > The following text is quoted from the above url: > > "Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority > approval -- i.e. at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for > release, and there must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may > not be vetoed. Generally the community will cancel the release vote if > anyone identifies serious problems, but in most cases the ultimate > decision, lies with the individual serving as release manager." > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > Jacopo > > > >
