Re: Branching for Oozie 4.0
Hi,
I think we should be good to release 4.0 early next week. Mona will be
rolling out the release.
Pending:
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1482 - backward
compatibility with older servers for frequency in json response. Patch is
already up.
- A minor issue with db upgrade if error msg string is >4K characters. We
need to truncate and insert to the varchar errormsg column. Ryota is
working on this and should be committed by tomorrow.
Is there anything else that needs to be pulled in?
Robert/Bowen,
Would you guys be able to take the time and try out branch-4.0 since
this is a major one with DB upgrade? If you find any issues, we can pull
them in before the release. Since the RC candidate will not contain any
binaries, you don't have to wait till RC to try it out.
Regards,
Rohini
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Mona Chitnis wrote:
> We discovered a couple of critical bugs around Bundle Kill command. We
> will be patching branch 3.3, branch-4.0 and trunk in the next few days and
> then would be comfortable preparing for the release.
>
> --
> Mona
>
> On 7/24/13 11:36 AM, "Robert Kanter" wrote:
>
> >Hi Rohini,
> >
> >What's the status of branch 4? Do you think you'll be sending out a vote
> >for the release soon?
> >
> >thanks
> >- Robert
> >
> >
> >On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Shwetha GS
> wrote:
> >
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1465 has a small patch to
> >>make
> >> some constants public. These are very useful for EL extensions. Can you
> >> please merge to 4.0 branch
> >>
> >> -Shwetha
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Rohini Palaniswamy <
> >> rohini.adi...@gmail.com
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> > This is done now. Changed version to 4.0.0 for the following
> >> >
> >> > project = OOZIE AND fixVersion = trunk AND resolution = Fixed AND Key
> >>not
> >> > in (OOZIE-1453, OOZIE-1447, OOZIE-1440) AND fixVersion not in
> >>("3.3.0",
> >> > "3.3.1", "3.3.2")
> >> >
> >> > Also removed trunk from FixVersion/s when there were other versions.
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Rohini
> >> >
> >> > On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy <
> >> > rohini.adi...@gmail.com
> >> > > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > > Do you mean the "Fix Version" field?
> >> > >Yes.
> >> > >
> >> > > > I know that many JIRAs are using that
> >> > > to also mean the "target version", which is a field we don't have
> >> > > "Fix Version" is the equivalent of bugzilla "Target Version".
> >> > >
> >> > > > I'm sure there are some JIRAs marked with
> >> > > "Fix Version" as trunk that we don't want in 4.0, right?
> >> > > Yes. A couple of jiras went into trunk after the branching. They
> >>will
> >> > > not be marked 4.0
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > > Rohini
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Robert Kanter <
> rkan...@cloudera.com
> >> > >wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Do you mean the "Fix Version" field? I know that many JIRAs are
> >>using
> >> > >> that
> >> > >> to also mean the "target version", which is a field we don't have
> >> > (perhaps
> >> > >> we should have that field?). I'm sure there are some JIRAs marked
> >> with
> >> > >> "Fix Version" as trunk that we don't want in 4.0, right?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> - Robert
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Rohini Palaniswamy <
> >> > >> rohini.adi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > Planning to do a bulk update of the Fixed version of jiras to
> >> > branch-4.0
> >> > >> > tomorrow. Currently they are marked as trunk. Please let know if
> >> there
> >> > >> are
> >> > >> > any objections.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Regards,
> >> > >> > Rohini
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy <
> >> > >> > rohini.adi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > > Created
> >>http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/oozie/branches/branch-4.0/.
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > Patches yet to be done for branch-4.0.
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > OOZIE-1379 Generate SLA end_miss event only after confirming
> >> > against
> >> > >> > > persistent store
> >> > >> > > OOZIE-1249 and OOZIE-1430 Documentation for JMS notifications
> >>and
> >> > SLA
> >> > >> > > monitoring
> >> > >> > > OOZIE-1405 Fix flakey unit tests
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > Regards,
> >> > >> > > Rohini
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Robert Kanter <
> >> > rkan...@cloudera.com
> >> > >> > >wrote:
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >> Ah, you're right; thanks.
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> I reviewed the patch, but I'd like someone else to also take a
> >> look
> >> > >> > >> because
> >> > >> > >> I'm not a DB expert.
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> - Robert
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Virag Kothari <
> >> > vi...@yahoo-inc.com
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> > That change is reverted by OOZIE-1436. Can you review
> >> > >> > >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/12164/ and confirm
Re: Branching for Oozie 4.0
We discovered a couple of critical bugs around Bundle Kill command. We
will be patching branch 3.3, branch-4.0 and trunk in the next few days and
then would be comfortable preparing for the release.
--
Mona
On 7/24/13 11:36 AM, "Robert Kanter" wrote:
>Hi Rohini,
>
>What's the status of branch 4? Do you think you'll be sending out a vote
>for the release soon?
>
>thanks
>- Robert
>
>
>On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Shwetha GS wrote:
>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1465 has a small patch to
>>make
>> some constants public. These are very useful for EL extensions. Can you
>> please merge to 4.0 branch
>>
>> -Shwetha
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Rohini Palaniswamy <
>> rohini.adi...@gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > This is done now. Changed version to 4.0.0 for the following
>> >
>> > project = OOZIE AND fixVersion = trunk AND resolution = Fixed AND Key
>>not
>> > in (OOZIE-1453, OOZIE-1447, OOZIE-1440) AND fixVersion not in
>>("3.3.0",
>> > "3.3.1", "3.3.2")
>> >
>> > Also removed trunk from FixVersion/s when there were other versions.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Rohini
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy <
>> > rohini.adi...@gmail.com
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> > > > Do you mean the "Fix Version" field?
>> > >Yes.
>> > >
>> > > > I know that many JIRAs are using that
>> > > to also mean the "target version", which is a field we don't have
>> > > "Fix Version" is the equivalent of bugzilla "Target Version".
>> > >
>> > > > I'm sure there are some JIRAs marked with
>> > > "Fix Version" as trunk that we don't want in 4.0, right?
>> > > Yes. A couple of jiras went into trunk after the branching. They
>>will
>> > > not be marked 4.0
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Rohini
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Robert Kanter > > >wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Do you mean the "Fix Version" field? I know that many JIRAs are
>>using
>> > >> that
>> > >> to also mean the "target version", which is a field we don't have
>> > (perhaps
>> > >> we should have that field?). I'm sure there are some JIRAs marked
>> with
>> > >> "Fix Version" as trunk that we don't want in 4.0, right?
>> > >>
>> > >> - Robert
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Rohini Palaniswamy <
>> > >> rohini.adi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > Planning to do a bulk update of the Fixed version of jiras to
>> > branch-4.0
>> > >> > tomorrow. Currently they are marked as trunk. Please let know if
>> there
>> > >> are
>> > >> > any objections.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Regards,
>> > >> > Rohini
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy <
>> > >> > rohini.adi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > Created
>>http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/oozie/branches/branch-4.0/.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Patches yet to be done for branch-4.0.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > OOZIE-1379 Generate SLA end_miss event only after confirming
>> > against
>> > >> > > persistent store
>> > >> > > OOZIE-1249 and OOZIE-1430 Documentation for JMS notifications
>>and
>> > SLA
>> > >> > > monitoring
>> > >> > > OOZIE-1405 Fix flakey unit tests
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Regards,
>> > >> > > Rohini
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Robert Kanter <
>> > rkan...@cloudera.com
>> > >> > >wrote:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >> Ah, you're right; thanks.
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> I reviewed the patch, but I'd like someone else to also take a
>> look
>> > >> > >> because
>> > >> > >> I'm not a DB expert.
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> - Robert
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Virag Kothari <
>> > vi...@yahoo-inc.com
>> > >> >
>> > >> > >> wrote:
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> > That change is reverted by OOZIE-1436. Can you review
>> > >> > >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/12164/ and confirm?
>> > >> > >> > We can keep OOZIE-1437 open to deal the problems we will
>>face
>> > when
>> > >> > >> having
>> > >> > >> > a 'proper' fix for the clob/varchar issues.
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >> > Thanks,
>> > >> > >> > Virag
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >> > On 6/28/13 11:12 AM, "Robert Kanter"
>> > wrote:
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >> > >I think we need both; OOZIE-1436 reverts the columns back
>> > because
>> > >> of
>> > >> > an
>> > >> > >> > >OpenJPA/Oracle issue and OOZIE-1437 is to fix an if
>>statement
>> > >> added
>> > >> > >> into
>> > >> > >> > >our code (see
>> > >> > >> > >
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>>
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1398?focusedCommentId=1369422
>>4
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>>
>>>&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#c
>>>om
>> > >> > >> > >ment-13694224
>> > >> > >> > >)
>> > >> > >> > >
>> > >> > >> > >thanks
>> > >> > >> > >- Robert
>> > >> > >> > >
>> > >> > >> > >
>> > >> > >> > >On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Virag Kothari <
>> > >> vi...@yahoo-inc.com
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >> > >wrote:
>> > >> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
Re: Branching for Oozie 4.0
Hi Rohini,
What's the status of branch 4? Do you think you'll be sending out a vote
for the release soon?
thanks
- Robert
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Shwetha GS wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1465 has a small patch to make
> some constants public. These are very useful for EL extensions. Can you
> please merge to 4.0 branch
>
> -Shwetha
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Rohini Palaniswamy <
> rohini.adi...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > This is done now. Changed version to 4.0.0 for the following
> >
> > project = OOZIE AND fixVersion = trunk AND resolution = Fixed AND Key not
> > in (OOZIE-1453, OOZIE-1447, OOZIE-1440) AND fixVersion not in ("3.3.0",
> > "3.3.1", "3.3.2")
> >
> > Also removed trunk from FixVersion/s when there were other versions.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rohini
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy <
> > rohini.adi...@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > Do you mean the "Fix Version" field?
> > >Yes.
> > >
> > > > I know that many JIRAs are using that
> > > to also mean the "target version", which is a field we don't have
> > > "Fix Version" is the equivalent of bugzilla "Target Version".
> > >
> > > > I'm sure there are some JIRAs marked with
> > > "Fix Version" as trunk that we don't want in 4.0, right?
> > > Yes. A couple of jiras went into trunk after the branching. They will
> > > not be marked 4.0
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Rohini
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Robert Kanter > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> Do you mean the "Fix Version" field? I know that many JIRAs are using
> > >> that
> > >> to also mean the "target version", which is a field we don't have
> > (perhaps
> > >> we should have that field?). I'm sure there are some JIRAs marked
> with
> > >> "Fix Version" as trunk that we don't want in 4.0, right?
> > >>
> > >> - Robert
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Rohini Palaniswamy <
> > >> rohini.adi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Planning to do a bulk update of the Fixed version of jiras to
> > branch-4.0
> > >> > tomorrow. Currently they are marked as trunk. Please let know if
> there
> > >> are
> > >> > any objections.
> > >> >
> > >> > Regards,
> > >> > Rohini
> > >> >
> > >> > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy <
> > >> > rohini.adi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Created http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/oozie/branches/branch-4.0/.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Patches yet to be done for branch-4.0.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > OOZIE-1379 Generate SLA end_miss event only after confirming
> > against
> > >> > > persistent store
> > >> > > OOZIE-1249 and OOZIE-1430 Documentation for JMS notifications and
> > SLA
> > >> > > monitoring
> > >> > > OOZIE-1405 Fix flakey unit tests
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Regards,
> > >> > > Rohini
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Robert Kanter <
> > rkan...@cloudera.com
> > >> > >wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> Ah, you're right; thanks.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> I reviewed the patch, but I'd like someone else to also take a
> look
> > >> > >> because
> > >> > >> I'm not a DB expert.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> - Robert
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Virag Kothari <
> > vi...@yahoo-inc.com
> > >> >
> > >> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > That change is reverted by OOZIE-1436. Can you review
> > >> > >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/12164/ and confirm?
> > >> > >> > We can keep OOZIE-1437 open to deal the problems we will face
> > when
> > >> > >> having
> > >> > >> > a 'proper' fix for the clob/varchar issues.
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > >> > Virag
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > On 6/28/13 11:12 AM, "Robert Kanter"
> > wrote:
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > >I think we need both; OOZIE-1436 reverts the columns back
> > because
> > >> of
> > >> > an
> > >> > >> > >OpenJPA/Oracle issue and OOZIE-1437 is to fix an if statement
> > >> added
> > >> > >> into
> > >> > >> > >our code (see
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1398?focusedCommentId=13694224
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> >&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#com
> > >> > >> > >ment-13694224
> > >> > >> > >)
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > >thanks
> > >> > >> > >- Robert
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > >On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Virag Kothari <
> > >> vi...@yahoo-inc.com
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > >wrote:
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > >> OOZIE-1436 will convert data varchar column back to lob due
> to
> > >> some
> > >> > >> > >>issues
> > >> > >> > >> seen (In JIRA description) with OpenJPA.
> > >> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > >> Thanks,
> > >> > >> > >> Virag
> > >> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > >> On 6/28/13 10:55 AM, "Robert Kanter"
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > >> >Can we also get OOZIE-1437 (paramerize size limit of
> setData
> > in
> > >> > >>
Re: Branching for Oozie 4.0
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1465 has a small patch to make
some constants public. These are very useful for EL extensions. Can you
please merge to 4.0 branch
-Shwetha
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Rohini Palaniswamy wrote:
> This is done now. Changed version to 4.0.0 for the following
>
> project = OOZIE AND fixVersion = trunk AND resolution = Fixed AND Key not
> in (OOZIE-1453, OOZIE-1447, OOZIE-1440) AND fixVersion not in ("3.3.0",
> "3.3.1", "3.3.2")
>
> Also removed trunk from FixVersion/s when there were other versions.
>
> Regards,
> Rohini
>
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy <
> rohini.adi...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > > Do you mean the "Fix Version" field?
> >Yes.
> >
> > > I know that many JIRAs are using that
> > to also mean the "target version", which is a field we don't have
> > "Fix Version" is the equivalent of bugzilla "Target Version".
> >
> > > I'm sure there are some JIRAs marked with
> > "Fix Version" as trunk that we don't want in 4.0, right?
> > Yes. A couple of jiras went into trunk after the branching. They will
> > not be marked 4.0
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rohini
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Robert Kanter >wrote:
> >
> >> Do you mean the "Fix Version" field? I know that many JIRAs are using
> >> that
> >> to also mean the "target version", which is a field we don't have
> (perhaps
> >> we should have that field?). I'm sure there are some JIRAs marked with
> >> "Fix Version" as trunk that we don't want in 4.0, right?
> >>
> >> - Robert
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Rohini Palaniswamy <
> >> rohini.adi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Planning to do a bulk update of the Fixed version of jiras to
> branch-4.0
> >> > tomorrow. Currently they are marked as trunk. Please let know if there
> >> are
> >> > any objections.
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Rohini
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy <
> >> > rohini.adi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Created http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/oozie/branches/branch-4.0/.
> >> > >
> >> > > Patches yet to be done for branch-4.0.
> >> > >
> >> > > OOZIE-1379 Generate SLA end_miss event only after confirming
> against
> >> > > persistent store
> >> > > OOZIE-1249 and OOZIE-1430 Documentation for JMS notifications and
> SLA
> >> > > monitoring
> >> > > OOZIE-1405 Fix flakey unit tests
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > > Rohini
> >> > >
> >> > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Robert Kanter <
> rkan...@cloudera.com
> >> > >wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Ah, you're right; thanks.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I reviewed the patch, but I'd like someone else to also take a look
> >> > >> because
> >> > >> I'm not a DB expert.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> - Robert
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Virag Kothari <
> vi...@yahoo-inc.com
> >> >
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > That change is reverted by OOZIE-1436. Can you review
> >> > >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/12164/ and confirm?
> >> > >> > We can keep OOZIE-1437 open to deal the problems we will face
> when
> >> > >> having
> >> > >> > a 'proper' fix for the clob/varchar issues.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Thanks,
> >> > >> > Virag
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > On 6/28/13 11:12 AM, "Robert Kanter"
> wrote:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > >I think we need both; OOZIE-1436 reverts the columns back
> because
> >> of
> >> > an
> >> > >> > >OpenJPA/Oracle issue and OOZIE-1437 is to fix an if statement
> >> added
> >> > >> into
> >> > >> > >our code (see
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1398?focusedCommentId=13694224
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
> >&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#com
> >> > >> > >ment-13694224
> >> > >> > >)
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >thanks
> >> > >> > >- Robert
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Virag Kothari <
> >> vi...@yahoo-inc.com
> >> > >
> >> > >> > >wrote:
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >> OOZIE-1436 will convert data varchar column back to lob due to
> >> some
> >> > >> > >>issues
> >> > >> > >> seen (In JIRA description) with OpenJPA.
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> Thanks,
> >> > >> > >> Virag
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> On 6/28/13 10:55 AM, "Robert Kanter"
> >> wrote:
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> >Can we also get OOZIE-1437 (paramerize size limit of setData
> in
> >> > >> > >> >JsonWorkflowAction based on user's configuration) in
> >> branch-4.0?
> >> > >> > >>Without
> >> > >> > >> >this, the size of is always hardcoded at
> max
> >> of
> >> > >> 2k,
> >> > >> > >>even
> >> > >> > >> >if the user changes it in oozie-site (because of OOZIE-1398).
> >> > >> > >> >
> >> > >> > >> >thanks
> >> > >> > >> >- Robert
> >> > >> > >> >
> >> > >> > >> >
> >> > >> > >> >On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Rohini Palaniswamy
> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> wrote:
> >> > >> > >> >
> >> > >> > >> >> Hi,
> >> > >> > >>
Re: Branching for Oozie 4.0
This is done now. Changed version to 4.0.0 for the following
project = OOZIE AND fixVersion = trunk AND resolution = Fixed AND Key not
in (OOZIE-1453, OOZIE-1447, OOZIE-1440) AND fixVersion not in ("3.3.0",
"3.3.1", "3.3.2")
Also removed trunk from FixVersion/s when there were other versions.
Regards,
Rohini
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy wrote:
> > Do you mean the "Fix Version" field?
>Yes.
>
> > I know that many JIRAs are using that
> to also mean the "target version", which is a field we don't have
> "Fix Version" is the equivalent of bugzilla "Target Version".
>
> > I'm sure there are some JIRAs marked with
> "Fix Version" as trunk that we don't want in 4.0, right?
> Yes. A couple of jiras went into trunk after the branching. They will
> not be marked 4.0
>
> Regards,
> Rohini
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Robert Kanter wrote:
>
>> Do you mean the "Fix Version" field? I know that many JIRAs are using
>> that
>> to also mean the "target version", which is a field we don't have (perhaps
>> we should have that field?). I'm sure there are some JIRAs marked with
>> "Fix Version" as trunk that we don't want in 4.0, right?
>>
>> - Robert
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Rohini Palaniswamy <
>> rohini.adi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Planning to do a bulk update of the Fixed version of jiras to branch-4.0
>> > tomorrow. Currently they are marked as trunk. Please let know if there
>> are
>> > any objections.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Rohini
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy <
>> > rohini.adi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Created http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/oozie/branches/branch-4.0/.
>> > >
>> > > Patches yet to be done for branch-4.0.
>> > >
>> > > OOZIE-1379 Generate SLA end_miss event only after confirming against
>> > > persistent store
>> > > OOZIE-1249 and OOZIE-1430 Documentation for JMS notifications and SLA
>> > > monitoring
>> > > OOZIE-1405 Fix flakey unit tests
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Rohini
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Robert Kanter > > >wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Ah, you're right; thanks.
>> > >>
>> > >> I reviewed the patch, but I'd like someone else to also take a look
>> > >> because
>> > >> I'm not a DB expert.
>> > >>
>> > >> - Robert
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Virag Kothari > >
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > That change is reverted by OOZIE-1436. Can you review
>> > >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/12164/ and confirm?
>> > >> > We can keep OOZIE-1437 open to deal the problems we will face when
>> > >> having
>> > >> > a 'proper' fix for the clob/varchar issues.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Thanks,
>> > >> > Virag
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On 6/28/13 11:12 AM, "Robert Kanter" wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > >I think we need both; OOZIE-1436 reverts the columns back because
>> of
>> > an
>> > >> > >OpenJPA/Oracle issue and OOZIE-1437 is to fix an if statement
>> added
>> > >> into
>> > >> > >our code (see
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1398?focusedCommentId=13694224
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> >&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#com
>> > >> > >ment-13694224
>> > >> > >)
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >thanks
>> > >> > >- Robert
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Virag Kothari <
>> vi...@yahoo-inc.com
>> > >
>> > >> > >wrote:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >> OOZIE-1436 will convert data varchar column back to lob due to
>> some
>> > >> > >>issues
>> > >> > >> seen (In JIRA description) with OpenJPA.
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> Thanks,
>> > >> > >> Virag
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> On 6/28/13 10:55 AM, "Robert Kanter"
>> wrote:
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> >Can we also get OOZIE-1437 (paramerize size limit of setData in
>> > >> > >> >JsonWorkflowAction based on user's configuration) in
>> branch-4.0?
>> > >> > >>Without
>> > >> > >> >this, the size of is always hardcoded at max
>> of
>> > >> 2k,
>> > >> > >>even
>> > >> > >> >if the user changes it in oozie-site (because of OOZIE-1398).
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >> >thanks
>> > >> > >> >- Robert
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >> >On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Rohini Palaniswamy
>> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> wrote:
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >> >> Hi,
>> > >> > >> >> I am planning to branch trunk as branch-4.0 and trash the
>> > >> current
>> > >> > >> >> branch-4.0 today evening. Discussed this with some of the
>> folks
>> > >> > >>during
>> > >> > >> >>the
>> > >> > >> >> summit. This will facilitate releasing HCat integration, JMS
>> > >> > >> >>notifications
>> > >> > >> >> for job and SLA and SLA monitoring as Oozie 4.0 which we are
>> > done
>> > >> > >>with
>> > >> > >> >> functional testing and in the process of stress testing. This
>> > will
>> > >> > >>free
>> > >> > >> >>up
>> > >> > >> >> the trunk for the next release features of HA, cron based
>> > >> > >>scheduling, DB
>> > >> > >> >> clo
Re: Branching for Oozie 4.0
> Do you mean the "Fix Version" field? Yes. > I know that many JIRAs are using that to also mean the "target version", which is a field we don't have "Fix Version" is the equivalent of bugzilla "Target Version". > I'm sure there are some JIRAs marked with "Fix Version" as trunk that we don't want in 4.0, right? Yes. A couple of jiras went into trunk after the branching. They will not be marked 4.0 Regards, Rohini On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Robert Kanter wrote: > Do you mean the "Fix Version" field? I know that many JIRAs are using that > to also mean the "target version", which is a field we don't have (perhaps > we should have that field?). I'm sure there are some JIRAs marked with > "Fix Version" as trunk that we don't want in 4.0, right? > > - Robert > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Rohini Palaniswamy < > rohini.adi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Planning to do a bulk update of the Fixed version of jiras to branch-4.0 > > tomorrow. Currently they are marked as trunk. Please let know if there > are > > any objections. > > > > Regards, > > Rohini > > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy < > > rohini.adi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Created http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/oozie/branches/branch-4.0/. > > > > > > Patches yet to be done for branch-4.0. > > > > > > OOZIE-1379 Generate SLA end_miss event only after confirming against > > > persistent store > > > OOZIE-1249 and OOZIE-1430 Documentation for JMS notifications and SLA > > > monitoring > > > OOZIE-1405 Fix flakey unit tests > > > > > > Regards, > > > Rohini > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Robert Kanter > >wrote: > > > > > >> Ah, you're right; thanks. > > >> > > >> I reviewed the patch, but I'd like someone else to also take a look > > >> because > > >> I'm not a DB expert. > > >> > > >> - Robert > > >> > > >> > > >> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Virag Kothari > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > That change is reverted by OOZIE-1436. Can you review > > >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/12164/ and confirm? > > >> > We can keep OOZIE-1437 open to deal the problems we will face when > > >> having > > >> > a 'proper' fix for the clob/varchar issues. > > >> > > > >> > Thanks, > > >> > Virag > > >> > > > >> > On 6/28/13 11:12 AM, "Robert Kanter" wrote: > > >> > > > >> > >I think we need both; OOZIE-1436 reverts the columns back because > of > > an > > >> > >OpenJPA/Oracle issue and OOZIE-1437 is to fix an if statement added > > >> into > > >> > >our code (see > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1398?focusedCommentId=13694224 > > >> > > > >> > > > >&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#com > > >> > >ment-13694224 > > >> > >) > > >> > > > > >> > >thanks > > >> > >- Robert > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > >On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Virag Kothari < > vi...@yahoo-inc.com > > > > > >> > >wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > >> OOZIE-1436 will convert data varchar column back to lob due to > some > > >> > >>issues > > >> > >> seen (In JIRA description) with OpenJPA. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Thanks, > > >> > >> Virag > > >> > >> > > >> > >> On 6/28/13 10:55 AM, "Robert Kanter" > wrote: > > >> > >> > > >> > >> >Can we also get OOZIE-1437 (paramerize size limit of setData in > > >> > >> >JsonWorkflowAction based on user's configuration) in branch-4.0? > > >> > >>Without > > >> > >> >this, the size of is always hardcoded at max > of > > >> 2k, > > >> > >>even > > >> > >> >if the user changes it in oozie-site (because of OOZIE-1398). > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> >thanks > > >> > >> >- Robert > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> >On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Rohini Palaniswamy > > >> > >> > > >> > >> >> wrote: > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> >> Hi, > > >> > >> >> I am planning to branch trunk as branch-4.0 and trash the > > >> current > > >> > >> >> branch-4.0 today evening. Discussed this with some of the > folks > > >> > >>during > > >> > >> >>the > > >> > >> >> summit. This will facilitate releasing HCat integration, JMS > > >> > >> >>notifications > > >> > >> >> for job and SLA and SLA monitoring as Oozie 4.0 which we are > > done > > >> > >>with > > >> > >> >> functional testing and in the process of stress testing. This > > will > > >> > >>free > > >> > >> >>up > > >> > >> >> the trunk for the next release features of HA, cron based > > >> > >>scheduling, DB > > >> > >> >> clob column removal to move forward. > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> Patches that need to get into branch-4.0 are > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> OOZIE-1433 ActionCheckX should override XCommand.getKey() to > > >> prevent > > >> > >> >> duplicates > > >> > >> >> OOZIE-1436 Revert SLA_XML and few other varchar columns back > to > > >> clob > > >> > >> >> OOZIE-1427 Update CredentialsModule docs to mention Hive > > >> > >> >> OOZIE-1379 Generate SLA end_miss event only after confirming > > >> against > > >> > >> >> persistent store > > >> > >>
Re: Branching for Oozie 4.0
Do you mean the "Fix Version" field? I know that many JIRAs are using that to also mean the "target version", which is a field we don't have (perhaps we should have that field?). I'm sure there are some JIRAs marked with "Fix Version" as trunk that we don't want in 4.0, right? - Robert On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Rohini Palaniswamy < rohini.adi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Planning to do a bulk update of the Fixed version of jiras to branch-4.0 > tomorrow. Currently they are marked as trunk. Please let know if there are > any objections. > > Regards, > Rohini > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy < > rohini.adi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Created http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/oozie/branches/branch-4.0/. > > > > Patches yet to be done for branch-4.0. > > > > OOZIE-1379 Generate SLA end_miss event only after confirming against > > persistent store > > OOZIE-1249 and OOZIE-1430 Documentation for JMS notifications and SLA > > monitoring > > OOZIE-1405 Fix flakey unit tests > > > > Regards, > > Rohini > > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Robert Kanter >wrote: > > > >> Ah, you're right; thanks. > >> > >> I reviewed the patch, but I'd like someone else to also take a look > >> because > >> I'm not a DB expert. > >> > >> - Robert > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Virag Kothari > >> wrote: > >> > >> > That change is reverted by OOZIE-1436. Can you review > >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/12164/ and confirm? > >> > We can keep OOZIE-1437 open to deal the problems we will face when > >> having > >> > a 'proper' fix for the clob/varchar issues. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Virag > >> > > >> > On 6/28/13 11:12 AM, "Robert Kanter" wrote: > >> > > >> > >I think we need both; OOZIE-1436 reverts the columns back because of > an > >> > >OpenJPA/Oracle issue and OOZIE-1437 is to fix an if statement added > >> into > >> > >our code (see > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1398?focusedCommentId=13694224 > >> > > >> > >&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#com > >> > >ment-13694224 > >> > >) > >> > > > >> > >thanks > >> > >- Robert > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Virag Kothari > > >> > >wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> OOZIE-1436 will convert data varchar column back to lob due to some > >> > >>issues > >> > >> seen (In JIRA description) with OpenJPA. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Virag > >> > >> > >> > >> On 6/28/13 10:55 AM, "Robert Kanter" wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> >Can we also get OOZIE-1437 (paramerize size limit of setData in > >> > >> >JsonWorkflowAction based on user's configuration) in branch-4.0? > >> > >>Without > >> > >> >this, the size of is always hardcoded at max of > >> 2k, > >> > >>even > >> > >> >if the user changes it in oozie-site (because of OOZIE-1398). > >> > >> > > >> > >> >thanks > >> > >> >- Robert > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> >On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Rohini Palaniswamy > >> > >> > >> > >> >> wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > >> >> Hi, > >> > >> >> I am planning to branch trunk as branch-4.0 and trash the > >> current > >> > >> >> branch-4.0 today evening. Discussed this with some of the folks > >> > >>during > >> > >> >>the > >> > >> >> summit. This will facilitate releasing HCat integration, JMS > >> > >> >>notifications > >> > >> >> for job and SLA and SLA monitoring as Oozie 4.0 which we are > done > >> > >>with > >> > >> >> functional testing and in the process of stress testing. This > will > >> > >>free > >> > >> >>up > >> > >> >> the trunk for the next release features of HA, cron based > >> > >>scheduling, DB > >> > >> >> clob column removal to move forward. > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> Patches that need to get into branch-4.0 are > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> OOZIE-1433 ActionCheckX should override XCommand.getKey() to > >> prevent > >> > >> >> duplicates > >> > >> >> OOZIE-1436 Revert SLA_XML and few other varchar columns back to > >> clob > >> > >> >> OOZIE-1427 Update CredentialsModule docs to mention Hive > >> > >> >> OOZIE-1379 Generate SLA end_miss event only after confirming > >> against > >> > >> >> persistent store > >> > >> >> OOZIE-1435 StatusTransitService unnecessarily updates the > >> > >> >>lastModifiedTime > >> > >> >> of jobs which causes MaterializationService to bring same jobs > in > >> > >>memory > >> > >> >> OOZIE-1249 and OOZIE-1430 Documentation for JMS notifications > and > >> SLA > >> > >> >> monitoring > >> > >> >> Subworkflow notifications don't have workflow as parent id > >> > >> >> And any other issues that crop up during the stress testing. > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >>Hoping most of this will get committed today before we > branch. > >> > >>Please > >> > >> >> bring up any other jiras that we need to get into branch-4 > before > >> > >>moving > >> > >> >> towards a release. Looking at a timeline of releasing 4.0 in 3 > >> weeks. > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> Regards, > >> > >> >> Rohini > >> > >
Re: Branching for Oozie 4.0
Planning to do a bulk update of the Fixed version of jiras to branch-4.0 tomorrow. Currently they are marked as trunk. Please let know if there are any objections. Regards, Rohini On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy < rohini.adi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Created http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/oozie/branches/branch-4.0/. > > Patches yet to be done for branch-4.0. > > OOZIE-1379 Generate SLA end_miss event only after confirming against > persistent store > OOZIE-1249 and OOZIE-1430 Documentation for JMS notifications and SLA > monitoring > OOZIE-1405 Fix flakey unit tests > > Regards, > Rohini > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Robert Kanter wrote: > >> Ah, you're right; thanks. >> >> I reviewed the patch, but I'd like someone else to also take a look >> because >> I'm not a DB expert. >> >> - Robert >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Virag Kothari >> wrote: >> >> > That change is reverted by OOZIE-1436. Can you review >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/12164/ and confirm? >> > We can keep OOZIE-1437 open to deal the problems we will face when >> having >> > a 'proper' fix for the clob/varchar issues. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Virag >> > >> > On 6/28/13 11:12 AM, "Robert Kanter" wrote: >> > >> > >I think we need both; OOZIE-1436 reverts the columns back because of an >> > >OpenJPA/Oracle issue and OOZIE-1437 is to fix an if statement added >> into >> > >our code (see >> > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1398?focusedCommentId=13694224 >> > >> >&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#com >> > >ment-13694224 >> > >) >> > > >> > >thanks >> > >- Robert >> > > >> > > >> > >On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Virag Kothari >> > >wrote: >> > > >> > >> OOZIE-1436 will convert data varchar column back to lob due to some >> > >>issues >> > >> seen (In JIRA description) with OpenJPA. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> Thanks, >> > >> Virag >> > >> >> > >> On 6/28/13 10:55 AM, "Robert Kanter" wrote: >> > >> >> > >> >Can we also get OOZIE-1437 (paramerize size limit of setData in >> > >> >JsonWorkflowAction based on user's configuration) in branch-4.0? >> > >>Without >> > >> >this, the size of is always hardcoded at max of >> 2k, >> > >>even >> > >> >if the user changes it in oozie-site (because of OOZIE-1398). >> > >> > >> > >> >thanks >> > >> >- Robert >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Rohini Palaniswamy >> > >> >> > >> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> >> Hi, >> > >> >> I am planning to branch trunk as branch-4.0 and trash the >> current >> > >> >> branch-4.0 today evening. Discussed this with some of the folks >> > >>during >> > >> >>the >> > >> >> summit. This will facilitate releasing HCat integration, JMS >> > >> >>notifications >> > >> >> for job and SLA and SLA monitoring as Oozie 4.0 which we are done >> > >>with >> > >> >> functional testing and in the process of stress testing. This will >> > >>free >> > >> >>up >> > >> >> the trunk for the next release features of HA, cron based >> > >>scheduling, DB >> > >> >> clob column removal to move forward. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> Patches that need to get into branch-4.0 are >> > >> >> >> > >> >> OOZIE-1433 ActionCheckX should override XCommand.getKey() to >> prevent >> > >> >> duplicates >> > >> >> OOZIE-1436 Revert SLA_XML and few other varchar columns back to >> clob >> > >> >> OOZIE-1427 Update CredentialsModule docs to mention Hive >> > >> >> OOZIE-1379 Generate SLA end_miss event only after confirming >> against >> > >> >> persistent store >> > >> >> OOZIE-1435 StatusTransitService unnecessarily updates the >> > >> >>lastModifiedTime >> > >> >> of jobs which causes MaterializationService to bring same jobs in >> > >>memory >> > >> >> OOZIE-1249 and OOZIE-1430 Documentation for JMS notifications and >> SLA >> > >> >> monitoring >> > >> >> Subworkflow notifications don't have workflow as parent id >> > >> >> And any other issues that crop up during the stress testing. >> > >> >> >> > >> >>Hoping most of this will get committed today before we branch. >> > >>Please >> > >> >> bring up any other jiras that we need to get into branch-4 before >> > >>moving >> > >> >> towards a release. Looking at a timeline of releasing 4.0 in 3 >> weeks. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> Regards, >> > >> >> Rohini >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >
Re: Branching for Oozie 4.0
Created http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/oozie/branches/branch-4.0/. Patches yet to be done for branch-4.0. OOZIE-1379 Generate SLA end_miss event only after confirming against persistent store OOZIE-1249 and OOZIE-1430 Documentation for JMS notifications and SLA monitoring OOZIE-1405 Fix flakey unit tests Regards, Rohini On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Robert Kanter wrote: > Ah, you're right; thanks. > > I reviewed the patch, but I'd like someone else to also take a look because > I'm not a DB expert. > > - Robert > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Virag Kothari > wrote: > > > That change is reverted by OOZIE-1436. Can you review > > https://reviews.apache.org/r/12164/ and confirm? > > We can keep OOZIE-1437 open to deal the problems we will face when having > > a 'proper' fix for the clob/varchar issues. > > > > Thanks, > > Virag > > > > On 6/28/13 11:12 AM, "Robert Kanter" wrote: > > > > >I think we need both; OOZIE-1436 reverts the columns back because of an > > >OpenJPA/Oracle issue and OOZIE-1437 is to fix an if statement added into > > >our code (see > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1398?focusedCommentId=13694224 > > > >&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#com > > >ment-13694224 > > >) > > > > > >thanks > > >- Robert > > > > > > > > >On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Virag Kothari > > >wrote: > > > > > >> OOZIE-1436 will convert data varchar column back to lob due to some > > >>issues > > >> seen (In JIRA description) with OpenJPA. > > >> > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Virag > > >> > > >> On 6/28/13 10:55 AM, "Robert Kanter" wrote: > > >> > > >> >Can we also get OOZIE-1437 (paramerize size limit of setData in > > >> >JsonWorkflowAction based on user's configuration) in branch-4.0? > > >>Without > > >> >this, the size of is always hardcoded at max of 2k, > > >>even > > >> >if the user changes it in oozie-site (because of OOZIE-1398). > > >> > > > >> >thanks > > >> >- Robert > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Rohini Palaniswamy > > >> > > >> >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> Hi, > > >> >> I am planning to branch trunk as branch-4.0 and trash the > current > > >> >> branch-4.0 today evening. Discussed this with some of the folks > > >>during > > >> >>the > > >> >> summit. This will facilitate releasing HCat integration, JMS > > >> >>notifications > > >> >> for job and SLA and SLA monitoring as Oozie 4.0 which we are done > > >>with > > >> >> functional testing and in the process of stress testing. This will > > >>free > > >> >>up > > >> >> the trunk for the next release features of HA, cron based > > >>scheduling, DB > > >> >> clob column removal to move forward. > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> Patches that need to get into branch-4.0 are > > >> >> > > >> >> OOZIE-1433 ActionCheckX should override XCommand.getKey() to > prevent > > >> >> duplicates > > >> >> OOZIE-1436 Revert SLA_XML and few other varchar columns back to > clob > > >> >> OOZIE-1427 Update CredentialsModule docs to mention Hive > > >> >> OOZIE-1379 Generate SLA end_miss event only after confirming > against > > >> >> persistent store > > >> >> OOZIE-1435 StatusTransitService unnecessarily updates the > > >> >>lastModifiedTime > > >> >> of jobs which causes MaterializationService to bring same jobs in > > >>memory > > >> >> OOZIE-1249 and OOZIE-1430 Documentation for JMS notifications and > SLA > > >> >> monitoring > > >> >> Subworkflow notifications don't have workflow as parent id > > >> >> And any other issues that crop up during the stress testing. > > >> >> > > >> >>Hoping most of this will get committed today before we branch. > > >>Please > > >> >> bring up any other jiras that we need to get into branch-4 before > > >>moving > > >> >> towards a release. Looking at a timeline of releasing 4.0 in 3 > weeks. > > >> >> > > >> >> Regards, > > >> >> Rohini > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
Re: Branching for Oozie 4.0
Ah, you're right; thanks. I reviewed the patch, but I'd like someone else to also take a look because I'm not a DB expert. - Robert On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Virag Kothari wrote: > That change is reverted by OOZIE-1436. Can you review > https://reviews.apache.org/r/12164/ and confirm? > We can keep OOZIE-1437 open to deal the problems we will face when having > a 'proper' fix for the clob/varchar issues. > > Thanks, > Virag > > On 6/28/13 11:12 AM, "Robert Kanter" wrote: > > >I think we need both; OOZIE-1436 reverts the columns back because of an > >OpenJPA/Oracle issue and OOZIE-1437 is to fix an if statement added into > >our code (see > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1398?focusedCommentId=13694224 > >&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#com > >ment-13694224 > >) > > > >thanks > >- Robert > > > > > >On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Virag Kothari > >wrote: > > > >> OOZIE-1436 will convert data varchar column back to lob due to some > >>issues > >> seen (In JIRA description) with OpenJPA. > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Virag > >> > >> On 6/28/13 10:55 AM, "Robert Kanter" wrote: > >> > >> >Can we also get OOZIE-1437 (paramerize size limit of setData in > >> >JsonWorkflowAction based on user's configuration) in branch-4.0? > >>Without > >> >this, the size of is always hardcoded at max of 2k, > >>even > >> >if the user changes it in oozie-site (because of OOZIE-1398). > >> > > >> >thanks > >> >- Robert > >> > > >> > > >> >On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Rohini Palaniswamy > >> > >> >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi, > >> >> I am planning to branch trunk as branch-4.0 and trash the current > >> >> branch-4.0 today evening. Discussed this with some of the folks > >>during > >> >>the > >> >> summit. This will facilitate releasing HCat integration, JMS > >> >>notifications > >> >> for job and SLA and SLA monitoring as Oozie 4.0 which we are done > >>with > >> >> functional testing and in the process of stress testing. This will > >>free > >> >>up > >> >> the trunk for the next release features of HA, cron based > >>scheduling, DB > >> >> clob column removal to move forward. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Patches that need to get into branch-4.0 are > >> >> > >> >> OOZIE-1433 ActionCheckX should override XCommand.getKey() to prevent > >> >> duplicates > >> >> OOZIE-1436 Revert SLA_XML and few other varchar columns back to clob > >> >> OOZIE-1427 Update CredentialsModule docs to mention Hive > >> >> OOZIE-1379 Generate SLA end_miss event only after confirming against > >> >> persistent store > >> >> OOZIE-1435 StatusTransitService unnecessarily updates the > >> >>lastModifiedTime > >> >> of jobs which causes MaterializationService to bring same jobs in > >>memory > >> >> OOZIE-1249 and OOZIE-1430 Documentation for JMS notifications and SLA > >> >> monitoring > >> >> Subworkflow notifications don't have workflow as parent id > >> >> And any other issues that crop up during the stress testing. > >> >> > >> >>Hoping most of this will get committed today before we branch. > >>Please > >> >> bring up any other jiras that we need to get into branch-4 before > >>moving > >> >> towards a release. Looking at a timeline of releasing 4.0 in 3 weeks. > >> >> > >> >> Regards, > >> >> Rohini > >> >> > >> > >> > >
Re: Branching for Oozie 4.0
That change is reverted by OOZIE-1436. Can you review https://reviews.apache.org/r/12164/ and confirm? We can keep OOZIE-1437 open to deal the problems we will face when having a 'proper' fix for the clob/varchar issues. Thanks, Virag On 6/28/13 11:12 AM, "Robert Kanter" wrote: >I think we need both; OOZIE-1436 reverts the columns back because of an >OpenJPA/Oracle issue and OOZIE-1437 is to fix an if statement added into >our code (see >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1398?focusedCommentId=13694224 >&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#com >ment-13694224 >) > >thanks >- Robert > > >On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Virag Kothari >wrote: > >> OOZIE-1436 will convert data varchar column back to lob due to some >>issues >> seen (In JIRA description) with OpenJPA. >> >> >> Thanks, >> Virag >> >> On 6/28/13 10:55 AM, "Robert Kanter" wrote: >> >> >Can we also get OOZIE-1437 (paramerize size limit of setData in >> >JsonWorkflowAction based on user's configuration) in branch-4.0? >>Without >> >this, the size of is always hardcoded at max of 2k, >>even >> >if the user changes it in oozie-site (because of OOZIE-1398). >> > >> >thanks >> >- Robert >> > >> > >> >On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Rohini Palaniswamy >> >> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> I am planning to branch trunk as branch-4.0 and trash the current >> >> branch-4.0 today evening. Discussed this with some of the folks >>during >> >>the >> >> summit. This will facilitate releasing HCat integration, JMS >> >>notifications >> >> for job and SLA and SLA monitoring as Oozie 4.0 which we are done >>with >> >> functional testing and in the process of stress testing. This will >>free >> >>up >> >> the trunk for the next release features of HA, cron based >>scheduling, DB >> >> clob column removal to move forward. >> >> >> >> >> >> Patches that need to get into branch-4.0 are >> >> >> >> OOZIE-1433 ActionCheckX should override XCommand.getKey() to prevent >> >> duplicates >> >> OOZIE-1436 Revert SLA_XML and few other varchar columns back to clob >> >> OOZIE-1427 Update CredentialsModule docs to mention Hive >> >> OOZIE-1379 Generate SLA end_miss event only after confirming against >> >> persistent store >> >> OOZIE-1435 StatusTransitService unnecessarily updates the >> >>lastModifiedTime >> >> of jobs which causes MaterializationService to bring same jobs in >>memory >> >> OOZIE-1249 and OOZIE-1430 Documentation for JMS notifications and SLA >> >> monitoring >> >> Subworkflow notifications don't have workflow as parent id >> >> And any other issues that crop up during the stress testing. >> >> >> >>Hoping most of this will get committed today before we branch. >>Please >> >> bring up any other jiras that we need to get into branch-4 before >>moving >> >> towards a release. Looking at a timeline of releasing 4.0 in 3 weeks. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Rohini >> >> >> >>
Re: Branching for Oozie 4.0
I think we need both; OOZIE-1436 reverts the columns back because of an OpenJPA/Oracle issue and OOZIE-1437 is to fix an if statement added into our code (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1398?focusedCommentId=13694224&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13694224 ) thanks - Robert On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Virag Kothari wrote: > OOZIE-1436 will convert data varchar column back to lob due to some issues > seen (In JIRA description) with OpenJPA. > > > Thanks, > Virag > > On 6/28/13 10:55 AM, "Robert Kanter" wrote: > > >Can we also get OOZIE-1437 (paramerize size limit of setData in > >JsonWorkflowAction based on user's configuration) in branch-4.0? Without > >this, the size of is always hardcoded at max of 2k, even > >if the user changes it in oozie-site (because of OOZIE-1398). > > > >thanks > >- Robert > > > > > >On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Rohini Palaniswamy > > >> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> I am planning to branch trunk as branch-4.0 and trash the current > >> branch-4.0 today evening. Discussed this with some of the folks during > >>the > >> summit. This will facilitate releasing HCat integration, JMS > >>notifications > >> for job and SLA and SLA monitoring as Oozie 4.0 which we are done with > >> functional testing and in the process of stress testing. This will free > >>up > >> the trunk for the next release features of HA, cron based scheduling, DB > >> clob column removal to move forward. > >> > >> > >> Patches that need to get into branch-4.0 are > >> > >> OOZIE-1433 ActionCheckX should override XCommand.getKey() to prevent > >> duplicates > >> OOZIE-1436 Revert SLA_XML and few other varchar columns back to clob > >> OOZIE-1427 Update CredentialsModule docs to mention Hive > >> OOZIE-1379 Generate SLA end_miss event only after confirming against > >> persistent store > >> OOZIE-1435 StatusTransitService unnecessarily updates the > >>lastModifiedTime > >> of jobs which causes MaterializationService to bring same jobs in memory > >> OOZIE-1249 and OOZIE-1430 Documentation for JMS notifications and SLA > >> monitoring > >> Subworkflow notifications don't have workflow as parent id > >> And any other issues that crop up during the stress testing. > >> > >>Hoping most of this will get committed today before we branch. Please > >> bring up any other jiras that we need to get into branch-4 before moving > >> towards a release. Looking at a timeline of releasing 4.0 in 3 weeks. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Rohini > >> > >
Re: Branching for Oozie 4.0
OOZIE-1436 will convert data varchar column back to lob due to some issues seen (In JIRA description) with OpenJPA. Thanks, Virag On 6/28/13 10:55 AM, "Robert Kanter" wrote: >Can we also get OOZIE-1437 (paramerize size limit of setData in >JsonWorkflowAction based on user's configuration) in branch-4.0? Without >this, the size of is always hardcoded at max of 2k, even >if the user changes it in oozie-site (because of OOZIE-1398). > >thanks >- Robert > > >On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Rohini Palaniswamy >> wrote: > >> Hi, >> I am planning to branch trunk as branch-4.0 and trash the current >> branch-4.0 today evening. Discussed this with some of the folks during >>the >> summit. This will facilitate releasing HCat integration, JMS >>notifications >> for job and SLA and SLA monitoring as Oozie 4.0 which we are done with >> functional testing and in the process of stress testing. This will free >>up >> the trunk for the next release features of HA, cron based scheduling, DB >> clob column removal to move forward. >> >> >> Patches that need to get into branch-4.0 are >> >> OOZIE-1433 ActionCheckX should override XCommand.getKey() to prevent >> duplicates >> OOZIE-1436 Revert SLA_XML and few other varchar columns back to clob >> OOZIE-1427 Update CredentialsModule docs to mention Hive >> OOZIE-1379 Generate SLA end_miss event only after confirming against >> persistent store >> OOZIE-1435 StatusTransitService unnecessarily updates the >>lastModifiedTime >> of jobs which causes MaterializationService to bring same jobs in memory >> OOZIE-1249 and OOZIE-1430 Documentation for JMS notifications and SLA >> monitoring >> Subworkflow notifications don't have workflow as parent id >> And any other issues that crop up during the stress testing. >> >>Hoping most of this will get committed today before we branch. Please >> bring up any other jiras that we need to get into branch-4 before moving >> towards a release. Looking at a timeline of releasing 4.0 in 3 weeks. >> >> Regards, >> Rohini >>
Re: Branching for Oozie 4.0
Can we also get OOZIE-1437 (paramerize size limit of setData in JsonWorkflowAction based on user's configuration) in branch-4.0? Without this, the size of is always hardcoded at max of 2k, even if the user changes it in oozie-site (because of OOZIE-1398). thanks - Robert On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Rohini Palaniswamy wrote: > Hi, > I am planning to branch trunk as branch-4.0 and trash the current > branch-4.0 today evening. Discussed this with some of the folks during the > summit. This will facilitate releasing HCat integration, JMS notifications > for job and SLA and SLA monitoring as Oozie 4.0 which we are done with > functional testing and in the process of stress testing. This will free up > the trunk for the next release features of HA, cron based scheduling, DB > clob column removal to move forward. > > > Patches that need to get into branch-4.0 are > > OOZIE-1433 ActionCheckX should override XCommand.getKey() to prevent > duplicates > OOZIE-1436 Revert SLA_XML and few other varchar columns back to clob > OOZIE-1427 Update CredentialsModule docs to mention Hive > OOZIE-1379 Generate SLA end_miss event only after confirming against > persistent store > OOZIE-1435 StatusTransitService unnecessarily updates the lastModifiedTime > of jobs which causes MaterializationService to bring same jobs in memory > OOZIE-1249 and OOZIE-1430 Documentation for JMS notifications and SLA > monitoring > Subworkflow notifications don't have workflow as parent id > And any other issues that crop up during the stress testing. > >Hoping most of this will get committed today before we branch. Please > bring up any other jiras that we need to get into branch-4 before moving > towards a release. Looking at a timeline of releasing 4.0 in 3 weeks. > > Regards, > Rohini >
