Re: Successful OpenOffice built

[Oliver-Rainer Wittmann]

:-) forgot the link to the building guide

[1] https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO


Best regards, Oliver

On 24.02.2014 08:43, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:

Hi,

On 23.02.2014 00:36, Reem Elnagar wrote:

Hi :) I managed to build Openoffice :) and it is written in the
orientation to send you an e-mail when I finish so here it is :)



cool.

If you like you could share your experience. We are especially
interested on the feedback, on how the building guide and the referenced
sub pages for the different platforms [1] could be improved.
Thx in advance.

Best regards, Oliver.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Successful OpenOffice built

[Oliver-Rainer Wittmann]

Hi,

On 23.02.2014 00:36, Reem Elnagar wrote:

Hi :) I managed to build Openoffice :) and it is written in the
orientation to send you an e-mail when I finish so here it is :)



cool.

If you like you could share your experience. We are especially 
interested on the feedback, on how the building guide and the referenced 
sub pages for the different platforms [1] could be improved.

Thx in advance.

Best regards, Oliver.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Excel file validation

[shzh zhao]

thanks a lot ,I will bring it into AOO  automation test.


2014-02-21 21:02 GMT+08:00 Rob Weir :

> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Nick Pratt  wrote:
> > Does the OpenOffice - Calc project have any validation tools for Excel
> > BIFF8 files? Perhaps something that would log out of spec record
> > structures, incorrect record sequence etc.?
> >
>
> I use Microsoft's binary format validator:
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=26794
>
> -Rob
>
> > Regards
> >
> > Nick
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


-- 



*mailto: *aoo.zhaos...@gmail.com 

Re: Malware infection

[Andrea Pescetti]

Rob Weir wrote:

On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

Can we agree that we will answer all those mails by simply sending a link to
a webpage or wiki page?

When I respond I just sent them to this blog post:
http://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/how_to_safely_download_apache


I often point there people who complain they had to pay for OpenOffice, 
but you are right, indeed it covers all kinds of "bad" download sites. 
It would be OK for me to point users to it. And to have a link to it in 
the sidebar of our download page.


The only problem I see is the horribly mangled URL. But this is courtesy 
of Roller and it wouldn't make sense to change it now.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Malware infection

[Jonathon]

On February 23, 2014 12:50:12 PM PST, Xuacu wrote:
>I can't see anything snotty in saying that we can't do anything to prevent 
>malicious sites offering tampered with copies of Apache OpenOffice.

The issue is that the vocabulary that was used, implied that the victim was 
entirely to blame.
That is not the way to make friends and influence people.   

I have not yet seen the URL that the software was downloaded from. 
That URL is needed, to determine what the person really downloaded, and the 
appropriate follow up action.
(The OP didn't mention AOO in their tale of woe.  Nor did they mention which 
version of Mac OS X  was used.)
-- 
Your language. Your documents. Your way.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Malware infection

[Rob Weir]

On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Andrea Pescetti  wrote:
> On 23/02/2014 Max Merbald wrote:
>>
>> Hi David,
>> your answer is quite interesting. On one hand you write fairly rough
>> answers to people who ask for support
>
>
> (dropping John, the original poster, from CC since this is irrelevant to his
> support request)
>
> OK, we as a group have different opinions on the tone of this answer. But
> fact is, we will regularly receive this kind of complaints when someone
> downloads something that is not OpenOffice thinking he is downloading
> OpenOffice.
>
> Can we agree that we will answer all those mails by simply sending a link to
> a webpage or wiki page?
>

When I respond I just sent them to this blog post:

http://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/how_to_safely_download_apache

-Rob

> Max, feel free to create a text and put it in e-mail, or wiki page or
> whatever. We'll review it together, make sure it cannot be perceived as
> offensive and then we'll agree to put it online and answer these complaints
> by simply sending that link.
>
>
>> It's not a solution not to do anything about it.
>
>
> For the record, we filed complaints to search engines already. But download
> sites change so frequently that it's very hard to keep up with them. Anyway,
> if we know the URLs we can try and enforce our trademarks with search
> engines. This is far more effective than trying to have the sites shut down.
>
> Regards,
>   Andrea.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Malware infection

[Andrea Pescetti]

On 23/02/2014 Max Merbald wrote:

Hi David,
your answer is quite interesting. On one hand you write fairly rough
answers to people who ask for support


(dropping John, the original poster, from CC since this is irrelevant to 
his support request)


OK, we as a group have different opinions on the tone of this answer. 
But fact is, we will regularly receive this kind of complaints when 
someone downloads something that is not OpenOffice thinking he is 
downloading OpenOffice.


Can we agree that we will answer all those mails by simply sending a 
link to a webpage or wiki page?


Max, feel free to create a text and put it in e-mail, or wiki page or 
whatever. We'll review it together, make sure it cannot be perceived as 
offensive and then we'll agree to put it online and answer these 
complaints by simply sending that link.



It's not a solution not to do anything about it.


For the record, we filed complaints to search engines already. But 
download sites change so frequently that it's very hard to keep up with 
them. Anyway, if we know the URLs we can try and enforce our trademarks 
with search engines. This is far more effective than trying to have the 
sites shut down.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] Service e-mail addresses for the Forum

[Andrea Pescetti]

Marcus (OOo) wrote:

Is there a reason to limit this to "en" and "es" only?


They are the only ones who asked. Of course, when the pattern is ready, 
we can apply it to other forums.



+1 from me. I do however ask the forum-admins to consider if we could
use
1 ML. If we potentially create one ML pr forum, it will require a lot of
moderators.

This would be indeed a little nightmare.


Like all mailing lists, I expect that we will create them only upon 
request (and indeed, I am validating the pattern with "en" and "es" but 
only "en" will be created for the time being, "es" will be created after 
we can test that "en" meets the expectations). And we will make sure to 
have moderators before creation.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Malware infection

[Larry Gusaas]

On 2014-02-23, 3:06 PM Max Merbald wrote:
Your answer to John could, indeed, be interpreted to mean that you're a bit annoyed with 
people who have  problem with an infected version of OpenOffice because it frequently happened.


It could only be interpreted that way by a bloody moron. There was nothing 
wrong with his response.

--
_

Larry I. Gusaas
Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada
Website: http://larry-gusaas.com
"An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind theirs." - 
Edgard Varese



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] Service e-mail addresses for the Forum

[Marcus (OOo)]

Am 02/23/2014 10:12 PM, schrieb jan i:

On 23 February 2014 22:02, Andrea Pescetti  wrote:


Subject to lazy consensus, these are the service e-mail aliases (that will
actually work like the security mailing list: allow posts from anyone, no
public archives) that will be created for the en and es forums (so, mail
from the forum will appear to come from those addresses and users with
registrations problems will e-mail those addresses too):

openoffice-forum-admin-enapache.org

openoffice-forum-admin-esapache.org

See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7371 for more.


Is there a reason to limit this to "en" and "es" only? At first sight I 
don't see one. Of course it depends on the really used languages in the 
users posts. But with Google's translator many things can be covered 
when it's true that the very most posts are be about access problems, 
new password requests, etc.



+1 from me. I do however ask the forum-admins to consider if we could  use
1 ML. If we potentially create one ML pr forum, it will require a lot of
moderators.


This would be indeed a little nightmare.

However, +1 to create forums' mailing list(s).

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] Service e-mail addresses for the Forum

[jan i]

On 23 February 2014 22:02, Andrea Pescetti  wrote:

> Subject to lazy consensus, these are the service e-mail aliases (that will
> actually work like the security mailing list: allow posts from anyone, no
> public archives) that will be created for the en and es forums (so, mail
> from the forum will appear to come from those addresses and users with
> registrations problems will e-mail those addresses too):
>
> openoffice-forum-admin-enapache.org
>
> openoffice-forum-admin-esapache.org
>
> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7371 for more.
>
+1 from me. I do however ask the forum-admins to consider if we could  use
1 ML. If we potentially create one ML pr forum, it will require a lot of
moderators.

rgds
jan I.


> Regards,
>   Andrea.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Re: Malware infection

[Max Merbald]

Hi David,

your answer is quite interesting. On one hand you write fairly rough 
answers to people who ask for support, on the other hand you react quite 
sensitively to the responses to your mail. Do you see the discrepance? 
Ok, I could have omitted the "conveniently"  i apologise for this.


Your answer to John could, indeed, be interpreted to mean that you're a 
bit annoyed with people who have  problem with an infected version of 
OpenOffice because it frequently happened. I did not mean to make you 
leave the project, that's your own - and regrettable - decision. This 
whole thing shows that it is necessary to be careful what we write to 
people who ask for support. John was angry and embarrassed that after he 
gave his friend a tip to use openoffice his computer was infected with 
malware. And then he received a seemingly "annoyed" answer and got even 
more angry because from your answer it must have seemed to him that you 
weren't taking him quite seriously.


As to the question for the link from where his friend downloaded 
Openoffice, you may think it doesn't help a lot to know where that is. I 
don't share your opinion. And it's not an excuse that other projects 
suffer from the same problem. Of course we need to know where these 
things come from because if we don't we can't do anything against it. 
Ok, we can't do a lot, but those requests come fairly often and I think, 
not enough is done about those folks who use this wonderful project as a 
vehicle for their malware or who exploit it to make a lot of money with 
it. It's not a solution not to do anything about it. What do you think 
happens when articles in computer magazines or online start appearing 
which say that OpenOffice should not be used because it "regularely 
comes adorned with malware" or something? That would mean real trouble!


And please do NOT turn your back on OpenOffice!

Max


Am 23.02.2014 19:21, schrieb Dave Barton:

 Original Message  
From: Max Merbald 
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 15:02:18 +0100


of course we are grateful for the tip.

Agreed!


It seems, however, that Dave did not make that clear enough.

>From John's reactionary & unnecessarily abusive response, that is
clearly the case.


He appears to be more annoyed by people who mention trouble with download than 
with those fraudulent people who provide downloads infected with malware.

100% incorrect! Regrettably, my commentary came across to John and
possibly others, in a way that it was not intended.


Please be so kind as to tell us from where you downloaded the infected version 
of OpenOffice

That would be "interesting", but of little value. OpenOffice.org, Apache
OpenOffice, LibreOffice and numerous other OSS projects projects have
suffered this kind of fraud since the internet came into existence. Even
if we could cut off this one Google fraudster, he/it would simply
reappear under a different identity, along with hundreds of other
like-minded fraudsters out there.


Dave conveniently forgot to ask for that.

"conveniently..." What do you mean by this snotty attitude?

John, do you see how Max's above "hopefully" innocent comment can be
misinterpreted into something that was not intended. This is one of the
pitfalls of trying to provide user support without the ability to read
the mind of those who pose the question/issue.


We apologise for the misunderstanding.

+1 from me.


and hope that by now you found yourself an uninfected download for OpenOffice.

With the wisdom of hindsight, I think we can be confident that this is
the case.


Yours sincerely

Max

After more than decade of "attempting" to provide support and
contributions to the OOo/AOO project, it appears that I lack the ability
to contribute anything worthwhile. Therefore, I will remove myself from
Apache and move on to other interests.

Dave



  


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

[PROPOSAL] Service e-mail addresses for the Forum

[Andrea Pescetti]

Subject to lazy consensus, these are the service e-mail aliases (that 
will actually work like the security mailing list: allow posts from 
anyone, no public archives) that will be created for the en and es 
forums (so, mail from the forum will appear to come from those addresses 
and users with registrations problems will e-mail those addresses too):


openoffice-forum-admin-enapache.org

openoffice-forum-admin-esapache.org

See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7371 for more.

Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Malware infection

[Xuacu]

2014-02-23 20:34 GMT+01:00 Andrea Pescetti :
>
> (By the way, there was nothing wrong in the tone of your first reply in this
> thread; I was going to copy/paste it for a user reporting a similar
> problem).
>

Indeed. I can't see anything snotty in saying that we can't do
anything to prevent malicious sites offering tampered with copies of
Apache OpenOffice.

Regards
--
Xuacu

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Error in determine_new_packagename()

[Andrea Pescetti]

On 22/02/2014 LOH KOK HOE wrote:

@pescetti,
I notice that the revision number of the fixed you sent to me is rather
old because when I issue the command `svn info | grep "Revision"`, I
have this output `Revision: 1568993`.


Well, what I meant is:
- We had a similar problem with another configure option (dmake)
- We already fixed that in the past, with the revision I mentioned (this 
is why it is an old revision; at that URL you can find the exact lines 
changed and such)
- Following what was done there for dmake, you could have fixed it 
yourself for epm by modifying configure.in


I've now done it, so this should now be fixed. This is covered in
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124301

Please svn update, test (i.e., use 
--with-epm-url=http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz or 
another valid location) and leave a comment there to say if it works for 
you now.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Malware infection

[Andrea Pescetti]

Dave Barton wrote:

After more than decade of "attempting" to provide support and
contributions to the OOo/AOO project, it appears that I lack the ability
to contribute anything worthwhile. Therefore, I will remove myself from
Apache and move on to other interests.


Even if you can only continue to help with moderation, with the 
occasional forwarding of misdirected replies and with some quick reply 
to users, this will be an appreciated contribution to the project.


Please just continue this way: it may be less than you hope to 
contribute, but it is still worthwhile and useful to the project.


(By the way, there was nothing wrong in the tone of your first reply in 
this thread; I was going to copy/paste it for a user reporting a similar 
problem).


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Malware infection

[jan i]

On 23 February 2014 19:21, Dave Barton  wrote:

>  Original Message  
> From: Max Merbald 
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 15:02:18 +0100
>
> > of course we are grateful for the tip.
>
> Agreed!
>
> > It seems, however, that Dave did not make that clear enough.
>
> From John's reactionary & unnecessarily abusive response, that is
> clearly the case.
>
> > He appears to be more annoyed by people who mention trouble with
> download than with those fraudulent people who provide downloads infected
> with malware.
>
> 100% incorrect! Regrettably, my commentary came across to John and
> possibly others, in a way that it was not intended.
>
> > Please be so kind as to tell us from where you downloaded the infected
> version of OpenOffice
>
> That would be "interesting", but of little value. OpenOffice.org, Apache
> OpenOffice, LibreOffice and numerous other OSS projects projects have
> suffered this kind of fraud since the internet came into existence. Even
> if we could cut off this one Google fraudster, he/it would simply
> reappear under a different identity, along with hundreds of other
> like-minded fraudsters out there.
>
> > Dave conveniently forgot to ask for that.
>
> "conveniently..." What do you mean by this snotty attitude?
>
> John, do you see how Max's above "hopefully" innocent comment can be
> misinterpreted into something that was not intended. This is one of the
> pitfalls of trying to provide user support without the ability to read
> the mind of those who pose the question/issue.
>
> > We apologise for the misunderstanding.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> > and hope that by now you found yourself an uninfected download for
> OpenOffice.
>
> With the wisdom of hindsight, I think we can be confident that this is
> the case.
>
> > Yours sincerely
> >
> > Max
>
> After more than decade of "attempting" to provide support and
> contributions to the OOo/AOO project, it appears that I lack the ability
> to contribute anything worthwhile. Therefore, I will remove myself from
> Apache and move on to other interests.
>

Please reconsider that, we are all just humans who make good/bad judgements
and THAT IS ALLOWED in  here.

Speaking with my PMC hat on, we would have a really dull community if we
only accepted mails that conformed to a non-existing standard. We want to
have (and do have) a vibrant community, where the mails sometimes are a bit
on edge.

This ML is NOT a user support mail list so users should expect more rough
responses, than on e.g. forums.a.o

Its unfortunate that your response ended up like this. But please put it
behind you as one of those events you dont want to think long about.

Life is too short to take a single event to seriously !
Developing/supporting/being part of openSource/Apache/AOO is (and should
always be) fun.

In the hope to see continued contributions from you
rgds
jan I.




> Dave
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Re: Malware infection

[Dave Barton]

 Original Message  
From: Max Merbald 
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 15:02:18 +0100

> of course we are grateful for the tip.

Agreed!

> It seems, however, that Dave did not make that clear enough.

>From John's reactionary & unnecessarily abusive response, that is
clearly the case.

> He appears to be more annoyed by people who mention trouble with download 
> than with those fraudulent people who provide downloads infected with malware.

100% incorrect! Regrettably, my commentary came across to John and
possibly others, in a way that it was not intended.

> Please be so kind as to tell us from where you downloaded the infected 
> version of OpenOffice

That would be "interesting", but of little value. OpenOffice.org, Apache
OpenOffice, LibreOffice and numerous other OSS projects projects have
suffered this kind of fraud since the internet came into existence. Even
if we could cut off this one Google fraudster, he/it would simply
reappear under a different identity, along with hundreds of other
like-minded fraudsters out there.

> Dave conveniently forgot to ask for that.

"conveniently..." What do you mean by this snotty attitude?

John, do you see how Max's above "hopefully" innocent comment can be
misinterpreted into something that was not intended. This is one of the
pitfalls of trying to provide user support without the ability to read
the mind of those who pose the question/issue.

> We apologise for the misunderstanding.

+1 from me.

> and hope that by now you found yourself an uninfected download for OpenOffice.

With the wisdom of hindsight, I think we can be confident that this is
the case.

> Yours sincerely
> 
> Max 

After more than decade of "attempting" to provide support and
contributions to the OOo/AOO project, it appears that I lack the ability
to contribute anything worthwhile. Therefore, I will remove myself from
Apache and move on to other interests.

Dave



 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: OPEN OFFICE BUG---- OPEN OFFICE CALC

[Andrea Pescetti]

"brawny burger" wrote:

the program seems to confuse the number "8" with the letter "B".


We need more detail to check this. If there is a bug the explanation is 
surely more complex than this.



I was sorting numbers like
(but not these exact numbers, ie a series similar to these)


OK, but what happens with these? I get them sorted properly in Calc:

14kjg94jf22kjjffk
2233jkfjskljfjj4j4
2jdje
8Kdfe6444kgfkdl44
8r939438982fjfj
B4005849kdfj458
B588004DKJFLKK4
rui4knfjkk4j5

For any meaningful investigations we will need a list that is not sorted 
properly. It would be great if you can find a list that Calc is unable 
to sort correctly, since this is the only way you can help us 
investigate this possible bug.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

OPEN OFFICE BUG---- OPEN OFFICE CALC

[brawny burger]

FYIyou can pass this on to whoever might be responsible.   I could not
find any other email for this issue other than forums and it appears to be
a bug in the OPEN OFFICE CALC  program when using SORT. Recently when I
 attempted to use AND SORT a whole group of numbers using Calc
(spreadsheet), the program seems to confuse the number "8" with the letter
"B".  Thus it was not sorting properly.   (Note:  Advanced spreadsheet
user).   Sort did not sort properly  as it put a list  beginning with* 2
before the 1's*   and put  the* letter "B" intermixed with the number "8".
 * May be something that someone needs to look into.   FYIand no
response required;  just so you can fix it.   I was sorting numbers like
(but not these exact numbers, ie a series similar to these)

8r939438982fjfj
B4005849kdfj458
14kjg94jf22kjjffk
2jdje
​​
rui4knfjkk4j5
2233jkfjskljfjj4j4
B588004DKJFLKK4
8Kdfe6444kgfkdl44

Re: How could I make a build on writer module?

[LOH KOK HOE]

As I read the partial build guideline, I'm a bit confuse on the build step.
When I done my changes on the sw module, can I specifically just building
the sw module only. I see there is a Makefile under the sw module, can I
just issue `make` command right under this directory to build the sw
module? Or may be there isn't a simple process by simply calling the `make`
will get the job done.

I'm not sure how the build process going to be, I'm expecting some output
or a physical file generate after the build complete. Where could I grab
this output file and where should I move/plug it into the core module, thus
when I launch OpenOffice, I could see my changes immediately.

BTW, I suppose to see an executable file generate after the build (if I
still remember correctly there is an executable file called soffice which
will launch OpenOffice), but now I couldn't find it, where does it keep?


On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <
orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> On 12.02.2014 14:34, LOH KOK HOE wrote:
>
>> Thanks Andrea. Sorry for my mistake.
>>
>> To Oliver,
>> You mention AOO build environment have to be setup, did you mean the full
>> build at the very first step? Right after the command > "source
>> LinuxX86-64Env.Set.sh" which will lead to this command > "cd
>> instsetoo_native && build --all". Does the command > "build --all" is the
>> AOO build environment that you mention?
>>
>>
> Once you have created (via the configure) the corresponding platform
> script - in your case 'LinuxX86-64Env.Set.sh' - you have everything
> together to start building.
> 'source LinuxX86-64Env.Set.sh' and you are theoretically able to build
> individual modules.
> But modules have dependencies to other modules. Thus, it is recommended to
> build once all modules. Module instsetoo_native to the top module - it
> creates the installation packages. It depends more or less on all modules.
> A 'build --all' in instsetoo_native builds it after all modules are built
> on which it depends.
> After this step you are able to build individual modules as all
> dependencies are available.
>
> Best regards, Oliver.
>
>
>
>  THanks @!
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Andrea Pescetti > >wrote:
>>
>>  Forwarding the answer below to LOH KOK HOE, who is not subscribed. LOH
>>> KOK
>>> HOE: please read http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html to know
>>> how our mailing lists work, or you will miss answers. Andrea
>>>
>>> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi,


 On 10.02.2014 14:08, LOH KOK HOE wrote:

  I would like to focus my contribution to writer module only, how could
> I
> build and test only for this module? Do I need to make a full build
> for the
> whole system in order to run my test?
>
>
>  A full build to play around with the Writer (module sw in folder
 main/)
 is not needed. But your AOO build environment have to be setup and
 available as for a full build. And you need an installation package
 which corresponds to the source code revision of your AOO build
 environment.
 Once you have setup your AOO build environment you can just perform a
 debug build of module sw. Afterwards you have to copy the created
 libraries into the program folder of your installation.

 Do not hesitate to ask for further and deeper information or concrete
 steps for your environment on your way to play around with the Writer
 module.


 Best regards, Oliver.


   Thanks @!

>
>
>  -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




>>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Re: Malware infection

[Max Merbald]

Hello John,

of course we are grateful for the tip. It seems, however, that Dave did 
not make that clear enough. He appears to be more annoyed by people who 
mention trouble with download than with those fraudulent people who 
provide downloads infected with malware. Please be so kind as to tell us 
from where you downloaded the infected version of OpenOffice - Dave 
conveniently forgot to ask for that. We apologise for the 
misunderstanding and hope that by now you found yourself an uninfected 
download for OpenOffice.


Yours sincerely

Max

Am 23.02.2014 05:47, schrieb John Barrett Rose:

"You say..." What do you mean by this snotty attitude?

I realise it was not an Apache site.

I thought it might help you to know that there is a bloody swine operating
on Google under your name.

I imagined you might be grateful for the tip.

No? So go and get stuffed.


On 22 February 2014 17:46, Dave Barton  wrote:


 Original Message  
From: John Barrett Rose 
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 15:01:27 +0100


Dear Sirs,

On my recommendation, a friend in Salzburg tried to install
Openoffice.org on his iMac on Thursday 20 Feb and found it was infected
with Genieo malware including fake Adobe and fake Java installations.

Manage to clean out the mess, but it left me looking stupid as I have
had OO.org on my computer for several years without problems.

Be warned.

John Barrett Rose

If whatever it was you installed contained the malware you say, then it
was not Apache OpenOffice and you were hoodwinked into downloading from
a malicious website. Regrettably, this is something that Apache
OpenOffice is unable to prevent.

The only official download website is:
http://www.openoffice.org/download/index.html
The download link there will take you to the official SourceForge.net
servers.

Dave





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org