[FEATURE][DISCUSS] The values of upper and lower spacing for default paragraph did the complete opposite
Hi, The spacing size between lines is inconspicuous. But in some cases, it becomes a disturbing problem. This bug shows the problem: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125090. In the attachment, I put 2 screenshots to illustrate the issue. The patch is ready. Should we change it? -- Best Regards, Steve Yin
Re: [FEATURE][DISCUSS] The values of upper and lower spacing for default paragraph did the complete opposite
2014-06-13 15:16 GMT+08:00 Steve Yin steve.yin@gmail.com: Hi, The spacing size between lines is inconspicuous. But in some cases, it becomes a disturbing problem. This bug shows the problem: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125090. In the attachment, I put 2 screenshots to illustrate the issue. The patch is ready. Should we change it? +1 to change the default line space from bottom to top, which will make the layout align more to the content logic. Currently I spent a lot of time to change the default line space in my presentations. While currently we are working on 4.1.1. I think this change should belong to a big release, e.g. 4.2. - Shenfeng (Simon) -- Best Regards, Steve Yin
4.1.1_release_blocker requested: [Issue 124891] CRASH when 'View - close sidebar' with Navigator active
fanyuz...@gmail.com has asked for 4.1.1_release_blocker: Issue 124891: CRASH when 'View - close sidebar' with Navigator active https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124891 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.1.1_release_blocker requested: [Issue 125000] CRASH when scroll through very large and complex .odt
fanyuz...@gmail.com has asked for 4.1.1_release_blocker: Issue 125000: CRASH when scroll through very large and complex .odt https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125000 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Macro Security Button
Hi Raymond, On 12.06.2014 17:39, Steele, Raymond wrote: I am just trying to set ENABLE_NSS_MODULE=YES.I thought enabling category-b would do this, but that does not seem to be the case. How does one go about enabling the security macros button? I thought it was by enabling NSS and category-b, but that does not seem to work. I could manually force it , or change the configure script, but that does not seem to be the correct solution. According to main/configure.in line 330 the nss module is enabled by default. It gets disabled though in line 1422 of the same file unless category-b licensed code is explicitly enabled. This is so for policy reasons, see [1] for details. So if you enabled category-b licensed code and didn't disable nss, then nss should be enabled. If this isn't so please check and eventually update your system's autoconf tool. If that doesn't help then enabling the ENABLE_NSS_MODULE option by force may be the fastest solution. [1] http://markmail.org/thread/erh6leykxwygio2k Herbert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.1.1_release_blocker requested: [Issue 125024] Crash: after applying the comment arises the problem with using table
fanyuz...@gmail.com has asked for 4.1.1_release_blocker: Issue 125024: Crash: after applying the comment arises the problem with using table https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125024 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.1.1_release_blocker requested: [Issue 124717] Embedded GDI Metafiles replaced by Read Error box after File - Save
fanyuz...@gmail.com has asked for 4.1.1_release_blocker: Issue 124717: Embedded GDI Metafiles replaced by Read Error box after File - Save https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124717 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.1.1_release_blocker requested: [Issue 124877] reset formatting behind special formattings hangs AOO
fanyuz...@gmail.com has asked for 4.1.1_release_blocker: Issue 124877: reset formatting behind special formattings hangs AOO https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124877 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.1.1_release_blocker requested: [Issue 124966] Picture loss on save
fanyuz...@gmail.com has asked for 4.1.1_release_blocker: Issue 124966: Picture loss on save https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124966 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.1.1_release_blocker requested: [Issue 125030] CRASH when open edit mode copy of older document.odt version
fanyuz...@gmail.com has asked for 4.1.1_release_blocker: Issue 125030: CRASH when open edit mode copy of older document.odt version https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125030 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.1.1_release_blocker requested: [Issue 114361] Read Error with embedded images after saving in Writer
fanyuz...@gmail.com has asked for 4.1.1_release_blocker: Issue 114361: Read Error with embedded images after saving in Writer https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114361 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.1.1_release_blocker requested: [Issue 124947] Standard Filter in Fullscreen mode appears invisible, locks Calc Window
fanyuz...@gmail.com has asked for 4.1.1_release_blocker: Issue 124947: Standard Filter in Fullscreen mode appears invisible, locks Calc Window https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124947 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.1.1_release_blocker requested: [Issue 125086] Regression Textfield.user cant be deleted via Script
brinzing oliver.brinz...@gmx.de has asked for 4.1.1_release_blocker: Issue 125086: Regression Textfield.user cant be deleted via Script https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125086 --- Additional Comments from brinzing oliver.brinz...@gmx.de confirming with aoo410 w7 64bit aoo401: field is deleted aoo410: only first letter is deleted - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RELEASE]: AOO 4.1.1 code base and some additional proposed fixes
Hi, I have set flag 4.1.1_release_blocker? to bugs which we have proposed to be 4.1.1 showstopper candidates, here is the list. They are either fixed or under investigated by developers. *Priority 1:* Issue 124891 - CRASH when 'View - close sidebar' with Navigator active - regression, since 4.1.0 Issue 125000 - CRASH when scroll through very large and complex .odt - regression, since 4.1.0 Issue 125024 - Crash: after applying the comment arises the problem with using table - regression, since 4.1.0 Issue 124717 - Embedded GDI Metafiles replaced by Read Error box after File - Save - data loss, introduced in 4.1.0 Issue 124877 - reset formatting behind special formattings hangs AOO - regression, hung, since 4.1.0 *Priority 2:* Issue 124966 - Picture loss on save - data loss, since OOo 3.4 beta Issue 124947 - Standard Filter in Fullscreen mode appears invisible, locks Calc Window - lock, since OOo 3.3 Issue 114361 - Read Error with embedded images after saving in Writer - data loss, since OOo 3.2 Issue 125030 - CRASH when open edit mode copy of older document.odt version - regression On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 06/12/2014 09:01 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: On 12/06/14 08:19, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 11/06/14 19:51, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 06/11/2014 11:14 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: Hi, a possible schedule for AOO 4.1.1 is not yet finally discussed and defined but I would like to propose some further issues that are related to make the code working on MacOS 10.9.3. First I propose that we develop the AOO 4.1.1 on the existing branch AOO410 because it should be a minor bugfix release with some translation updates. But no bigger features. Don't we have created a branch for every new release even when it was a micro release like 4.1.1? To keep a clean repository for those who want to build a specific release from scratch? Or will you do some magic with SVN tags to reach this? no magic, but the difference between a branch and a tag is minimal. I would create a new branch based on branch AOO410. The release version is tagged and we tag the 4.1.1 as well. And we still have no Mac build bot but I have updated my Mac where I have built the release in the past. Means I have no 10.7 system in place and have to build on MacOs 10.9.3. We made these changes already on trunk and I propose the following issues for integration in AOO 4.1.1 to make the build possible on MacOS 10.9.3. It will still work on 10.7. Well I have already prepared a build and did a first basic test but it will need some more testing of course. The issues are: 124896 remove obsoleted module-internal custom allocator in SAL, https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124896 Should be decided by code developers. 124908 remove custom allocator support in stlport-replacement headers, https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124908 Should be decided by code developers. 124422 Build no more possible with Xcode 5.1 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124422 OK, looks reasonable. 124442 Mac and Java Oracle 1.7, https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124442 The last issue should be already fixed in AOO 4.1.0. Thats what I understood from the issue text and target milestone. ;-) I will check it, maybe I picked the wrong one. I had to make a further changes on trunk for building on Mavericks and clean this up but without an issue :-( I will reuse this issue for integrate the change. Juergen But the message is that I plan to integrate some necessary changes to make the build possible ;-) that's always one of the best reasons. When it is not buildable, the complete software is simply not ready to release. ;-) Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Reporting broken download link
Download works ok, but install results in message before continuing close OpenOffice 4.1.0 etc. OpenOffice is not open, click on OK and install aborts. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Reporting broken download link
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 09:12:35 -0400 Cliff Cleary nh11...@comcast.net wrote: Download works ok, but install results in message before continuing close OpenOffice 4.1.0 etc. OpenOffice is not open, click on OK and install aborts. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org The Quickstarter or some other component of OpenOffice is running. In Windows start TaskManager (Ctrl shift Esc) and kill any soffice processes shown on TM's Processes tab. Then install OpenOffice. -- Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.1.1_release_blocker requested: [Issue 125055] Opening some documents is much slower in AOO 4.1
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann o...@apache.org has asked for 4.1.1_release_blocker: Issue 125055: Opening some documents is much slower in AOO 4.1 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125055 --- Additional Comments from Oliver-Rainer Wittmann o...@apache.org requesting release blocking flag as this performance decrease is serious. I am working on a solution. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Macro Security Button
Thanks. Is coinMP and Hunspell needed for security features? -Original Message- From: Herbert Duerr [mailto:h...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 2:50 AM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Macro Security Button Hi Raymond, On 12.06.2014 17:39, Steele, Raymond wrote: I am just trying to set ENABLE_NSS_MODULE=YES.I thought enabling category-b would do this, but that does not seem to be the case. How does one go about enabling the security macros button? I thought it was by enabling NSS and category-b, but that does not seem to work. I could manually force it , or change the configure script, but that does not seem to be the correct solution. According to main/configure.in line 330 the nss module is enabled by default. It gets disabled though in line 1422 of the same file unless category-b licensed code is explicitly enabled. This is so for policy reasons, see [1] for details. So if you enabled category-b licensed code and didn't disable nss, then nss should be enabled. If this isn't so please check and eventually update your system's autoconf tool. If that doesn't help then enabling the ENABLE_NSS_MODULE option by force may be the fastest solution. [1] http://markmail.org/thread/erh6leykxwygio2k Herbert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
can't install 4.0.1
I am on a windows 7. I downloaded openoffice(OO) 3.2. I then upgraded to 3.3 and 3.4. Now I want to install 4.0.1, but I am reviving a message that OO is still running. I have exited and went in to task manager and killed soffice it is not running anywhere.l I checked all users. I tried to do a repair install, but same thing. I singed up for the forum,but couldn't post a question. So here I am. Please Help me... C 717.557.5723 email nateprice...@yahoo.com
Re: Bitte eure Meinung - Weil Dauerstreit keine Probleme löst
Am 12.06.2014 18:10, schrieb Dave: Ja Michael, man kann die Suche nach Konsens so lange treiben, bis alle gänzlich die Lust verlieren. Konsens ist kein demokratisches Prinzip. Vielleicht in der Ehe, ja, aber nicht als arbeitende Gemeinschaft. Logisch sind es nur Freiwillige - aber was tut das zur Sache? Das tut insoweit etwas zur Sache, als dass es durchaus tragisch wäre, wenn wir wegen einer durchaus heftigen Diskussion unter zwei langjährigen Projektmitgliedern am Ende Mitstreiter verlieren würden, Dies können wir uns nämlich eigentlich nicht leisten, denn wir sind eh' wenige. Es ist kann nicht in unserem Interesse sein, dass das Ergebnis am Ende lautet: Der Demokratie wurde Genüge getan; das Projekt ist kaputt. Btw. : seit wann ist Konsens kein demokratisches Prinzip. Wieso soll das Volk seine Herrschaft nur im Streit ausüben dürfen? Die deutsche Geschichte lehrt im Gegenteil, dass ohne eine breiten Konsens in wesentlichen Fragen Demokratie scheitern kann. Gruß Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Bitte eure Meinung - Weil Dauerstreit keine Probleme löst
Es gibt doch bereits einen Konsens: verschiedene Listen für verschiedene Zwecke (dev, users und doc sind die, die mir geläufig sind). Du willst offensichtlich diesen Konsens brechen. Seit Monaten verfolge ich diese Debatte und komme leider immer stärker zu diesem Schluss. Dieser Konsens kann sinnvollerweise durch eine Abstimmung nochmals bestätigt werden. Wenn du die Debatte weiterhin in die Länge ziehst, machst du diese Liste kaputt, ob das dein Willen ist oder nicht spielt keine Rolle. 2014-06-13 9:07 GMT+02:00 Dr. Michael Stehmann anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de: Am 12.06.2014 18:10, schrieb Dave: Ja Michael, man kann die Suche nach Konsens so lange treiben, bis alle gänzlich die Lust verlieren. Konsens ist kein demokratisches Prinzip. Vielleicht in der Ehe, ja, aber nicht als arbeitende Gemeinschaft. Logisch sind es nur Freiwillige - aber was tut das zur Sache? Das tut insoweit etwas zur Sache, als dass es durchaus tragisch wäre, wenn wir wegen einer durchaus heftigen Diskussion unter zwei langjährigen Projektmitgliedern am Ende Mitstreiter verlieren würden, Dies können wir uns nämlich eigentlich nicht leisten, denn wir sind eh' wenige. Es ist kann nicht in unserem Interesse sein, dass das Ergebnis am Ende lautet: Der Demokratie wurde Genüge getan; das Projekt ist kaputt. Btw. : seit wann ist Konsens kein demokratisches Prinzip. Wieso soll das Volk seine Herrschaft nur im Streit ausüben dürfen? Die deutsche Geschichte lehrt im Gegenteil, dass ohne eine breiten Konsens in wesentlichen Fragen Demokratie scheitern kann. Gruß Michael
