Re: [MWiki] Account creation

[Andrea Pescetti]

Sarah Spiers wrote:

Could someone please create an MWiki account for me? I would like the
username sspiersk if possible.


Done. You will receive a temporary password by mail. Let us know if you 
don't receive it within a few minutes. Otherwise, see you on the doc list!


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

[MWiki] Account creation

[Sarah Spiers]

Hello,

 

Could someone please create an MWiki account for me? I would like the
username sspiersk if possible.

 

Thank you,

Sarah Spiers

Re: BZ maximum attachment size?

[Rob Weir]

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Kay Schenk  wrote:
>
>
> On 07/24/2014 03:38 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Kay Schenk  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/22/2014 05:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
 On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Kay Schenk  wrote:
> Does anyone happen to know what our maximum attachment size is for BZ
> attachments? According to the help for BZ 4.4.4, it should process large
> attachments "nicer" now but I don't know how our particular instance is
> setup.
>

 There are two size limits, one for attachments stored in the database,
 and one for attachments stored on the file system.

 We have the limit set to 1000 KB for attachments stored in the
 database and 0 for storage in the file system, meaning these are
 disabled.

 Regards,

 -Rob
>>>
>>> OK, thanks. I can't find any specific information differentiating these
>>> two types, though. (?)
>>>
>>
>> The idea is it saves small attachments (up to one specified limit)
>> into the database.  If permitted larger attachments are then stored on
>> the file system, up to another specified size limit.
>>
>> Do we feel a need to allow larger attachments?
>>
>> -Rob
>
> Well I had an idea that might require it. I will bring up a topic soon
> and see what others think. There are probably alternative ways of doing
> what I was thinking.
>

OK.  Just keep in mind the maintenance question.  If we use the file
system for attachments this means a database backup would not be
sufficient.   I assume Infra takes care of the BZ backups so we'd need
to coordinate with them on any change.

-Rob


>>
>>


> Thanks.
> --
> -
> MzK
>
> "To be trusted is a greater compliment than being loved."
>-- George MacDonald
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

>>>
>>> --
>>> -
>>> MzK
>>>
>>> "To be trusted is a greater compliment than being loved."
>>>-- George MacDonald
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
> --
> -
> MzK
>
> "To be trusted is a greater compliment than being loved."
>-- George MacDonald
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: BZ maximum attachment size?

[Kay Schenk]

On 07/24/2014 03:38 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Kay Schenk  wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07/22/2014 05:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Kay Schenk  wrote:
 Does anyone happen to know what our maximum attachment size is for BZ
 attachments? According to the help for BZ 4.4.4, it should process large
 attachments "nicer" now but I don't know how our particular instance is
 setup.

>>>
>>> There are two size limits, one for attachments stored in the database,
>>> and one for attachments stored on the file system.
>>>
>>> We have the limit set to 1000 KB for attachments stored in the
>>> database and 0 for storage in the file system, meaning these are
>>> disabled.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> -Rob
>>
>> OK, thanks. I can't find any specific information differentiating these
>> two types, though. (?)
>>
> 
> The idea is it saves small attachments (up to one specified limit)
> into the database.  If permitted larger attachments are then stored on
> the file system, up to another specified size limit.
> 
> Do we feel a need to allow larger attachments?
> 
> -Rob

Well I had an idea that might require it. I will bring up a topic soon
and see what others think. There are probably alternative ways of doing
what I was thinking.

> 
> 
>>>
>>>
 Thanks.
 --
 -
 MzK

 "To be trusted is a greater compliment than being loved."
-- George MacDonald

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> --
>> -
>> MzK
>>
>> "To be trusted is a greater compliment than being loved."
>>-- George MacDonald
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 

-- 
-
MzK

"To be trusted is a greater compliment than being loved."
   -- George MacDonald

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: BZ maximum attachment size?

[Rob Weir]

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Kay Schenk  wrote:
>
>
> On 07/22/2014 05:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Kay Schenk  wrote:
>>> Does anyone happen to know what our maximum attachment size is for BZ
>>> attachments? According to the help for BZ 4.4.4, it should process large
>>> attachments "nicer" now but I don't know how our particular instance is
>>> setup.
>>>
>>
>> There are two size limits, one for attachments stored in the database,
>> and one for attachments stored on the file system.
>>
>> We have the limit set to 1000 KB for attachments stored in the
>> database and 0 for storage in the file system, meaning these are
>> disabled.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> -Rob
>
> OK, thanks. I can't find any specific information differentiating these
> two types, though. (?)
>

The idea is it saves small attachments (up to one specified limit)
into the database.  If permitted larger attachments are then stored on
the file system, up to another specified size limit.

Do we feel a need to allow larger attachments?

-Rob


>>
>>
>>> Thanks.
>>> --
>>> -
>>> MzK
>>>
>>> "To be trusted is a greater compliment than being loved."
>>>-- George MacDonald
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
> --
> -
> MzK
>
> "To be trusted is a greater compliment than being loved."
>-- George MacDonald
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: OOXML documentation

[Kay Schenk]

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Peter Kelly  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've begun writing up some documentation on the OOXML file format on the
> wiki:
>
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/OOXML
>
> The new content is that linked to from the first section, currently
> limited to a description of the packaging format, extensibility features,
> and a brief introduction to WordProcessingML. This is just the beginning,
> and there's a *lot* more to be covered, which will happen over the coming
> weeks (months?).
>
> I've deliberately avoided discussing details of any particular
> implementation, so that it's a general description that is hopefully of use
> to anyone writing software to deal with the format. I will however be
> releasing my own implementation (which converts to/from HTML) once I've
> completed the port to Linux (which is close to completion).
>
> If anyone else who has experience working with the format would like to
> contribute as well, that would be great. My expertise is limited to the
> word processing aspects only, as I've never worked with the spreadsheet or
> presentation formats.
>
> --
> Dr. Peter M. Kelly
> Founder, UX Productivity
> pe...@uxproductivity.com
> http://www.uxproductivity.com/
> http://www.kellypmk.net/
>
> PGP key: http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key
> (fingerprint 5435 6718 59F0 DD1F BFA0 5E46 2523 BAA1 44AE 2966)
>
>
Again, thank you! We have a lot to learn!

-- 
-
MzK

"To be trusted is a greater compliment than being loved."
   -- George MacDonald

Re: [WEBSITE][DOWNLOAD] Newest updates to webpages

[Kay Schenk]

On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 2:02 AM, Marcus (OOo)  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I've finished some more work on the download webpages. Because you can
> benefit from these changes for your localized website you may want to know
> how to use it.
>
> - Download webpage:
>
> 1.
> All the colored boxes + navigation bar + logo section can be defined to be
> shown or not. If they should be shown, the text can be localized in
> "msg_prop_l10n_XX.js".
>
> For an example see the source code of "http://www.openoffice.org/xx/
> download/index.html".
>
> - Download scripting:
>
> 1.
> Moved all variables and functions into an single global object "DL". Now
> only this object is in the global scope of the browser window and no longer
> every little variable (best practices in JS scripting).
>
> 2.
> The same for the localization strings in "msg_prop_l10n_XX.js" (global
> object "l10n").
>
> 3.
> An error text is shown when choosing not suitable select box options
> (e.g., OS X 32-bit + any language + 4.1.0). If it's not possible to
> translate the English wording properly into your language, then (more or
> less) free text can be defined.
>
> See the variables "l10n.dl_error_custom_1_text" until
> "l10n.dl_error_custom_4_text" (depends on the exception case) in
> "msg_prop_l10n_XX.js".
>
> - Select boxes:
>
> 1.
> The list items can be localized. The current strings are in English and
> can be found in "msg_prop_l10n_XX.js".
>
> See the variables "l10n.dl_green_box_select_box_os_values",
> "l10n.dl_green_box_select_box_language_values" and
> "l10n.dl_green_box_select_box_version_values" in "msg_prop_l10n_XX.js".
>
> 2.
> Furthermore, in the language select box the list items have a tool tip
> (native language name + ISO code).
>
> BTW:
> I'm now subscribed to the L10N mailinglist.
>
> And as always, if you need more details just ask. :-)
>
> Marcus
>

Very cool! a nice fill in template page. :)

Taking a look at this again. I have two ideas --

* take this email and make into an instruction page instructions.html or
something in /download

* it would be helpful to have a new file called "localized_download.html"
or something in /download as well that would contain the slightly edited
js references found, for example, in

http://www.openoffice.org/de/downloads/index.html

with placeholders for the language "js" file.

The second item  would be especially helpful to get translation volunteers
to help in anticipation of new language releases. They could submit the
changed download page, and the translated string js file as issues ahead of
time to be committed when the release comes out.

What do you think?




> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


-- 
-
MzK

"To be trusted is a greater compliment than being loved."
   -- George MacDonald

Re: BZ maximum attachment size?

[Kay Schenk]

On 07/22/2014 05:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Kay Schenk  wrote:
>> Does anyone happen to know what our maximum attachment size is for BZ
>> attachments? According to the help for BZ 4.4.4, it should process large
>> attachments "nicer" now but I don't know how our particular instance is
>> setup.
>>
> 
> There are two size limits, one for attachments stored in the database,
> and one for attachments stored on the file system.
> 
> We have the limit set to 1000 KB for attachments stored in the
> database and 0 for storage in the file system, meaning these are
> disabled.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -Rob

OK, thanks. I can't find any specific information differentiating these
two types, though. (?)

> 
> 
>> Thanks.
>> --
>> -
>> MzK
>>
>> "To be trusted is a greater compliment than being loved."
>>-- George MacDonald
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 

-- 
-
MzK

"To be trusted is a greater compliment than being loved."
   -- George MacDonald

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

OOXML documentation

[Peter Kelly]

Hi,

I've begun writing up some documentation on the OOXML file format on the wiki:

https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/OOXML

The new content is that linked to from the first section, currently limited to 
a description of the packaging format, extensibility features, and a brief 
introduction to WordProcessingML. This is just the beginning, and there's a 
*lot* more to be covered, which will happen over the coming weeks (months?).

I've deliberately avoided discussing details of any particular implementation, 
so that it's a general description that is hopefully of use to anyone writing 
software to deal with the format. I will however be releasing my own 
implementation (which converts to/from HTML) once I've completed the port to 
Linux (which is close to completion).

If anyone else who has experience working with the format would like to 
contribute as well, that would be great. My expertise is limited to the word 
processing aspects only, as I've never worked with the spreadsheet or 
presentation formats.

--
Dr. Peter M. Kelly
Founder, UX Productivity
pe...@uxproductivity.com
http://www.uxproductivity.com/
http://www.kellypmk.net/

PGP key: http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key
(fingerprint 5435 6718 59F0 DD1F BFA0 5E46 2523 BAA1 44AE 2966)



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [RELEASE]: AOO 4.1.1 milestone 3, based on rev. 1612804

[Pedro Lino]

Hi Juergen, all

Already installed and ran (and confirmed/tested previous bugs)
It is working perfectly (at least the en_US version)

I'm a little worried that the Windows Nightly based on the same build failed
http://ci.apache.org/builders/aoo-win7/builds/99

Is this bad news or it is not a problem?

Regards,
Pedro


On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Jürgen Schmidt 
wrote:

> > That means m3 will become a new revision. More info later ...
>
> ok the upload is nearly finished and the rebuild me is based on revision
> 1612804.
>
> Available as always under
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> when the upload is complete. try again later if you should have problems.
>

Re: [RELEASE]: AOO 4.1.1 milestone 3, based on rev. 1612804

[Jürgen Schmidt]

On 23/07/14 09:09, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 23/07/14 08:50, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 21.07.2014 18:03, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the translation deadline was last Friday and the milestone 3 build is
>>> underway.
>>>
>>> The m3 build is based on revision 1611634 from AOO410 branch. I have
>>> integrated 12 translation updates (including new languages). We have
>>> updates for de, he, km, lt, pl, pt, th, vi, zh-TW and new languages are
>>> ca, ca-XV and ca-XR.
>>>
>>> An overview of the fixed issues since AOO 4.1 can be found under
>>> http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/milestones/4.1.1-m3-r1611634/AOO4.1.1_fixes.html
>>>
>>>
>>> The upload of the binaries builds is ongoing and can be found under
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
>>>
>>>
>>> Happy testing and verifying of fixed issues. Feedback is welcome as
>>> reported issues or discussion on our dev@openoffice.apache.org mailing
>>> list.
>>>
>>
>> A serious defect has found its way into recent code line of planned
>> 4.1.1 release - see issue 125299, also reported on the verification of
>> issue 125228.
>>
>> This means that many text documents given in the Open Document Format
>> (ODF) will cause a crash during import.
>>
>> I already found the defect cause and will provide a fix today.
> 
> thanks for reporting this issue. We have a problem with 3 languages
> ca-XR, ca-XV, zh-TW and I will rebuilt m3 completely to have a fix for
> your issue integrated as well.
> 
> That means m3 will become a new revision. More info later ...

ok the upload is nearly finished and the rebuild me is based on revision
1612804.

Available as always under
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
when the upload is complete. try again later if you should have problems.

Juergen


> 
> Juergen
> 
> 
>>
>> Best regards, Oliver.
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: l10n-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: l10n-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.1 Beta Survey Results

[FR web forum]

This add-in is for MS-Excel.
Calc is not a clone of this software.

If you want to print barcode, you can use some extensions:
http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/search?query=barcode


- Mail original -
De: "arronlee" 
À: ooo-...@incubator.apache.org
Envoyé: Jeudi 24 Juillet 2014 11:27:50
Objet: Re: AOO 4.1 Beta Survey Results

Hi,
As for me, I am testing the related  excel barcode add-in
   these days. Do you have any
ideas about it? Or any good suggestion? I am totally a green hand on barcode
generating field. Any suggestion will be appreciated. Thanks in advance.


Best regards,
Arron




--
View this message in context: 
http://openoffice.2283327.n4.nabble.com/AOO-4-1-Beta-Survey-Results-tp4660633p4665885.html
Sent from the Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

4.1.1_release_blocker granted: [Issue 125300] cropping + scaling image in writer results in a blue rectangle

[bugzilla]

j...@apache.org has granted Armin Le Grand 's request for
4.1.1_release_blocker:
Issue 125300: cropping + scaling image in writer results in a blue rectangle
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125300


--- Additional Comments from j...@apache.org
grant showstopper flag

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.1 Beta Survey Results

[arronlee]

Hi,
As for me, I am testing the related  excel barcode add-in
   these days. Do you have any
ideas about it? Or any good suggestion? I am totally a green hand on barcode
generating field. Any suggestion will be appreciated. Thanks in advance.


Best regards,
Arron




--
View this message in context: 
http://openoffice.2283327.n4.nabble.com/AOO-4-1-Beta-Survey-Results-tp4660633p4665885.html
Sent from the Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

4.1.1_release_blocker requested: [Issue 125300] cropping + scaling image in writer results in a blue rectangle

[bugzilla]

Armin Le Grand  has asked  for 4.1.1_release_blocker:
Issue 125300: cropping + scaling image in writer results in a blue rectangle
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125300


--- Additional Comments from Armin Le Grand 
Fixed and asking for release blocker - it's a safe change.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: New Volunteer/Introduction

[Tal Daniel]

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Andrea Pescetti 
wrote:

> Sarah Spiers wrote:
>
>> Volunteering for OpenOffice is not for a class, but I hope to apply the
>> experience I gain to my academic pursuits. I have experience with and am
>> interested in writing, marketing/communication, and basic graphic design.
>> However, I am more than willing to help with anything else. I am a quick
>> learner and will do my best.
>>
>
> You would be a perfect documentation volunteer. We have an ongoing
> documentation project where we start having quite a few people ready to
> help, but still need help from someone who is a good writer (and preferably
> a native speaker) and who can provide some continuity.
>
> You can find the work-in-progress documentation here:
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/UserGuide


Welcome, Sarah.
I'm also a volunteer, and my main focus now is translating the UI & Help
System to Hebrew.
Andrea mentioned an ongoing effort to make documentation move to wiki. I'm
not sure what the future state of AOO [desktop] Help System would be, but I
encourage you to review it too, and make it more clear, at times.

Good luck!

Executable name in Linux launcher

[Andrea Pescetti]

In our typical Linux installation we rely on a launcher called
 /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice
which in turns executes
 /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice.bin

The 'soffice.bin' name is not hard-coded, but computed in the former 
script with

sd_binary=`basename "$0"`.bin

As observed on the users list
http://markmail.org/message/eihw7r66e2bb2giy
this breaks expectations when one is using a symlink (say, 
"openoffice4") to /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice since then $0 would 
be the symlink's name and not "soffice", so the launcher would try to 
execute "openoffice4.bin" and this wouldn't work.


Is there any reason against having some additional checks in our 
launcher, or even hardcode "soffice.bin" as executable name there? This 
seems Linux (or UNIX-like) specific but I haven't checked on other systems.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: New Volunteer/Introduction

[Andrea Pescetti]

Sarah Spiers wrote:

Volunteering for OpenOffice is not for a class, but I hope to apply the
experience I gain to my academic pursuits. I have experience with and am
interested in writing, marketing/communication, and basic graphic design.
However, I am more than willing to help with anything else. I am a quick
learner and will do my best.


You would be a perfect documentation volunteer. We have an ongoing 
documentation project where we start having quite a few people ready to 
help, but still need help from someone who is a good writer (and 
preferably a native speaker) and who can provide some continuity.


You can find the work-in-progress documentation here:
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/UserGuide

It's a wiki, so it will be fairly easy to edit. But you will need an 
account for that. Accounts are created on request: just let us know your 
preferred username and we can create it for you.


Then the main discussion hub for documentation is the dedicated doc 
list: http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html ; make sure you 
read http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/intro-doc.html and then 
please post to the doc list; you are free to pick the pages/sections you 
would like to work on, but we can also have suggestions for you if you 
prefer.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org