Re: We need some BZ changes now that 4.1.1. is out
On 26/08/14 00:22, Kay Schenk wrote: > Someone needs to add 4.1.1 to the version field for BZ. > > Apparently, I don't have the karma for this. :/ > I have added 4.1.1 to hopefully all relevant projects Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Packages from Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated to version 4.1.1
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 08:31:49AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 [...] > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) > Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org > > iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJT/CnVAAoJEM/u8xZRtf3oGAEP/2GREQVjvbyeXvFogSyidciR > bOaYcRKveqhDlIZuMVPEM5YPV+AQlArW2oLZ96ZgXg5RPi75xcfjS7q604gs22gJ > IDet75z6qrV23KrcRiGVkkF78rxitqarrEJdLy0rrhW0uAl7T6lJPFiLLXpM6CtY > huSZi0PtJxHZAiHwZiD0RYjrvVSufoCuEF8Q4MVPIfg09HKvoj8WOpubAB8//GwQ > OheYt0kqk29hRdvhXiQeWftz+/MJ9BmCGkqtTyuNzLQnRoRwy4X14OGIGO0M1dcl > K7UfGRNP94/TO42+J2/BWncBdhiJ4lj6q2BeqcpJe6guoVoTfJR8jLhFi+Uxeczz > nfqdqL3dLYOqv/zocP+z99VW/r/keVkZrWwRS9EjbVUKhooECTrGwwpPjRLvt+RK > YWjYjtnMaEgrcF5iSLrdd/7ZY+bfSFeFjHBCz/sWc7ZctfkErQaJ46+mUR8Qbrlk > l14Hz/d8w+spCQ3riz3pd78K8AisBICtV3AgvYWv4vFHqOT1+pr39LP9LD5A2ffA > 6qWcEfKMzdY1TUDMoomfgqhqjD1TRidRbwSmKkXMsGAm8NxbphjcLmdIyyrpDfEu > dMnbybt9GJpV+9XNY6jyAV757ToqSqdeHLLgxcWP7AGQR4LUMiOZ7YP39aageu2M > KUcgYpzKvyQ+LlIDhP1L > =B5zS > -END PGP SIGNATURE- I'd suggest you configure Enigmail in Thunderbird to sign using PGP/MIME instead of the old-fashioned inline-PGP, in Thunderbird's Account Settings go to OpenPGP Options and enable "Use PGP/MIME by default", as explained here http://www.rainydayz.org/content/81-account-settings Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Packages from Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated to version 4.1.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 25/08/14 17:05, Marcelo Santana wrote: > Hi all, > > The unofficial Apache OO Debian repository was updated and from now > it provides the version 4.1.1 of Apache Openoffice with all > available languages. > > All information needed for new installations or upgrades are > available from README file[1]. perfect, sounds good. Many thanks for this it's of great help at least for Debian users. Juergen > > [1]https://sourceforge.net/projects/apacheoo-deb/files/debian/ > > > Regards, > > -- Marcelo G. Santana (aka msantana) | GNU/Linux User number: > #208778 http://blog.msantana.eng.br | http://identi.ca/mgsantana > http://www.debianbrasil.org | http://br.gnome.org GnuPG fprint: > 88FB 5D63 ED02 3B5D 90D6 3A3E 8698 1CC9 89C5 5467 > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJT/CnVAAoJEM/u8xZRtf3oGAEP/2GREQVjvbyeXvFogSyidciR bOaYcRKveqhDlIZuMVPEM5YPV+AQlArW2oLZ96ZgXg5RPi75xcfjS7q604gs22gJ IDet75z6qrV23KrcRiGVkkF78rxitqarrEJdLy0rrhW0uAl7T6lJPFiLLXpM6CtY huSZi0PtJxHZAiHwZiD0RYjrvVSufoCuEF8Q4MVPIfg09HKvoj8WOpubAB8//GwQ OheYt0kqk29hRdvhXiQeWftz+/MJ9BmCGkqtTyuNzLQnRoRwy4X14OGIGO0M1dcl K7UfGRNP94/TO42+J2/BWncBdhiJ4lj6q2BeqcpJe6guoVoTfJR8jLhFi+Uxeczz nfqdqL3dLYOqv/zocP+z99VW/r/keVkZrWwRS9EjbVUKhooECTrGwwpPjRLvt+RK YWjYjtnMaEgrcF5iSLrdd/7ZY+bfSFeFjHBCz/sWc7ZctfkErQaJ46+mUR8Qbrlk l14Hz/d8w+spCQ3riz3pd78K8AisBICtV3AgvYWv4vFHqOT1+pr39LP9LD5A2ffA 6qWcEfKMzdY1TUDMoomfgqhqjD1TRidRbwSmKkXMsGAm8NxbphjcLmdIyyrpDfEu dMnbybt9GJpV+9XNY6jyAV757ToqSqdeHLLgxcWP7AGQR4LUMiOZ7YP39aageu2M KUcgYpzKvyQ+LlIDhP1L =B5zS -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Trying to help a users list subscriber
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Dave Barton wrote: > I am trying to help a long time users list subscriber whose emails are > being consistently bounced by our server. His email address definitely > appears in the subscriber list and he is posting from that address. Is > there anyone here with karma to assist with this, or should I contact infra? > Send me a email off-list with his details and I'll see if I can force an moderator unsubscribe. -Rob > TIA > > Dave > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Installing AOO on Ubuntu/Mint/Debian
Hi, When users want to install OpenOffice on Ubuntu or derivates, we advice them to uninstall LibreOffice. The problem is in the same name of executable program, soffice. I played with desktop integration and found some directives for generating .deb package (I think that I'm understand it right). file "main/sysui/desktop/debian/control" This file saying about packages which is in "Conflict", so what about adding here "libreoffice" or "libreoffice-common" ? Please, add comments. Regards, Michal Hriň - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Trying to help a users list subscriber
I am trying to help a long time users list subscriber whose emails are being consistently bounced by our server. His email address definitely appears in the subscriber list and he is posting from that address. Is there anyone here with karma to assist with this, or should I contact infra? TIA Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Broken desktop-integration in 4.1.1
On 08/25/2014 09:00 AM, Michal Hriň wrote: > > > Dňa 25.08.2014 o 17:09 Kay Schenk napísal(a): >> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Michal Hriň wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm trying release 4.1.1 on my system Ubuntu with KDE 4.13.3 and >>> desktop-integration is broken. >>> >>> Symlinks to soffice works but, when I tried to run program by >>> clicking to >>> icon in menu nothing happens or I got a "Warning" which says >>> >>> "Program will be executed: openoffice4 %U" by clicking on "Run" button >>> nothings happens. >>> >> >> Which desktop-integration did you install? >> >> The freedesktop integration works for me with KDE 4.10 on opensuse 12.3. >> >> > > In release archive for Debian, there was only one .deb package for > desktop intgeration, "dpkg" calls it "openoffice-debian-menus". OK, I'm using rpm so there are several choices. Interesting. Sorry for the confusion. > > >>> Notice / question: >>> >>> Have I create issue? (in bugzilla is only 4.1 and 4.2.0-dev version) >>> >>> As I'm playing with building of program, and I want to refresh my >>> programming, can someone point me to some reading about >>> desktop-integration >>> and to the source where is the code of it ? >>> >>> Why builds are provided without KDE integration ? When I tried to build >>> program --with-kde I didn't know which libraries build script expected. >>> Can someone point me which libraries and of what version are expected >>> for >>> successful build with kde-integration? >>> >> >> In configure.in in the source tree, you will find 2 parameters dealing >> withe kde -- >> --enable-kde >> --enable-kde4 >> >> I haven't followed the complete configuration to determine where kde4 is >> used. >> >> Also in configure.in, you will get to a section with starting comments >> >> "Check whether the Qt and KDE libraries are available." >> >> for more information on libraries needed. >> >> Since both Gnome and KDE now follow the freedesktop specification, that >> desktop integration seems to work well for most users. >> >> >>> Regards, >>> Michal Hriň >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > -- - MzK "For evil to flourish, it only requires good men to do nothing." -- Simon Wiesenthal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
We need some BZ changes now that 4.1.1. is out
Someone needs to add 4.1.1 to the version field for BZ. Apparently, I don't have the karma for this. :/ -- - MzK "For evil to flourish, it only requires good men to do nothing." -- Simon Wiesenthal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Anyone using publish.pl?
On 24/08/2014 Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: I get the same error on Fedora 20, something is wrong with the logic that sets both $ca_file and $ca_path in publish.pl, but as you can read in line 34, there is an environment variable to get rid of it: [ariel@localhost webgui]$ export IGNORE_CERT=1 [ariel@localhost webgui]$ perl publish.pl ooo-site arielch Thanks, it worked for me. The log message editing is still creating some confusion (possibly related to the fact that EDITOR is set to vim?) but this is definitely minor. Publishing now works correctly and this is very helpful. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: ASF banner ads
> On 2014-08 -25, at 17:12, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > On 31/07/2014 Rob Weir wrote: >> Noticed this: >> http://www.apache.org/ads/ >> It is a directory of banners that can be added to the website to >> promote ASF-wide things like ApacheCon. > > With ApacheCon EU now approaching, we could definitely use it. > >> Details are here: http://www.apache.org/ads/adserver.txt >> What do we think? Would it make sense to add this to the home page? >> If so, where? > > The home page is already quite cluttered. But this could fit in the footer. > We currently have a 203x61 feather on the right hand side in the footer. The > logo Apache provides for ApacheCon would be 234x60, so quite similarly sized. > We could accommodate it in the footer, to the left. > > And maybe it's indeed worth adding the code for the iframe inclusion and let > the people responsible for ApacheCon within Apache update the logo > automatically. > > I'm also OK with Juergen's suggestion to put it at the top, but I cannot find > a way for it to fit nicely (and the image itself already looks ugly, since it > is resized in a bad way). Perhaps in the downloads section? To remind people or just to inform that what they use is made by their community, which is vast and interesting. I tend to think that anything that impedes the delivery of a homepage's message is risky. This is especially so with something like AOO that is both an enduser product (or set of them) and a developers' project. > > Regards, > Andrea. Louis - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: ASF banner ads
On 31/07/2014 Rob Weir wrote: Noticed this: http://www.apache.org/ads/ It is a directory of banners that can be added to the website to promote ASF-wide things like ApacheCon. With ApacheCon EU now approaching, we could definitely use it. Details are here: http://www.apache.org/ads/adserver.txt What do we think? Would it make sense to add this to the home page? If so, where? The home page is already quite cluttered. But this could fit in the footer. We currently have a 203x61 feather on the right hand side in the footer. The logo Apache provides for ApacheCon would be 234x60, so quite similarly sized. We could accommodate it in the footer, to the left. And maybe it's indeed worth adding the code for the iframe inclusion and let the people responsible for ApacheCon within Apache update the logo automatically. I'm also OK with Juergen's suggestion to put it at the top, but I cannot find a way for it to fit nicely (and the image itself already looks ugly, since it is resized in a bad way). Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Broken desktop-integration in 4.1.1
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:28:28AM +0200, Michal Hriň wrote:
> As I'm playing with building of program, and I want to refresh my
> programming, can someone point me to some reading about desktop-integration
> and to the source where is the code of it ?
The code is in sysui/desktop
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/main/sysui/desktop/
Note that the build system uses directly rpmbuild/dpkg-deb instead of
epm, which is used in instsetoo_native to generate the packages (this
means, in sysui the source includes RPM spec and Debian control files,
while in instsetoo_native these are generated at build time).
See for example
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/main/sysui/desktop/debian/
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/main/sysui/desktop/redhat/
> Why builds are provided without KDE integration ?
Because the code is unmaintained (and completely broken).
> When I tried to build program --with-kde
this one is for KDE 3, use --enable-kde4
> I didn't know which libraries
> build script expected. Can someone point me which libraries and of
> what version are expected for successful build with kde-integration?
Almost three years ago, configure could detect the needed libraries
(http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1179069), it seems
it is still working, I've just tested and got:
The variable ENABLE_KDE4 is set to: TRUE
The variable KDE4_CFLAGS is set to: -DQT_SHARED -I/usr/include/QtCore
-DQT_SHARED -I/usr/include/QtGui -I/usr/include/QtCore -I/usr/include/kde4
-DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT
The variable KDE4_LIBS is set to: -L/usr/lib64/kde4/devel -L/usr/lib64
-lkdeui -lkdecore -lQtCore -lQtGui
You need the development packages for those libraries; use your package
manager to see what provides those libraries; in Fedora, for example
yum whatprovides */libQtCore.so */libQtGui.so */libkdeui.so */libkdecore.so
shows that the packages are kdelibs-devel and qt-devel (in Debian, they
may be libqt4-dev and kdelibs4-dev).
Note that some distros come with Qt5 and KDE Frameworks, I guess that
configure cannot detect them.
Also note that in order to build successfully, you'll need to apply
kde4_fpicker.patch, and in order to start the application you need to
apply kde4_dbus_appname.patch.
If you succeed in building and running OpenOffice with KDE4 enabled,
you'll understand what "completely broken" means ;)
Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina
diff --git a/main/fpicker/source/unx/kde4/KDE4FilePicker.cxx
b/main/fpicker/source/unx/kde4/KDE4FilePicker.cxx
index 52701fa..ef2e411 100644
--- a/main/fpicker/source/unx/kde4/KDE4FilePicker.cxx
+++ b/main/fpicker/source/unx/kde4/KDE4FilePicker.cxx
@@ -52,6 +52,8 @@
//kde has an enum that uses this...OO does too
#undef SETTINGS_MOUSE
+#undef SETTINGS_LOCALE
+#undef SETTINGS_STYLE
#include
#include
diff --git a/main/vcl/unx/kde4/KDEXLib.cxx b/main/vcl/unx/kde4/KDEXLib.cxx
index b1cc67c..7493539 100644
--- a/main/vcl/unx/kde4/KDEXLib.cxx
+++ b/main/vcl/unx/kde4/KDEXLib.cxx
@@ -74,9 +74,9 @@ void KDEXLib::Init()
pInputMethod->SetLocale();
XrmInitialize();
- KAboutData *kAboutData = new KAboutData("Apache OpenOffice",
+ KAboutData *kAboutData = new KAboutData("ApacheOpenOffice",
"kdelibs4",
- ki18n( "Apache OpenOffice" ),
+ ki18n( "ApacheOpenOffice" ),
"3.4.0",
ki18n( "Apache OpenOffice with KDE Native Widget
Support." ),
KAboutData::License_File,
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: [Build] Release build parameters
Michal Hriň wrote: can someone write me which exact "configure" parameters or some another are used for building (linux) release packages ? See the build options at the bottom of https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds (I think ca-XR is missing in the list of languages, the rest looks OK) Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Preparing 4.1.1 download stats
Rob Weir wrote: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/aoo-stats/410.lst I need to prepare a file for 4.1.1 now.I assume I can just replace all the "4.1.0" with "4.1.1" in the paths and file names. Are there any other changes? Any translations dropped? Any new ones? Any changes to the naming conventions? No translations dropped. No naming conventions changes. Just three new languages: ca, ca-XR, ca-XV. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Broken desktop-integration in 4.1.1
Dňa 25.08.2014 o 17:09 Kay Schenk napísal(a): On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Michal Hriň wrote: Hi, I'm trying release 4.1.1 on my system Ubuntu with KDE 4.13.3 and desktop-integration is broken. Symlinks to soffice works but, when I tried to run program by clicking to icon in menu nothing happens or I got a "Warning" which says "Program will be executed: openoffice4 %U" by clicking on "Run" button nothings happens. Which desktop-integration did you install? The freedesktop integration works for me with KDE 4.10 on opensuse 12.3. In release archive for Debian, there was only one .deb package for desktop intgeration, "dpkg" calls it "openoffice-debian-menus". Notice / question: Have I create issue? (in bugzilla is only 4.1 and 4.2.0-dev version) As I'm playing with building of program, and I want to refresh my programming, can someone point me to some reading about desktop-integration and to the source where is the code of it ? Why builds are provided without KDE integration ? When I tried to build program --with-kde I didn't know which libraries build script expected. Can someone point me which libraries and of what version are expected for successful build with kde-integration? In configure.in in the source tree, you will find 2 parameters dealing withe kde -- --enable-kde --enable-kde4 I haven't followed the complete configuration to determine where kde4 is used. Also in configure.in, you will get to a section with starting comments "Check whether the Qt and KDE libraries are available." for more information on libraries needed. Since both Gnome and KDE now follow the freedesktop specification, that desktop integration seems to work well for most users. Regards, Michal Hriň - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Packages from Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated to version 4.1.1
Hi all, The unofficial Apache OO Debian repository was updated and from now it provides the version 4.1.1 of Apache Openoffice with all available languages. All information needed for new installations or upgrades are available from README file[1]. [1]https://sourceforge.net/projects/apacheoo-deb/files/debian/ Regards, -- Marcelo G. Santana (aka msantana) | GNU/Linux User number: #208778 http://blog.msantana.eng.br | http://identi.ca/mgsantana http://www.debianbrasil.org | http://br.gnome.org GnuPG fprint: 88FB 5D63 ED02 3B5D 90D6 3A3E 8698 1CC9 89C5 5467 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Broken desktop-integration in 4.1.1
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Michal Hriň wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying release 4.1.1 on my system Ubuntu with KDE 4.13.3 and > desktop-integration is broken. > > Symlinks to soffice works but, when I tried to run program by clicking to > icon in menu nothing happens or I got a "Warning" which says > > "Program will be executed: openoffice4 %U" by clicking on "Run" button > nothings happens. > Which desktop-integration did you install? The freedesktop integration works for me with KDE 4.10 on opensuse 12.3. > Notice / question: > > Have I create issue? (in bugzilla is only 4.1 and 4.2.0-dev version) > > As I'm playing with building of program, and I want to refresh my > programming, can someone point me to some reading about desktop-integration > and to the source where is the code of it ? > > Why builds are provided without KDE integration ? When I tried to build > program --with-kde I didn't know which libraries build script expected. > Can someone point me which libraries and of what version are expected for > successful build with kde-integration? > In configure.in in the source tree, you will find 2 parameters dealing withe kde -- --enable-kde --enable-kde4 I haven't followed the complete configuration to determine where kde4 is used. Also in configure.in, you will get to a section with starting comments "Check whether the Qt and KDE libraries are available." for more information on libraries needed. Since both Gnome and KDE now follow the freedesktop specification, that desktop integration seems to work well for most users. > Regards, > Michal Hriň > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > -- - MzK "For evil to flourish, it only requires good men to do nothing." -- Simon Wiesenthal
Preparing 4.1.1 download stats
For the download stats I use a data file that lists all the full-install files for each release. For example, with 4.1.0 I used this file: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/aoo-stats/410.lst I need to prepare a file for 4.1.1 now.I assume I can just replace all the "4.1.0" with "4.1.1" in the paths and file names. Are there any other changes? Any translations dropped? Any new ones? Any changes to the naming conventions? Regards, -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Setting buildbot back to trunk
Hi, On 25.08.2014 14:25, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 25/08/14 14:23, Regina Henschel wrote: Hi, version 4.1.1 is out. Can someone please set a Windows buildbot back to trunk? aoo-win7 fails currently anyway. I believe Herbert has already done it but not 100% sure, he is on vacation this week. Will try to check ... I am still not very familiar with the build bots. Yes, Herbert switched the build bots for Linux32bit and Windows back to trunk. I noticed the typo in the build bot configuration script for the Windows build bot and corrected it hopefully. Now, we have to wait for the next build bot run to check, if the Windows build bot is noo working on trunk. Best regards, Oliver. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Setting buildbot back to trunk
On 25/08/14 14:23, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi, > > version 4.1.1 is out. Can someone please set a Windows buildbot back to > trunk? aoo-win7 fails currently anyway. I believe Herbert has already done it but not 100% sure, he is on vacation this week. Will try to check ... I am still not very familiar with the build bots. Juergen > > Kind regards > Regina > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Setting buildbot back to trunk
Hi, version 4.1.1 is out. Can someone please set a Windows buildbot back to trunk? aoo-win7 fails currently anyway. Kind regards Regina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO 4.1.1 DEB 64bit build seems old
On 25/08/2014 13:19, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 13:10:59 +0200 > Davide Dozza wrote: > >>> Try a fresh d/l of OO 4.1.1 DEB 64 bit and a reinstall. It is possible that >>> you have one of the Release Candidates - on My Xubuntu 14.04 using latest >>> DEB 64 the two About screens (Xubuntu and Windows) are identical. >>> >> I tried this morning with two different Sourceforge downloads. >> Do you mean it's possible there are RCs still on some Sourceforge mirrors? >> > There shouldn't be - I was thinking if you had an older download. My d/l was > of the en-GB version, and as I say its About screen is identical to the > Windows version. It's definitively a user profile problem. Using a different user with a clean profile everything is ok. Is't the case to open an issue? Davide - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO 4.1.1 DEB 64bit build seems old
Am 25.08.2014 um 13:10 schrieb Davide Dozza: > >> Try a fresh d/l of OO 4.1.1 DEB 64 bit and a reinstall. It is possible that >> you have one of the Release Candidates - on My Xubuntu 14.04 using latest >> DEB 64 the two About screens (Xubuntu and Windows) are identical. >> > > I tried this morning with two different Sourceforge downloads. > Do you mean it's possible there are RCs still on some Sourceforge mirrors? > > Davide DEBs 64 bit are ok here Regards Mechtilde signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: AOO 4.1.1 DEB 64bit build seems old
Davide Dozza wrote: I tried this morning with two different Sourceforge downloads. Do you mean it's possible there are RCs still on some Sourceforge mirrors? RCs are never uploaded to SourceForge. And anyway you have the final version if the (very strange) About screen you posted is correct: Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0-> This line is outdated AOO411m6(Build:9775) - Rev. 1617669 -> This line is OK (correct Rev.) 2014-04-22 12:11 - Linux x86_64-> This line is outdated I have no idea of the root cause, I see everything OK on Linux (RPM): first line says 4.1.1, third line says August 2014. But do you really get the three lines as such or it's a copy/paste error? The only strange thing about those builds is that there used to be two sets of packages for desktop integration, but this should have been fixed (i.e., the version you download should have only one set of packages in the desktop integration folder). Moreover, desktop integration should not interfere at all with the displayed version number. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO 4.1.1 DEB 64bit build seems old
> Try a fresh d/l of OO 4.1.1 DEB 64 bit and a reinstall. It is possible that > you have one of the Release Candidates - on My Xubuntu 14.04 using latest DEB > 64 the two About screens (Xubuntu and Windows) are identical. > I tried this morning with two different Sourceforge downloads. Do you mean it's possible there are RCs still on some Sourceforge mirrors? Davide - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO 4.1.1 DEB 64bit build seems old
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 11:53:27 +0200 Davide Dozza wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just installed AOO 4.1.1 DEB 64 bit on my Ubuntu 14.04. > > Looking at Help -> About I've found out something strange. > > The splash screen reports: > > Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 > AOO411m6(Build:9775) - Rev. 1617669 > 2014-04-22 12:11 - Linux x86_64 > > while the Win version reports: > > Apache OpenOffice 4.1.1 > AOO411m6(Build:9775) - Rev. 1617669 > 2014-08-13 09:06:54 (Mi, 13 Aug 2014) > > revision seems the same but the name and the date seem uncorrect. > > Just some typos or the version on Sourceforge is not correct? > > Davide Try a fresh d/l of OO 4.1.1 DEB 64 bit and a reinstall. It is possible that you have one of the Release Candidates - on My Xubuntu 14.04 using latest DEB 64 the two About screens (Xubuntu and Windows) are identical. -- Rory O'Farrell - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
AOO 4.1.1 DEB 64bit build seems old
Hi all, I've just installed AOO 4.1.1 DEB 64 bit on my Ubuntu 14.04. Looking at Help -> About I've found out something strange. The splash screen reports: Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 AOO411m6(Build:9775) - Rev. 1617669 2014-04-22 12:11 - Linux x86_64 while the Win version reports: Apache OpenOffice 4.1.1 AOO411m6(Build:9775) - Rev. 1617669 2014-08-13 09:06:54 (Mi, 13 Aug 2014) revision seems the same but the name and the date seem uncorrect. Just some typos or the version on Sourceforge is not correct? Davide - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Development progress on SVG-graphics
Hi Regina, On 16.08.2014 21:01, Regina Henschel wrote: Hi all, there have been some discussions in German in private emails before the implementations. That was a wrong behavior and should not happen again, please excuse this. I'll translate and summarize here some of those discussions: CSS knows a large variety of selectors in a rule, read http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/selector.html. We discussed to which extend they should be supported. Because currently Inkscape supports CSS only rudimentary, and there are no special requests in Bugzilla, and other areas of CSS (e.g. filter and animation) are more important, the decision has been, to support only those selectors, which can be implemented straightforward within the existing design. Find details about current implementation in the comments in main/svgio/source/svgreader/svgstylenode.cxx. There exists currently no code to load external data which are referenced in a svg-image. Therefore support for "@import" rule has been postponed. In contrast to browsers, the environment, in which svg-images are used in Apache OpenOffice, has no user-defined style sheets. In addition '@import' rule is not supported. So the author's rule is always taken and authors can directly determine the order of styles. Therefore the '!important' part of a description is ignored for now. A CSS-style is stored in a SvgStyleAttributes-instance. Each svg-node gets a linked list of pointers to styles, ordered according the priority specified by "cascading". The list is build once using method fillCssStyleVector. (I hope, I've got it right.) Yes, thanks for adding this here. Maybe I am sometimes too concentrated on discussing issues directly in the issuezilla task. OTOH it belongs there and the task defines the problem to discuss about precisely. OTOH the bugzilla mailing list is just too big to always follow completely, so maybe sending hints to issues where a discussion is ongoing to the dev list is a good approach... Sincerely, Armin Kind regards Regina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- ALG - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
[Build] Release build parameters
Hi, can someone write me which exact "configure" parameters or some another are used for building (linux) release packages ? Regards, Michal Hriň - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Broken desktop-integration in 4.1.1
Hi, I'm trying release 4.1.1 on my system Ubuntu with KDE 4.13.3 and desktop-integration is broken. Symlinks to soffice works but, when I tried to run program by clicking to icon in menu nothing happens or I got a "Warning" which says "Program will be executed: openoffice4 %U" by clicking on "Run" button nothings happens. Notice / question: Have I create issue? (in bugzilla is only 4.1 and 4.2.0-dev version) As I'm playing with building of program, and I want to refresh my programming, can someone point me to some reading about desktop-integration and to the source where is the code of it ? Why builds are provided without KDE integration ? When I tried to build program --with-kde I didn't know which libraries build script expected. Can someone point me which libraries and of what version are expected for successful build with kde-integration? Regards, Michal Hriň - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: user mailing lists and forums
> But it makes sense to give some more visibility to the current "mailing > lists" link (the envelope, on the right column) and to add a link to > http://openoffice.apache.org/native-lang.html ; the idea behind using > icons was probably to avoid to display English text, but all linked > pages are in English anyway... If you have any suggestions on how to > arrange it (with these two "indirect" links, to the pages describing > English and N-L lists) we can take a look. After reading your answer I found the icons. :-) They are placed above the search field therefore for me they looked liked as action icons (support mail/form, voting via g+) so I ignored them. I suggest that https://forum.openoffice.org/ should be extended with the user mailing lists (only user! no dev/qa/…!) to have the supporting ways in one place for near all languages. Language (ID) - User Forum - User Mailing List To avoid too many requests from unsubscribed senders, we shouldn't simply list all mailing lists. This is a good reason, but (1) http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html and (2) http://openoffice.apache.org/native-lang.html provide the direct posting addresses. So IMO it would be better to have a help text how to use mailinglists like "Using Mailing Lists" and "Participation Guidelines" at (1) but with the first step: "To use a mailinglist you have to subscribe to this mailing lists!" In the table there should only a mailto-link to the list-subscribe@... and a link to only one mail archive for this list. col1: Language (ID) col2: User Forum col3: Subscription Link to Mailing List col4: Link to Mail Archive right beside the table: How to use mailinglists Regards, Mathias - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Fwd: Funds for speaker to Central America Free Software event
Alexandro Colorado wrote: Can you give me the contact for the treasurer? I couldnt find it atht he galleries link. I am also on my mobile so is a bit harder to surf from here. Details are listed here http://www.apache.org/foundation/ and the address is simply treasurer at apache.org, but contacting the treasurer is the very last step (1: design; 2: proposal here with amount; 3: consensus on this list; 4: paying; 5: asking treasurer for reimbursement) so there is no need to contact him at this stage yet. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
