Re: Attracting new developers
Am 07/20/2016 09:25 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 7/20/2016 12:03 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 07/20/2016 07:51 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: OpenOffice really needs more developers, especially build experts but also programmers in general. We do have a web page, http://openoffice.apache.org/get-involved.html, but it it not very obvious and tends to emphasize non-programming contributions. Those are very valuable, but we have far too few developers. I only found out about the need for developers by reading bo...@apache.org, a mailing list that is available to a few hundred people. Meanwhile, it's a quiet day if there are less than 100,000 downloads. The download page, https://www.openoffice.org/download/, could have a "Developers Needed" block similar to the "Help Spread the Word" block, linking to http://openoffice.apache.org/get-involved.html. that's possible. But an additional message box on the main webpage could also help to get the attention. Let me think about all this in the next days (maybe weekend?). The more places we call attention to the need, the more likely users are to find out about it. I picked the page I did because when I want to install software package X I type in Google "download X", and usually pick the first hit. For "Download OpenOffice" that is the download page. sure. I meaned the main webpage because there we have already a box ready which just needs to be filled with text and finally enabled to show. If this does get us some more developers, I am volunteering to shepherd and organize them. I don't think just telling them to pick something to work on is an effective way of getting them started - we seem to lose a lot of people at that point. Thats great as this would be a question because it is a key point that we need to satisfy: How to please new devs with mentors and work? ;-) If we only get a few responses I plan to work with them individually. In many cases my role will be to answer questions for which I happen to know the answer and not be embarrassed to ask questions that reveal my ignorance if necessary. If we get a lot of responses I'll try to form them into mixed-skill teams such that the members of each team can help each other. It seems to me you are waiting already for new people. :-) Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Attracting new developers
On 7/20/2016 12:03 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 07/20/2016 07:51 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: OpenOffice really needs more developers, especially build experts but also programmers in general. We do have a web page, http://openoffice.apache.org/get-involved.html, but it it not very obvious and tends to emphasize non-programming contributions. Those are very valuable, but we have far too few developers. I only found out about the need for developers by reading bo...@apache.org, a mailing list that is available to a few hundred people. Meanwhile, it's a quiet day if there are less than 100,000 downloads. The download page, https://www.openoffice.org/download/, could have a "Developers Needed" block similar to the "Help Spread the Word" block, linking to http://openoffice.apache.org/get-involved.html. that's possible. But an additional message box on the main webpage could also help to get the attention. Let me think about all this in the next days (maybe weekend?). The more places we call attention to the need, the more likely users are to find out about it. I picked the page I did because when I want to install software package X I type in Google "download X", and usually pick the first hit. For "Download OpenOffice" that is the download page. If this does get us some more developers, I am volunteering to shepherd and organize them. I don't think just telling them to pick something to work on is an effective way of getting them started - we seem to lose a lot of people at that point. Thats great as this would be a question because it is a key point that we need to satisfy: How to please new devs with mentors and work? ;-) If we only get a few responses I plan to work with them individually. In many cases my role will be to answer questions for which I happen to know the answer and not be embarrassed to ask questions that reveal my ignorance if necessary. If we get a lot of responses I'll try to form them into mixed-skill teams such that the members of each team can help each other. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: Attracting new developers
+1, thanks Patricia > -Original Message- > From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] > Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 10:51 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Attracting new developers > > OpenOffice really needs more developers, especially build experts but > also programmers in general. > > We do have a web page, http://openoffice.apache.org/get-involved.html, > but it it not very obvious and tends to emphasize non-programming > contributions. Those are very valuable, but we have far too few > developers. > > I only found out about the need for developers by reading > bo...@apache.org, a mailing list that is available to a few hundred > people. Meanwhile, it's a quiet day if there are less than 100,000 > downloads. > > The download page, https://www.openoffice.org/download/, could have a > "Developers Needed" block similar to the "Help Spread the Word" block, > linking to http://openoffice.apache.org/get-involved.html. > > If this does get us some more developers, I am volunteering to shepherd > and organize them. I don't think just telling them to pick something to > work on is an effective way of getting them started - we seem to lose a > lot of people at that point. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Attracting new developers
Am 07/20/2016 07:51 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: OpenOffice really needs more developers, especially build experts but also programmers in general. We do have a web page, http://openoffice.apache.org/get-involved.html, but it it not very obvious and tends to emphasize non-programming contributions. Those are very valuable, but we have far too few developers. I only found out about the need for developers by reading bo...@apache.org, a mailing list that is available to a few hundred people. Meanwhile, it's a quiet day if there are less than 100,000 downloads. The download page, https://www.openoffice.org/download/, could have a "Developers Needed" block similar to the "Help Spread the Word" block, linking to http://openoffice.apache.org/get-involved.html. that's possible. But an additional message box on the main webpage could also help to get the attention. Let me think about all this in the next days (maybe weekend?). If this does get us some more developers, I am volunteering to shepherd and organize them. I don't think just telling them to pick something to work on is an effective way of getting them started - we seem to lose a lot of people at that point. Thats great as this would be a question because it is a key point that we need to satisfy: How to please new devs with mentors and work? ;-) Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Attracting new developers
OpenOffice really needs more developers, especially build experts but also programmers in general. We do have a web page, http://openoffice.apache.org/get-involved.html, but it it not very obvious and tends to emphasize non-programming contributions. Those are very valuable, but we have far too few developers. I only found out about the need for developers by reading bo...@apache.org, a mailing list that is available to a few hundred people. Meanwhile, it's a quiet day if there are less than 100,000 downloads. The download page, https://www.openoffice.org/download/, could have a "Developers Needed" block similar to the "Help Spread the Word" block, linking to http://openoffice.apache.org/get-involved.html. If this does get us some more developers, I am volunteering to shepherd and organize them. I don't think just telling them to pick something to work on is an effective way of getting them started - we seem to lose a lot of people at that point. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Any chance to merge the gbuild branch rather soonish?
Hi Damjan; I am back to gbuild, have moved my Windows VM's disk to the faster ext3 filesystem, and have begun doing the only thing I can think of to debug this: manually "bisection testing" the gbuild-reintegration branch to try isolate which patch causes the build performance regression. There is 136 patches ported from the branches/gbuild branch that have been merged in batches to branches/gbuild-reintegration. Patch 129 builds in 341 minutes. Patch 43 builds in 335 minutes. So it must be one of the 42 most recent patches. Currently compiling patch 16. Nice! I was thinking perhaps we should consider having a different build system for windows (capstone?) but if gbuild works that would be fine. Can you please sync the gbuild-reintegration branch with trunk? There have been some library updates and it would be good to have all those changes together. Pedro.
Re: [REPORT] AOO 4.1.2 Deployment and Take-Up through 2016Q2
On 19/07/2016 01:48, Dave Fisher wrote: > 238 "countries" is impressive. Are any missed? Depending upon who is doing the counting, and how they are counting, there are between 198 and 350 countries in the world today. That said, I was surprised by a couple of countries that were listed. I'm guessing that SourceForge knows what it is doing. jonathon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Any chance to merge the gbuild branch rather soonish?
I am back to gbuild, have moved my Windows VM's disk to the faster ext3 filesystem, and have begun doing the only thing I can think of to debug this: manually "bisection testing" the gbuild-reintegration branch to try isolate which patch causes the build performance regression. There is 136 patches ported from the branches/gbuild branch that have been merged in batches to branches/gbuild-reintegration. Patch 129 builds in 341 minutes. Patch 43 builds in 335 minutes. So it must be one of the 42 most recent patches. Currently compiling patch 16. On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On 05/05/2016 10:51 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > >> Windows XP SP3 32-bit on a VirtualBox instance on FreeBSD, underlying >> filesystem is ZFS which does cause I/O slowdown, but not enough to explain >> this. >> >> Can't remember what compiler I installed; there are Windows SDK 7 and >> Visual Studio 9 directories. >> > > Despite the lag, I'd like to get back to this given all your effort so far. > > Do you still have your config.log? It should show in there what it found > for the C compiler. > > OK, and maybe a crazy idea. Despite the fact that we're having problems > with the Win7 build for our usual processing, would it be worth doing a > merge INTO the guild branch and setting up an additional win buildbot for > that? > > >> SDK_PATH="/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.0" >> ./configure --with-frame-home="$SDK_PATH" --with-psdk-home="$SDK_PATH" >> --with-midl-path="$SDK_PATH/bin" >> --with-ant-home="/cygdrive/c/apache-ant-1.9.6" --with-dmake-url=" >> http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2"; >> --with-epm-url=" >> http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz"; >> --enable-pch --disable-atl --disable-activex --without-junit >> --with-cl-home="/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0/VC" >> --with-csc-path="/cygdrive/c/Windows/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v3.5" >> --with-jdk-home="/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Java/jdk1.7.0" >> --disable-directx >> --with-package-format="installed" --enable-wiki-publisher >> >> I am currently thinking we will gain more from porting to Java, than >> trying >> to maintain a build system for the buggy, leaky, complex, crash-prone, >> insecure languages that are C/C++. >> > > I don't know if its C++, which is still very widely used for programming > development, or our complicated code, of which I'm guessing, at least 25% > could be eliminated. > > > > >> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Damjan Jovanovic >>> wrote: >>> >>> Unfortunately I discovered a major problem with the gbuild-reintegration branch: on Windows, the build time of trunk is about 3-4 hours, but it's over 12 hours to build gbuild-reintegration :-(. I don't have time to investigate soon, nor do I know where to even begin... >>> Hi Damjan, and thanks for this update even it is disappointing. >>> >>> Could you share what the specifics are for the Windows platform you're >>> using for the build? >>> >>> * specific Windows OS >>> * C compiler and flags >>> * build options >>> * >>> >>> anything else? >>> >>> Thanks again for all your work on this. We can work this out. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:20 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Hello; > > FWIW, I am preparing a second round of spelling fixes ... it's a > quite big change. I would prefer to do such changes *after* the > new build system is in place though. > > I can deal easily with any breakage caused by the spelling fixes but > it may not be very fun to have to fix again the build issues so I > would really prefer to chose the battle field ahead of time ;). > > Pedro. > > - > >>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> MzK >>> >>> "Time spent with cats is never wasted." >>> -- Sigmund Freud >>> >>> >> > -- > > MzK > > "Time spent with cats is never wasted." >-- Sigmund Freud > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >